Jump to content

Trump and Russia


Recommended Posts

Trump ends CIA's covert mission to arm anti-Assad rebels.

http://archive.is/q1vS6

 

Watch the responses to this story... It'll be viewed as Trump doing a solid for Vlad. The backlash forthcoming from neocons, the DNC, the corporate media and segments of the USIC will be hilarious because they will all leave out the fact (either through ignorance on the part of the DNC masses, or deliberately in the case of the neocons and usic who know better) the groups being armed by this program were ISIS and AQ fighters NOT moderate rebels.

 

Get ready for a major escalation in the mud slinging.

 

 

More to say on this in the deep state thread... :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's about corruption.

 

And a secret meeting that the President won't say what was talked about with the guy who tried hacking our election and who also is one of the most corrupt people on earth is suspicious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is he supposed to know?

 

Didn't you read?

 

The meeting was secret.

 

He's talking about reports like "Trump and Putin Held a Second, Undisclosed, Private Conversation" in the NYT

 

and "Trump had undisclosed hour-long meeting with Putin at G-20 summit" in The Washington Post.

 

 

except............... how is a meeting considered ‘previously undisclosed’ if it was reported on by the media on July 8, 2017?

 

"Previously undisclosed" second Trump-Putin meeting at G20... reported on 8 July https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertonardelli/us-isolated-on-paris-agreement-in-end-of-summit-g20?utm_term=.crBkNdnV6#.ynnWnX9Go

 

 

The Gators and Baskins have been played by the media again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He's talking about reports like "Trump and Putin Held a Second, Undisclosed, Private Conversation" in the NYT

 

and "Trump had undisclosed hour-long meeting with Putin at G-20 summit" in The Washington Post.

 

 

except............... how is a meeting considered ‘previously undisclosed’ if it was reported on by the media on July 8, 2017?

 

The Gators and Baskins have been played by the media again.

Have your sarcasm meter checked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have your sarcasm meter checked.

 

I knew what your post was about TYTT, I guess I shouldn't have quoted anyone.

 

The point is that the NYT and WAPO came out with this "2nd meeting" story to whip up the lemmings

 

even though it had already been reported by Buzzfeed a week and a half ago.............. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

CIA Director Mike Pompeo was recently asked about Russian attempts to interfere in the U.S. election, and his response included this:

Asked if Russia interfered in the US election Pompeo says: "of course..& in the last one, & the one before that & the one before that"

4:41 PM - 20 Jul 2017

That troubled one of the members of The Resistance in the House, Rep. Adam Schiff:

 

 

Adam Schiff Retweeted Jim Sciutto

Disturbed to see CIA Director trivialize Russian interference in our election. 2016 not comparable to anything in the past. He knows better.

 

If Hillary Clinton had won would Democrats even be talking “Russia” ever hour of every day?

And is it “trivializing” the present to say something similar has happened in the past?

Funny Liberals.....

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

CIA Director Mike Pompeo was recently asked about Russian attempts to interfere in the U.S. election, and his response included this:

That troubled one of the members of The Resistance in the House, Rep. Adam Schiff:

 

If Hillary Clinton had won would Democrats even be talking “Russia” ever hour of every day?

And is it “trivializing” the present to say something similar has happened in the past?

Funny Liberals.....

LOCK HIM UP!

 

Not every day, but frequently up to the trials of the Frumps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dems are jealous that Russia favored the GOP for once.

No. I'm pissed off that the Russia narrative ever got started. I'm ticked off that instead of examining the content of the Wikileaks and work on fixing what's wrong with your party they decide to push the narrative that they would of won if it wasn't for Wikileaks/Comey/Russia, etc.. There is going to be an all out war in the Democratic Party between the progressive candidates who don't take corporate money and the more center left politicians that do. It won't be pretty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...