Jump to content

Tucker Carlson


T&C

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Nope

Baloney.  Try to narrow the number of your screen names down to a prime number. What a mess.  
 

 

Edited by Irv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BillStime said:


Hey @redtail hawk - he’s full of schitt - he doesn’t ignore anyone. He told me the same BS.

 

He thrives on owning the libs. 
 

That’s why they are here - other wise they would be satisfied with the circle jerk at their safe place. 
 

 

Dude, I thought you were allowed at that place now, what happened?  Won't they put up with your Trump porn?

7 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Tonight, you will deny my thrice. Umm, 5 times. 
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/business/media/tucker-carlson-trump.html

So you DON'T hate Trump? 🤔 

11 hours ago, Tiberius said:

All those police attacked and Fox acts like that was cool 

Who was acting like it was cool to attack a police officer, Tibs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BillStime said:


You do realize SDS has the tools to monitor IP addresses and usernames here, right?

I used to do that occasionally on the BBMB, but here... I'm pretty sure he wants to keep you around for chuckles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


You do realize SDS has the tools to monitor IP addresses and usernames here, right?

 

Give me a break.  You're faking your IP address.  Busted.  What a mess.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tucker-carlson-january-6-sicknick-b2297015.html

effectively the extent of his newly found Jan 6 "evidence".

He's a joke.

Carlson also said he's invited officials like Garland and Schummer to appear on the show and provide some real-time entertainment and debate on the events, the video, his statements, and their statements but nobody has accepted the invite.  My skeptical side says if he's such a liar then end the charade and prove it by calling him out on his own show but I also expect none of these people have the guts to call his bluff and take up his offer.  So what does that say about commitment to the truth?  Throwing stones at each other over the fence can be fun but its nothing like some in your face confrontation.  Time for an old-fashioned throw-down.  Tucker seems up to it but the rest of these folks I suspect are cowards.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Carlson also said he's invited officials like Garland and Schummer to appear on the show and provide some real-time entertainment and debate on the events, the video, his statements, and their statements but nobody has accepted the invite.  My skeptical side says if he's such a liar then end the charade and prove it by calling him out on his own show but I also expect none of these people have the guts to call his bluff and take up his offer.  So what does that say about commitment to the truth?  Throwing stones at each other over the fence can be fun but its nothing like some in your face confrontation.  Time for an old-fashioned throw-down.  Tucker seems up to it but the rest of these folks I suspect are cowards.

I suspect none of them desire to give him any relevance or legitimacy...smart.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I suspect none of them desire to give him any relevance or legitimacy...smart.

That's the excuse I expected to hear (I was going to close my post with it!).  But at the end of the day they just lack the guts for the confrontation.

 

(and that's the response I expected)

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

Do u think trump giving N Korea's dictator legitimacy was smart?  helpful?

So in this scenario is Schummer or Carlson the dictator?  I mean, Chuck did call on the network to censor the show.  But either way I don't see any equivalency in the argument. 

 

Its not an unreasonable expectation to ask US officials that dispute statements made by a media personality to appear a TV "news" show with a reporter they claim is making false statements to set him straight.  Especially when it involves the biggest threat to democracy since the Civil War.  What could be more important?

 

As for legitimacy, he already has one of the highest rated shows so its not like they'd be giving him anything.  And if truth is on their side they would severely damage his "legitimacy". to the point he'll have close to zero legitimacy.  And you'll have done a public service by neutralizing his voice.  But logically, if officials bashing the guy know his positions have merit they would want to avoid any discussion.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are missing the point. It's not about Garland or Lynn Cheney going on Brave Culture Warrior Tucker's show.

It's about Brave Culture Warrior Tucker going on someone else's show to explain exactly what he meant when he said he hates Trump with a passion and that he believed most of the election fraud claims were nonsense.

So when is our Bold Warrior going to address this? Maybe he's not so bold ...

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
13 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

So in this scenario is Schummer or Carlson the dictator?

 

I mean if you're searching for commies...https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/exclusive-kremlin-putin-russia-ukraine-war-memo-tucker-carlson-fox/

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The January 6 videos touch a nerve because they threaten Democrats' lies

by Tucker Carlson

 

Last night, we aired video from surveillance cameras on Capitol Hill. That video was recorded 26 months to the day before January 6, 2021, and for 26 months, that footage was held from the American public. The January 6 Committee made certain. Now, the Justice Department also kept a lid on that video footage and in fact, in some cases, DOJ did not share it with criminal defendants who had been charged on January 6 in violation of their constitutional rights. We felt it was a public service to bring what we could to you. There was no justification for keeping the secret any longer

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-january-6-videos-touch-nerve-because-they-threaten-dems-lies

 

 

 

.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So people are still shilling for a guy who has given sworn testimony that he’s a lying liar who thinks the people who listen to him are gullible?

 

Like, at what point do you get some self respect and stop listening to this guy?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

So people are still shilling for a guy who has given sworn testimony that he’s a lying liar who thinks the people who listen to him are gullible?

 

Like, at what point do you get some self respect and stop listening to this guy?

 

Again the same can be said for any talking head on the alphabet networks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...