ToGoGo Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, appoo said: Can someone please help me understand why you'd want any rookie this side of MHJ (the most ready made rookie WR we've seen other than JJ & Chase since like Julio Jones/AJ Green), over DEEBO FREAKIN SAMUEL?!! They don’t know what they want and should be placed on ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Not sold on our ability to use him 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appoo Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Beyond that, there's literally no way the Bills could financially take Deebo on until after June 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, stlbills13 said: I think you should be able to get Deebo for relatively cheap in terms of trade compensation. You can always make it work cap wise. I do think your WR room gets a little redundant but Deebo is good and you'd still be drafting a WR tonight in my opinion. I'd rather have Aiyuk but I would assume the 49ers would rather have him too the redundancy being that they are pretty flexible as opposed to one trick ponies doing the same thing does help though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein's Dog Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 4 minutes ago, dma0034 said: Fair enough. Obviously Beane has way more knowledge than I ever will with cap space Also, Beane can have things prepared behind the scenes. Josh's restructure for instance, ready to go on a moments notice. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 25 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Aiyuk is more likely IMO Work with two huge niner fans and saying that aiyuk is the one they'll keep. Samuel they want to move. Old, injury prone, costly. I don't want Samuel. I wouldn't hate aiyuk if price is ok. Neither truly interest me. Higgins is peerless price clone, too. 25 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Aiyuk is more likely IMO Work with two huge niner fans and saying that aiyuk is the one they'll keep. Samuel they want to move. Old, injury prone, costly. I don't want Samuel. I wouldn't hate aiyuk if price is ok. Neither truly interest me. Higgins is peerless price clone, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralonzo Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 32 minutes ago, Success said: I wouldn't mind both Deebo-lite AND Deebo-normal, personally. Too much will give you Type 2 Deebobetes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Hahahahaha another self proclaimed cap expert on WGR telling everyone “definitively” the Bills can’t trade for Deebo or Aiyuk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 What in the world kind of Offense are we planning on running? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) 44 minutes ago, glazeduck said: Yeah this feels like obvious BS I'm like 75% sure we'll be taking your boy from Oregon tonight. We are not at the spot in our team's life cycle where we should be trading for a weathered WR that we have to commit major cap space to. Drafting a couple young studs tonight makes way more sense. Edited April 26 by HappyDays 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DapperCam Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 I think people are vastly overrating how productive a rookie WR will be (especially one in the 2nd round). For every Puka Nacua, there are 30 rookies that perform just okay (even good ones). If we traded for Deebo, I would expect he would out produce every rookie WR in this class (even the MHJ) for this upcoming season. Now, whether we can fit him capwise...I'm not so sure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 5 minutes ago, appoo said: Beyond that, there's literally no way the Bills could financially take Deebo on until after June 1 want to tell that to the Bills and Mike G? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 13 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said: They days of FA WRs are clearly in their prime, in case you haven't noticed. for dumb teams it is. The WR inflation is obscene. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconator Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 41 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I would not like this! Which means we are probably going to trade for J'Marr Chase. Beane pulling a fast one on us again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Pats make a lot of sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playoffs? Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Let’s get them both! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) I don't understand how NFL analysts, all of NFL twitter, and four pages worth of posts on this thread don't seem to be acknowledging the following: The Bills CAN'T trade for Deebo. Literally cannot do it. The only way it would work is if San Fran said "we'll pay most of his salary this year", which...why would they do that? Failing that unlikely scenario, the Bills' salary cap situation makes it literally impossible for them to trade for Samuel, Aiyuk, or Higgins right now. They can't afford it. Edited April 26 by Logic 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appoo Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said: want to tell that to the Bills and Mike G? Feel free to Math your way out of that 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 15 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: whether you see it or not, a legit league reporter has stated we have interest. Eh the Bills get dangled as bait in a lot of these trade discussions. But the trades we end up pulling off are never the ones we're rumored to be in on. Nobody had us trading for Diggs. Nobody has us trading up for Elam or Kincaid. We tried trading for Von Miller before the Rams did - nobody reported this until after fact. I would wager the 49ers are dangling the Bills and/or Patriots as potential trade partners to incentivize the real trade partners to increase their offer. I could actually see the Pats making this move, it makes sense for them. Maybe the 49ers are putting it out there that their division rival with a slightly higher 2nd round pick is also in the conversation. I would just be really surprised if us trying to trade for Deebo Samuel or any player leaked into the media because it's never happened. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.