Jump to content

1/2/22 Falcons at Bills


eball

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

Maybe because Sanders is 34, in his 12th season and has played 175 games?

 

Losing even a half-step makes all the difference. It happens to every player, especially those who excel at getting separation. It's just unfortunate it happened to Sanders about half-way through this season and will not get better.  See John Brown and now Cole Beasley.

 

Cole Beasley had a rib injury. I wouldn't conclude he is done yet. He will catch on with another team next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

Maybe because Sanders is 34, in his 12th season and has played 175 games?

 

Losing even a half-step makes all the difference. It happens to every player, especially those who excel at getting separation. It's just unfortunate it happened to Sanders about half-way through this season and will not get better.  See John Brown and now Cole Beasley.

Maybe that’s it, but is speed has been fine. I view the problem being more about ball tracking, hands and (possibly) being in the correct spot.  He just seems off.  Maybe off = old.  Idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Maybe that’s it, but is speed has been fine. I view the problem being more about ball tracking, hands and (possibly) being in the correct spot.  He just seems off.  Maybe off = old.  Idk

 

That's been my feeling as well.  Not quite on the same page as Josh, not quite able to adjust and haul in the ball as well as he could.  Maybe it's vision, or reaction time.  Maybe it's hearing footsteps - perhaps they get louder as the years mount up. 

 

To be fair there have been times he's been wide open and Josh hasn't taken the throw, but there have also been times when he's been targeted and dropped it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, HalftimeAdjustment said:

 

Cole Beasley had a rib injury. I wouldn't conclude he is done yet. He will catch on with another team next year.

 

Agree, I don't think Beasley is "done" a la John Brown, but he's certainly last a step or two, which is crucial for getting separation in man-to-man. Still one of the best to find a hole in zone but there's a lot of evidence Beasley is having a problem in man-to-man. 

 

OTOH, McKenzie is far less wile in zone but is much more dangerous in man-to-man. If only we could meld them together. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Maybe that’s it, but is speed has been fine. I view the problem being more about ball tracking, hands and (possibly) being in the correct spot.  He just seems off.  Maybe off = old.  Idk

 

Probably the same thing. I don't see much difference between losing a step in speed and agility. The ability to make adjustments is also a sign of age. It happens to everyone and at a certain point the slow decline can quickly turn into falling off a cliff. Sanders may still have a few good games left but we probably shouldn't expect him to get much better than he is now. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Beasley and Davis back in the lineup this weekend, it will be interesting to see how the snaps are divided up amongst the receivers.

First things first: Davis should be WR2 and should out-snap Sanders. That much is clear to me.

In the slot, things are a little more interesting.

McKenzie seems to be the clearly superior option in terms of gaining separation in man coverage. Beasley is still the go-to guy in terms of finding soft spots in zone. Perhaps the degree to which each guy is used can and should be determined by the way that the opposing defense is playing us in a given week. If they're gonna go man-free, let McKenzie eat. If it's the two-high zone that teams were hammering us with, put Beasley in. 

Meanwhile, Sanders is another interesting option to take snaps in the slot. He might be the best of both worlds, with regard to his ability to beat both man and zone coverage. Obviously, having too many WRs and having to figure out how to feed them all is a good problem to have.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Logic said:

With Beasley and Davis back in the lineup this weekend, it will be interesting to see how the snaps are divided up amongst the receivers.

First things first: Davis should be WR2 and should out-snap Sanders. That much is clear to me.

In the slot, things are a little more interesting.

McKenzie seems to be the clearly superior option in terms of gaining separation in man coverage. Beasley is still the go-to guy in terms of finding soft spots in zone. Perhaps the degree to which each guy is used can and should be determined by the way that the opposing defense is playing us in a given week. If they're gonna go man-free, let McKenzie eat. If it's the two-high zone that teams were hammering us with, put Beasley in. 

Meanwhile, Sanders is another interesting option to take snaps in the slot. He might be the best of both worlds, with regard to his ability to beat both man and zone coverage. Obviously, having too many WRs and having to figure out how to feed them all is a good problem to have.

 

Agree. At the beginning of the season, I half-expected the Bills to run a LOT of 5-wide, which clearly didn't work that well and quickly abandoned.  But as the offense has seemed to find its rhythm,  McKenzie improving, a "greater" threat to run with some effectiveness and the OLine playing better, I wonder if we'll see a few more 5-wide sets to see if it works. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

I wonder if we'll see a few more 5-wide sets to see if it works. 

Not sure I want Motor or Knox out of the game, Knox was a blocking beast against NE, and Motor keeps D honest, and means they have to worry about 2 RB's with Josh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

Agree. At the beginning of the season, I half-expected the Bills to run a LOT of 5-wide, which clearly didn't work that well and quickly abandoned.  But as the offense has seemed to find its rhythm,  McKenzie improving, a "greater" threat to run with some effectiveness and the OLine playing better, I wonder if we'll see a few more 5-wide sets to see if it works. 

5 wide sets are easier to defend against because defense knows you're passing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, NewEra said:

I don’t think that really helps.  They just don’t seem to be in sync.  They need to figure it out and I don’t see how sitting will help what is going on with 17 and 1.  Jmo 

 

that said, I’d rather have Diggs, Davis, Beasley and Isaiah out there over him. He should get some run this week with Davis out again.  Maybe Cole too. I know he’s Eligible to come off but ya never know 

Continue to rotate them all and play the ones that are getting open.  I think you over reacting to Sanders.
 

He is a player in decline but he made a few plays this season and is still capable. 

Edited by Bob in STL
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, nucci said:

5 wide sets are easier to defend against because defense knows you're passing


The certainty of pass can be mitigated by the lack of depth most teams have defensively. In other words, is your 4th or 5th corner going to be able to cover his man effectively? 5-wide can also be effective if you have a QB who can run the way Allen does.

I'm  not saying it should be used all the time or anything, and obviously it hasn't been our most effective offense this year. It can be highly effective in small doses, though, imo.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Bills Fan said:

Star returned today per Sean. Post above you yolo posted.

 

Just now, YoloinOhio said:

Personal matter, he is back now.

 

Yeah, you guys misinterpreted me...it was meant as an exasperated "who the hell knows WHAT is going on..." statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bob in STL said:

Continue to rotate them all and play the one that are getting open.  I think you over reacting to Sanders.
 

He is a player in decline but he made a few plays this season and is still capable. 


My disappointment in him has less to do with his actual play and more to do with the expectations I had for him.  I wrote, several times, that I thought he was the missing link.  That he would be the guy that allows this passing offense to take the next step and allow someone to be open on every pass play.  That wasn’t the case.  Partly because the OL regressed.  Partly because he wasn’t the player I thought we were getting.  I overestimated the impact his addition would make on the team.  
 

that said, the most important season is is right around the corner and he still has a chance to meet the lofty expectations I had for him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, NewEra said:


My disappointment in him has less to do with his actual play and more to do with the expectations I had for him.  I wrote, several times, that I thought he was the missing link.  That he would be the guy that allows this passing offense to take the next step and allow someone to be open on every pass play.  That wasn’t the case.  Partly because the OL regressed.  Partly because he wasn’t the player I thought we were getting.  I overestimated the impact his addition would make on the team.  
 

that said, the most important season is is right around the corner and he still has a chance to meet the lofty expectations I had for him.

I understand.  He is not the guy that makes you regret doubling Diggs.   So far no one is.  After Diggs  - Sanders, Davis, Beasley, McKenzie is a pretty solid and deep group.  
 

4 solid guys competing for 2 jobs is a good thing.  Toss in Kumerow and Stevenson, and WR is not a concern right now.  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...