Jump to content

Leslie Frazier "taking a year off from coaching" per Bills PR


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

 

Thinking back, Dorsey was dealt a pretty bad hand.  I'm optimistic he has a good Year 2.  

 

-He has a brand new OL coach trying to implement a new scheme with middle of the road talent, which led to a bottom third OL ranking.  

 

-He had no real slot WR after Crowder went down early in the season.

 

-His WR2 turned out to be a high end WR3/big play threat.

 

-Josh Allen busted up his elbow halfway through the season and clearly wasn't right, albeit improving, throughout the rest of the season.  

Oh man. If only Leslie Frazier had to deal with injuries and poor performers on the defensive side. Lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billl said:

The Bills lose to the Bengals 27-10 and everyone walks away talking about the defensive failings. Football fans are funny.

Did you watch the game?  You need to check out the stats.  Let's start with the Bengals getting 30 first downs. 

 

Sure the offense wasn't dominate but at every key point in the game the D failed:

 

* The Bengal's scored TD's on their first two drives of the game.  They were up 14 - 0 before the Bill's had touched the ball for their 2nd possession.

 

*  After the Bills had cut the lead to 14 - 7 the D allowed the Bengals to go on a long time consuming drive that ended in a FG and a 17 - 7 lead.  And the only reason Cincy didn't score a TD on that drive was a great play by Millano and a dropped pass by Chase.

 

*  At the start of the 3rd quarter the Bills went on a long drive that ended in a FG cutting the Bengal's lead to 17 - 10.  Sure a TD would have been better but at home it was now a one score game and the D needed to step up and grab the momentum.

 

*  Instead Cincy goes on a long TD drive to go up 24- 10 and use up most of the rest of the 3rd quarter in the process.

 

And when fans criticize the D it comes from a knowledge that Buffalo has favored the D in draft picks and FA signings over the last 3 years.  The Bills chose to prioritize the D over the O so more is expected of the defense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FireChans said:

10 points.

 

dorsey should also take some time 

I'm not happy with Dorsey either but there's a pretty big difference in an OC that's going into year 2 of his career as a coordinator vs Frazier who has been a DC/HC for over 15 years.  

 

What you see with Frazier is what you're going to get.  He's not going to start shaking it all up in his 60s.  Dorsey can still pivot and improve this early into his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

Did you watch the game?  You need to check out the stats.  Let's start with the Bengals getting 30 first downs. 

 

Sure the offense wasn't dominate but at every key point in the game the D failed:

 

* The Bengal's scored TD's on their first two drives of the game.  They were up 14 - 0 before the Bill's had touched the ball for their 2nd possession.

 

*  After the Bills had cut the lead to 14 - 7 the D allowed the Bengals to go on a long time consuming drive that ended in a FG and a 17 - 7 lead.  And the only reason Cincy didn't score a TD on that drive was a great play by Millano and a dropped pass by Chase.

 

*  At the start of the 3rd quarter the Bills went on a long drive that ended in a FG cutting the Bengal's lead to 17 - 10.  Sure a TD would have been better but at home it was now a one score game and the D needed to step up and grab the momentum.

 

*  Instead Cincy goes on a long TD drive to go up 24- 10 and use up most of the rest of the 3rd quarter in the process.

 

And when fans criticize the D it comes from a knowledge that Buffalo has favored the D in draft picks and FA signings over the last 3 years.  The Bills chose to prioritize the D over the O so more is expected of the defense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before the game if I told you the Bengals only scored 27 you would’ve taken it. If I told you the Bills only scored 10 you would have guaranteed a loss 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Both sides of the ball failed hard that game. I'd say the Offense failed harder. That's all.

I think that is fair. Also, hard to take away very much from that game at all as the entire team was "off".

 

Still, third season in a row -- 4th if you count the 2nd-half meltdown against the Texans in 2019 -- where the team was eliminated from the playoffs with a poor showing by the defense.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

For those who want a bit of a thoughtful analysis of the Bills statistically excellent D rather than a knee jerk hot take, this is pretty good:

https://buffalonews.com/sports/bills/bills-offseason-questions-how-can-the-defense-be-tweaked-to-get-over-playoff-hump/article_aaaa7c84-b398-11ed-b263-2742817ebae6.html

Thanks for posting this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Personnel and resource allocation wise I agree. That has to be more of the model. They shouldn't change a lot schematically though. They need to hope Tre comes back to full form. They need to develop Elam and they need to be better up front.

In addition to allocating the lions share of the resources to the Offense the D needs to:

 

*  Take more chances and become a pressure defense.

 

*  Play their rookies early and often.  If a draft pick shows signs of being good put him on the field knowing there will be mistakes. KC had what, 3 rookies staring on D in the SB?

 

*  Change the philosophy to one that recognizes that when a team moves the ball and keeps your O off the field you are failing even if they don't score or only get a FG instead of a TD.  The Offense should be the strength of the Bills.  An opponents 3 and out should be treated like a TO.  And if you give up a quick TD know that your high powered O will be right back on the field. 

 

This is how KC does it. 

 

As an aside, offenses need to establish a rhythm.  When they're sitting on a bench they are getting themselves out of sync whch leads to 3 and outs when they do finally get the ball.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Before the game if I told you the Bengals only scored 27 you would’ve taken it. If I told you the Bills only scored 10 you would have guaranteed a loss 

Apples and oranges. If I told you that the Bengals gained 30 first downs, had 412 yards in total Offense, rushed the ball for 172 yards, had 34 minutes TOP, had no turnovers and gave up only 1 sack what would you have thought?

 

If the Bengals had needed to score 40 points they could have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

Three games if we're being honest here:  Twice against KC and against the Bengals.  And the D wasn't exactly stellar against Indy in that playoff game either.  Came close to blowing a 24 - 10 4th quarter lead.

 

 

They were absolutely shredded by Indy. First time a team has lost in the postseason with over 450 yards and 0 turnovers.

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite a couple big flops, he has done an outstanding job in Buffalo and Minnesota. I seriously doubt he'll be back, but some other team will be lucky to have him in 2024. Isn't it just like a few small minded fans to overlook the devastating impact of all the injuries he had to deal with this past season. I don't know that anyone else could have done it any better. That said, I'm hopeful for the future. If our defense can stay where it's at with a healthy DL and the OL gets a huge upgrade, 2024 will be our best year ever.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nosejob said:

They've been needing this for 2 years.

The key point in recent Bills history was at the end of the 2020 season when Buffalo opted to make do with less on the offense and maximize the firepower on defense.  An offensively minded coaching/management group would have recognized the unique talent the Bills had at QB and surrounded Allen was as much talent as the CAP would allow.  Under no circumstances would they let the O line atrophy in the way it has. 

 

 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...