Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As Shaw66 wisely points out, it's a week-to-week thing. 

 

Like many others, I'm also disappointed we didn't get that true deep threat.  However, we added another guy that excels against man coverage.  We have a good mix of players that excel at 1 or the other, and some are good against both.  Moore is another guy, that if he lines up as your 3rd or even 4th guy, good luck lining up your CB3 on him one on one.  He's still a very young guy, who will likely reach whatever his potential is here.  What that is, we don't know for sure, but I would bet, it's better than what he's done to date. 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Allen2Moulds said:

As Shaw66 wisely points out, it's a week-to-week thing. 

 

Like many others, I'm also disappointed we didn't get that true deep threat.  However, we added another guy that excels against man coverage.  We have a good mix of players that excel at 1 or the other, and some are good against both.  Moore is another guy, that if he lines up as your 3rd or even 4th guy, good luck lining up your CB3 on him one on one.  He's still a very young guy, who will likely reach whatever his potential is here.  What that is, we don't know for sure, but I would bet, it's better than what he's done to date. 

 

If you look at Palmer and Moore you have to look at their situations.  Moore has never had a quality QB throwing to him, and Palmer comes from. Greg Roman offense.  I think Brady’s schemes are more receiver friendly.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...