Ed_Formerly_of_Roch

So the 4 names highlighted below very likely aren't going anywhere and good chance AJ is also back. That leaves 4 or 5 roster spots open and you want 2 rookie DT's and a rookie at Edge. That leaves only one to two spots left for any vet presence and you think having 3 rookies will improve things this coming season? When people start posting about using multiple draft picks on the same position, you have to look at how the roster will end up looking. You can do that with sixth or seventh rounders as good chance you can hide one of them on the PS, but anything above the 6th round would likely get grabbed up. You need to have open spots that will improve the team. Does the line need help, absolutely, but the idea of using multiple high picks on the same position is silly unless you're in the rebuild mode. DL is a position that often takes time to get good. It even took Bruce Smith a few years, great pass rusher from the start, but took a few seasons to get good against the run. For these reasons with a team as close as the Bills are, I think they need more high level vets on the DL than rookies. On the other hand CB is a spot you can put a rookie on the field and they often will be fine.

Don't let facts get in the way of a good argument!! Did it stop the Germans from invading Pearl Harbor?

Kind of funny, towards the end of commercial, Allen made a pass into the endzone, looked like the same identical pass he made to Coleman where he scrambled right and threw to left corner of end zone.

Johnny Unitas was certainly one of the best QB's of his time, but to see him at #1 makes me have to question if the criteria has changed a lot since then?? The rest of the names a the top are what I'd call more modern day QB's.

I've actually started watching more NBA of late. What does drive me crazy in both NBA and even worse in college is they stop play to review the clock, it takes 10 minutes to figure it out and add an entire .4 seconds to the clock. To me college basketball has become unwatchable between the one and done's leaves you with hardly any idea on who is on what teams and for the most part these college kids can't shoot worth anything. In the NBA if you leave a player open from 10 feet, most of the time they will make the open shot, but not in college anymore.

Reading the latest article on KC getting all the calls and the NFL denying it, but as this article stated, it's a problem for the NFL as that is the overall perception of things and the league needs to erase that. Got me thinking, is this an NFL problem or is it the same in all sports? I'm guessing it's much worse in the NFL only because only 16 games are played and playoffs are all one and done's as opposed to best 4 of 7 so impact of calls is rarely felt as much??

I've always said it's too easy to get elected tot he football HOA and too hard to get elected to t he baseball HOA. I didn't read all the exact criteria changes, but overall less elected every year isn't necessarily a bad thing IMO.

Reading a quote, major upset, stunning were words used. Guess I'm wondering how anyone can say that when throughout the last 10 weeks or so of the season Allen was favored to win the award. Yes it did get much closer at the end of the season, but Allen was still ahead. The same article also mentioned how in 2023 Allen had better stats, that Lamar, but didn't win it. So why would it then be shocking that Allen won this year? Jackson sould have won it this year, was very close, but can't see how anyone can be shocked by results. In a major upset, Buffalo Bills quarterback Josh Allen was named the 2024 NFL MVP in a historically rare victory Thursday night

I thought one of the Buffalo News writers was a voter? Unless I missed it, don't see anyone listed though do see Vic Carruci is a voter. Looks like Allen did get good support from the NFL Network crew

I kind of wondered the same thing as throughout the night no sightings of Jackson. To me that was a hint that Allan won the award. Is there some site that lists the voting results, by person??

I 've always said I could get open on an NFL CB if you give the QB enough time as I, the WR know where I'm going and the DB doesn't. BTW I'll be 70 this year!

Once a year sounds too high, maybe every other year or two out of three years. Think it won't happen till they go to 18 games and add a second bye. That would make it easier. Two team every year report to camp a week early to play in the HOF game. They could add two more teams to report a week early and have those two teams face off someplace on Labor day weekend, then give them the next week off??

The one thing that worries me in 2025 maybe more than anything, can they sustain the TO numbers battle like they did this year.. There's a lot of luck involved there, being in the right place at the right time. It's kind of like winning one score games, think it was 3 years ago, the Bills lost only like one one score game all season, the following year lost a few of them.

So which side does Crosby play? That was one of the issues the past couple of years, whenever Miller came in, Groot would be forced to switch to other side and he didn't ever seem to be as good from the other side. Don't want to repeat that again. Or include Groot in the trade, but then the overall improvement of the team drops off considerably in even making the trade. Or maybe Crosby is good from both sides?

Agree, Another way to look at it would be, based on last Sundays game if there were 17 others just like it,, would you award him the MVP off that performance, in fact would he even have been a finalist, probably not. He played well, but was more than just a poor first drive overall. It certainly wasn't one of his top 10 performances of the year.

There's a long list of players that posters wanted to run out of town starting with Brown, Knox, and Bass. Folks wanted to cut Bass by October of his rookie year, then by year 2 loved him everyone said great pick, this year back to getting rid of him. What's it all mean, basically that posters here are all clueless and overly emotional.

See Rogers, Jets!

Actually you are as fully qualified as most GM's or owners in the league is . The reason I say that is if they were more qualified, there's wouldn't be all the failures in the hires that happen regularly. That was kind of the point of @oldmanfan the odds of getting anyone better when you consider all the failures is very low and no one knows who will be a success. The Bills were lucky that they made a good choice in McD. To the OP's point @Ramza86 that a 15 YO could get the team to the wild card. then how come Mayfield failed in Cleveland (and Carolina) and now looks great? While not as long of a track record of success, but Darnold in Minn looked pretty darn good this year after years of failure. Sis they all of a sudden figure things out or is it the coaching? Yeah it's easy to say anyone can win in this league when you have a great superstar QB, but really not as easy as many think.

So it also tells us that Elam is one of the 25% best CBs in the league!!

Looking at these scores I can't even figure out of a lower number is better or worse!! Which in itself, could be a reason for concern!!

Well the one other concern I'd have with a vertical threat is for whatever reason Allen seems to throw a rather inaccurate long ball. If I were a DC going up against the Bills and lets assume they had selected Worthy, I wouldn't worry all that much about him and a deep ball as figure we have to take a chance someplace and until Allen can show he can complete that pass fairly often, lets worry more about stopping him elsewhere.

So what do you want to do cut him?? LOL that's not happening. As you even stated he's be back as the 6th WR, but that likely won't be the case as they've only carried 5, so he'll be back as the #5 WR. That won't change regardless of what Steve Smith says. Regardless of how good or bad he is, he's not getting cut and not to say he can't improve. Posters here have a very bad track record of evaluating players off one or two seasons of play. (see Knox, Brown for starters)

Yeah I'd have no issue with cutting Samuel as didn't show very much, not sure if they WANT to do that from a cap standpoint?? Maybe they can get him to take a big pay cut?? Based on his performance this year, doubtful he'd get big money anywhere else. Agree too both TE's are assets, but seemed like we never really went with that concept very much. It would seem that since the WR group is one of the weakest areas and not having tons of cap space using 2 TE's more would be a good strategy money wise.

Well if you want WR to open up downfield, to me that's very risky as for whatever reason Allen seems terrible with accuracy in throwing long passes. Not just this year, but multiple seasons, rarely does he hit someone on target. If you want the offense to thrive on long passes, may need a different QB. Why can't they make KC punt more than twice, you state we've never done that, but also state we struggled going downfield. So yes, you can develop a mindset of not punting, but as I mention, Allen and long passes aren't a good fit, or just as easily could go in the direction of making the defense better. Either works, it doesn't have to be one or the other. I do recall in Davis's rookie year Allen was routinely throwing 20 yard passes to him on the sideline and Davis would make these amazing tiptoe catches. Not sure where either the throw or for Davis, the catches went?

Really?? Because you say so? They haven't done that the past few years so yes Coleman will be kept as one of the 5 so then as you stated added Shakir and Samuel and if they resign Hollins which many hope for, that leaves one spot. Unless they decide to break the trend they've gone with, it is NOT likely you will get 2 more, sorry to disappoint you.