Jump to content

RD 5, Pick 171: Nathan Peterman (QB) - Pitt


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bum.

 

The guy Is awful. At UT he looked like a steaming pile of ****.

 

Taking this clown over Kelly is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.

 

SO he played on a 5-7 team with players recruited by the coach that got canned, and the promptly went to Pitt and flourished and HE is a bum?

 

BS. You don't have that much of a stark contrast in stats AND he passes for 5 TDs in Death Valley to beat the National Champion Clemson Tigers unless he was under some pretty crappy conditions at UT.

Edited by BmoreBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guessing him and CJ will be competing for backup QB this year and potentially starter next year.

 

This ruined all the Chad Kelly fans hopes, but you got UDFA too.

 

Dont feel like his arm is strong enough to throw in the Buffalo wind.

Backup? They will compete for #3. Yates is the backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock said the guy is a top 5 pick if he had a clean record.

 

 

He said no such thing. He said Kelly was a "top 5 QB' if not for his off-field issues, not a top 5 pick. Meaning that Mayock would've had him in the top 5 of his QBs this year. Huge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a stronger arm than Watson, the 12th pick and is more accurate. He outplayed Watson this year when Pitt beat Clemson.

No he doesn't. The combine mph is really not a good indicator. Glennon threw 49 and he has a very decent arm. Peterman has a rag arm. Watson isn't a cannon but he can hurl it well enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks there is a reason this kid went in the fifth.

 

That being said, you can't complain we don't take a QB ever, and we do that it's not the guy you want so it's not good.

We drafted Listenbee and he STILL hasn't seen the field... so... it could be worse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...