Jump to content

Bills plan to tender Dane Jackson


Reed83HOF

Recommended Posts

  • Reed83HOF changed the title to Bills plan to tender Dane Jackson
13 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

Good move. Still relatively cheap for a guy that can be a low end starter. 

I wonder if in camp they give him and Elam some reps at nickel. I dont think Johnson is going anywhere but if he went down for an extended length of time I would want to know if either of those guys can play inside.  

Completely agree.

 

At Pitt, Dane never played nickel but has quickness/aggression to play there. Originally thought that's where he'd focus in the NFL, given he lacks ideal speed for outside.  But he's very good depth/low-end starter material.

 

Solid re-signing at $2.7m.  I still think we should draft a pure nickle corner in the late rounds, as you said, we need depth at inside corner and could look to deploy more dime looks...depending how MLB is addressed and/or plans to use Benford as a 3rd safety/dime

Edited by MasterStrategist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:

I like bringing Dane back but at 2.7 Mil? That seems a bit high?

 

For some reason I thought it would be under 2

 

Dane Jackson is a RFA.  If the Bills do not "tender" him a contract, he becomes an UFA.

Original round tender is $2.7M.  The price cannot be lower.

If a team offers him more, the Bills can match OR let him go and get a 7th round pick (his original draft round).

 

Now, Dane could sign for lower with the Bills and give up his tender option (like Cam Lewis did) but Jackson thinks he is worth more.

It's his right to do this.  Personally, I think a team will offer a contract higher and he signs it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:

I like bringing Dane back but at 2.7 Mil? That seems a bit high?

 

For some reason I thought it would be under 2

 

Tender is only for year, can they turn around and now offer him a 2 or 3 year deal at lower number for 2023?  Or are you not allowed to do that with tendered players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

Tender is only for year, can they turn around and now offer him a 2 or 3 year deal at lower number for 2023?  Or are you not allowed to do that with tendered players?


Jackson would never sign multi-years at that low of a salary. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ColoradoBills said:

 

Dane Jackson is a RFA.  If the Bills do not "tender" him a contract, he becomes an UFA.

Original round tender is $2.7M.  The price cannot be lower.

If a team offers him more, the Bills can match OR let him go and get a 7th round pick (his original draft round).

 

Now, Dane could sign for lower with the Bills and give up his tender option (like Cam Lewis did) but Jackson thinks he is worth more.

It's his right to do this.  Personally, I think a team will offer a contract higher and he signs it.

Ahh interesting I didn’t know all of that. 

 

Thanks for the explanation buddy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I’m a bit surprised, but he is functional depth. Good for him. 

 

I’m just glad the guy can walk after playing Gumby neck. That’s a miracle to me! Good for him. The rest is gravy. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

Tender is only for year, can they turn around and now offer him a 2 or 3 year deal at lower number for 2023?  Or are you not allowed to do that with tendered players?

I think you can do that.


Colorado^ had a good explanation above, but I do believe the bills can sign him to a 2-3 year deal to lower the cap hit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beast said:


Jackson would never sign multi-years at that low of a salary. 

You don't think he would sign say a 3 year year maybe around a $10 mil contract, this year $1 mil salary and $3 mil bonus, 2024 $2.5 mil, 2025 $3.5 mil, $5 mil total guaranteed?  Bills would still have easy out in 2025 for $1mil

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...