Chicken Boo Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 (edited) 7 hours ago, MJS said: So, if the Bills are there at 28 and they have the option of taking a player with a 1st round grade versus taking a 2nd round graded receiver, you want them to pass on the higher rated players and reach for a 2nd round talent? I honestly think some of you don't understand how the draft works. You make a draft board. You grade players. You draft according to your board. You don't get enamored with any one player or even any one position, because there are a billion scenarios and it might not fall the way you think, especially when you are at 28. There will be a 1st round grade WR there at 28, unless a bunch of trade-ups happen. If the Bills pass on one of these guys for a player on defense heads need to roll. I'm sick of the bs. No excuses. 7 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said: That is a spectacularly awful approach No it isn't. The Bills need to come away with one of the top 5-6 WRs in the 1st round. I really don't care if a bunch of "let's draft defense again" fans agree with me or not. I was right about DK, I was right about Breece. I'm right now. Edited March 30 by Chicken Boo 1 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prospector Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 If the LSU WRs are gone, I wouldn’t mind this. This guy plays very cerebral. Professor X would be proud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptnCoke11 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 7 hours ago, MJS said: So, if the Bills are there at 28 and they have the option of taking a player with a 1st round grade versus taking a 2nd round graded receiver, you want them to pass on the higher rated players and reach for a 2nd round talent? I honestly think some of you don't understand how the draft works. You make a draft board. You grade players. You draft according to your board. You don't get enamored with any one player or even any one position, because there are a billion scenarios and it might not fall the way you think, especially when you are at 28. They’ll be the same people crying Beane reached if he takes the 8th best receiver at 28 and doesn’t pan out 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Costa Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 3 hours ago, Brandon said: The defensive backfield is the strength of the coaching staff. They can find someone they can get by with. I'm considerably less confident of their ability to find a starting caliber WR later in the draft. And then the are the longer term contract considerations. With FA WR costs skyrocketing, it's more valuable to have that position on cost controlled contracts than it is a safety. And then there's the fact that DeJean would be a projection to safety. He's a college corner and that's where I'd give him his first shot in the NFL. Maybe he can play safety, but maybe he can't. Like Gabe Davis or Khalil Shakir on day 3 ? Got it bud ✅ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullBuchanan Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 1 hour ago, NoSaint said: and to my point: in your wildest dreams of his potential, you picked a guy with a paycheck between Jerry jeudy and Christian kirk No, in my wildest dreams, he's Ed Reed. Just because I'm taking the best player that is also the most needed in the first, doesn't mean we take take WRs later. They can use every pick on receivers from the 3rd on as far as I'm concerned, though I would like to see us get depth LBs, a QB prospect and more secondary help there. I'll take this kid all day over the 6th best WR. 39 minutes ago, Paul Costa said: Like Gabe Davis or Khalil Shakir on day 3 ? Got it bud ✅ Or Diggs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullBuchanan Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 2 hours ago, HappyDays said: Yeah we should have gone with your idea and drafted Trenton Simpson in the 1st last year. Nevermind that he almost made it to our 3rd round pick. His 1 sack and 2 TFL on the season surely would have been the difference. Why he even played 61% of special teams snaps. If the rest of us weren't so clueless maybe we would have foreseen this elite production. Oh, that's right, our deep linebacking pool definitely wasn't a key reason Josh was golfing again while other teams were playing for Super Bowls. Simpson was learning behind absolute studs last year. Now that they let Queen walk, he'll have his shot this year. Meanwhile, Allen will once again be golfing next January if you get your wish and we get a 6th passing option for the offense instead of addressing the primary reason our team is not a serious SB contender. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsbackto81 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 9 hours ago, GunnerBill said: DeJean? No chance. He may be there at 28. No chance he's on the board at 60. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 (edited) 1 hour ago, Paul Costa said: Like Gabe Davis or Khalil Shakir on day 3 ? Got it bud ✅ Well, that's two out of seven. How did the others turn out for them? Yes, they've had some success in the past. That doesn't change anything. I still have more confidence in their ability to find a competent safety or corner later on than a WR. Edited March 31 by Brandon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 Wouldn't hate it. For some reason I just love me a good RB or safety. When either of those positions is making great plays, it's just a brand of football I enjoy watching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 8 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: Wouldn't hate it. For some reason I just love me a good RB or safety. When either of those positions is making great plays, it's just a brand of football I enjoy watching. Fortunately, you can find very good players at those positions in the third round and on day 3. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 7 minutes ago, Dr. Who said: Fortunately, you can find very good players at those positions in the third round and on day 3. True Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerboski Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 God no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 49 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: Wouldn't hate it. For some reason I just love me a good RB or safety. When either of those positions is making great plays, it's just a brand of football I enjoy watching. nostalgia is real but if I’m an nba GM, a 10 ft fadeaway jumper isn’t getting a first round grade either 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meatloaf63 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said: Oh, that's right, our deep linebacking pool definitely wasn't a key reason Josh was golfing again while other teams were playing for Super Bowls. Simpson was learning behind absolute studs last year. Now that they let Queen walk, he'll have his shot this year. Meanwhile, Allen will once again be golfing next January if you get your wish and we get a 6th passing option for the offense instead of addressing the primary reason our team is not a serious SB contender. We didn’t move on because our offense struggled, stalled, at the 20 yard line, not because our defense failed. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floydboy12 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 I think if he’s there at 28 it’s pretty likely he’s the best player on the board. With the addition of Samuel, I don’t think the same urgency to absolutely take a wide out in round 1 is there. With the unimpressive combine showing of Franklin he could be there at 60. So could Legette, Corley and Roman Wilson. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 24 minutes ago, NoSaint said: nostalgia is real but if I’m an nba GM, a 10 ft fadeaway jumper isn’t getting a first round grade either Not really nostalgia, since we still have great RB and safety play around the league, but there is a reason they're two of the most undervalued positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo716 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 3 hours ago, Chicken Boo said: There will be a 1st round grade WR there at 28, unless a bunch of trade-ups happen. If the Bills pass on one of these guys for a player on defense heads need to roll. I'm sick of the bs. No excuses. No it isn't. The Bills need to come away with one of the top 5-6 WRs in the 1st round. I really don't care if a bunch of "let's draft defense again" fans agree with me or not. I was right about DK, I was right about Breece. I'm right now. Breece hall wasn't even a first round pick... And I certainly wouldn't draft him in the first And the rest of the league didn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaB Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 There is no defensive player in this draft in the 20s that can help this team get to the Super Bowl. There may be a few offensive players that can help #17 take us to the Super Bowl though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullBuchanan Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 1 hour ago, Chicken Boo said: There will be a 1st round grade WR there at 28, unless a bunch of trade-ups happen. If the Bills pass on one of these guys for a player on defense heads need to roll. I'm sick of the bs. No excuses. No it isn't. The Bills need to come away with one of the top 5-6 WRs in the 1st round. I really don't care if a bunch of "let's draft defense again" fans agree with me or not. I was right about DK, I was right about Breece. I'm right now. metcalf was a 64th pick. Hall was 36th. Neither one went in the first round. I don't think folks here adamant against taking a WR in the 2nd. Also, neither one has been a factor in making their team a contender, so despite being very good players, not sure it's a great argument for us to overinvest in one of them. 2 hours ago, Meatloaf63 said: We didn’t move on because our offense struggled, stalled, at the 20 yard line, not because our defense failed. Better draft a QB then, because there were multiple WRs open on that drive if that's your argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 15 hours ago, bills6969 said: we have huge holes to fill in secondary. Need to prioritize it in draft. Dejean reminds me of Hyde. Could come in and fill immediate need. I also like Cole Bishop in round 3 or 4 if he’s available. Need? Absolutely not. So, no. No to a first round DB when it's a deep draft for WR and we need one , badly. Did I say no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.