Jump to content

Could Elam be packaged in a trade up?


Recommended Posts

Here are the 5 worse secondaries from last year ranked.

 

#28 Colts

#29 Giants

#30 Cardinals

#31 Raiders

#32 Bears

 

if so it would soften the compensation it would take to move up with any of these teams. How Elam’s value is perceived is something I’d be curious to know. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had high hopes for Kaiir, but he has not shown a darn thing in this league. He may still be developed, but I doubt he’s shown enough to get much of anything in terms of a move up in the first round.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Disagree 4
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

I had high hopes for Kaiir, but he has not shown a darn thing in this league. He may still be developed, but I doubt he’s shown enough to get much of anything in terms of a move up in the first round.

Me too. I wonder if we could get a 3rd for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

He has little to no value at this point, better to keep him and see if he turns the corner for us.

 

I agree with this. Another team would have to be willing to take on his guaranteed contract. $4.5M total for 2024 & 2025. That makes it tough because they’d be stuck with that if he didn’t work out. That really tanks his value. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tipster19 said:

Here are the 5 worse secondaries from last year ranked.

 

#28 Colts

#29 Giants

#30 Cardinals

#31 Raiders

#32 Bears

 

if so it would soften the compensation it would take to move up with any of these teams. How Elam’s value is perceived is something I’d be curious to know. 

 

I think this is one of these things where, "if you don't think enough of your 2022 1st round pick to play him in in more than half the games, and you're already giving up and willing to trade him, we don't think enough of him that we're willing to give you very much"

 

19 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Spencer has actual value IMO.  We did it with Cordy Glenn. Perhaps Spencer gets us from 28 to 13-16ish if we add a 2025 4th

 

Or he could be used in a package to NYG

 

Fact: Cordy Glenn, who was an established starting LT before previous season injury and IR, moved us up 9 spots from 21 to 12, WITH a same year 5th round pick thrown in (and a 6th back as change).

 

Fact: Brown is not a LT, and a 2025 4th is considered devalued to approximate a 2025 5th. 

 

I don't think you're gonna see Brown get you 12 spots. 

 

 

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

Elam and 28 for 33

Huh?

19 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Spencer has actual value IMO.  We did it with Cordy Glenn. Perhaps Spencer gets us from 28 to 13-16ish if we add a 2025 4th

 

Or he could be used in a package to NYG

I never thought of Brown being traded. He’s young with a cheap contract and upside. If we need to trade up he could be a legitimate pawn. Good insight Warrior 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

What makes you think that?

 

I'm not Firebaugh Kid, but I thought he showed flashes when he played towards the end of 2022 season when Benford was injured.

 

So I don't think the "Fat Lady" has sung yet, but I don't think other GMs are gonna give much either.

 

4 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Huh?

 

He's saying Elam would have negative value in a trade.  It would de-value our pick to the 2nd round to package Elam with it.

 

Wise guys.

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

I'm not Firebaugh Kid, but I thought he showed flashes when he played towards the end of 2022 season when Benford was injured.

 

So I don't think the "Fat Lady" has sung yet, but I don't think other GMs are gonna give much either.

 

 

He's saying Elam would have negative value in a trade.  It would de-value our pick to the 2nd round to package Elam with it.

 

Wise guys.

Ok haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy does well in straight man coverage but he screws up in zone and when he has to make adjustments.

 

Maybe he'll eventually learn but at this point he'd only have value to a team that plays straight man as a base D.

 

This is the NFL so I doubt there are any teams that do that.

 

He wasn't a first round pick. What mystifies me is why his shortcomings weren't apparent from film or scouting.  Any thoughts?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...