Jump to content

Wildcard round - Steelers Bills post game thread


BuffaloBill

Recommended Posts

Just now, chongli said:

I see a fine coming:

 

 

 

This one didnt even have any really controversial calls imo.

 

Maybe the bad call on the fumble the Bills recovered inbounds. But Pickens needs to learn he isnt going to get a ton of DPI calls in the playoffs. And that last play was actually pretty clean by Jackson.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stevewin said:

This is great news - prob won't be avail next week, but maybe if they keep going he could be avail later.  When he first went down and was grabbing lower leg the first thing I thought was Achilles 


Have to say, an ounce of my heart muscle was at a loss for faith when Bernard went down, then, air cast and cart, and he’s reaction. Told wife, He’s the Allen of the defense. I probably just wanted to justify my heart hurting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, sven233 said:

Tim Graham

@ByTimGraham

Bills CB Rasul Douglas told me in the locker room he felt he was ready to play, but the team held him out. Douglas then said he'll play next week against the Chiefs.

 

Yeah!!!

2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

This one didnt even have any really controversial calls imo.

 

Maybe the bad call on the fumble the Bills recovered inbounds. But Pickens needs to learn he isnt going to get a ton of DPI calls in the playoffs. And that last play was actually pretty clean by Jackson.

 

Compared to what the Chiefs do to receivers in the playoffs that was touch football 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

To the thousands of “yinz” fans (whatever the blank that means) who acted like clowns for days calling us all soft…

 

ENJOY YOUR OFFSEASON!!!!!!! 


Sailing back down the crick as we speak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said:

If he went out of bounds, if any part of his body was out of bounds he can not be the first person to touch the ball before re-establishing himself in bounds...

 

hasn't that always been the rule.  You can not go out of bounds and then be the first to touch the ball.  Its the same as catching it after being oob the way the rule is written.  Hasn't this been called a bunch of times on guys trying to recover fumbles and being the first to touch the ball after stepping out of bounds?

This is false. The rule you are referring to is for receivers. Once the player has caught the ball he is no longer a receiver.

NFL Rule 8-1-8-b

Edited by vincec
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

The only reason the 2nd call was overturned is because they blew the 1st call.   They were saving face, and anyone watching the game knew that was a fumble.   Generally when someone has to explain something its because they are feeding you a load of crap. 


Remember on the first blown call.. we get back from commercial greedland and Romo is explaining why it’s a fumble. But that wasn’t the call! The call was an incomplete pass. So if you’re explaining that IT’S DEFINITELY A FUMBLE, then it’s definitely a completed pass. 
 

I won’t say the refs were awful. I’m glad they didn’t go crazy with the whistle. But those too reviewed calls were so terrible. Always side on keeping the play alive, then allow for reviews. The refs did the complete opposite in both instances. And that’s little league stuff. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

This one didnt even have any really controversial calls imo.

 

Maybe the bad call on the fumble the Bills recovered inbounds. But Pickens needs to learn he isnt going to get a ton of DPI calls in the playoffs. And that last play was actually pretty clean by Jackson.

I would say the calls went far more in Pitt's direction 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

I'm confused too. So you don't have to even recover a fumble if some part of your body is OOB and you touch it?! In this specific instance, if the Steeler wouldn't have touched the ball, could a Bill been OOB, just touched the ball and not secured it, and the Bills would have taken possession? Makes no sense.

There was a game recently...maybe in the college football playoffs where this happened.  A kickoff rolled to a complete stop about the five yard line and about 2 yards in bound.  The returner laid down on his stomach with his feet out of bounds and touched the ball.  It was therefore an illegal kick out of bounds and they got the ball out at the 40.  Found a link to this example by the Packers a few years back.  https://www.sbnation.com/2016/9/25/13049606/packers-kick-return-ty-montgomery-randall-cobb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...