Jump to content

American CULTURAL Marxism: The Commie Left And Those Who Support Them (Useful Idiots)


Recommended Posts

On 5/9/2022 at 7:23 PM, DRsGhost said:

The sooner every sane American comes to this realization the quicker we can get to the other side of what is coming.

 

There's no reaching across the aisle anymore. That time is long gone. Treat these people with the complete lack of respect and decorum they deserve. Believe them when they continually keep telling you who they are.

 

 

 


Every cult accusation is a confession:

 


Free speech, right dumba$$$$$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

YOU MUST PARTICIPATE, COMRADE!

 

 

Idrissa Gueye is a Senegalese footballer who plays for his country and for the French side Paris Saint-Germain.

 

On Sunday 15th May, Paris Saint-Germain played Montpellier. On that day, players in the French Ligue 1 were meant to wear football jerseys with the numbers in LGBT rainbow colours in order to commemorate the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia. Unexpectedly, Mr Gueye did not play in that match. So far as I can find out with my limited ability to search news reports in French, he has not said why he sat out the match, but it is widely believed that it was because he felt that it would be incompatible with his religious beliefs to wear a shirt in Pride colours. He is a practising Muslim.

 

This is the really sinister–one might say Stalinist–part:

 

Via Paul Embery, I found this quotation from a letter that the FFF (Fédération Française de Football / French Football Federation) sent to Mr Gueye on May 17th:

There are two possibilities, either these allegations are unfounded and we invite you to speak out without delay to silence these rumours. For example, we invite you to accompany your message by a photo of yourself wearing said shirt.

 

Or the rumours are true. In this case we invite you to realise the impact of your act, and the grave error committed. The fight against discrimination towards different minorities, whoever they might be, is a vital fight for all times. Whether it’s skin colour, religion, sexual orientation, or any other difference, all discrimination is based on the same principle which is rejection of the other because they are different from the majority.

 

By refusing to take part in this collective operation, you are effectively validating discriminatory behaviour, and rejection of the other, and not just against the LGBTQI+ community. The impact of football on society and the capacity for footballers to be a role model for those who admire them gives us all a particular responsibility.

 

 

For the Left, it is not enough that fellow leftists show solidarity in the cause du jour. All must be forced to participate. No one can sit on the sidelines. Why? Because holdouts might stimulate questions from those who wonder whether the Left’s causes are really righteous. That can’t be permitted. Unanimity is required.

 

Ms. Solent writes:

One does not have to share Mr Gueye’s religious beliefs, or his (probable) opinions on LGBT issues, to see something sinister in this demand that he make a display of loyalty to prove his “innocence” of a charge that he did not participate in what is effectively the visual equivalent of compelled speech.

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/05/you-must-participate-comrade.php

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

A decision bigger than guns and abortion looms

by Don Surber

 

 

The press has focused on the Dobbs case because the Supreme Court will use it to sweep Roe v. Wade into the dustbin of history. The ruling will bring a lot of emotion from both sides, as 49 years of prayer finally are answered. Likewise, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen will get a lot of attention because the association likely will succeed in ending New York's draconian restrictions on carrying a pistol to protect oneself.

 

(snip)

 

The Supreme Court case that matters the most this year is West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency.

 

 

https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2022/06/a-decision-bigger-than-guns-and.html?m=1

 

 

 

The real impact of this has nothing at all to do with CO2 or global warming.

 

It has the potential to fundamentally change how our government operates.

 

Right now congress passes law that simply command some unelected bureaucracy to draft regulations to address problem X. The bureaucracy than decides what rules it wants, how to apply them, how to punish those who question them and reserve to themselves the ability to change the rules, write nee rules, expand their oversight, reinterpret the original law however they like and far too often to simply invent new law to allow them to take up even more power.

 

All with little or no congressional or voter influenced oversight.

 

This case might force these unelected and unregulated agencies actually get congressional approval before they can implement these rules.

 

Thats a huge win for all of us.

 

Congress has foisted off the actual work of rule making to unelected toadies for far too long. Make them do their jobs, and more importantly, make them responsible for the consequences of those rules.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

WATCH: 'Marxist-Leninist' revolutionaries forecast 'bloodshed' at pro-abortion protest

 

Syracuse University students held a pro-abortion protest last month that advocated for socialism and abolishing the Supreme Court.

 

 

 

https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=19670

 

 

 

 

What I love most about this debate is the talking point about how we can't allow nine unelected judges comprising SCOTUS to take away rights while failing to comprehend that it was a ruling by a different group of nine unelected judges comprising SCOTUS that provided those rights in the first place.  So objecting to the judicial process seems a hypocritical and perhaps clueless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

 

All hail the State !

 

 

Biden's top 68 appointees have just 2.4 years of business experience, analysis finds - including 62 percent of officials
who have 'virtually NO private sector experience' on their work records

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11015337/Top-68-Biden-appointees-just-2-4-years-business-experience.html

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


All members of Congress should be banned from trading stocks.

 

I couldn’t buy individual stocks in my last job and I didn’t have nearly the access to MNPI than members of Congress. 

Yeh it is widespread... should be put in a blind trust... thought it was but will have to do more research... knew plenty of congressional staff who traded to... should be also blind trust... I got questioned about insurance for having a TIAA Account when working for the RMA at USDA... for a conflict of interest... it was a retirement 403B but it had insurance in its name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Unfortunately, this practice is still legal and it should not be.

 

And yet we are to believe these people are the ones not selling out or democracy to the highest bidder?  Somehow they’re less corrupt than the republicans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

And yet we are to believe these people are the ones not selling out or democracy to the highest bidder?  Somehow they’re less corrupt than the republicans?


Oh they are all bad… I have always said that.

 

But I have zero faith republicans want to preserve our republic - they are clearly on a trajectory of authoritarian rule because they can’t win on their own merit.

 

it is a dying party and they know it

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BillStime said:


Oh they are all bad… I have always said that.

 

But I have zero faith republicans want to preserve our republic - they are clearly on a trajectory of authoritarian rule because they can’t win on their own merit.

 

it is a dying party and they know it

 

 

 

 


So the leader of your party is bought and paid for but you believe them cause they say the things you like? How is this logical? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, aristocrat said:

So the leader of your party is bought and paid for but you believe them cause they say the things you like? How is this logical? 

 

It's not.  It's feelz.  And delusion in thinking that the Dems aren't the party that's dying, given their Marxist turn and desires to "fundamentally transform America" from the greatest country ever to what they envision.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Socialists Rising in L.A.

The city’s June elections herald the arrival of a new political force.

Soledad Ursúa

 

 

 

The Los Angeles chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America has emerged as the clear winner of the city’s June 7 primary in the weeks since ballot counting began. Five out of the nine candidates on the ballot for city office to earn the DSA’s endorsement have either won outright (garnering more than 50 percent of the vote) or advanced to the general election with leads over their rivals. The results reveal the expanding political might of L.A.’s socialist Left.

 

Los Angeles primaries usually see low turnout. Well-organized groups with a solid ground game stand to do best. This year, every registered voter was mailed a ballot, and 84 percent of ballots were cast by mail. The city now permits ballot harvesting and unguarded drop boxes, and it doesn’t check signatures. The DSA took advantage of these rules, got boots on the ground, and reaped the rewards.

 

https://www.city-journal.org/socialists-rising-in-los-angeles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.city-journal.org/socialists-rising-in-los-angeles

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Socialists Rising in L.A.

The city’s June elections herald the arrival of a new political force.

Soledad Ursúa

 

 

 

The Los Angeles chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America has emerged as the clear winner of the city’s June 7 primary in the weeks since ballot counting began. Five out of the nine candidates on the ballot for city office to earn the DSA’s endorsement have either won outright (garnering more than 50 percent of the vote) or advanced to the general election with leads over their rivals. The results reveal the expanding political might of L.A.’s socialist Left.

 

Los Angeles primaries usually see low turnout. Well-organized groups with a solid ground game stand to do best. This year, every registered voter was mailed a ballot, and 84 percent of ballots were cast by mail. The city now permits ballot harvesting and unguarded drop boxes, and it doesn’t check signatures. The DSA took advantage of these rules, got boots on the ground, and reaped the rewards.

 

https://www.city-journal.org/socialists-rising-in-los-angeles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.city-journal.org/socialists-rising-in-los-angeles

This is not surprising- bit it still amazes me that anyone believes the 2020 Presidential election was legitimate. These are exactly the policies that were in place in swing states , and the Dems fought tooth and nail against signature checking. When one group is against security measures that’s pretty much all you need to know about the results. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

This is not surprising- bit it still amazes me that anyone believes the 2020 Presidential election was legitimate. These are exactly the policies that were in place in swing states , and the Dems fought tooth and nail against signature checking. When one group is against security measures that’s pretty much all you need to know about the results. 

 

What? You're a conspiracy theorist!

 

A candidate who rarely emerged from his basement to campaign and when he did it was to embarrassingly sparse crowds.

 

Multiple states unconstitutionally changing election laws.

 

Mail in drop boxes everywhere in states where ballots and ballot applications were indiscriminately puked out everywhere.

 

Then 81 million votes for an old, white establishment guy. The very antithesis of what the dem base shouts for in a candidate. The base was mobilized.

 

But sure, most secure election in US history!

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boatdrinks said:

This is not surprising- bit it still amazes me that anyone believes the 2020 Presidential election was legitimate. These are exactly the policies that were in place in swing states , and the Dems fought tooth and nail against signature checking. When one group is against security measures that’s pretty much all you need to know about the results. 

 

That will come as some shock to Trump's 2020 Campaign Chair, Trump's White House Attorneys, and the leadership of Trump's Department of Justice, all of whom looked into the claims of fraud and did not find it despite their jobs literally depending on Trump remaining in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

That will come as some shock to Trump's 2020 Campaign Chair, Trump's White House Attorneys, and the leadership of Trump's Department of Justice, all of whom looked into the claims of fraud and did not find it despite their jobs literally depending on Trump remaining in office.

If you believe that I’ve got a great bridge to sell you. We all know what really happened because we watched the lead up , and it was completely predictable when all attempts at security were disallowed. These witnesses were probably threatened with prosecution ( oh they’d get a fair trial all right ) by the dictatorship currently at the helm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The messaging wasn’t simply..

 

We didn't find widespread evidence of an unsecured election

 

Or

 

This was a unique election because covid, but all measures were taken to make sure the 2020 was secure.

 

Both of which would have been dubious as well. However if something to that effect was released and was left at that I'd certainly be less skeptical.

 

Instead we got an election conducted under conditions that prior to 2020 had bipartisan condemnation as being open to massive fraud. 

 

And what statement is released and shouted from the rooftops across the planet 24/7 for months on end?

 

"It was the most secure election in US history"

 

:lol:

 

Just a bit out over the tips of their skis with that one. If you take that statement at face value then I don't know what to tell you other than some serious reflection is in order.

 

It's beyond laughable, and the way media outlets immediately parroted it without question and with such force and regularity is part of the evidence that makes one question if the election maybe, just maybe wasn't all that secure after all.

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

How does any of this help with rent? 

 

Read those ridiculous bills again - deliberately titled to make anyone that opposes such things as an evil person - they always are. 

 

The "no" votes could be for any reason - on grounds that most of it is not the Federal Government's responsibility and the SCOTUS will likely agree anyway.  

 

DC ladies and gentlemen.  Wasting your tax dollars because they brought the planet to its knees locking you up.  

 

Now they need distractions for November. 

 

 

FYI - "marriage" and Contraception is most definitely NOT the Federal freaking governments responsibility.  Absolutely outrageous to think otherwise.  

 

There will officially be nothing DC can't do in your world and that's not how this is supposed to work.   


Rent?

 

You sound like a socialist.

 

And if Dems proposed anything to help Americans your cult would vote against it like they did with:

 

-Easing the baby formula shortage

-Price gouging at the pump 

-Relief to small businesses

 

And the list goes on…

 

And lastly - no government - state or federal - should have any say about medical and reproductive health.

 

What has the cult delivered lately?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...