Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

Oh.

 

 

Link to actual memo included.in story.

 

The Capitol Police official timeline provides the most succinct summary of a series of events around Sund's request, some of which have been disputed and at times misreported in the news media.

"COP Sund asks Senate Sergeant at Arms (SSAA) Michael Stenger and House Sergeant at Arms (HSAA) Paul Irving for authority to have National Guard to assist with security for the January 6, 2021 event based on briefing with law enforcement partner and revised intelligence Assessment," the timeline recorded. "COP Sund's request is denied. SSAA and HSAA tell COP Sund to contact General Walker at DC National Guard to discuss the guard's ability to support a request if needed."

 

The Capitol Police timeline shows what we have been saying for the last year — that DOD support via the National Guard was refused by the House and Senate sergeant at arms, who report to Pelosi," Patel said. "Now we have it in their own writing, days before Jan. 6. And despite the FBI warning of potential for serious disturbance, no perimeter was established, no agents put on the street, and no fence put up."

 

Gee, I wonder why we haven't heard any of Patels testimony to the J6 committee?

 

Cmon @ChiGoose do we have a deal? 

Edited by DRsGhost
  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 716er said:

Is Patel your boyfriend or something?

 

Patel is a grifter, so he targets the easiest marks that most grifters target: diehard Trump supporters. Tell them what they want to hear and then sell them a book or some vitamin pills or whatever.

 

He's not as good as Trump though, who can just ask for money for a defense fund that doesn't exist and they'll give him $250 million. But you gotta start somewhere!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Patel is a grifter, so he targets the easiest marks that most grifters target: diehard Trump supporters. Tell them what they want to hear and then sell them a book or some vitamin pills or whatever.

 

He's not as good as Trump though, who can just ask for money for a defense fund that doesn't exist and they'll give him $250 million. But you gotta start somewhere!

 

Care to comment coward?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Care to comment coward?

 

 

 

 

According to this article, the request was denied by the House and Senate Seargant at Arms:

 

Quote

"COP Sund asks Senate Sergeant at Arms (SSAA) Michael Stenger and House Sergeant at Arms (HSAA) Paul Irving for authority to have National Guard to assist with security for the January 6, 2021 event based on briefing with law enforcement partner and revised intelligence Assessment," the timeline recorded. "COP Sund's request is denied. SSAA and HSAA tell COP Sund to contact General Walker at DC National Guard to discuss the guard's ability to support a request if needed."

 

Considering that both of them lost their jobs the very next day, it would seem they royally screwed up and got what they deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

 

According to this article, the request was denied by the House and Senate Seargant at Arms:

 

 

Considering that both of them lost their jobs the very next day, it would seem they royally screwed up and got what they deserved.

 

Also denied by DC mayor. She has her job still.

 

Seems like this is pretty relevant to the happenings of J6, no? Why did we not hear about this from the committee? We know Patels testimony highlighted this grave error. Yet they haven't shared it, nor will they. Why did it take someone on a Bills message board to link to a 2 week old story for you to be made aware of the timeline of this massive failure?

 

Because this committee is interested in telling you A story, not THE story.  It's all politics. Every last bit of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DRsGhost said:

 

Also denied by DC mayor. She has her job still.

 

Seems like this is pretty relevant to the happenings of J6, no? Why did we not hear about this from the committee? We know Patels testimony highlighted this grave error. Yet they haven't shared it, nor will they. Why did it take someone on a Bills message board to link to a 2 week old story for you to be made aware of the timeline of this massive failure?

 

Because this committee is interested in telling you A story, not THE story.  It's all politics. Every last bit of it.

 

Wait, you think I wasn't aware that they did not have the proper security for Jan 6th?

 

It was clear that the decision was made that they didn't need the kind of force that they had for the riots after George Floyd's death. And it was clear that the people who made that decision were wrong. And of the three people on the board that oversees the Capitol Police, two of them lost their jobs the next day.

 

None of this is new. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Wait, you think I wasn't aware that they did not have the proper security for Jan 6th?

 

It was clear that the decision was made that they didn't need the kind of force that they had for the riots after George Floyd's death. And it was clear that the people who made that decision were wrong. And of the three people on the board that oversees the Capitol Police, two of them lost their jobs the next day.

 

None of this is new. 

 

Reading comprehension dude.

 

The memo and the exact timeline of the denials you were not aware of.

 

Has the committee shared that the Trump administration formally asked for up to 20k national guard troops in the days before J6 and the request was denied on multiple fronts?

 

Why hasnt the committee in search of truth shared that information? They certainly must have had access to the very same memo.

 

Gee, I wonder why they wouldn't share information that is exculpatory.....that's a tough one!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Reading comprehension dude.

 

The memo and the exact timeline of the denials you were not aware of.

 

Has the committee shared that the Trump administration formally asked for up to 20k national guard troops in the days before J6 and the request was denied on multiple fronts?

 

Why hasnt the committee in search of truth shared that information? They certainly must have had access to the very same memo.

 

Gee, I wonder why they wouldn't share information that is exculpatory.....that's a tough one!

 

 

 

 

 

Ok, let's say that you're correct. Frankly, I don't have the time or patience to chase down everything posted on RedStateThisIsRealNewsBenShapiroFederalistWeThinkOurReadersAreIdiotsAndWeAreScammingThemForProfitDotCom, but let's say you're right: Trump asked for more security and it was denied by Nancy Pelosi, the Deep State, Democratic Socialist Liz Cheney, the reverse vampires, Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and all of those people who eat babies.

 

How is that exculpatory for the recorded phone call where Trump commits a crime?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Ok, let's say that you're correct. Frankly, I don't have the time or patience to chase down everything posted on RedStateThisIsRealNewsBenShapiroFederalistWeThinkOurReadersAreIdiotsAndWeAreScammingThemForProfitDotCom, but let's say you're right: Trump asked for more security and it was denied by Nancy Pelosi, the Deep State, Democratic Socialist Liz Cheney, the reverse vampires, Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and all of those people who eat babies.

 

You're pathetic. As I knew you'd come back with the right wing sources shtick....I specifically highlighted that the f-ing memo being reported on is linked to in the story.  As in you can click on it and read it all for yourself.

 

Seriously, ***** off with this shtick.

 

9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

How is that exculpatory for the recorded phone call where Trump commits a crime?

 

 

You're going to have to fill me in. Actually someone else please fill me in.  What's the latest "we've got him this time" load?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

And it's always great knowing the real DR lives comfortably inside your head almost two years after his departure. 

 

Beautiful! 

 

:lol:

👆 Tell me you're delusional without telling me you're delusional...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

At first blush, thinking the FBI or FBI informants being involved seems nutty and conspiratorial.

 

But if you think about what they have done in the recent past , it makes me wonder.  The Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot comes to mind.  Seems they like to coax people into committing crimes and come swooping in at the last minute to save the day.  They also seem to like to pick people easily duped like people with schizophrenia to do the crimes.  Like the bomb plot in Portland.

 

Laugh it off if you must, but its really not out of character for the FBI to be involved.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/23/the-whitmer-kidnapping-case-reveals-the-fbis-new-counterterrorism-target-is-you/

 

https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-informants-had-bigger-role-213400243.html

 

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/portlanders-condemn-bomb-plot-criticize-fbi-probe/

 

 


Oh I don’t doubt this may have happened.  But it doesn’t come close to accounting for, or overriding or excusing, an attempted COUP by an outgoing President, nor does it excuse the morons who stormed the building.  It’s classic Soviet-era “whataboutism” designed to distract, deny, and obscure the real issue.  (Not saying you’re doing that - it’s obvious who in this thread is doing it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This committe is a one sided political clown show? You don't say...

 

 

 

And how many times has the phrase "attack on our democracy" been uttered by members of this sham clown committee?

 

Commies gonna commie.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DRsGhost said:

This committe is a one sided political clown show? You don't say...

 

 

 

And how many times has the phrase "attack on our democracy" been uttered by members of this sham clown committee?

 

Commies gonna commie.

 

 


And fascists gonna fascist.

 

You are the primo example of someone who only surfs “news” outlets for confirmation of his own demented beliefs.  
 

There are few things worse than the tyranny of a closed mind.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


And fascists gonna fascist.

 

You are the primo example of someone who only surfs “news” outlets for confirmation of his own demented beliefs.  
 

There are few things worse than the tyranny of a closed mind.

 

Oh I don't know about that. I think talking "threats to democracy" constantly while at the same time looking the other way as federal thugs are sent to harass people in their private homes might just be a tad bit more tyrannical.

 

Of course you condemning someone as a fascist because they carry a differering political opinion sure comes close.

 

The hypocrisy is boundless with you morons.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Oh I don't know about that. I think talking "threats to democracy" constantly while at the same time looking the other way as federal thugs are sent to harass people in their private homes might just be a tad bit more tyrannical.

 

Of course you condemning someone as a fascist because they carry a differering political opinion sure comes close.

 

The hypocrisy is boundless with you morons.

I think these folks really need to look up the definition of fascism. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I think these folks really need to look up the definition of fascism. 

 

Oh I'm well schooled in history unlike the subhuman cretins upthread who simply copy-and-paste from disinformation outlets.

 

Fascism usually starts with the invoking of a folk myth ("the election was stolen!" - check) as a justification for suspension of law and, ultimately, the use of force.  As a political ethos it requires a demonized enemy of the state ("you [liberal] morons"), and is characterized by protectionist economic policies (MAGA - check!) and a militarized state which relies on fear and armed groups of loyalists to instill loyalty and order (CHECK).

 

And it's coming.

Edited by Coach Tuesday
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Oh I'm well schooled in history unlike the subhuman cretins upthread who simply copy-and-paste from disinformation outlets.

.

 

Imagine being lectured by someone with the posting history of Coach Tuesday

giphy.gif

 

 

 

My 67 years of life experience and B.A. in History from SBU are mildly amused.

 

If you don't read other sources because of your obvious bias.................................you are not "well-schooled"

 

😆

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Oh I'm well schooled in history unlike the subhuman cretins upthread who simply copy-and-paste from disinformation outlets.

 

Fascism usually starts with the invoking of a folk myth ("the election was stolen!" - check) as a justification for suspension of law and, ultimately, the use of force.  As a political ethos it requires a demonized enemy of the state ("you [liberal] morons"), and is characterized by protectionist economic policies (MAGA - check!) and a militarized state which relies on fear and armed groups of loyalists to instill loyalty and order (CHECK).

 

And it's coming.

Yes, in Germany it was the "Stab in the back" theory, the claim that the German Army never lost the First World War. The democratic government surrendered when the army was still fighting, blah blah. But the lie worked for Hitler 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Oh I'm well schooled in history unlike the subhuman cretins upthread who simply copy-and-paste from disinformation outlets.

 

Fascism usually starts with the invoking of a folk myth ("the election was stolen!" - check) as a justification for suspension of law and, ultimately, the use of force.  As a political ethos it requires a demonized enemy of the state ("you [liberal] morons"), and is characterized by protectionist economic policies (MAGA - check!) and a militarized state which relies on fear and armed groups of loyalists to instill loyalty and order (CHECK).

 

And it's coming.


It’s also telling that we frequently see “otherizing” by people on this board supporting the Trump side. 
 

The Left is deranged

Liberals are Commies

Enemy of the people. 

It’s this kind of language that dehumanizes the other side, giving permission to dismiss them and often leads to violence. 

 

While those with more left positions certainly talk crap about GOP officials and public figures, you do not see nearly as much vitriol directed at other regular Americans. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Oh I'm well schooled in history unlike the subhuman cretins upthread who simply copy-and-paste from disinformation outlets.

 

Fascism usually starts with the invoking of a folk myth ("1/6 was the greatest threat to our democracy since the Civil War" "the election was stolen!" - check) as a justification for suspension of law and, ultimately, the use of force (like imprisoning political prisoners in solitary confinement for over a year without trial that are charged with misdemeanor crimes or SWAT team arrests of 70 year old's in the middle of the night while giving political allies a pass on criminal actions).  As a political ethos it requires a demonized enemy of the state (deplorables & Russian assets & white supremacists & gay hating bigots"you [liberal] morons"), and is characterized by protectionist economic policies (MAGA - check!) and a militarized state which relies on fear and armed groups of loyalists (Antifa, BLM, abortion anarchists)to instill loyalty and order (CHECK).

 

And it's coming.

Fixed.  Maybe a look in the mirror and reality check for some here?

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Law enforcement sent to protect a federal building being firebombed on a nightly basis = Trumps storm troopers according to Pelosi et al.

 

Federal agents sent to harass a private citizen in his home who is accused of no crime = look at those right wing media outlets you are citing.

 

You guys are something else. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Oh I'm well schooled in history unlike the subhuman cretins upthread who simply copy-and-paste from disinformation outlets.

 

Fascism usually starts with the invoking of a folk myth ("the election was stolen!" - check) as a justification for suspension of law and, ultimately, the use of force.  As a political ethos it requires a demonized enemy of the state ("you [liberal] morons"), and is characterized by protectionist economic policies (MAGA - check!) and a militarized state which relies on fear and armed groups of loyalists to instill loyalty and order (CHECK).

 

And it's coming.

The use of the power of the State to put down unrest and silence dissent. Of our two parties….which does this better describe? 

Edited by SoCal Deek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

The use of the power of the State to put down unrest and silence dissent. Of our two parties….which does this better describe? 

 

Which of the two parties attempted a coup by force?

 

And yes - there are plenty of fascists on the left.  They seem unable to even organize themselves into a coherent assembly, let alone orchestrate a Marxist takeover.  They are inept, but equally despicable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

Which of the two parties attempted a coup by force?

 

And yes - there are plenty of fascists on the left.  They seem unable to even organize themselves into a coherent assembly, let alone orchestrate a Marxist takeover.  They are inept, but equally despicable.  

Your first line is NOT fascism! It’s the opposite. Nice try coach. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stunning!  Lol nope not in the least......it's just a deep blue circle j....

 

 

 

A poll found that 74.5 percent of likely independent midterm voters said the hearings on the January 6 riot at the Capitol will not influence their vote.

 

“A majority of voters–even one-third of Democrats–don’t care about the January 6th proceedings in Congress,” said Mark Meckler, president of Convention of States Action, which conducted the poll with the Trafalgar Group. “While Washington, DC, elites obsess about scoring political points, Americans face real issues like inflation, rising crime, and shortages of basic staples like baby formula and feminine products.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/24/poll-almost-75-percent-of-independents-say-january-6-hearings-will-not-affect-their-midterm-vote/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Stunning!  Lol nope not in the least......it's just a deep blue circle j....

 

 

 

A poll found that 74.5 percent of likely independent midterm voters said the hearings on the January 6 riot at the Capitol will not influence their vote.

 

“A majority of voters–even one-third of Democrats–don’t care about the January 6th proceedings in Congress,” said Mark Meckler, president of Convention of States Action, which conducted the poll with the Trafalgar Group. “While Washington, DC, elites obsess about scoring political points, Americans face real issues like inflation, rising crime, and shortages of basic staples like baby formula and feminine products.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/24/poll-almost-75-percent-of-independents-say-january-6-hearings-will-not-affect-their-midterm-vote/

 

Nonsense. We need our daily recaps from lemmings who love being lied to.

 

:lol:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Stunning!  Lol nope not in the least......it's just a deep blue circle j....

 

 

 

A poll found that 74.5 percent of likely independent midterm voters said the hearings on the January 6 riot at the Capitol will not influence their vote.

 

“A majority of voters–even one-third of Democrats–don’t care about the January 6th proceedings in Congress,” said Mark Meckler, president of Convention of States Action, which conducted the poll with the Trafalgar Group. “While Washington, DC, elites obsess about scoring political points, Americans face real issues like inflation, rising crime, and shortages of basic staples like baby formula and feminine products.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/24/poll-almost-75-percent-of-independents-say-january-6-hearings-will-not-affect-their-midterm-vote/

 

Ah yes... BREITBART... lolz

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Ah yes... BREITBART... lolz

 

giphy.gif

 

 

 

 

No low info Bill.  Its a Trafalgar poll....

 

 

"We were named the best polling firm of 2016 presidential race, and this year, Real Clear Politics called us “the most accurate pollster of the cycle among those firms that polled multiple Senate and governor races.”

 

https://www.thetrafalgargroup.org/

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

No low info Bill.  Its a Trafalgar poll....

 

 

"We were named the best polling firm of 2016 presidential race, and this year, Real Clear Politics called us “the most accurate pollster of the cycle among those firms that polled multiple Senate and governor races.”

 

https://www.thetrafalgargroup.org/

 

Robert Cahaly is an American pollster and founder of the Trafalgar Group. He was previously a political consultant for Republican Party candidates.

 

gtfo

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Robert Cahaly is an American pollster and founder of the Trafalgar Group. He was previously a political consultant for Republican Party candidates.

 

gtfo

 

 

 

So?  Can I disqualify every link you post because it's direct from a Democrat operative?

 

You get your "information" from Democrat Super PACS.

 

Trafalgar has data and recognition to back up their legitimacy.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...