Jump to content

An Injection of Facts Re QB recently Drafted


Recommended Posts

There have been a plethora of posts exclaiming how we should "bring in" young QB X,Y, or Z to "compete" with EJ. Or we should bring in QB V because he's known to be all that. Many QB in question are still under contract to the teams that drafted them, in some cases for multiple years.

 

Most of them (including some FA) are their teams' best choice at QB currently. While that doesn't mean they might not be available through trade, it does suggest that the team is going to want a comparable impact player or enough high-round draft choices to acquire an impact player (eg we aren't going to get him for a "late round" pick and an aging cornerback - more like a 2nd and 3rd, or a 3rd and Marcel Dareus or Kiko Alonso). If we're going to give up something rally good, football wisdom suggests we do so only if we have confidence that QB is a clear upgrade.

 

Here are the stats of all QB drafted in the first 4 rounds since 2011. I have highlighted the QB most frequently mentioned as "let's bring in X to compete". A few QB with minimal playing time are listed across the bottom.

 

Before another "Lets bring in Foles and Glennon to compete with EJ" thread, I hope people will look at the actual performance stats - follow it back to pro-football-reference whence I sourced the data, get down in the game logs, and think about whether this is a genuine "known factor" improvement, or did you happen to see a good game and there must have been counterpoint not-so-good games to give those overall stats? Because EJ, whether or not some want to admit it, has had good games and shown flashes too.

 

Have fun!

 

 

 

post-10683-0-27455800-1420816639_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been a plethora of posts exclaiming how we should "bring in" young QB X,Y, or Z to "compete" with EJ. Or we should bring in QB V because he's known to be all that. Many QB in question are still under contract to the teams that drafted them, in some cases for multiple years.

 

Most of them (including some FA) are their teams' best choice at QB currently. While that doesn't mean they might not be available through trade, it does suggest that the team is going to want a comparable impact player or enough high-round draft choices to acquire an impact player (eg we aren't going to get him for a "late round" pick and an aging cornerback - more like a 2nd and 3rd, or a 3rd and Marcel Dareus or Kiko Alonso). If we're going to give up something rally good, football wisdom suggests we do so only if we have confidence that QB is a clear upgrade.

 

Here are the stats of all QB drafted in the first 4 rounds since 2011. I have highlighted the QB most frequently mentioned as "let's bring in X to compete". A few QB with minimal playing time are listed across the bottom.

 

Before another "Lets bring in Foles and Glennon to compete with EJ" thread, I hope people will look at the actual performance stats - follow it back to pro-football-reference whence I sourced the data, get down in the game logs, and think about whether this is a genuine "known factor" improvement, or did you happen to see a good game and there must have been counterpoint not-so-good games to give those overall stats? Because EJ, whether or not some want to admit it, has had good games and shown flashes too.

 

Have fun!

 

 

 

I think some people react to seeing a SportsCenter highlight of a QB throwing a TD and instantly feel that player is an improvement. That's the beauty of not paying attention to every play a player makes, like we do with our guys. We know every bad throw and decision our QBs make since OTAs. We have every flaw memorized. But all these other QBs have to be better because we don't see everything they do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people react to seeing a SportsCenter highlight of a QB throwing a TD and instantly feel that player is an improvement. That's the beauty of not paying attention to every play a player makes, like we do with our guys. We know every bad throw and decision our QBs make since OTAs. We have every flaw memorized. But all these other QBs have to be better because we don't see everything they do.

 

Well, even giving the benefit of the doubt that maybe these guys are NFL rewind subscribers addicted to the "coaches film" - it's easy to cherry-pick games.

Unless one really watches every game, one doesn't get a full picture.

 

I think there's also the well-known work aphorism that "one awshit wipes out 10 attaboys". A horrid play sticks in our memory more than 10 good ones.

 

It's why I'm personally glad EJ got benched - once he got benched, it became easy to see that he wasn't the problem with the run game and the OL.

The only highlighted guy on that list I would bother with is Foles.

 

You honed in on the best of the "2nd tier" guys, and the one who has shown the most IMO.

 

That said - the Iggles won't be giving him away. The market for a capable QB is strong, he has value to them as a backup even if they do want to go for Mariota, and he's signed through 2015 at a modest contract considering what he's shown.

 

So if you think we should go after him, what do you think we should be willing to give up?

Edited by Hopeful
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said this in many other threads: I believe EJ Manuel performed as well as "most" QBs do in their first 14 games - and on a par with other QBs we could reasonably acquire this off season through free agency or trade. He severely regressed this year; however, I will not reach any conclusions about him until I see what he can do under a competent offensive coaching staff and behind a competent O line.

 

As for other QBs. I have broken down the game logs of QBs the Bills could potentially acquire to compete with EJ. IMHO, Mike Glennon has performed the best in his opportunities and has as high a ceiling as any of them. I certainly would not mind at all if Whaley found a way to trade for him to compete with EJ.

Edited by billsfan1959
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said this in many other threads: I believe EJ Manuel performed as well as "most" QBs do in their first 14 games - and on a par with other QBs we could reasonably acquire this off season through free agency or trade. He severely regressed this year; however, I will not reach any conclusions about him until I see what he can do under a competent offensive coaching staff and behind a competent O line.

 

As for other QBs. I have broken down the game logs of QBs the Bills could potentially acquire to compete with EJ. IMHO, Mike Glennon has performed the best in his opportunities and has as high a ceiling as any of them. I certainly would not mind at all if Whaley found a way to trade for him to compete with EJ.

 

OK, please ignore that thumping sound - it's just my head hitting the nearest wall. Better now. I'll try one more time.

 

I agree, Glennon is promising.

 

Glennon is signed for 2 more years and costs ~ 1/10th as much as their this year's QB, now FA McCown. He's currently the only decent QB on their roster. (Correction: it was pointed out to me McCown is not a FA, he's signed through 2015 for $5.2M with apparently no dead money if he's cut by 1 June. So they have Glennon and McCown). IF they are willing to trade for him, what do you think they would want? Hint: a bag of footballs, a late round pick, and a decent player won't cut it. They're going to want something commensurate with the loss of a game-changing player, which is what a QB is. In addition, to replace him with a competent, NFL-proven FA backup for 2 years would cost $4-10 million. Glennon would cost them $1.2M

 

IMO you only trade major goods (game-changing players, high round draft picks, which is what I think the market price would be IF Tampa would trade him) for a player you KNOW will contribute - not for a guy to "compete".

 

So is what the Bills would likely have to give up "worth it" for a guy who would only "compete" with EJ, which is what I agree Glennon's stats and game film indicate he'd be doing?

Edited by Hopeful
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said this in many other threads: I believe EJ Manuel performed as well as "most" QBs do in their first 14 games - and on a par with other QBs we could reasonably acquire this off season through free agency or trade. He severely regressed this year; however, I will not reach any conclusions about him until I see what he can do under a competent offensive coaching staff and behind a competent O line.

 

As for other QBs. I have broken down the game logs of QBs the Bills could potentially acquire to compete with EJ. IMHO, Mike Glennon has performed the best in his opportunities and has as high a ceiling as any of them. I certainly would not mind at all if Whaley found a way to trade for him to compete with EJ.

I hate how shallow I am, but I can never see Glennon being the face of a franchise. I just can't.

 

And good work OP. Ej had a very typical rookie year. He completely outplayed Bortles, yet EJ was a reach and Bortles was a top 5 by every "expert."

 

It's funny how people try to act like they have any idea what guys will become good pro QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone here is holding their breath that EJ may still develop into a serviceable QB, not even a pro bowl QB... I'm just saying serviceable, I hope you like the color blue..... then I hope you like purple..... then pine boxes...

 

stats don't always tell the whole story.

Edited by Homey D. Clown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop it. Everyone here know that EJ is terrible. He has never thrown a quality pass in his life. Any completions were either dumb luck or brilliant catches by his wideouts. Every other QB who has ever thrown a pass is better than EJ and any coach worth hiring will not take the job as long as EJ is on the roster.

Edited by Maddog69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

OK, please ignore that thumping sound - it's just my head hitting the nearest wall. Better now. I'll try one more time.

 

I agree, Glennon is promising.

 

Glennon is signed for 2 more years and costs ~ 1/10th as much as their this year's QB, now FA McCown. He's currently the only decent QB on their roster.

IF they are willing to trade for him, what do you think they would want? Hint: a bag of footballs, a late round pick, and a decent player won't cut it. They're going to want something commensurate with the loss of a game-changing player, which is what a QB is. In addition, to replace him with a competent, NFL-proven FA backup for 2 years would cost $4-10 million. Glennon would cost them $1.2M

 

IMO you only trade major goods (game-changing players, high round draft picks, which is what I think the market price would be IF Tampa would trade him) for a player you KNOW will contribute - not for a guy to "compete".

 

So is what the Bills would likely have to give up "worth it" for a guy who would only "compete" with EJ, which is what I agree Glennon's stats and game film indicate he'd be doing?

No need to be sarcastic or condescending. I was only expressing my opinion, worth no more or less than anyone else's. At this point, neither one of us has any idea what it would require to obtain Glennon in a trade - and I never advocated giving up "major goods." I think that Tampa Bay will probably draft Winston or Mariotta, keep McCown, and Glennon "might" be available in a trade for a "reasonable" price. If that were the case then I wouldn't mind making the trade. In other words, if, by some chance, he would be available in a trade that would be reasonable for the Bills, I wouldn't be opposed. Again, just my humble opinion. Nothing to go hitting your head against a wall over...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate how shallow I am, but I can never see Glennon being the face of a franchise. I just can't.

 

And good work OP. Ej had a very typical rookie year. He completely outplayed Bortles, yet EJ was a reach and Bortles was a top 5 by every "expert."

 

It's funny how people try to act like they have any idea what guys will become good pro QBs.

No, that was Bridgewater, who was the last pick in the 1st round IIRC.

 

Bortles was all over the draft board. And I find it very likely the only team who thought so highly of him was Jax. Jus tlike Buffalo and EJ. It only takes 1 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that was Bridgewater, who was the last pick in the 1st round IIRC.

 

Bortles was all over the draft board. And I find it very likely the only team who thought so highly of him was Jax. Jus tlike Buffalo and EJ. It only takes 1 team.

You need to check your facts again. By draft time, Bortles was a slam dunk top 10 pick. Bridgewater was barely in the 1st if he was there at all. Johnny Hobbit was all over the place.

We should try to acquire pick #199 every year and always pick a QB. It worked once, it is guaranteed to work again, right?

Why the hell did the Bills draft Leif Larsen over Brady? I knew Brady was going to be this good!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's EJM, and/or draft a guy that will take at least 2 years to develop. In other words, it's EJM.

 

There MIGHT be a guy that's been developing on another teams bench, that can come here cheap, and surprise us, but that is like hitting the lottery.

 

There are probably some fans of other teams that look at our own EJM as that kind of guy. "Yeah, Buffalo might let Manuel go for cheap, and I thought he looked pretty good, but their coach/o-line/running game sucked. The ______ (Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Jags, Titans, Texans...) should take a chance on him..."

 

They gotta work on building up the offense around EJM for this next season. There really isn't a good, likely alternative.

Edited by HoF Watkins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills traded down to draft EJ.

 

The plan was for him to sit behind the veteran Kolb and learn.

 

Kolb got injured and EJ was thrust into action as a rookie despite himself being injured for most of his rookie preseason.

 

He was injured two more times during his rookie season.

 

And as far as we know he's had poor coaching in Buffalo.

 

It would be premature to write-off EJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been a plethora of posts exclaiming how we should "bring in" young QB X,Y, or Z to "compete" with EJ. Or we should bring in QB V because he's known to be all that. Many QB in question are still under contract to the teams that drafted them, in some cases for multiple years.

 

Most of them (including some FA) are their teams' best choice at QB currently. While that doesn't mean they might not be available through trade, it does suggest that the team is going to want a comparable impact player or enough high-round draft choices to acquire an impact player (eg we aren't going to get him for a "late round" pick and an aging cornerback - more like a 2nd and 3rd, or a 3rd and Marcel Dareus or Kiko Alonso). If we're going to give up something rally good, football wisdom suggests we do so only if we have confidence that QB is a clear upgrade.

 

Here are the stats of all QB drafted in the first 4 rounds since 2011. I have highlighted the QB most frequently mentioned as "let's bring in X to compete". A few QB with minimal playing time are listed across the bottom.

 

Before another "Lets bring in Foles and Glennon to compete with EJ" thread, I hope people will look at the actual performance stats - follow it back to pro-football-reference whence I sourced the data, get down in the game logs, and think about whether this is a genuine "known factor" improvement, or did you happen to see a good game and there must have been counterpoint not-so-good games to give those overall stats? Because EJ, whether or not some want to admit it, has had good games and shown flashes too.

 

Have fun!

 

 

 

 

 

so ej is good thread

Stop it. Everyone here know that EJ is terrible. He has never thrown a quality pass in his life. Any completions were either dumb luck or brilliant catches by his wideouts. Every other QB who has ever thrown a pass is better than EJ and any coach worth hiring will not take the job as long as EJ is on the roster.

 

 

:thumbsup:

It's EJM, and/or draft a guy that will take at least 2 years to develop. In other words, it's EJM.

 

There MIGHT be a guy that's been developing on another teams bench, that can come here cheap, and surprise us, but that is like hitting the lottery.

 

There are probably some fans of other teams that look at our own EJM as that kind of guy. "Yeah, Buffalo might let Manuel go for cheap, and I thought he looked pretty good, but their coach/o-line/running game sucked. The ______ (Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Jags, Titans, Texans...) should take a chance on him..."

 

They gotta work on building up the offense around EJM for this next season. There really isn't a good, likely alternative.

 

EJM, that's different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people react to seeing a SportsCenter highlight of a QB throwing a TD and instantly feel that player is an improvement. That's the beauty of not paying attention to every play a player makes, like we do with our guys. We know every bad throw and decision our QBs make since OTAs. We have every flaw memorized. But all these other QBs have to be better because we don't see everything they do.

Right...I have seen it suggested a few times here in the last few days t hat the Bill should bring in Brian Hoyer...has anyone watched this guy play, other than against the Bills? He is pretty wretched. But, hey, he isn't EJ Manuel....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before another "Lets bring in Foles and Glennon to compete with EJ" thread, I hope people will look at the actual performance stats - follow it back to pro-football-reference whence I sourced the data, get down in the game logs, and think about whether this is a genuine "known factor" improvement, or did you happen to see a good game and there must have been counterpoint not-so-good games to give those overall stats?

 

Wait, Foles has just had a few good games on Sportscenter? Which part of the ratio 27-2 don't you understand? But you want to write him off during an injury-filled season? The guy's 25 years-old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to check your facts again. By draft time, Bortles was a slam dunk top 10 pick. Bridgewater was barely in the 1st if he was there at all. Johnny Hobbit was all over the place.

 

Why the hell did the Bills draft Leif Larsen over Brady? I knew Brady was going to be this good!!!

Leif Larsen was a monster at the combine and Todd Collins ruined it for all future Michigan QBs in Buffalo. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, even giving the benefit of the doubt that maybe these guys are NFL rewind subscribers addicted to the "coaches film" - it's easy to cherry-pick games.

Unless one really watches every game, one doesn't get a full picture.

 

I think there's also the well-known work aphorism that "one awshit wipes out 10 attaboys". A horrid play sticks in our memory more than 10 good ones.

 

It's why I'm personally glad EJ got benched - once he got benched, it became easy to see that he wasn't the problem with the run game and the OL.

 

 

You honed in on the best of the "2nd tier" guys, and the one who has shown the most IMO.

 

That said - the Iggles won't be giving him away. The market for a capable QB is strong, he has value to them as a backup even if they do want to go for Mariota, and he's signed through 2015 at a modest contract considering what he's shown.

 

So if you think we should go after him, what do you think we should be willing to give up?

I wouldn't give up anything for either Foles or Glennon. They need to sign a free agent and draft a guy.

Is Jake Locker a free agent?

Edited by chris heff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills cannot rely on EJ becoming a serviceable QB. The defense is ready now. They need to find a QB that has shown they are on the cusp of being ready now or can be the starter day 1. Then they need to find another QB that has the talent to be the backup. Then they can let EJ compete with the 2 new QBs for the starting spot. Whoever wins, the Bills go forward. To go into another season believing EJ will be an adequate starter without having an adequate starter on the roster would be extreme negligence on the part of the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills cannot rely on EJ becoming a serviceable QB. The defense is ready now. They need to find a QB that has shown they are on the cusp of being ready now or can be the starter day 1. Then they need to find another QB that has the talent to be the backup. Then they can let EJ compete with the 2 new QBs for the starting spot. Whoever wins, the Bills go forward. To go into another season believing EJ will be an adequate starter without having an adequate starter on the roster would be extreme negligence on the part of the GM.

I agree. I think (hope) EJ will be improved going into next year. Maybe watching a vet, albeit a **** one, helped him. Maybe it didn't but I can't write him off yet. Especially after reading all about ole Douchetool coaching for his job and promptly quitting once he had it

 

Bring in another journeyman and hope for the best. If a good QB presents himself in a reasonable trade... do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don;t know what the stats are, but I've watched Locker play enough to know that EJM will have a better career than Jake Locker.

EJ: afraid to run lest he gets hurt.

Locker: not afraid to run.

 

EJ: gets hurt.

Locker: gets hurt.

 

Conclusion: Locker > EJ. But it's close. If you're gonna get hurt, get hurt doing something slightly more entertaining than overthrowing Robert Woods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EJ: afraid to run lest he gets hurt.

Locker: not afraid to run.

 

EJ: gets hurt.

Locker: gets hurt.

 

Conclusion: Locker > EJ. But it's close. If you're gonna get hurt, get hurt doing something slightly more entertaining than overthrowing Robert Woods.

They are very similar but EJ just had his 2nd season destroyed by Marrone. Locker has gotten hurt every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just about everything I've read since Marrone walked leads me to believe that the players on the offense deserve a fresh start. All of them.

 

I believe that Eric Wood and Cordy Glenn went backwards. The second fastest guy in the history of the NFL draft sat there like a bump on a log. Marquise Goodwin. CJ Spiller and Fred went south.

 

I believe that we have the talent to be a very good offense. We have veterans in Henderson and Wood, a growing star in Henderson, some superior athletes waiting to play (Cyrus and Cyril), and a couple other veterans (Hairston, Pears, Urbik, Williams) that just might be terrific if coached properly. If they keep CJ, I think he'll bounce back. However, I also believe Bryce Brown has the natural ability to be a star. Fred has one more good year in him. We have Watkins, Woods, Hogan, Goodwin, as our top 4 wideouts. Tight end needs improvement, although I like Chandler's ability to get open and make nice catches.

 

We need a quarterback. EJ is a quarterback. I like him, and I would not go into the ota's with just EJ and Tuel. That is stupid.

 

I think our new owners have committed the resources to win now. I actually believe that Doug Whaley is the right guy for the job. I think he'll sign a guard and maybe a quality tight end. And he will find an answer at quarterback.

 

A lot of people find this whole ordeal as tortuous. I'm enjoying it. I'm glad Doug Marrone is gone. I'm glad Kyle Orton quit.

 

Moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's EJM, and/or draft a guy that will take at least 2 years to develop. In other words, it's EJM.

 

There MIGHT be a guy that's been developing on another teams bench, that can come here cheap, and surprise us, but that is like hitting the lottery.

 

There are probably some fans of other teams that look at our own EJM as that kind of guy. "Yeah, Buffalo might let Manuel go for cheap, and I thought he looked pretty good, but their coach/o-line/running game sucked. The ______ (Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Jags, Titans, Texans...) should take a chance on him..."

 

They gotta work on building up the offense around EJM for this next season. There really isn't a good, likely alternative.

 

Please don't mistake, I'm all for drafting a QB if there's a value player who drops. Nix said "if you wait to draft a QB until you need one, you've waited too long" or words to that effect. Unfortunately he didn't practice what he preached. I'm also all for signing the best FA that we can.

 

I agree with you about EJ being likely our best shot this year and that we need to really build up the line and the running game. A surprisingly mediocre QB can take a team into the playoffs with a great running game and D (TJ Yates, anyone?)

 

I'm just frustrated by the "let's bring in all these QB who are under contract to other teams and are the best QB on that team right now" threads.

Just about everything I've read since Marrone walked leads me to believe that the players on the offense deserve a fresh start. All of them.

 

I believe that Eric Wood and Cordy Glenn went backwards. The second fastest guy in the history of the NFL draft sat there like a bump on a log. Marquise Goodwin. CJ Spiller and Fred went south.

 

I believe that we have the talent to be a very good offense. We have veterans in Henderson and Wood, a growing star in Henderson, some superior athletes waiting to play (Cyrus and Cyril), and a couple other veterans (Hairston, Pears, Urbik, Williams) that just might be terrific if coached properly. If they keep CJ, I think he'll bounce back. However, I also believe Bryce Brown has the natural ability to be a star. Fred has one more good year in him. We have Watkins, Woods, Hogan, Goodwin, as our top 4 wideouts. Tight end needs improvement, although I like Chandler's ability to get open and make nice catches.

 

We need a quarterback. EJ is a quarterback. I like him, and I would not go into the ota's with just EJ and Tuel. That is stupid.

 

I think our new owners have committed the resources to win now. I actually believe that Doug Whaley is the right guy for the job. I think he'll sign a guard and maybe a quality tight end. And he will find an answer at quarterback.

 

A lot of people find this whole ordeal as tortuous. I'm enjoying it. I'm glad Doug Marrone is gone. I'm glad Kyle Orton quit.

 

Moving forward.

 

Well said. I'm leaning towards this POV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Bills cannot rely on EJ becoming a serviceable QB. The defense is ready now. They need to find a QB that has shown they are on the cusp of being ready now or can be the starter day 1. Then they need to find another QB that has the talent to be the backup. Then they can let EJ compete with the 2 new QBs for the starting spot. Whoever wins, the Bills go forward. To go into another season believing EJ will be an adequate starter without having an adequate starter on the roster would be extreme negligence on the part of the GM."

 

 

WHO?

 

Who is this magically serviceable QB that you speak of?

Edited by HoF Watkins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills cannot rely on EJ becoming a serviceable QB. The defense is ready now. They need to find a QB that has shown they are on the cusp of being ready now or can be the starter day 1. Then they need to find another QB that has the talent to be the backup. Then they can let EJ compete with the 2 new QBs for the starting spot. Whoever wins, the Bills go forward. To go into another season believing EJ will be an adequate starter without having an adequate starter on the roster would be extreme negligence on the part of the GM.

Yes they do. Who did you have in mind? Cutler? Bradford? Rex Grossman? Edited by PromoTheRobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. I'm not against bringing in Locker, I just don't expect him to beat out EJM when he gets here.

 

Surprisingly, the FA (of an admittedly slim crop) I'd most like to see is Sanchez. I am sure that would be a controversial choice here.

He played the best football of his career this past season in Philly. Questions to be answered would be: did it help him to get thrown out of his nice cozy NYJ bed? is it system - did Chip Kelly help him and he'll regress away from Kelly?

 

Other FA I'd like to see B'lo look at include Matt Moore. Moore looked OK in 2011 and we haven't seen much of him since. Has he still "got it"? Will he re-sign with Miami? They paid him $4M to sit on the bench last year. He should be a steadying veteran presence for EJ if we could get him.

 

Mallet is the most intriguing FA. I would expect the Texans to put on a push to keep him, but if not, he's the one with the "unknown potential" factor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of those guys intrigue me, or at least EJM intrigues me more. I doubt any of them will "hold the place" for an eventual successor any better than EJM would. They have to bring in a veteran, and will probably draft someone too, but like I said, for at least this next season, I fully expect EJM to be the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it seems to me at this point the best option would be going after Mark Sanchez and giving him an opportunity to compete for the starting job. If he loses we have an nice backup QB who can come in and win some games. Then I would also look to draft a QB in the mid to late rounds to compete with Tuel. Gotta keep searching for a QB and hope we get lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they do. Who did you have in mind? Cutler? Bradford? Rex Grossman?

 

As we all know the pickings are slim, but that's why Whaley and the next HC make the big bucks.

 

Maybe we try to pry Bradford out of StL. Sanchez is a FA maybe he'd like a chance at starting. Pick another FA and sign both. Draft the best available in the 2nd or 3rd and take a flyer on someone in the 7th. The Bills just can't go into another season with the only option EJ. He already failed once, not entirely his fault most likely, and the players don't appear to have any faith in him. The players lack of faith in him may be the biggest reason that the Bills have to find someone else. The Bills have a defense that is ready for the playoffs now. 2014 was a wasted year for that defense. The belief going into the season that EJ would be ready was a huge miscalculation by Whaley. If he ties the 2015 season to EJ again and EJ fails, Whaley should be gone. You can't make the same mistake twice in two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EJ: afraid to run lest he gets hurt.

Locker: not afraid to run.

 

EJ: gets hurt.

Locker: gets hurt.

 

Conclusion: Locker > EJ. But it's close. If you're gonna get hurt, get hurt doing something slightly more entertaining than overthrowing Robert Woods.

I don't think EJ was afraid to run. I think he was told not too. The same as he was told not to "force" the ball down field.

 

Sometimes the injury thing is just bad luck. Phil Simms was injured a lot early in his career and got benched in favor of Scott Brunner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that EJ has only had 14 games, playing for a coach who is miserable, and an offensive system that is questionable, and yet still produced early/rookie numbers that fall in line with many successful QBs gives me hope that he can still develop. I just hope the damage is reversible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...