All Activity

Remember last year or two years ago when that family said a Bills fan knocked or pushed there girl over? It got tons of airplay on new stations everywhere And it was never verified from the Buffalo Bills.. or witnesses .. and the eye in the sky never caught it .. Buffalo News never did a story on it Because it probably was slightly fabricated Not saying the girl didn't fall down but a angry drunk Bills fan definitely wasn't shouting obscenities saying he's going to knock over 49er fans like they said just rampaging people The Buffalo News never ran with the story and the Buffalo Bills would be able to catch it with their eye in the sky

Will you ever stand up for the average American citizen? These people are given benefits and still choose to rip us off. ***** them.

I too look for gems in the fantasy waiver & FA wire this time of year. Never seems to works out.

While I primarily agree with you, I will say (playing devil's advocate for just a moment), that drive you spoke of: 1. Ate up more than 1/2 of the 2nd quarter. The Steelers' offense sat on the sideline for over 30 minutes (real time) and did not get back on the field until less than a minute to go (with no timeouts) in the first half, effectively denying their ability to score points at the end of the half. Losses against both the Patriots and Texans can be traced back to the defense giving up cheap points at the end of the first half in each of those games. 2. The physical beat-down on that drive played a role in wearing down the Steelers' defense and invigorating the Bills' confidence on offense. While the drive only netted 3 points, it was the start of a 26-0 run. 3. The drive may have ended with a TD, except that on 4th and goal from the 2, there was a false start penalty that led McD to reconsider his decision to go for it and settle for a FG. 4. The Bills were playing without both of their starting OTs (and with interior linemen also banged up) -- so the coaches were mindful of not asking Josh to stand in the pocket and hold the ball for more than a couple of seconds. We saw what happened against Houston when the ball didn't come out of his hand quickly. In fact, the sort of smash-mouth scheme that they ran against Pittsburgh is probably what they should have done against Houston too. That said, I'm not sure that is the best course of action to take a against the Burrow-led Bengals whose offense is superior to that of Houston/Pittsburgh. I think the key (which we probably agree on) is that the Bills need to show that they can be versatile on offense. When the game-flow permits, it is perfectly OK to impose their will against an opposing defense and grind the ball on the ground, while judiciously mixing in passes here and there. However, there will come a time (possibly this week against Cinci), where they will need be able to compete in a shootout. With the lack of viable downfield threats, that is not really the way they are built, but they HAVE shown (this year against the Ravens and Bucs, for example) that with a stud QB like Josh that they CAN do it.

You avoided my question. Very unexpected. I shall answer yours if you answer mine.

Ray Davis is a solid backup but I want him touching the ball as little as possible to briefly spell Cook, nothing more. Johnson is a great pass catching back and adds a little bit of a compliment but with what we are paying Cook, he should be closer to a 3 down bell cow back, and he has the skills to do it, so that is going to eat into Davis' touches (and Johnson's to an extent) and I'm completely fine with that. Why would we ever want Davis with the ball in his hands vs Cook? The obvious thing that Beane and McDermott both missed is how bad our WR corp is. It has been laughably bad the last two years. We needed to add two difference makers really, but at least one. And we failed to add a single difference maker in two consecutive offseasons during Josh Allen's prime. That is criminal.

not to mention a ridiculous waste of cap space

Are the crimes of a few a reason to strip the citizenship of thousands?

If they get both the audio and video of the attacks, we'll have an answer. The guy seems to love killing. he told his troops in Iraq to disregard the JAG officers rules of engagement. He would have been there, whooping it up and high diving the other degenerates. I'm sure your income is much higher than his 😂. loser.

I’m surprised “Fat Dom”(Eagles Head of Security) didn’t try to insert himself into the situation thereby increasing his 5 minutes of fame.

These were who I'm hoping will win (or in some cases lose), not predictions.

Pretty damning article, with quotes from former Air Force secretary and Bush advisor. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/former-air-force-secretary-bradley-would-be-court-martialed-under-normal-circumstances/ar-AA1Rz50C?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=692f437604624609bda5fd717be7003d&ei=75 Since Wolfgang doesnt know how to click on links, I have some key quotes below: "Several other former U.S. government and military leaders have also dubbed the “double tap” attack a violation of the country’s law of war manual. " “Adm. Bradley was reported to have given an excuse, if you will, for the second engagement. That doesn’t hold water. These people were wounded. They were in the water. They were not a threat to anybody. Again, that’s a textbook example of a war crime,” Kendall said Monday. “You can‘t kill survivors who can no longer fight,” John Yoo, who served as an adviser in former President George W. Bush’s administration, said during a Monday appearance on CNN. “So, the admiral should not have obeyed the order that Secretary Hegseth gave. And even the soldiers who carried out the admiral‘s orders should not have obeyed.” "Leavitt alleged the strikes were justified after narcotrafficking groups were deemed foreign terrorist organizations, allowing for “lethal targeting in accordance with the laws of war.” Her comments contradict the U.S.’s war manual, which states “orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal.”

I had expected him to land with Ravens, Pats, Niners, or Chargers personally. But Broncos makes sense too, just thought those other teams could use the help more.

You mean the people that are defrauding tax paying Americans? Get them the ***** out of here. Walz is as corrupt as his is clueless.

That sounds racist, doesn’t it? Of course we should both see what the entire context is before issuing our condemnation. Did you know that “rupar” has become a verb? Not a nice one either. I haven’t seen you or any other of the board’s lefties chime in on the fraud the Somalian community is involved with in the Land of 10,000 Lakes. Why do you think that is? No character? No balls? Just asking questions.

It takes quite a man to fill a 14 inch hole.

I only voted for Shaq.

I like the guy and he's giving his all every game, but injury prone and usually listed as day to day?..........are you telling me we can't do better than this?

I picked Milano and Bosa. My 3rd choice would be Shaq Thompson.

I would have already used Denver, so would be going w Tampa. But Denver over Vegas seems solid.

I think the Steeler game confirmed their identity. Against Cincy we’ll see the same to keep pretty boy on the bench. I don’t see how anyone can stop our OL and Cook. All he needs is a 14 inch hole. If it’s there, he’ll find it. Uncanny.

Good for Eli. We had no idea what to do with him! I was excited when Bean signed him (same goes for Samuel), but other than McKenzie, they haven't found anyone for that role despite both being better receivers than McKenzie. Go figure.

Throwing the military under the bus here. These pigs don't care about hurting anyone https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/trump-ukraine-russia-venezuela-12-02-2025