947

I'd rather see a trade of our 2019 1st to move up, than to give up #22.

It's this type of thinking that cost us 6 more elite years from London Fletcher.

We need to add 2 starting LBs, and it's doubtful we can get both in the draft. I think we take a LB at #22 (Vander Esch or Evans), but need a FA too. Nigel Bradham, Zach Brown, or Tahir Whitehead- would absolutely be impact LB signings for the Bills. All good fits for us, hopefully the prices come down after the initial FA frenzy.

Willie Snead is a possession/slot WR, just like the 2 WRs we currently have. He is the opposite of what we need, we need a down-field threat. It's like you guys just jump on names you've heard of, without knowing what they can do. Meredith maybe could be a fit, but is coming off a major injury, and not worth giving anything up.

I'd be happier if we took Rudolph at 12, than if we took Allen at 22. If we trade up for Allen, I'm gonna need a vacation.

This is EXACTLY what I came in this thread to post. Allen is a going to be the next huge QB bust, which sucks for him because he belongs nowhere near the first round conversation, but he keeps getting rammed down everyone's throats to the point that he could go top-10. I admit, aggressively trading up and taking a probable bust would be a Billsy thing to do. I think Beane knows better.

Pretty much. My main point was that if GB signs Watkins, both Cobb & Nelson will be on the FA market.

Because tying that much cap space up in the WR position would be asinine. They're about to re-do Rodgers' deal to something like Jimmy G got, and their Defense has multiple needs, that money would be better spent here. Sure, they could probably figure out a way to keep 3 expensive WRs on their roster, but I just don't see it happening.

Packers would have to cut both Jordy & Cobb to afford Sammy, but I don't see either as a fit for us. Cobb doesn't fit our needs at all. We need a deep threat, not another possession WR, already have 2 of those. Jordy would be nice, but would cost way more than McBeane would be willing to spend, and only has 1-2 years left before going out to pasture. He'll go to a contender.

If Moore is signed, Peterman will beat him out with ease & he'll be cut in preseason. I don't even consider Moore a feasible Bridge QB option, no thanks.

Mathews is absolutely NOT a fit for what we need. He is strictly a possession WR, best suited for the slot. We already have 2 possession guys, don't need a 3rd, what we need is a deep threat.

I think he drops to Round 3, maybe even 4. There's no guarantee he regains 100% strength in the torn pec, ever. On top of that, it's really doubtful he'd be able to play this year. Of course he says he'll be ready for camp, he just lost millions of dollars with this injury and is doing damage control. I'd be OK with the risk with our 3rd rounder, but no more than that.

There's 0% chance of this draft actually happening, but even with no OL drafted, this would be the best ever. I wanted to draft OL in the 2nd, but couldn't pass Vander Esch there. 21: R1P21 LB RASHAAN EVANS ALABAMA 22: R1P22 DL VITA VEA WASHINGTON 53: R2P21 QB JOSH ALLEN WYOMING 56: R2P24 LB LEIGHTON VANDER ESCH BOISE STATE 96: R3P32 WR DEONTAY BURNETT USC 121: R4P21 EDGE JOSH SWEAT FLORIDA STATE 158: R5P21 RB BO SCARBROUGH ALABAMA 166: R5P29 CB DARIOUS WILLIAMS UAB

I would love this. Vander Esch or Rashan Evans along with a DT at 21/22, then QB in the 2nd and sign a vet.

Foles was barely adequate in the regular season games he started after Wentz went down. Yes, he was fantastic in the playoffs, but who knows if he can do that again. I'd be on-board with him for a 2nd, but there's no way he's worth more than that. Nobody is paying a 1st for Foles.

Josh Allen, aka Ryan Leaf 2.0.

I think he'd be a great fit, but yeah, too expensive. We could probably get 2 new starting LBs for the $10M it'd cost for Zach Brown, and that's what we need.

I really doubt anybody offers Stewart more than the veteran minumum. Let another team waste cap space on him, he really wouldn't be any better than Tolbert.

I'm starting to warm up to Jackson. I think with the right OC, he can be a good NFL starter. I'd be ok with him at 21 or 22, but I don't think he warrants a trade-up.

No Darnold or Allen. Both will be forgotten busts within 3 years like Jake Locker or Joey Harrington. I'd be OK with a trade up for Mayfield. Or Rosen, but that'd be too expensive for my tastes.

My big fear is we give up 3 first rounders for Darnold or Allen. Those guys are very high bust risks, it wouldset us back years. Please... no! Sit tight, and if Mayfield somehow falls out of the top-10, then start looking to move up. But only for a 1st & a 2nd, plus a low round pick if needed.

There is now way anybody trades anything for Tyrod, he's not even worth a 6th rounder to other teams. Even if a team did want him, they know he'll be cut & will wait it out.

Anybody know of a place in the western burbs? I see there's a place up in Streamwood, but that's almost an hour drive, same as going downtown for me. Too much to drive home after 4 hours of beers...

I think Peterman will pass Cardale by the end off rookie minicamp. The new staff has no tie to Cardale and I really don't expect him to have any shot here. Peterman will be our #2 on opening day, and will probably get some starts when Tyrod gets banged up.

The Rule of 26-27-60 is used to predict the success of future NFL quarterbacks. The rule proposes that if a NFL prospect scored at least a 26 on the Wonderlic test, started at least 27 games in college, and completed at least 60 percent of his passes, he would succeed in the NFL, if he did not meet all three criteria, he would fail. Peterman started 30+ games, completed 60.1%, and scored a 33 on the Wonderlic (same as Brady). Trent Edwards started 30+ games & scored 31 on the Wonderlic. But only completed 56%. Using this formula- Peterman has a better chance of NFL success.