Dolphins @ Bengals - TNF Game Thread

[GunnerBill]

1 hour ago, Scott7975 said:

 

You realize that the independent neurologist doesnt make the final call right?  The team doctor makes the final call.  The independent neurologist is just there to consult.

 

 

Yes I am saying they didnt do their job.  Many players, analysts, and other Neurologists share that opinion too so its not just me.

 

Any of this sound familiar?

 

 

 

The team physician makes the call not the independant.  Independant is just there to consult.  People are confused by this because its the independent that makes the call to return if the player was actually put in concussion protocol but not on gameday

 

 

 

They did not do their job period.  Anybody that watched that display of Tua grabbing his helmet, slow to get up, shaking his head, and GMI causing collapse to the ground knows this was not back muscles or legs which would be orthopedic where the head and spine is neurological.

 

 

 

All of this was taken from the NFL's own website.

 

I have said, repeatedly, that it is plausible that the process could have failed - that includes the Dolphins ignoring the neurologist. But as of this point nobody has brought forward any evidence to suggest that is what happened. 

 

If it is, then the NFL should throw the book at the Dolphins.

42 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

GunnerBill, it doesn't take a doctor to know Tua suffered a concussion in the Bills game. Scott is 100% correct! The doctors errored in their judgements and who knows why? That's the bottom line. I can definelty go there because the evidence is overwhelming and indisputable. Now let the cover up begin...

 

It isn't. He may well have suffered a concussion and there may well be a cover up because the Dolphins did something very silly. But if that is the case we need to see actual evidence. 

 

You can't definitely go there. You can have your opinion. We all can. He looked like he had suffered a concussion. But we need more than just the video of the collision with the ground to say it is indisputable.

Edited September 30, 2022 by GunnerBill

[Big Blitz]

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Would everyone support a mandatory 1 week rest period after a concussion? 
 

 

 

No.  The system is clearly working.  

 

The Dolphins just gave it the finger last Sunday.

 

He was never put in the protocol because they knew that meant he would not have played last night being a short week.

 

 

Everyone there should be investigated.  All of them.  And Tyreek Hill should then be suspended for the year as punishment.  Since they lost all the draft picks they'd be stripped of to get him anyway.  I may or may not be serious here on that last part.  

Edited September 30, 2022 by Big Blitz

[newcam2012]

19 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

Burrow had a terrible deep ball his rookie year than got chase 

Joe Burrow literally couldn’t  start at Ohio State and I quote urban meyer… “ He throws like a girl”

 

Now players improve… But nobody ever said tua threw like a girl… He replaced Jalen hurts as a true freshman in the national championship game and won it with a 50 yard deep ball… A ball hurts wasn’t making at the time

 

You keep going back to Tua when he played un high school and college. That's really not relevant now. It's looking like maybe he was a very good or great college QB. I mean his supporting cast was second to none. Fast forward to the NFL and its pretty clear by most Tua isn't very good. Brian Flores refused to play him. A well respected coach even amount the players. That should speak volumes. The Dolphins were actively seeking Watson and Brady. That should speak volumes. The guy has woefully fallen short this far. He has literally the best 1-2 Wr combo in the league and still looks average at best. I suggest you get dismiss the HS and college Tua and focus on the NFL Tua. The NFL Tua is not what the Dolphins were looking for. The Tua pick is in line with the Josh Rosen pick. 

[Patrick Duffy]

2 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

The Tua pick is in line with the Josh Rosen pick.

 

Nah I wouldn't go that far. Tua has had his struggles but not even close to anything near being in line with the Rosen pick

[Buffalo716]

Just now, newcam2012 said:

You keep going back to Tua when he played un high school and college. That's really not relevant now. It's looking like maybe he was a very good or great college QB. I mean his supporting cast was second to none. Fast forward to the NFL and its pretty clear by most Tua isn't very good. Brian Flores refused to play him. A well respected coach even amount the players. That should speak volumes. The Dolphins were actively seeking Watson and Brady. That should speak volumes. The guy has woefully fallen short this far. He has literally the best 1-2 Wr combo in the league and still looks average at best. I suggest you get dismiss the HS and college Tua and focus on the NFL Tua. The NFL Tua is not what the Dolphins were looking for. The Tua pick is in line with the Josh Rosen pick. 

Comparing tua to Rosen is hyperbole

 

One hasn’t even been able to play at a back up level… The other has 35 touchdowns to 18 interceptions in his career… 
 

And again I’m not saying tua is a great quarterback for the NFL

 

I’m talking pure arm strength which people said he has a noodle arm

 

Just because he doesn’t have a howitzer doesn’t mean it’s a noodle

 

And you can go back to his true freshman year of college to see he doesn’t have a noodle arm with the game-winning pass in the national championship game

[newcam2012]

5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I have said, repeatedly, that it is plausible that the process could have failed - that includes the Dolphins ignoring the neurologist. But as of this point nobody has brought forward any evidence to suggest that is what happened. 

 

If it is, then the NFL should throw the book at the Dolphins.

 

It isn't. He may well have suffered a concussion and there may well be a cover up because the Dolphins did something very silly. But if that is the case we need to see actual evidence. 

 

You can't definitely go there. You can have your opinion. We all can. He looked like he had suffered a concussion. But we need more than just the video of the collision with the ground to say it is indisputable.

We need more evidence on whether there was a cover up and why he was allowed to play. Where we disagree is whether Tua suffered a concussion and why he was allowed to play. No one can convince me he wasn't concussed and he passed protocols. That's an assumption I'm willing to make based on the evidence I saw. Maybe this will help. You look outside before you go to sleep and the ground is clear and you can see the concrete. In the morning you wake up and the ground is covered with snow. It's pretty safe to say it snowed last night. What you are saying is wait maybe someone bought a snow machine and it really didn't snow. We need to investigate it. 

5 minutes ago, Sheneneh Jenkins said:

 

Nah I wouldn't go that far. Tua has had his struggles but not even close to anything near being in line with the Rosen pick

You are probably right here. 

5 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

Comparing tua to Rosen is hyperbole

 

One hasn’t even been able to play at a back up level… The other has 35 touchdowns to 18 interceptions in his career… 
 

And again I’m not saying tua is a great quarterback for the NFL

 

I’m talking pure arm strength which people said he has a noodle arm

 

Just because he doesn’t have a howitzer doesn’t mean it’s a noodle

 

And you can go back to his true freshman year of college to see he doesn’t have a noodle arm with the game-winning pass in the national championship game

I can say with reasonable validity that his arm isn't anything special in the NFL. In fact, it appears to be more inadequate strength wise than an asset. For whatever that's worth. 

[HappyDays]

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

So you are saying you knew better from watching than the independent neurologist knew from an examination. 

 

Myself, no, but several neurological experts have chimed in on Twitter and said that he should not have played on Thursday after the injury he suffered against us. There is supposed to be certain "no-go" symptoms that keep a player out regardless of the independent consultant's opinion. Staggering and looking woozy after hitting his head by all accounts should be considered a no-go symptom. My understanding is that there is no objective way for the independent consultant to verify for sure if the player in question has a concussion. The symptoms are subjective and the protocol is easy to fake. That's why objective symptoms such as what Tua showed are supposed to keep a player out. Again this isn't my opinion, this is what I've read from actual experts on Twitter.

 

That being said I would not be surprised at all if the Dolphins did in fact technically follow the protocol to the letter and therefore protected themselves from repercussions. Ethically I don't agree with them sending Tua back in - frankly I think it is disgusting - but the NFL can't ascribe punishments subjectively like that. The protocol needs to be clearer. Players are always going to want to get back on the field. They have to protect the players from themselves.

 

If Tua did in fact have a concussion against us and another one yesterday, it is the closest the NFL has come in a long time to a really serious issue of public confidence in the league. He could have suffered a TBI or worse. It didn't happen this time but the NFL has to do everything in their power to make sure that risk never comes up again.

 

Also **** the Dolphins.

 

Edited September 30, 2022 by HappyDays

[GunnerBill]

3 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

We need more evidence on whether there was a cover up and why he was allowed to play. Where we disagree is whether Tua suffered a concussion and why he was allowed to play. No one can convince me he wasn't concussed and he passed protocols. That's an assumption I'm willing to make based on the evidence I saw. Maybe this will help. You look outside before you go to sleep and the ground is clear and you can see the concrete. In the morning you wake up and the ground is covered with snow. It's pretty safe to say it snowed last night. What you are saying is wait maybe someone bought a snow machine and it really didn't snow. We need to investigate it. 

 

 

That is not a relevant metaphor because I am saying if we are being told a neurologist cleared him - and to be clear, we are - then I believe that neurologist because to screw this up would have major consequences for him. They make those sorts of mistakes incredibly rarely.

 

If it later turns out that in fact the neurologist did not clear him and the Dolphins put him out there then that is a different story. 

 

[Low Positive]

6 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

Comparing tua to Rosen is hyperbole

 

One hasn’t even been able to play at a back up level… The other has 35 touchdowns to 18 interceptions in his career… 
 

And again I’m not saying tua is a great quarterback for the NFL

 

I’m talking pure arm strength which people said he has a noodle arm

 

Just because he doesn’t have a howitzer doesn’t mean it’s a noodle

 

And you can go back to his true freshman year of college to see he doesn’t have a noodle arm with the game-winning pass in the national championship game

You are probably right, but I base that upon the accuracy and touch he demonstrates in short to medium passes in the NFL. If you do that well, you can soften up a defense for deep shots. It's what Brady has done for decades.

 

That said, I don't care what he did in college. Devonta Smith made Mac Jones look like he has elite arm talent. Alabama's receivers are so much faster than college DBs that all the QBs have to do is get it there.

 

 

[Buffalo716]

5 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

We need more evidence on whether there was a cover up and why he was allowed to play. Where we disagree is whether Tua suffered a concussion and why he was allowed to play. No one can convince me he wasn't concussed and he passed protocols. That's an assumption I'm willing to make based on the evidence I saw. Maybe this will help. You look outside before you go to sleep and the ground is clear and you can see the concrete. In the morning you wake up and the ground is covered with snow. It's pretty safe to say it snowed last night. What you are saying is wait maybe someone bought a snow machine and it really didn't snow. We need to investigate it. 

You are probably right here. 

I can say with reasonable validity that his arm isn't anything special in the NFL. In fact, it appears to be more inadequate strength wise than an asset. For whatever that's worth. 

I never said it was special

 

I have continuously said it’s not as weak as what some people think… It’s just a simple as that

 

People would make you think it’s a chase Daniel arm… or kellen Moore … it’s not that weak 

 

It’s A step above fitz… and fitz is a step above Barkley 

 

I would say Barkley has a noodle arm

[GunnerBill]

Just now, HappyDays said:

 

Myself, no, but several neurological experts have chimed in on Twitter and said that he should not have played on Thursday after the injury he suffered against us. There is supposed to be certain "no-go" symptoms that keep a player out regardless of the independent consultant's opinion. Staggering and looking woozy after hitting his head by all accounts should be considered a no-go symptom. My understanding is that there is no objective way for the independent consultant to verify for sure if the player in question has a concussion. The symptoms are subjective and the protocol is easy to fake. That's why objective symptoms such as what Tua showed are supposed to keep a player out. Again this isn't my opinion, this is what I've read from actual experts on Twitter.

 

That being said I would not be surprised at all if the Dolphins did in fact technically follow the protocol to the letter and therefore protected themselves from repercussions. Ethically I don't agree with them sending Tua back in - frankly I think it is disgusting - but the NFL can't ascribe punishments subjectively like that. The protocol needs to be clearer. Players are always going to want to get back on the field. They have to protect the players from themselves.

 

If Tua did in fact have a concussion against us and another one yesterday, it is the closest the NFL has come in a long time to a really serious issue of public confidence in the league. He could have suffered a TBI or worse. It didn't happen this time but the NFL has to do everything in their power to make sure that risk never comes up again.

 

Also **** the Dolphins.

 

Myself, no, but several neurological experts have chimed in on Twitter and said that he should not have played on Thursday after the injury he suffered against us. There is supposed to be certain "no-go" symptoms that keep a player out regardless of the independent consultant's opinion. Staggering and looking woozy after hitting his head by all accounts should be considered a no-go symptom. My understanding is that there is no objective way for the independent consultant to verify for sure if the player in question has a concussion. The symptoms are subjective and the protocol is easy to fake. That's why objective symptoms such as what Tua showed are supposed to keep a player out. Again this isn't my opinion, this is what I've read from actual experts on Twitter.

 

That being said I would not be surprised at all if the Dolphins did in fact technically follow the protocol to the letter and therefore protected themselves from repercussions. Ethically I don't agree with them sending Tua back in - frankly I think it is disgusting - but the NFL can't ascribe punishments subjectively like that. The protocol needs to be clearer. Players are always going to want to get back on the field. They have to protect the players from themselves.

 

If Tua did in fact have a concussion against us and another one yesterday, it is the closest the NFL has come in a long time to a really serious issue of public confidence in the league. He could have suffered a TBI or worse. It didn't happen this time but the NFL has to do everything in their power to make sure that risk never comes up again.

 

Also **** the Dolphins.

 

I agree with a lot of this. I don't agree it as easy to fool a neurologist as you claim though. @machine gun kelly explained that better than I could. Nobody is denying that the prima facie evidence we saw on TV looks like a concussion. 

 

The protocol needs strengthening though so that even if a player is NOT concussed, the symptoms that Tua displayed on the field on Sunday immediately trigger him being heldout. There is no doubt about that. 

[Patrick Duffy]

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

That is not a relevant metaphor because I am saying if we are being told a neurologist cleared him - and to be clear, we are - then I believe that neurologist because to screw this up would have major consequences for him. They make those sorts of mistakes incredibly rarely.

 

If it later turns out that in fact the neurologist did not clear him and the Dolphins put him out there then that is a different story. 

 

 

You're statement here is completely understandable and I agree that's normally the case in these situations. I will also say that something just seems a bit off in this particular situation which is reason for the investigation. I'm not sure what will come out about this but it certainly seems like more explaining is needed.

[frostbitmic]

Would the Neurologist be brought in for an examination of the player if the team doctor said it was a spine/back injury ?

[newcam2012]

9 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

You are probably right, but I base that upon the accuracy and touch he demonstrates in short to medium passes in the NFL. If you do that well, you can soften up a defense for deep shots. It's what Brady has done for decades.

 

That said, I don't care what he did in college. Devonta Smith made Mac Jones look like he has elite arm talent. Alabama's receivers are so much faster than college DBs that all the QBs have to do is get it there.

 

 

He was throwing to Ruggs, Waddle,  and Juedy. Now it's Hill and Waddle. Need I say more. 

[Scott7975]

18 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

That is not a relevant metaphor because I am saying if we are being told a neurologist cleared him - and to be clear, we are - then I believe that neurologist because to screw this up would have major consequences for him. They make those sorts of mistakes incredibly rarely.

 

If it later turns out that in fact the neurologist did not clear him and the Dolphins put him out there then that is a different story. 

 

 

A neurologist doesnt have to clear him though.  He only has to be cleared by the teams head physician who isnt necessarily a neurologist.  The teams head physician is who decides whether he can play or not.

Edited September 30, 2022 by Scott7975

[newcam2012]

If I were Tua, I'd be looking for several neurologists opinions and evaluations. 2nd, 3rd, and 4th independent evaluations. Decide if he should continue to play football. His health should come first. His family and friends have to encourage him to reevaluate his football career. 

 

Secondly, I would be consulting a lawyer to see if I have a legitimate law suit against the league, the Dolphins, and various doctors. 

[Scott7975]

22 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I agree with a lot of this. I don't agree it as easy to fool a neurologist as you claim though. @machine gun kelly explained that better than I could. Nobody is denying that the prima facie evidence we saw on TV looks like a concussion. 

 

The protocol needs strengthening though so that even if a player is NOT concussed, the symptoms that Tua displayed on the field on Sunday immediately trigger him being heldout. There is no doubt about that. 

 

Agree with this.  Although concussion symptoms can take hours to days to show any symptoms so I dont think its all that hard to fool a neurologist in that case.  This is why the protocol does need to change.

 

As an example I got a concussion at work.  After about a minute of dizziness I was fine and worked the rest of the day.  It wasnt until later that night I started getting bad headaches among other things.

Edited September 30, 2022 by Scott7975

[machine gun kelly]

12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I agree with a lot of this. I don't agree it as easy to fool a neurologist as you claim though. @machine gun kelly explained that better than I could. Nobody is denying that the prima facie evidence we saw on TV looks like a concussion. 

 

The protocol needs strengthening though so that even if a player is NOT concussed, the symptoms that Tua displayed on the field on Sunday immediately trigger him being heldout. There is no doubt about that. 

Happy, I don’t want to play doctor on the board so PM me and happy to chat with you tomorrow about a neuro exam.  The bottom line is there is a baseline assessment when not in season.  That is then evaluated compared to the objective neuro exam post possible concussion.  Until they meet the threshold, they are out.  The athlete doesn’t know what to do or say even with coaching to get around it.

 

The neuros willing to take on the huge malpractice risk e v a l nfl players are not screwing with the enormous fees they pay to cover those bills for their malpractice.  Most neuros I know and neurosurgeons do t want the headache (no pun) because if they get it wrong they are sued for potentially $100 mil.  Most of the best steer clear.

 

My point is a player or a team can’t do the wink wink, nor nod they did 30 years ago when we watched Amy Given Sunday and those docs.  That crap doesn’t fly now.

 

you don’t have to believe or agree with me, but I’ve been in this space among others for a long long time.

[White Linen]

2 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

Not according to this board

 

Zack Moss isn’t even an NFL caliber running back to some here lol

 

And then I started arguing his arm strength because some people would make you believe He throws a football like Chase Daniel or kellen Moore… He doesn’t have a howitzer but his arm isn’t that weak

 

It's extremely weak.

[Scott7975]

4 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

If I were Tua, I'd be looking for several neurologists opinions and evaluations. 2nd, 3rd, and 4th independent evaluations. Decide if he should continue to play football. His health should come first. His family and friends have to encourage him to reevaluate his football career. 

 

Secondly, I would be consulting a lawyer to see if I have a legitimate law suit against the league, the Dolphins, and various doctors. 

 

The problem is Tua is a competitor and likely will do anything he can to stay on the field.  This is why players need protections from themselves.  Also why he likely would look for second opinions that would let him play instead of second opinions that say he cant

[GunnerBill]

45 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

A neurologist doesnt have to clear him though.  He only has to be cleared by the teams head physician who isnt necessarily a neurologist.  The teams head physician is who decides whether he can play or not.

 

Yes but if the the neurologist says he can't play teams do not put players out there. If that is what the Dolphins did and it is proveable they are in a world of trouble.

[newcam2012]

38 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

The problem is Tua is a competitor and likely will do anything he can to stay on the field.  This is why players need protections from themselves.  Also why he likely would look for second opinions that would let him play instead of second opinions that say he cant

I get what you are saying. It does appear that Tua is part of the problem here. He is a danger to himself and he clearly wants to play. However, it may not be in his best interest. That's where family and close friends have to intervene. Convince him that his health is the number one priority. To seek medical advice. It's not a sign of weakness. Further neurologist's evaluations would be very wise. 

5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yes but if the the neurologist says he can't play teams do not put players out there. If that is what the Dolphins did and it is proveable they are in a world of trouble.

It is quite possible. 

[Scott7975]

2 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

I get what you are saying. It does appear that Tua is part of the problem here. He is a danger to himself and he clearly wants to play. However, it may not be in his best interest. That's where family and close friends have to intervene. Convince him that his health is the number one priority. To seek medical advice. It's not a sign of weakness. Further neurologist's evaluations would be very wise. 

 

Im sure he is getting medical treatment at this point.  Yes, players need protections from themselves because they want to compete and be on the field.  These guys are use to getting battered in a game and are use to brushing it off as nothing.  They dont worry about the consequences until they actually happen.  Unless they are Mac Jones who gets an ankle sprain and acts like a shark just bit his leg off.

Edited September 30, 2022 by Scott7975

[machine gun kelly]

Guys, it’s not the team physician.  Within whatever time is designated by the league, in a suspected concussion with any of the four gated issues, an independent neurologist is required to assess and clear or place I whatever stage they deem from their neuro e v a l, which again is not an interview.

 

this is not any given Sunday anymore.  Debate as much as you want, but I’m friends with the Bucs Independent Neuro.  He’s been a customer for me for years.

[Scott7975]

13 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:

Guys, it’s not the team physician.  Within whatever time is designated by the league, in a suspected concussion with any of the four gated issues, an independent neurologist is required to assess and clear or place I whatever stage they deem from their neuro e v a l, which again is not an interview.

 

this is not any given Sunday anymore.  Debate as much as you want, but I’m friends with the Bucs Independent Neuro.  He’s been a customer for me for years.

 

Yes during the week when they are in concussion protocol they have to be cleared by an independent to go back.  During a game the NFL website with the rules says this:

 

Quote

For the avoidance of doubt, the responsibility for the diagnosis of concussion and the decision to return a player to a game remain exclusively within the professional judgment of the Head Team Physician or the Club physician designated as responsible for the diagnosis and management of concussion.

 

32 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yes but if the the neurologist says he can't play teams do not put players out there. If that is what the Dolphins did and it is proveable they are in a world of trouble.

 

You can say they do not put players out there but you dont know that for a fact.  The decision is entirely up to the head team physician.  Yes, I think they would be in a world of trouble but that doesnt mean it never happens.  People do stupid ***** all the time whether they are professionals or not.  We dont even know for a fact he was actually physically examined by the independent.  Was that stated anywhere?

 

Lawyers break the law and do shady *****

Doctors break the law and do shady *****

Politicians break the law and do shady *****

CEOs of big corporatiosn beak the law and do shady *****

Feds break the law and do shady *****

etc etc etc

Everybody does shady *****.

The NFL most certainly does shady *****

Edited September 30, 2022 by Scott7975

[Patrick Duffy]

10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yes but if the the neurologist says he can't play teams do not put players out there. If that is what the Dolphins did and it is proveable they are in a world of trouble.

 

Yup, also there may be times different teams neurologist could possibly recommend a player not return and not necessarily a no he can't return. In instances similar to that being could be risky if player returned but not enough to say "no, he can't return this game", So in that "grey" area, it would leave the decision to someone else to go against that recommendation if deciding to risk it.

 

I don't know, but I would be interested to hear the discussion when this went down

 

 

[syhuang]

😄

 

 

[newcam2012]

5 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

Happy, I don’t want to play doctor on the board so PM me and happy to chat with you tomorrow about a neuro exam.  The bottom line is there is a baseline assessment when not in season.  That is then evaluated compared to the objective neuro exam post possible concussion.  Until they meet the threshold, they are out.  The athlete doesn’t know what to do or say even with coaching to get around it.

 

The neuros willing to take on the huge malpractice risk e v a l nfl players are not screwing with the enormous fees they pay to cover those bills for their malpractice.  Most neuros I know and neurosurgeons do t want the headache (no pun) because if they get it wrong they are sued for potentially $100 mil.  Most of the best steer clear.

 

My point is a player or a team can’t do the wink wink, nor nod they did 30 years ago when we watched Amy Given Sunday and those docs.  That crap doesn’t fly now.

 

you don’t have to believe or agree with me, but I’ve been in this space among others for a long long time.

I appreciate your knowledge and info. According to what you are saying it seems reasonable to conclude the neurologist errored in judgement. Tua should have never been allowed to play. Or am I assuming things incorrectly? 

[Warcodered]

2 hours ago, syhuang said:

😄

 

 

He's felt like the odd man out on that crew a lot.

[newcam2012]

4 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

Guys, it’s not the team physician.  Within whatever time is designated by the league, in a suspected concussion with any of the four gated issues, an independent neurologist is required to assess and clear or place I whatever stage they deem from their neuro e v a l, which again is not an interview.

 

this is not any given Sunday anymore.  Debate as much as you want, but I’m friends with the Bucs Independent Neuro.  He’s been a customer for me for years.

I can't see how Tua could have been cleared to play. Like you stated concussion protocols and changes have been made. It's no longer a "wink wink" thing. With that said, I've never seen a player who suffered that kind of head trauma and with clear motor skills loss afterwards take the field in a matter of 30 minutes. Not in this modern day. The changes have prevented such occurrences until this incident. Add in we were told it's a back injury. Lol. What an insult to our intelligence. This whole thing stinks to the high heaven. Whether it's corrupt and or negligence some heads should roll. This just can't happen. 

[Ray Stonada]

4 hours ago, newcam2012 said:

I can't see how Tua could have been cleared to play. Like you stated concussion protocols and changes have been made. It's no longer a "wink wink" thing. With that said, I've never seen a player who suffered that kind of head trauma and with clear motor skills loss afterwards take the field in a matter of 30 minutes. Not in this modern day. The changes have prevented such occurrences until this incident. Add in we were told it's a back injury. Lol. What an insult to our intelligence. This whole thing stinks to the high heaven. Whether it's corrupt and or negligence some heads should roll. This just can't happen. 

 

Two facts that might be related: the Phins treated their QB this way and their owner is Stephen Ross.

 

People like Ross find ways around the rules; hire lackeys everywhere; find loyalists to run the protocols; game the system to have "success" at any cost, etc. He did the same stuff in real estate, getting city permission to build Hudson Yards in New York, which looks like a massive skyscraper / shopping mall from Dubai was dropped into the city and which no one needed or likes.

 

[GunnerBill]

9 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

You can say they do not put players out there but you dont know that for a fact.  The decision is entirely up to the head team physician.  Yes, I think they would be in a world of trouble but that doesnt mean it never happens.  People do stupid ***** all the time whether they are professionals or not.  We dont even know for a fact he was actually physically examined by the independent.  Was that stated anywhere?

 

Lawyers break the law and do shady *****

Doctors break the law and do shady *****

Politicians break the law and do shady *****

CEOs of big corporatiosn beak the law and do shady *****

Feds break the law and do shady *****

etc etc etc

Everybody does shady *****.

The NFL most certainly does shady *****

 

On the bolded, yes that is what has been stated. Multiples times and re-iterated by RapSheet yesterday. He was examined it was concluded he did not have a concussion and therefore he did not enter the protocol. 

 

As for Doctors breaking the law and "doing shady ****" it is incredibly rare. The conspiracy theorists would be disappointed how rare it is. 

 

If something shady has happened here - contrary to what has been reported this far - then the book should absolutely be thrown at them. But I will wait for evidence of that first.

[Scott7975]

25 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

On the bolded, yes that is what has been stated. Multiples times and re-iterated by RapSheet yesterday. He was examined it was concluded he did not have a concussion and therefore he did not enter the protocol. 

 

As for Doctors breaking the law and "doing shady ****" it is incredibly rare. The conspiracy theorists would be disappointed how rare it is. 

 

If something shady has happened here - contrary to what has been reported this far - then the book should absolutely be thrown at them. But I will wait for evidence of that first.

 

Its rare? It may be rare on mainstream media but its not rare at all.

 

Here this is just a first on google that just happened in March.  You can find fraud doctors over thousands of pages just on google.  Just because it wasnt on your local news channel doesnt make it rare

 

Quote

Sixteen Michigan and Ohio-area defendants, including 12 physicians, have been sentenced to prison for a $250 million health care fraud scheme that included the exploitation of patients suffering from addiction and the illegal distribution of over 6.6 million doses of medically unnecessary opioids.Mar 9, 2022

 

Again, you are a professional so you have a bias to think professional won't risk their license by doing shady *****.  Thats completely false.  Money is a funny thing.  Even to people that have it.

 

I understand you wanting to see hard proof.  For me the hard proof was the display on the field.  Any thing other than being ruled an orthopedic cause is an automatic no go.  Coincidentaly they said it was his back.  None of that display is symptoms of orthopedic.  They were clear signs of concussion symptoms.  They either did shady ***** or they are incompentent af.  Either way they did Tua wrong.

Edited October 1, 2022 by Scott7975

[syhuang]

10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

On the bolded, yes that is what has been stated. Multiples times and re-iterated by RapSheet yesterday. He was examined it was concluded he did not have a concussion and therefore he did not enter the protocol. 

 

As for Doctors breaking the law and "doing shady ****" it is incredibly rare. The conspiracy theorists would be disappointed how rare it is. 

 

If something shady has happened here - contrary to what has been reported this far - then the book should absolutely be thrown at them. But I will wait for evidence of that first.

one question: Tua had a “back” injury and wasn’t in concussion protocol leading to Thursday’s game, why was he checked for concussion symptoms everyday as stated by NFL? 
 

Does every player listed in injury report but not in concussion protocol get checked for concussion symptoms everyday? My understanding is “no”.  So other than Tua, which other players not in concussion protocol is checked for concussion symptoms including by independent neuro expert everyday? what protocol is based on to check concussion symptoms on a player with “back” injury but not in concussion protocol?

 

 

[Doc Brown]

10 minutes ago, syhuang said:

one question: Tua had a “back” injury and wasn’t in concussion protocol leading to Thursday’s game, why was he checked for concussion symptoms everyday as stated by NFL? 
 

Does every player listed in injury report but not in concussion protocol get checked for concussion symptoms everyday? My understanding is “no”.  So other than Tua, which other players not in concussion protocol is checked for concussion symptoms including by independent neuro expert everyday? what protocol is based on to check concussion symptoms on a player with “back” injury but not in concussion protocol?

No.  Just if they perform a concussion test during the game which they did with Tua last Sunday.  It doesn't matter whether the initial assessment was positive or negative.

 

Here's the concussion protocol. Basically, if they even check a player for a concussion during the game and they determine that player doesn't have one they follow up at least once.  The following day from what I understand.  I'm guessing he was checked every day for extra caution given how he reacted to the Milano hit.

 

All players who undergo any concussion evaluation on game day shall have a follow up concussion evaluation done the following day by a member of the medical staff. This includes players with both a "positive" and a "negative" initial assessment. The follow up exam should ideally be performed by the same physician who saw the patient on game day, but this may not always be possible. If not, then another member of the club's medical staff may see the patient, who should coordinate their findings with the initial examining physician. At a minimum, the followup exam should consist of: a) focused neurological examination, and b) complete symptom checklist. If symptoms and/or neurological examination are abnormal when compared to baseline, the Locker Room Concussion Evaluation should be performed.

[GunnerBill]

57 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Its rare? It may be rare on mainstream media but its not rare at all.

 

Here this is just a first on google that just happened in March.  You can find fraud doctors over thousands of pages just on google.  Just because it wasnt on your local news channel doesnt make it rare

 

 

Again, you are a professional so you have a bias to think professional won't risk their license by doing shady *****.  Thats completely false.  Money is a funny thing.  Even to people that have it.

 

I understand you wanting to see hard proof.  For me the hard proof was the display on the field.  Any thing other than being ruled an orthopedic cause is an automatic no go.  Coincidentaly they said it was his back.  None of that display is symptoms of orthopedic.  They were clear signs of concussion symptoms.  They either did shady ***** or they are incompentent af.  Either way they did Tua wrong.

 

It is extremely rare. Professionals who screw up don't stay professionals for long. Do you get a bad egg here and there? Sure. But to start from an assumption "I saw something on tv so I will believe my assumption and believe it was an incompetent / corrupt professionl". That is nuts to me.

 

[machine gun kelly]

9 hours ago, newcam2012 said:

I appreciate your knowledge and info. According to what you are saying it seems reasonable to conclude the neurologist errored in judgement. Tua should have never been allowed to play. Or am I assuming things incorrectly? 

Honestly, it’s a moot point as we weren’t there, and we don’t know.  I agree with Scott the team doc evaluates during the game, and the independent Neuro is called in if they hit one of the gates which he did.  I wasn’t clear on that point.  An MD knows how to complete a basic Neuro exam. 
 

At the end of the day, I just don’t know what happened and is silly on me to make wild suppositions.  Now Tua could be out for awhile.

[newcam2012]

5 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Its rare? It may be rare on mainstream media but its not rare at all.

 

Here this is just a first on google that just happened in March.  You can find fraud doctors over thousands of pages just on google.  Just because it wasnt on your local news channel doesnt make it rare

 

 

Again, you are a professional so you have a bias to think professional won't risk their license by doing shady *****.  Thats completely false.  Money is a funny thing.  Even to people that have it.

 

I understand you wanting to see hard proof.  For me the hard proof was the display on the field.  Any thing other than being ruled an orthopedic cause is an automatic no go.  Coincidentaly they said it was his back.  None of that display is symptoms of orthopedic.  They were clear signs of concussion symptoms.  They either did shady ***** or they are incompentent af.  Either way they did Tua wrong.

Agree 100%. 👍

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

It is extremely rare. Professionals who screw up don't stay professionals for long. Do you get a bad egg here and there? Sure. But to start from an assumption "I saw something on tv so I will believe my assumption and believe it was an incompetent / corrupt professionl". That is nuts to me.

 

I get that. However, in this Tua situation there can only be two realistic decisions. Either the medical staff was corrupt or incompetent. It's really that simple in my mind. Maybe I'm off in my thinking? 

[GunnerBill]

18 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

 

I get that. However, in this Tua situation there can only be two realistic decisions. Either the medical staff was corrupt or incompetent. It's really that simple in my mind. Maybe I'm off in my thinking? 

 

So to me there are three options:

 

1. The medical staff were corrupt or incompetent and I give that very little credence;

2. Something about the process was off either he was not medically examined by the independent neurologist or he was but they didn't clear him and Miami put him back out there regardless;

3. He wasn't concussed. 

 

I could totally buy that #2 is possible which is why it should be thoroughly investigated, but as of now the NFL themselves and the main credible NFL reporters are not saying that is what happened. So it leaves me with #3 unless new evidence comes to light.

[newcam2012]

31 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So to me there are three options:

 

1. The medical staff were corrupt or incompetent and I give that very little credence;

2. Something about the process was off either he was not medically examined by the independent neurologist or he was but they didn't clear him and Miami put him back out there regardless;

3. He wasn't concussed. 

 

I could totally buy that #2 is possible which is why it should be thoroughly investigated, but as of now the NFL themselves and the main credible NFL reporters are not saying that is what happened. So it leaves me with #3 unless new evidence comes to light.

That's fair. I'm no doctor but what I saw on TV sure looks to be a clear concussion. Not sure how anyone can advocate Tua wasn't concussed. Here is the definition of a concussion: "temporary unconsciousness or confusion caused by a blow on the head." Our eyes are not lying here! Believe what you saw! In A court of law this would be considered "beyond a reasonable doubt." I'll ask this. Since the inception of concussion protocols in the NFL (all sports) when have you ever seen a player return to play 30 minutes after receiving a head blow and stumbling/ shaking their head? NEVER!!! What's a lie is that Tua suffered a back injury and that caused his loss of motor skills. I don't know how anyone in these right mind can believe this.

 

Investigations can only show 3 things.

(1) incompetentence

(2) Nefarious behavior

(3) a cover up.