Buffalo_Gal Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 1 minute ago, njbuff said: Yeah, he is afraid Mueller might have a heart attack. Oh, leave Mueller alone. He's busy memorizing Weismann's report, and that ain't easy for an old guy to do. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGee Return TD Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 3 minutes ago, njbuff said: Yeah, he is afraid Mueller might have a heart attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 1 hour ago, McGee Return TD said: lol This is the worst executive privilege gambit yet - plus Mueller already indicated he plans to stick to the report. Barr is afraid of something. You think that Barr's gambit is worse than Mueller announcing that he's going to make a statement without informing his superior first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, GG said: You think that Barr's gambit is worse than Mueller announcing that he's going to make a statement without informing his superior first? As a private citizen, he technically doesn't have a superior any more. 1 hour ago, McGee Return TD said: lol This is the worst executive privilege gambit yet - plus Mueller already indicated he plans to stick to the report. Barr is afraid of something. If Mueller doesn't stick to the report - if his testimony adds to it, or changes it in any way - it impugns his entire investigation. They're certainly not afraid of him diverging from the report. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: As a private citizen, he technically doesn't have a superior any more. If Mueller doesn't stick to the report - if his testimony adds to it, or changes it in any way - it impugns his entire investigation. They're certainly not afraid of him diverging from the report. Barr's letter is to help Mueller in his ability to refuse to expound upon what is in the report. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: As a private citizen, he technically doesn't have a superior any more. I think he's married. 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 (edited) Let’s hope this is finally the end of an important inquiry turned spectacle. Mueller clearly has nothing new to share and already will be sticking to the report. If someone wants to start impeachment for obstruction, they are not getting more from Mueller than they already have. Pelosi has indicated that she has no appetite for impeachment, a position I hope she sticks to. Edited July 23, 2019 by BeginnersMind 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 8 hours ago, DC Tom said: As a private citizen, he technically doesn't have a superior any more. But he may still be bound to NDA from the investigation 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/23/the_mueller_reports_footnotes_to_contradictory_119658.html It was in the footnotes, for example, where the FBI appears to have misled the FISA court in its application to spy on Carter Page – obscuring its reliance on opposition research, the Steele dossier, financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign. The more than 2,000 footnotes included in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Trump-Russia collusion allegations are also illuminating. Most of the citations are matter-of-fact support for claims made in the main text. But a close reading reveals that many of the footnotes raise more questions than they answer, especially regarding Mueller’s methods and intent. Some footnotes show that key allegations often rely on the flimsy say-so of media accounts; others show a willingness to accept the claims of anti-Trump critics at face value. Mueller and his team also used the footnotes as the place to include unsubstantiated gossip and speculation. Mueller has made it clear that during his scheduled testimony before Congress on Wednesday, he will not discuss his investigation beyond the “four corners” of his official report. But those four corners encompass not only the main text, but thousands of footnotes. If Robert Mueller is going to defend his document, he will have to be prepared to defend the footnotes too. It is there where the strengths and weaknesses of the Mueller report are most clearly on display. Come Wednesday’s hearings, the advantage may go to the questioners who know where to look. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That does not look good for Mike Flynn. The case was almost tossed, no one on the prosecution side could say this guy broke a specific law and they acknowledged they had no evidence that the Turkish government paid him, and still the jury found him guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: That does not look good for Mike Flynn. The case was almost tossed, no one on the prosecution side could say this guy broke a specific law and they acknowledged they had no evidence that the Turkish government paid him, and still the jury found him guilty. Remember Flynn worked with the government to make the case against them. They tried to throw him back into the mix of this case when his new counsel starting making waves in the FBI perjury matter, but Flynn wasn't defendant (he was bait). (more) 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (This goes in multiple threads -- but especially this one and the DS ones considering how often I was told I was nuts for saying what I knew to be a fact, verified by people who are paid to know) This means the entire G-Pop stuff was entrapment, unjustified -- which, since they have been VERY clear the past two years that G-Pop was the start of the whole shebang, means the CI investigation was baseless from the start. Everyone is *****. 4 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGee Return TD Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Laughing at this news as if it's nothing only proves you didn't read the report -- or much of anything about the origin of the counterintelligence investigation into Trump's campaign, which the FBI had been using as a shield/justification for their FISA *****ery for over two years. If you disagree, explain to board how Mifsud being proven to be a western intelligence asset who was tasked with introducing GP to Russians is not utterly devastating to the entire foundation of the narrative which has been pushed on the public. Every single news outlet referred to him as a Russian tied asset for years -- and Mueller did as well. Oops. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 On 7/23/2019 at 5:30 AM, BeginnersMind said: Let’s hope this is finally the end of an important inquiry turned spectacle. Mueller clearly has nothing new to share and already will be sticking to the report. If someone wants to start impeachment for obstruction, they are not getting more from Mueller than they already have. Pelosi has indicated that she has no appetite for impeachment, a position I hope she sticks to. Lol riiiiiiiiight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 38 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: How do the Democrats even begin to compete with this sort of marketing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: How do the Democrats even begin to compete with this sort of marketing? You're not wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 . 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 On 7/24/2019 at 6:42 PM, DC Tom said: How do the Democrats even begin to compete with this sort of marketing? #orangemanbad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 It's "CLEAR" to Adam.......................... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 46 minutes ago, B-Man said: It's "CLEAR" to Adam.......................... I said it 100 days ago before they took over the majority -- the House committee will be all about show and 2020, nothing of merit or substance. The Senate Judiciary is where the action will be. Schiff will be lucky to escape what's coming without a perp walk. (he's Gang of 8 and knows better than most just how false the information he's pushed/is pushing is. Criminally so) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: It's "CLEAR" to Adam.......................... Follow the money? That's what politicians in the swamp do, not what DOJ is supposed to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 What? How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: What? How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? If the House dems can call John Dean to testify then most anything is possible. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: What? How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? If the defense gets to enter Inspector Clousseau highlights then it's all good. Edited July 26, 2019 by 4merper4mer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: What? How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? Full re.tard is an interesting prosecution strategy... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: What? How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? Probably an inaccurate tweet. (Shocker. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 27, 2019 Share Posted July 27, 2019 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: What? How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? Evidence there never should have been a Godfather III??? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Worthwhile thread/information. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 Bold move. Watching his perp walk will be one of the highlights. The irony is THICK. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That's not how it works, you weaselly little *****. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 51 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's not how it works, you weaselly little *****. Be careful what you wish for, Strzok, as you will surely get it. By the way...are we back to Russia or we still planning to impeach Trump because he sent out a white supremacist dog whistle to a far-left Bernie fan to make him murder a bunch of people in Dayton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said: Be careful what you wish for, Strzok, as you will surely get it. By the way...are we back to Russia or we still planning to impeach Trump because he sent out a white supremacist dog whistle to a far-left Bernie fan to make him murder a bunch of people in Dayton? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Bold move. Watching his perp walk will be one of the highlights. The irony is THICK. Not irony, good legal strategy. They're going to get a preview of the evidence regarding the case for any potential criminal charges through the civil discovery process. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 6, 2019 Share Posted August 6, 2019 11 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Not irony, good legal strategy. They're going to get a preview of the evidence regarding the case for any potential criminal charges through the civil discovery process. Yes but that works both ways, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts