Jump to content

Bills to work out TE Jace Sternberger (now signed to 1 year deal)


JohnNord

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Based on BB’s comments about Dalton playing the “Big Slot”, I expect 3 TEs on the roster. Possibly 4 if they decide FB isn’t in the plans. 🤷‍♂️ 

 

Yea I expect three tight ends IF they have a third guy worth keeping. They won't keep three tight ends to keep an inferior player and lose a guy they like at another spot, but we know they already like Morris some and as I said above they liked Sternberger enough to bring him in pre-draft back in 2019. I think that could develop into a nice little camp battle for TE3. 

 

They will keep Reggie Gilliam though, unless something really odd happens. He is a core special teamer, can play traditional full back, in line tight end and H-back in a pinch. There is value in that multi-functionality. 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Chandler#81 said:

riiiight.. 🤦‍♂️ Both were 3rd Round picks, 1 stuck with his team, became a starter in his 2nd season and is now recognized as a critical player on a perennial Playoff team. The other was cut, couldn’t catch on with another NFL club, couldn’t catch on with a CFL team and is now bouncing around on scrap heaps. But he’s a better receiver.

Please keep your insane humor coming. We all need numerous interludes.

 

Anyway, I like this signing. Even figuring McDermott to continue with his maddening penchant to sit rookies, Kincaid represents a significant departure from our Offense, especially with letting Beasley walk for a 2nd time. 2 TE sets are a growing trend but must be manned by players with excellent skill sets. The premise alone is an advantage to nickel coverage.

 

Take a breathe psycho.  I only said he has better hands as a matter of my opinion in response to a post about Jace being used specifically in the red zone. Knox is obviously the much better, accomplished and proven player.

 

 

 

Edited by White Linen
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't study the draft, so I had no idea who Sternberger was until I saw this thread.   Having read the thread and the comments about how he sort blew up his career coming out of college, I think the Bills are thinking there's something else going on here.   I think the Bills asked him, "Kid, have you rehabilitated yourself?"  (apologies to Arlo).  In fact, I think the Bills are already sure that he's a good bet. 

 

I say all the time that one thing you can tell about players in the draft is the quality of their physical skills.   Guys taken in the first have outstanding talent, in the second, high-quality starter talent, in the third, starter talent.  After that, guys are projects.  

 

Third round, Sternberger presumptively has starter talent.  (He played some quarterback in high school, he was a star tight-end on an undefeated state championship team, and he was a power forward on the basketball team.)  If the Bills were interested in him in the draft, then he passed the Bills' character screens - hard worker, team orientation, wants to learn, etc.   In his college career, he bounced around.  In his pro career, he got injured, had a substance abuse suspension (related to his recovery?), caught a playoff TD from Rodgers, got released by the Pack and bounced around, only to resurface as a standout in the USFL.  Sounds very much like a guy who needed a reset.  The Bills signing him suggests that they think he now is bringing to the game the kind of attitude that they value. 

 

Training camp and preseason will give him six weeks to demonstrate that he's now bringing the right focus to the game.   He's still a project, but an interesting gamble.   If he makes the roster, great.  If he goes to the practice squad, he probably won't stay there, because other teams will recognize that the only reason he isn't on the roster is the Bills' depth at the position.  If he gets cut, then we'll know he's just the latest in a long line of receivers who I, along with a lot of others, fell in love with who never went anywhere. 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

Sternberger went ahead of Knox in the draft, and Big Al's description actually sounds a lot like Knox.   OK speed, OK route runner, undersized for a blocker, but that's undersized for a traditional tight end.  

 

Take another Knox and put him on the field just as DC said, in the red zone, and you've got something.   Diggs is a guy who separates like Beasley, and he's valuable, but teams were taking him away in the red zone, the Bills didn't other have good options.  I like Davis, but he hasn't been effective in the red zone.  Knox has.  Kincaid should be.   If there's a Knox clone on the field, that's four legitimate short-route targets, and it should be a simple thing for Allen to find the mismatch and go there.   Knox. Sternberger, and Kincaid all running tight curls, some small back will be boxed out by a big body.  

My recollection is that Knox was very athletic coming out of college with high end speed.  The knock on him was lack of productivity and experience.  He had been a QB in high school and was very much underutilized at Ole Miss because the WRs at Ole Miss were DK Metcalf and AJ Brown.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Simon changed the title to Bills to work out TE Jace Sternberger (now signed to 1 year deal)
On 7/24/2023 at 6:09 PM, That's No Moon said:

Kincaid took his role.

 

I hope not.

 

The guy whose role I think we want Kincaid to fill is McKenzie/Crowder - on the field ~60% of the time, hauling them in over the middle.

 

Morris was a 25% of the snaps on offense guy, who played 2/3 of the ST snaps.  That's not what we want from our 1st round pick.  Now, there's some good stuff that Morris did, which we hope Kincaid can emulate - did a good job of getting on the same page and getting open for Josh on extended plays.  Ran good routes.  Showed signs of being able to release with some nifty moves like the arm-over he pulled off, think it was against Miami.

 

The Bills didn't keep 2 TE in 2021 and it was a bit unusual.  2019 saw them keeping 4, Knox Sweeney Kroft and Smith.  In 2020 they kept 3 (if we count Gilliam as a FB): Knox, Tyler Kroft, and Lee Smith.  2022 was Knox, Morris, and Sweeney.

 

I don't think it's a stretch at all to think they'll keep 3, but I wouldn't count out Morris in favor of Sternberger unless Sternberger shows some stuff on ST.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

I hope not.

 

The guy whose role I think we want Kincaid to fill is McKenzie/Crowder - on the field ~60% of the time, hauling them in over the middle.

 

Morris was a 25% of the snaps on offense guy, who played 2/3 of the ST snaps.  That's not what we want from our 1st round pick.  Now, there's some good stuff that Morris did, which we hope Kincaid can emulate - did a good job of getting on the same page and getting open for Josh on extended plays.  Ran good routes.  Showed signs of being able to release with some nifty moves like the arm-over he pulled off, think it was against Miami.

 

The Bills didn't keep 2 TE in 2021 and it was a bit unusual.  2019 saw them keeping 4, Knox Sweeney Kroft and Smith.  In 2020 they kept 3 (if we count Gilliam as a FB): Knox, Tyler Kroft, and Lee Smith.  2022 was Knox, Morris, and Sweeney.

 

I don't think it's a stretch at all to think they'll keep 3, but I wouldn't count out Morris in favor of Sternberger unless Sternberger shows some stuff on ST.

 

 

 

He will have his opportunities obviously, but not sure what percentage it may be. Might be a bit less than what some may think, at least starting off since I'd expect he will get worked in a little slowly. Also it's possible Shakir might make a run too and play a factor. So will be interesting seeing how many of these things play out leading up to the start of the season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea I expect three tight ends IF they have a third guy worth keeping. They won't keep three tight ends to keep an inferior player and lose a guy they like at another spot, but we know they already like Morris some and as I said above they liked Sternberger enough to bring him in pre-draft back in 2019. I think that could develop into a nice little camp battle for TE3. 

 

They will keep Reggie Gilliam though, unless something really odd happens. He is a core special teamer, can play traditional full back, in line tight end and H-back in a pinch. There is value in that multi-functionality. 

Reggie is one of the better full backs in the league too. He’s not going anywhere.

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Beck Water said:

I don't think it's a stretch at all to think they'll keep 3, but I wouldn't count out Morris in favor of Sternberger unless Sternberger shows some stuff on ST.

 

Yea I think they will keep 3. It isn't impossible they keep 4 but that would require going light somewhere and Sternberger and Morris would have to excel to make that a sensible decision I think. It's a good point you make about Morris's tight end usage though. Your backup tight ends have to play teams. They went with two active tight ends on game day for most of last season. Morris as the backup played 67% of all ST snaps. Knox isn't being put out there on teams. Kincaid isn't. So they might need a 3rd active TE on game day and that person better be a special teams player. Sternberger did a little of it when he was in Green Bay (around 30% of the ST snaps in games where he was active) but he has a gap to close there if he is going to oust Morris. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2023 at 8:10 AM, John from Riverside said:

I wonder if they might consider him as a practice squad stash especially if we plan on running more 12 personnel this year

I think the 12 personnel thing is getting blown out of proportion.   If Kincaid plays a lot and is split out wide, how is that really different than 11 personnel?  He is a bigger body, that will mean something but if he was to be unavialable, it would seem plausible to me to replace him with a WR vs "has to be another TE".  Now if they are going to line the TE's on the LOS then I agree they need more, I am not sure that is the plan.

 

I often think about personnel groupings and stats of them are misleading.    You could have a RB that lines up in the slot, you can have TE's that was spread.....I have always thought it would be good to track both personnel groupings and formations.  Because for instance, there may not be any real difference between one teams 12 and anothers 11 other than one guy has "TE" instead of "WR" next to his title but they do the same exact thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...