SoggyHog Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 You don’t have to be a football fan to be a Bills fan. I, however, am a football fan. The energy and excitement of the game thrills me. The strategy of every play, every position and every inch energizes me. The dedication of the players to live an unlivable dream intrigues me. The story of the players motivates me and makes me feel a parallel in my life. Every single one of these kids has a story and a dream. Respect to the players that fuel my love for the game of football. Tom Brady included. http://www.nfl.com/q...HP11_hot_topics All that being said...... I still hate the SOB! Oh yeah, I almost forgot. I hope we kick his A** this year! GO BILLS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Id give that nod to Peyton. Tom is talented but has a great coach and system behind him. Peyton IS the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 You don’t have to be a football fan to be a Bills fan. I, however, am a football fan. The energy and excitement of the game thrills me. The strategy of every play, every position and every inch energizes me. The dedication of the players to live an unlivable dream intrigues me. The story of the players motivates me and makes me feel a parallel in my life. Every single one of these kids has a story and a dream. Respect to the players that fuel my love for the game of football. Tom Brady included. http://www.nfl.com/q...HP11_hot_topics All that being said...... I still hate the SOB! Oh yeah, I almost forgot. I hope we kick his A** this year! GO BILLS! This is gonna be hotly contested around here just on sheer homerism as its a rule to hate on anything rival of the Bills. That being said, I love football as much as I love the Bills and I am not afraid to admit that Brady is definitely in the conversation and is definitely top 5 IMO already. What he has done is one thing, the personnel he had to do it is even more impressive. All 3 superbowls were won with scrubs to throw to. Its not like he had Rice and Taylor like Montana did, or Harrison and Wayne like Peyton did...this guy did it with people no one can even remember anymore outside of Branch. I think its too early to say he is already the best ever, but he deserves to be in the discussion. I still think Montana was the best QB I have ever seen, including Peyton who for all his gaudy stats, Peyton still has a shaky post season record. Its been said a hundred times, but Brady is todays Montana and Peyton is todays Marino. To be honest, I think Rodgers has the potential to end his career (assuming it keeps going like it has) as a guy who's name ends up in the argument for best ever. But back to Brady...I would rank him #5 all time right now IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoggyHog Posted August 31, 2012 Author Share Posted August 31, 2012 I'd give it to Peyton too. I lived in Indy in '06 thru '10, and he is an amazing QB. He went down last year, the whole team went down. Brady goes down and they still go to the playoffs. Interesting article none the less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Peyton hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Is this a yearly thread now? Oh, about Brady some guy named Joe Montana has some more rings to show you, and he never crapped the bed in the super bowl. Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talley56 Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Patriots minus Brady = 11-5 Colts minus Manning = 2-14 Nuff said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Brady is too dependent on a surrounding cast to be considered the greatest of all time. I'd put Peyton, Montana, and Elway ahead of him in terms of greatness...and in terms of pure QB ability, I'd also put Mario in front of him. Brady fails to maintain a level of greatness in the face of a solid pass rush, as was evidenced in the last two Pats SB appearances against less talented Giants teams. If you pressure Brady, he's anything but great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 He's definitely in the conversation, but the SBs are why people put him up there & he was considered little more than a game manager back then. Since he started putting up Manning-like #s he's also had a Manning-like playoff record. He didn't get enough credit in the SB years & he's gotten too much credit since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiterateStylish Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 In the conversation, sure. I dont think I could put him #1 though. Watching Cassel take that team to 11-5 took the wind out of Brady's sail a bit. I think when Peyton wins the Super Bowl with Denver, which I think he will, he will be considered the greatest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDogg20 Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Id give that nod to Peyton. Tom is talented but has a great coach and system behind him. Peyton IS the system. I 100% agree. Peyton is the best I have ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poblano Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 you can´t even consider him the best of his time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Peyton. Its not even close. When Brady is pressured he is very very human. He is lucky to have the line play he's had all his career Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Peyton. I'm honestly not sure how it is a question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 (edited) Brady is too dependent on a surrounding cast to be considered the greatest of all time. I'd put Peyton, Montana, and Elway ahead of him in terms of greatness...and in terms of pure QB ability, I'd also put Mario in front of him. Brady fails to maintain a level of greatness in the face of a solid pass rush, as was evidenced in the last two Pats SB appearances against less talented Giants teams. If you pressure Brady, he's anything but great. I have nothing to add to this. Edited September 1, 2012 by billsoverdue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 (edited) Brady is too dependent on a surrounding cast to be considered the greatest of all time. I'd put Peyton, Montana, and Elway ahead of him in terms of greatness...and in terms of pure QB ability, I'd also put Mario in front of him. Brady fails to maintain a level of greatness in the face of a solid pass rush, as was evidenced in the last two Pats SB appearances against less talented Giants teams. If you pressure Brady, he's anything but great. Really? How can anyone seriously say that? Say what you want about these two, but its not even close in terms of who had more talent to play with, and that is Manning. He has had by far more talent and Brady had less talent around him in his 3 SB's than Manning had his whole career. Manning had Harrison, Edge, Wayne, Clark, etc...Brady had Branch and a bunch of scrubs and a retread Dillon when he won those 3 SB's. And if it were not for his Defense giving up 2 once in a life time plays (the catch on the helmet and than manningham last year) he would have 5 Sb's to his one. Peyton has not shown up way too often in the post season where Brady has shined way more consistently with far less talent. Brady didnt start getting talent until the later years on offense. Its been a terrible collection of no names, has beens, and people who cant even make other rosters during their SB years that he has to work with. There isnt a single player he had on offense that would have started for Indy during that time. No WR could beat out Harrisson or Wayne...Dillon was not going to beat out Edge...what ever scrub TE he had was not going to beat out Clark. I get the debate, and Peyton is among the best, but to say Brady was dependent on talent being around him is ridiculous in comparison to Manning. The fact that Manning did not win more than 1 SB with all that talent...HOF talent...around him, just adds to his post season failures. Edited September 1, 2012 by Alphadawg7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiterateStylish Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Really? How can anyone seriously say that? Say what you want about these two, but its not even close in terms of who had more talent to play with, and that is Manning. He has had by far more talent and Brady had less talent around him in his 3 SB's than Manning had his whole career. Manning had Harrison, Edge, Wayne, Clark, etc...Brady had Branch and a bunch of scrubs and a retread Dillon when he won those 3 SB's. And if it were not for his Defense giving up 2 once in a life time plays (the catch on the helmet and than manningham last year) he would have 5 Sb's to his one. Peyton has not shown up way too often in the post season where Brady has shined way more consistently with far less talent. Brady didnt start getting talent until the later years on offense. Its been a terrible collection of no names, has beens, and people who cant even make other rosters during their SB years that he has to work with. There isnt a single player he had on offense that would have started for Indy during that time. No WR could beat out Harrisson or Wayne...Dillon was not going to beat out Edge...what ever scrub TE he had was not going to beat out Clark. I get the debate, and Peyton is among the best, but to say Brady was dependent on talent being around him is ridiculous in comparison to Manning. The fact that Manning did not win more than 1 SB with all that talent...HOF talent...around him, just adds to his post season failures. Oh boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Brady is not the best ever, but he is miles ahead of Peyton Gump, the Big Game Chump. So is Eli Gump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Really? How can anyone seriously say that? Say what you want about these two, but its not even close in terms of who had more talent to play with, and that is Manning. He has had by far more talent and Brady had less talent around him in his 3 SB's than Manning had his whole career. Manning had Harrison, Edge, Wayne, Clark, etc...Brady had Branch and a bunch of scrubs and a retread Dillon when he won those 3 SB's. And if it were not for his Defense giving up 2 once in a life time plays (the catch on the helmet and than manningham last year) he would have 5 Sb's to his one. Peyton has not shown up way too often in the post season where Brady has shined way more consistently with far less talent. Brady didnt start getting talent until the later years on offense. Its been a terrible collection of no names, has beens, and people who cant even make other rosters during their SB years that he has to work with. There isnt a single player he had on offense that would have started for Indy during that time. No WR could beat out Harrisson or Wayne...Dillon was not going to beat out Edge...what ever scrub TE he had was not going to beat out Clark. I get the debate, and Peyton is among the best, but to say Brady was dependent on talent being around him is ridiculous in comparison to Manning. The fact that Manning did not win more than 1 SB with all that talent...HOF talent...around him, just adds to his post season failures. Any argument where you have to use "if only...." is a losing argument. And by "surrounding cast" I'm talking about more than the skill positions. Brady's losses to the Giants are HUGE dings to his record, especially the first loss against a 10-6 team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PushthePile Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 (edited) Brady is the best of this era and definately in the discussion for all-time. Peyton has been knocked out in the first round 6 or 7 times in his career. To compare that to Bradys superbowl losses is a little ridiculous. Edited September 1, 2012 by PushthePile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Brady is the best of our time and definately in the discussion for all-time. Peyton has been knocked out in the first round 6 or 7 times in his career. To compare that to Bradys superbowl losses is a little ridiculous. I don't think it's ridiculous at all. We're not talking about overall team performance, we're talking about individual QBs and their impact. Peyton elevated a pretty mediocre team to one that was a perennial playoff participant and eventual SB champion. Brady took a 16-0 team to the SB against a 6-loss team and failed to even maintain the same level of production as his position, let alone elevate it. It wasn't the Pats defense that lost those last two SBs. Take Peyton off the list...Montana alone is at a level above Brady, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PushthePile Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I don't think it's ridiculous at all. We're not talking about overall team performance, we're talking about individual QBs and their impact. Peyton elevated a pretty mediocre team to one that was a perennial playoff participant and eventual SB champion. Brady took a 16-0 team to the SB against a 6-loss team and failed to even maintain the same level of production as his position, let alone elevate it. It wasn't the Pats defense that lost those last two SBs. Take Peyton off the list...Montana alone is at a level above Brady, IMO. I cant agree with the notion that Peyton's teams were mediocre. I actually think Peyton has had more talent on the field over his career. The losses to the Giants are nothing to hold against Brady. Those Giants teams had a ton of talent themselves and were playing their best football. Brady didnt play poorly considering the pressure he was under. Those games were close. I find it hard to believe Peyton or any other all-time QB does a whole lot more under that pressure. I love Peyton but his own personal playoff performances arent all-time great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickenbru Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I hate the bastard, but Brady's in the top 5. Still, I'd go with a healthy Peyton over a healthy Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I cant agree with the notion that Peyton's teams were mediocre. I actually think Peyton has had more talent on the field over his career. The losses to the Giants are nothing to hold against Brady. Those Giants teams had a ton of talent themselves and were playing their best football. Brady didnt play poorly considering the pressure he was under. Those games were close. I find it hard to believe Peyton or any other all-time QB does a whole lot more under that pressure. I love Peyton but his own personal playoff performances arent all-time great. A 16-0 team losing to a 10-6 team isn't a big deal? They were close games...point is, they shouldn't have been. Reference Brady's pre-SB interview when he scoffed at the notion that he would lead his team to only 17 points...he well expected to put up points and he failed to do that. If he had still won, it wouldn't really matter....but they lost...for the first time that season....and that is a huge blemish, IMO. I hate the bastard, but Brady's in the top 5. Still, I'd go with a healthy Peyton over a healthy Brady. If top 5 means "fifth", I could certainly put him in that sport...that sounds like a pretty good spot for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Can this guy ever be considered the best qb ever? http://sportsofboston.com/2011/05/22/photo-tom-brady-on-water-slide-at-mexican-vacation-with-gisele/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I can't believe this is even a discussion. Peyton, Joe M, Johnny U are 3 that are clearly better than Brady. All you have to do is compare the 2010 Colts to the 2011 Colts for Peyton. Joe M never lost a super bowl and earned the name Joe Cool for a reason. Danny boy and Elway deserve some conversation as well. Brady can't even enter this equation until after them. Besides, it is easy to be Brady* when your coach steals the D's signals and knows what is coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Can this guy ever be considered the best qb ever? http://sportsofbosto...on-with-gisele/ lmao.... I can't believe this is even a discussion. Peyton, Joe M, Johnny U are 3 that are clearly better than Brady. All you have to do is compare the 2010 Colts to the 2011 Colts for Peyton. Joe M never lost a super bowl and earned the name Joe Cool for a reason. Danny boy and Elway deserve some conversation as well. Brady can't even enter this equation until after them. Besides, it is easy to be Brady* when your coach steals the D's signals and knows what is coming LOL, I was hoping someone else would throw in that last part so I didn't have to take the heat for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 LOL, I was hoping someone else would throw in that last part so I didn't have to take the heat for it I'm surprised it took this long. I was waiting as well, figured I toss it out. On a serious note, no doubt the guy is a great qb, but the best ever? No way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I must have missed all those years of stacked Indy teams & scrub NE teams. The only year I remember the Colts having a defense they won the SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 You don’t have to be a football fan to be a Bills fan. I, however, am a football fan. The energy and excitement of the game thrills me. The strategy of every play, every position and every inch energizes me. The dedication of the players to live an unlivable dream intrigues me. The story of the players motivates me and makes me feel a parallel in my life. Every single one of these kids has a story and a dream. Respect to the players that fuel my love for the game of football. Tom Brady included. http://www.nfl.com/q...HP11_hot_topics All that being said...... I still hate the SOB! Oh yeah, I almost forgot. I hope we kick his A** this year! GO BILLS! I would definitely have to give the nod to Tom Brady. Montana stunk up 3 qtrs of the game and then did magic in the 4th qtr to bail them out....On the other hand Brady and his offense has dominated the league for the decade with some outstanding quarter backing. Brady put fear into the opponents... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 (edited) 1. Brady 2. Montana 3. Graham 4. Manning 5. Unitas 6. Youngh 7. Marino 8. Elway 9. Favre 10. Tarkenton, Stauhbach, Aikman, Kelly, Starr, Bradshaw, Namath, Stabler, Edited September 1, 2012 by Dadonkadonk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiterateStylish Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 1. Brady 2. Montana 3. Graham 4. Manning 5. Unitas 6. Youngh 7. Marino 8. Elway 9. Tarkenton, Stauhbach, Aikman, Kelly, Starr, Bradshaw 9.Namath, Stabler, Aikman??? Bahahahaha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Formerly Allan in MD Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Johnny Unitas, week in and week out, was the ultimate in a quarterback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 (edited) Few years ago I would have said yes he is. Great arm can make all throws, super quick decision maker, has all the subtleties down like looking off the DBs, been successful in different schemes and with different personnel, 3 rings etc etc. Only knock was not a great scrambler, but so what when you can do all that other stuff. But 2 SB losses later when the O didn't put up a lot points, and I see him losing his edge a bit, I'd put him in with a group of legends like staubach montana and elway. But during his era at least he's clearly #1 to me, well ahead of Manning Edited September 1, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasper13 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Super Bowl. 2 minutes left. No timeouts. 80 yards. Need a TD to win. Who do you want at QB? I'd take Montana every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 bunch of young guys saying peyton peyton peyton. i put brady at around #8.--which is no insult. peyton around 7. montana 1. elway 2(he carried --and i mean really carried some mediocre denver teams to deep in the playoffs).Marino 3. Steve Young 4. Fran Tarkenton 5. favre 6(only equalled by elway,marino in sheer talent dept--woulda been no 1 exc for occas brain farts) Danny Fouts and Kenny anderson round out the top 10. apologies to the pre 1960s guys like sammy baugh, johnny U ,Otto Graham didnt really see ya cant judge you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 (edited) bunch of young guys saying peyton peyton peyton. i put brady at around #8.--which is no insult. peyton around 7. montana 1. elway 2(he carried --and i mean really carried some mediocre denver teams to deep in the playoffs).Marino 3. Steve Young 4. Fran Tarkenton 5. favre 6(only equalled by elway,marino in sheer talent dept--woulda been no 1 exc for occas brain farts) Danny Fouts and Kenny anderson round out the top 10. apologies to the pre 1960s guys like sammy baugh, johnny U ,Otto Graham didnt really see ya cant judge you This is more along the lines of how I feel...not just cause I grew up watching them play, but because it just hit me that the competition they played against was like much better back then since we had fewer teams and less parity. Definitely agree about Elway...both he and Mario were one man armies at times...each of them often had no defense and no RB worth a damn...they had some nice wideouts at times, but as far as a complete team? Nah.... And I rank Peyton up there because I see him doing the very same thing that Elway and Marino had to do during the 80s...take mediocre teams and turn them into playoff/SB teams pretty much by themselves. Edited September 1, 2012 by ajzepp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffery Lester Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Tom Brady was the best football player I have ever seen over a 5 year period in the early 2000's. I do not like him either. But I do respect him. People give credit to Beilcheat. Look it up he had a loosing record as a headcoach prior to Tammy becoming his QB. I give all props to Brady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offside Number 76 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I don't think he's the best quarterback currently, much less ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Tom over Peyton x10 IMO. Toms 7-4 against the media darling known as Peyton Some of these posts blow my mind. Peyton had plenty of talent over the years. The colts got old and they declined lately. Peyton was toms whipping boy until much like Lebron James one time Peyton/Lebron finally won the big one I'm all about my bills. But Brady's a golden god if they score another td or two and beat the giants.. No tyree helmet catch things change quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts