Richard Noggin Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 5 minutes ago, Bangarang said: Not a fan of the deal But we don't know the deal yet. We know the ceiling of the deal, which we all should know is not exactly "the deal." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrags Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 9 minutes ago, NewEra said: More than I wanted to pay him, but figured this would happen. Was hoping it would be for 3-4M a year tho Yeah not far off tho especially with the “up to” wording in that tweet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenorthremembers Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Dont hate it. 29th in terms of average salary. Get a guy back who has already been in the system and can help a rookie learn the scheme. Low risk high reward. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookie Man Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I felt like he was improving as the season went on. Needs to play more controlled. Had some friendly fire hits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Summary Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I miss Poyer already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 re-signing, not resigning 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 They will still sign another FA safety and draft at least one more … 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 He was starting to look for the ball instead of peoples heads towards the end of the season, could have something there. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Noggin Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, Bookie Man said: I felt like he was improving as the season went on. Needs to play more controlled. Had some friendly fire hits. He punishes teammates who've already made the tackle for getting there sooner. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Wow. With all the guys out there this stinks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Noggin Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, ngbills said: Wow. With all the guys out there this stinks. If there was EVER a position where McBeane deserves the benefit of the doubt, it MUST be safety don't ya think?? 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Richard Noggin said: If there was EVER a position where McBeane deserves the benefit of the doubt, it MUST be safety don't ya think?? We had Rapp last year. We know what we are getting with him. Don’t know why you give him that kind of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Noggin Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) 31 minutes ago, ngbills said: We had Rapp last year. We know what we are getting with him. Don’t know why you give him that kind of money. You don't really know WHAT kind of money they're actually giving him, though. We have the absolute CEILING of the deal. That can be quite misleading. Come on, man Edited March 7 by Richard Noggin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 21 minutes ago, MWK said: What a terrible deal. He was a liability last year. Personal fouls incoming. He got a lot better later in year when he was more accustomed to defense. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Fixit Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Hyphens matter. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, Richard Noggin said: You don't really WHAT kind of money they're actually giving him, though. We have the absolute CEILING of the deal. That can be quite misleading. Come on, man Hope so. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juice_32 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I love this guy, don’t get the hate. We need a little more nasty on the back end. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverOutNick Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 24 minutes ago, MWK said: What a terrible deal. He was a liability last year. Personal fouls incoming. 100% dude is awful in coverage. He’s a Heat Seeking missile and a good tackler. Not a fan and honestly surprised this is the direction we’re going at safety 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 He'll be a lot better in Poyer's role. Plus, he seemed to get better later in the year. I have no issue with this. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 How many times does it need to be said that you should never, EVER take the first reported signing of a contract at face value? The devil is always, ALWAYS in the details. The first report of a signing or re-signing is always by the player's agent, and always stated in a way that makes it sound as favorable as possible for the player. Invariably, followup reports often show greater detail that make the deal seem a lot more fair and palatable. And yet, every year, we continue to go through the "first announcement sticker shock". Every year. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.