Jump to content

The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency


Nanker

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I think it's important to note that no one - almost literally, maybe 6000 people or so - pays attention to Rick Newman.

 

"Yahoo Finance Columnist," for God's sake.  What's his day job?

 

Baking gay cupcakes that he refuses to sell to cis-gendered Caucasians, angrily demanding that they must take their "white privilege" elsewhere?

 

Well, either that or anal probe training dummy when Tom Brady, agent of aliens, isn't available.

Edited by Koko78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

BLESS HER HEART: Andrea Mitchell Compares Trump to Joseph Stalin.

 

 

Based on what I read in the New York Times both last year and in Stalin’s obit, I’m not sure if I understand what the problem here is…

 by Ed Driscoll

 

 

 

.

 

Can I get a nice, juicy "Trump is Pol Pot" or "Trump is Theoneste Bagosora?" comparison soon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol these people...

 

Jim Acosta on Facing Jeering Mob at Trump Rally: ‘It Felt Like We Weren’t in America Anymore’

 

“My sense of it is that these opinions these folks have at these rallies, they’re shaped by what they see in the primetime hours of Fox News and what they hear from some conservative news outlets that just sort of give them this daily diet of what they consider to be terrible things we do over here at CNN,” Acosta told Cupp.  “It’s very unfortunate. But it’s a pitting of American against American and honestly, it needs to stop.”

 

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/jim-acosta-on-facing-jeering-mob-at-trump-rally-it-felt-like-we-werent-in-america-anymore/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

 

 

How can a member of the #Resistance (CNN is the epicenter along with the WaPo) a newspaper btw, that proclaimed on day 1 of the Trump era "democracy dies in darkness," complain about people being whipped into a frenzy and say it with a straight face?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

Can I get a nice, juicy "Trump is Pol Pot" or "Trump is Theoneste Bagosora?" comparison soon?

 

I love the part where Trevor Noah tries to pin the shooting at the Capital Gazette on Trump.

 

Do you leftists even BOTHER to think before you speak? I swear, the meltdown is starting to get a little embarrassing.

 

Oh, wait.

 

No it's not. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

Lol these people...

 

Jim Acosta on Facing Jeering Mob at Trump Rally: ‘It Felt Like We Weren’t in America Anymore’

 

“My sense of it is that these opinions these folks have at these rallies, they’re shaped by what they see in the primetime hours of Fox News and what they hear from some conservative news outlets that just sort of give them this daily diet of what they consider to be terrible things we do over here at CNN,” Acosta told Cupp.  “It’s very unfortunate. But it’s a pitting of American against American and honestly, it needs to stop.”

 

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/jim-acosta-on-facing-jeering-mob-at-trump-rally-it-felt-like-we-werent-in-america-anymore/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

 

 

 

How can a member of the #Resistance (CNN is the epicenter along with the WaPo) a newspaper btw, that proclaimed on day 1 of the Trump era "democracy dies in darkness," complain about people being whipped into a frenzy and say it with a straight face?

 

 

 

 

 “It’s very unfortunate. But it’s a pitting of American against American and honestly, it needs to stop.”

 


Seriously?  A !@#$ing CNN personality said that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

 “It’s very unfortunate. But it’s a pitting of American against American and honestly, it needs to stop.”

 


Seriously?  A !@#$ing CNN personality said that?

 

Brian Stelter of CNN is calling it a 'hate movement.'

 

It's like they have no self-awareness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

Brian Stelter of CNN is calling it a 'hate movement.'

 

It's like they have no self-awareness.

 

People say I'm overreacting, but I see the left already laying the groundwork for, next time they have the White House and Congress, arguing the Republican Party should be outlawed as a hate group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

People say I'm overreacting, but I see the left already laying the groundwork for, next time they have the White House and Congress, arguing the Republican Party should be outlawed as a hate group.

 

I missed the part where anyone at CNN called out Maxine Waters for urging her people to do damage to others.

 

Must be part of a different hate movement. One that's really built on love and crumbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

People say I'm overreacting, but I see the left already laying the groundwork for, next time they have the White House and Congress, arguing the Republican Party should be outlawed as a hate group.

 

Which is why, if the republicans had any modicum of intelligence, they'd strike first.

 

 

Edited by joesixpack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 26, the News and Documentary Emmy Award nominations were announced, and PBS topped the list with 45 nominations. CBS led the broadcast networks with 31 nods, followed by CNN and HBO with 22 each, and ABC with 20. MSNBC got 5. Vice News got nine. Al-Jazeera International USA got five. And The New York Times got seven -- for videos! Even the liberal website Vox got three. The Fox News channel, which leads in cable-news viewership year after year after year, got none. Raise your hand if you're surprised. 

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/brentbozellandtimgraham/2018/08/01/the-emmy-awards-tilt-to-the-left-n2505665

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OH: NY Dem Governor Attacks Media For Asking Tough Questions.

When you hear about a politician verbally attacking a member of the media the story is supposed to be about President Trump, right? (And to be fair, he certainly does more than his fair share of it.)

 

But this story, which you’re unlikely to hear much about unless you live in New York, isn’t about Trump. It’s about New York Governor (and 2020 presidential hopeful) Andrew Cuomo. During a press conference yesterday, NY1 reporter Zack Fink had the temerity to ask the Governor a question about the latest in a series of campaign finance scandals embroiling Cuomo and whether or not he planned to return some large and very dodgy donations. While he didn’t invoke the dreaded “fake news” claim, Cuomo did go after Fink’s employer, accusing them of fraud, and then went on to seemingly try to implicate the reporter himself in the company’s troubles. (Huffington Post).

 

 

 

That’s different because shut up.

 

 

 

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

It must be horrible to be so obsessed with white people.

 

You know what's really funny? Everyone on the left is coming to her aid, arguing that the white supremacists are the ones calling out her older tweets.'

 

Even the NYT released a statement that they were satisfied she was not going to use her racism in her articles.

 

In other words, what she wrote is perfectly acceptable to the NYT, and pretty much everyone on the left, because she's the victim here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

You know what's really funny? Everyone on the left is coming to her aid, arguing that the white supremacists are the ones calling out her older tweets.'

 

Even the NYT released a statement that they were satisfied she was not going to use her racism in her articles.

 

In other words, what she wrote is perfectly acceptable to the NYT, and pretty much everyone on the left, because she's the victim here.

 

People wanna hold Josh Allen's feet to the fire over "old tweets", but, it's ok for this woman to not be vilified over her "old tweets".

 

Ok, got it.

 

No wonder the President calls the NYT a failing organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, njbuff said:

 

People wanna hold Josh Allen's feet to the fire over "old tweets", but, it's ok for this woman to not be vilified over her "old tweets".

 

Ok, got it.

 

No wonder the President calls the NYT a failing organization.

 

I see a couple of baseball players are under the same scrutiny, apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then there is the Left's hilarious response...............Oh but you crazy Right-Wingers objected when Kevin Williamson was fired from The Atlantic for his prior writings,

 

you CAN'T honestly want Jeong fired....................if so, you are hypocrites.

 

 

:lol:................The problem is her posts are racist....................his were pro-life......................Nice try though.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing hypocrisy by the left in every way, shape and form.

 

Problem is the Democrats will probably take over the House or the Senate (maybe both) and it's going to get even uglier when this happens.

Just now, Koko78 said:

It's not racist if it's against white people.

 

She's a goddamned hero! She deserves a purple heart.

 

She must hang out with Strzok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Even the NYT released a statement that they were satisfied she was not going to use her racism in her articles.

 

 

Oh, where is that statement?  I want to see the Times argue "Yeah, they're racist...but they can put it aside."

 

I actually want to save it for the next time someone complains about a racist Republican.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Oh, where is that statement?  I want to see the Times argue "Yeah, they're racist...but they can put it aside."

 

I actually want to save it for the next time someone complains about a racist Republican.

 

has someone you confronted in this manner spent even a picosecond of self-reflection when you mentioned their hypocrisy?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:

 

has someone you confronted in this manner spent even a picosecond of self-reflection when you mentioned their hypocrisy?

 

 

 

No.  But I never stop hoping.

 

Really...the acid test in this case is: change "white" to "black."  Is it offensive then?  And those defending her would say "Yes, absolutely, in all cases, without exception."  And she would never work again.

2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

NYT statement. 

IMG_20180802_154118.jpg

 

Again...swap "white" with "black."  Then see if the Times writes that.

 

No, they don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No.  But I never stop hoping.

 

Really...the acid test in this case is: change "white" to "black."  Is it offensive then?  And those defending her would say "Yes, absolutely, in all cases, without exception."  And she would never work again.

 

Again...swap "white" with "black."  Then see if the Times writes that.

 

No, they don't.

 

it makes sense to anyone who isn't on a liberal cloud of dreaming

 

i'm finding my energy to bother with these people is 1/10th of what it was a decade ago

 

i'm getting older and they are getting way too stubborn for common sense to take hold

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely someone has to be capitalizing on the abundance of dumb things people said on Twitter years ago. I saw several baseball players got nailed. There must be professional Twitter miners out there that dig up old skeletons from people's closets.

Edited by RaoulDuke79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Surely someone has to be capitalizing on the abundance of dumb things people said on Twitter years ago. I saw several baseball players got nailed. There must be professional Twitter miners out there that dig up old skeletons from people's closets.

 

I love these stories because it helps us reinforce the message we have for my 13--year-old son: the internet is forever.  Live by it and die by it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Surely someone has to be capitalizing on the abundance of dumb things people said on Twitter years ago. I saw several baseball players got nailed. There must be professional Twitter miners out there that dig up old skeletons from people's closets.

 

3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

I love these stories because it helps us reinforce the message we have for my 13--year-old son: the internet is forever.  Live by it and die by it.

 

 

Nothing is ever deleted from the Internet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

You know what's really funny? Everyone on the left is coming to her aid, arguing that the white supremacists are the ones calling out her older tweets.'

 

Even the NYT released a statement that they were satisfied she was not going to use her racism in her articles.

 

In other words, what she wrote is perfectly acceptable to the NYT, and pretty much everyone on the left, because she's the victim here.

 

what did they think of Josh Allen's old tweets I wonder.  Since when can a person's old tweets be forgiven?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

Again...swap "white" with "black."  Then see if the Times writes that.

 

Now making the Twitter rounds is this article by NYT opinion writer agreeing about Roseanne being fired for her racist tweet, and arguing it should be about the totality of her work.

 

Quote

 

This is not a “one bad tweet” issue. In March, I argued that Kevin Williamson, the conservative writer briefly hired by The Atlantic, should be judged by the totality of his work, not by a vile tweet (and, as it later turned out, a discussion on a podcast) in which he seemed to suggest that women who get abortions should be hanged.

 

Williamson insists his comments were misunderstood, but that’s another story. The relevant question here is: What’s the “totality” of Barr’s work, at least when it comes to political and racial questions? John Podhoretz, the editor of Commentary magazine, summed it up perfectly when he described Barr as “a boor,” a “notorious believer and propagator of conspiracy theories related to 9/11,” and, in all, “not merely a loose cannon but a MIRVed ICBM ready to go off in all directions at any time.”

 

Barr’s tweet about Jarrett, in other words, wasn’t the odd needle in the haystack. It was the last straw.

 

 

I guess we'll wait to hear what the writer thinks about the new racist the NYT just hired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...