Jump to content

Watson vs Allen.


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea I get that. At times the last two years though he has just played some flat out bad football that is kind of hard to unsee. Even against Green Bay in the playoffs the second half he was bad. He is a winner. The greatest QB of all time and a flat out winner. I just think the play is a lot more uneven than it used to be, regardless of how well he played in the Superbowl. 

What I think people are missing about Brady is that more than any QB in the league ever, he has answers. Whatever you throw at him—especially in meaningful games—he’ll figure it out and make the right decisions. Josh Allen, for instance, clearly isn’t there yet. To be sure, Brady isn’t perfect every game. He’ll occasionally even lose a playoff game. But in terms of diagnosing and exploiting what’s in front of him, no QB compares. As for physical attributes, they’re certainly good enough. He can make every throw even if his arm doesn’t compare to those of Allen, Rodgers, and Mahomes. One of the great myths of our era is that Aaron Rodgers is somehow the GOAT. He is a phenomenal QB, but too often doesn’t have the answers in big games.

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

What I think people are missing about Brady is that more than any QB in the league ever, he has answers. Whatever you throw at him—especially in meaningful games—he’ll figure it out and make the right decisions. Josh Allen, for instance, clearly isn’t there yet. To be sure, Brady isn’t perfect every game. He’ll occasionally even lose a playoff game. But in terms of diagnosing and exploiting what’s in front of him, no QB compares. As for physical attributes, they’re certainly good enough. He can make every throw even if his arm doesn’t compare to those of Allen, Rodgers, and Mahomes. One of the great myths of our era is that Aaron Rodgers is somehow the GOAT. He is a phenomenal QB, but too often doesn’t have the answers in big games.

The king of intangibles. You won't find this on any stat sheet unless you are looking for most rings.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

What I think people are missing about Brady is that more than any QB in the league ever, he has answers. Whatever you throw at him—especially in meaningful games—he’ll figure it out and make the right decisions. Josh Allen, for instance, clearly isn’t there yet. To be sure, Brady isn’t perfect every game. He’ll occasionally even lose a playoff game. But in terms of diagnosing and exploiting what’s in front of him, no QB compares. As for physical attributes, they’re certainly good enough. He can make every throw even if his arm doesn’t compare to those of Allen, Rodgers, and Mahomes. One of the great myths of our era is that Aaron Rodgers is somehow the GOAT. He is a phenomenal QB, but too often doesn’t have the answers in big games.

 

I don't disagree with any of that. But the bad games are much more common than they used to be. That is understandable. He is 40 freaking 3. I don't think saying he is still the 6th best Quarterback in the world is anything other than ultimate respect for his ability to find a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So I think Watson is better than Burrow and Herbert at this stage by still some distance. But I have said there are only 7 teams who shouldn't at least be calling about Deshaun Watson and two of those are Cincy and the Chargers because they have 4 more years of cost control (3 of stringent cost control) with guys who looked good to very good as rookies. 

 

That was my thinking to.  Watson is better today but not by much and if Burrow & Herbert improve as much as I think they will next year they'll be nipping at Watson's heels and costing their teams a hell of a lot less money.

 

As an aside I fully expect Allen to make another jump next year.  He has improved every year since the Senior Bowl so I feel safe in assuming he has at least one more jump left in him.  

 

Right now the odds are better that Allen will hit his highest upside then he will stall out where he is now.  Last season was not a one year wonder but the continued climb of a young QB from high school to his 3rd year in the NFL.  It's really quite extraordinary when you think about the progress Allen has made over that time.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CincyBillsFan said:

That was my thinking to.  Watson is better today but not by much and if Burrow & Herbert improve as much as I think they will next year they'll be nipping at Watson's heels and costing their teams a hell of a lot less money.

 

As an aside I fully expect Allen to make another jump next year.  He has improved every year since the Senior Bowl so I feel safe in assuming he has at least one more jump left in him.  

 

Right now the odds are better that Allen will hit his highest upside then he will stall out where he is now.  Last season was not a one year wonder but the continued climb of a young QB from high school to his 3rd year in the NFL.  It's really quite extraordinary when you think about the progress Allen has made over that time.

 

He's still relatively inexperienced.  The more he plays the better he'll get. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

That was my thinking to.  Watson is better today but not by much and if Burrow & Herbert improve as much as I think they will next year they'll be nipping at Watson's heels and costing their teams a hell of a lot less money.

 

As an aside I fully expect Allen to make another jump next year.  He has improved every year since the Senior Bowl so I feel safe in assuming he has at least one more jump left in him.  

 

Right now the odds are better that Allen will hit his highest upside then he will stall out where he is now.  Last season was not a one year wonder but the continued climb of a young QB from high school to his 3rd year in the NFL.  It's really quite extraordinary when you think about the progress Allen has made over that time.

 

 

While I agree with that on Allen I am not sure I buy the built in assumption that Watson has totally plateaued and therefore Burrow and Herbert are bound to close the gap. He just had his best individual season as a pro. There is no guarantee that by the time they need paying Herbert and Burrow have caught him, thought Cincy and LAC should definitely take the chance to find out. Still think Watson is better than you think he is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2021 at 6:29 AM, CincyBillsFan said:

 

I took your suggestion up and asked one Cleveland and five Cincinnati fans if they would rather have Allen or Watson.  The Browns fan & four of the five Bengals fans said they would take Allen over Watson in a heart beat. The remaining Bengal's fan said it would be a toss up and he would be happy with either.

 

I think we may be underestimating how much Allen has moved up among non-Bills fans based on his National TV performances starting last Thanksgiving against Dallas.

 

A common theme among those I asked was that they felt like Watson had plateaued and Allen was still improving.

 

 

 

This.  I live in Hawai'i and i can count on one hand the amount of locals who were born and bred here in Hawai'i who are longtime Bills fans.  Over the last few months as I've been going out in public with my Bills shirts and/or Bills mask on I've had numerous random strangers strike up conversations about how good our quarterback--and thus our team--is now.

 

More than once I've gotten people who have just said "I love your Quarterback."

 

Let's just pray Allen doesn't get any serious injuries, because he's here to stay if he can stay healthy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2021 at 6:55 AM, GunnerBill said:

 

This is true to an extent. The Texans were definitely in a lot of back and forth shoot out games. Watson was 10th in attempts this year. Part of the reason he led the league in passing was he completed over 70% of his throws and it can't all be attributed to soft coverage giving him the underneath throws - he was 2nd in the league in intended air yards per attempt behind only Tom Brady and led the league in completed air yards per attempt and completed air yards per completion. He was only 15th in the league in YAC by receivers. In short Watson's number were good mainly because he is really, really good. Yes, the type of games his team played was a factor, but not as big a factor as his ability. He is a top 5 Quarterback. Rather than continuing to try and caveat his play Bills fans should be going "wow that guy is great and yet I don't need to feel jealous about it because we have one of the very few guys who is better." But Bills fans have this chip on their shoulder that everyone else's guys get respect and the Bills' guys don't and it makes them respond to things in some odd ways. 

 

I think you're trying to be much too objective here and it's slanting reality. Yeah, you're right that Watson is a great QB.  I 100% agree.  However, there has been so much raving publicly about the season he just had without acknowledging the very real and warranted caveat that so much of his statistically great season was garbage time.

 

It's been something talked about with every single Bills QB since Kelly when a QB plays well towards the ends of games when they're out of reach... it's completely fair to bring it up with Watson. who threw 23 TDs when trailing in games this season and more TDs in the 4th quarter (13) than any other quarter.

 

Watson's great, but I think it's misguided to look at the season he just had as some kind of validation of his greatness.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2021 at 7:25 AM, CincyBillsFan said:

 

 

IMO my top 5 would be: Rogers, Mahomes, Allen, Brady and Wilson.  My next 7 would be:  Jackson, Watson, Prescott, Herbert, Burrough, Stafford & Mayfield

 

 

I like your list and agree completely with the top 5.  I'd put Watson at 6 just behind Wilson, though.  And yeah, I think Wilson is better than Watson.  And I think everyone behind them falls off a cliff, including Jackson who I just don't think will ever "get over the hump" and become what he needs to become.

 

I love looking at that list right now, actually.  It shows me that there are a LOT of teams in the NFL right now with potential QB issues and we are no longer one of them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I think you're trying to be much too objective here and it's slanting reality. Yeah, you're right that Watson is a great QB.  I 100% agree.  However, there has been so much raving publicly about the season he just had without acknowledging the very real and warranted caveat that so much of his statistically great season was garbage time.

 

It's been something talked about with every single Bills QB since Kelly when a QB plays well towards the ends of games when they're out of reach... it's completely fair to bring it up with Watson. who threw 23 TDs when trailing in games this season and more TDs in the 4th quarter (13) than any other quarter.

 

Watson's great, but I think it's misguided to look at the season he just had as some kind of validation of his greatness.

Been here for 20 years.....there’s been some talk....but there hasn’t been a bills QB that has put together numbers that have been worth even discussing....even in garbage time.  Comparing discussion about watsons garbage time stats to former Bills qb stats Is a poor comparison.  Jmo

 

According to people that watch games....and not just look at stats, Watson had a great season.  Terrible OL.  Terrible run game.  Terrible coaching.  Terrible defense. All Midget WRs.  Crap TEs. It was Watson vs other teams.  Garbage time stats aside, he played great amidst the worst of circumstances 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I think you're trying to be much too objective here and it's slanting reality. Yeah, you're right that Watson is a great QB.  I 100% agree.  However, there has been so much raving publicly about the season he just had without acknowledging the very real and warranted caveat that so much of his statistically great season was garbage time.

 

It's been something talked about with every single Bills QB since Kelly when a QB plays well towards the ends of games when they're out of reach... it's completely fair to bring it up with Watson. who threw 23 TDs when trailing in games this season and more TDs in the 4th quarter (13) than any other quarter.

 

Watson's great, but I think it's misguided to look at the season he just had as some kind of validation of his greatness.

 

Disagree. They were not miles behind in a lot of those games. Did the sort of games he played in affect some of his numbers? Absolutely. Was it the main factor? Nope. Or else he wouldn't also lead the league in air yards per completion. Unless the argument is "okay it was prevent but every pass he completed against prevent was 15-20 yards downfield." Which would be one strange sort of prevent defense. 

 

Yes the games he was in matter. They matter less than how good Deshaun Watson is.

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I like your list and agree completely with the top 5.  I'd put Watson at 6 just behind Wilson, though.  And yeah, I think Wilson is better than Watson.  And I think everyone behind them falls off a cliff, including Jackson who I just don't think will ever "get over the hump" and become what he needs to become.

 

I love looking at that list right now, actually.  It shows me that there are a LOT of teams in the NFL right now with potential QB issues and we are no longer one of them.

You think watson falls off of a cliff behind Wilson?   I don’t see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NewEra said:

You think watson falls off of a cliff behind Wilson?   I don’t see it

 

I don't think that is what he meant. I think he meant there is a cliff after those 6 - and I agree with him there is. Personally I have Watson top of the 2nd tier ahead of Wilson and the 43 year old, but I can take an argument that he is the back of that queue. I think there is a reasonable argument to be made, although not one I agree with. There is zero argument that he should be ranked any lower than 6th. And the gap between 6th and 7th is where the real drop is. I think I'd have Tannehill #7. And I don't think he is in the same group as Watson at all.

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Disagree. They were not miles behind in a lot of those games. Did the sort of games he played in affect some of his numbers? Absolutely. Was it the main factor? Nope. Or else he wouldn't also lead the league in air yards per completion. Unless the argument is "okay it was prevent but every pass he completed against prevent was 15-20 yards downfield." Which would be one strange sort of prevent defense. 

 

Yes the games he was in matter. They matter less than how good Deshaun Watson is.

 

Watson helped keep his team in a lot of those games, absolutely.  But it's also true that a good chunk of his production came in garbage time or blowout losses like against Chicago or Green Bay.

 

7 of his 36 TDs were in garbage time/blowout losses.

 

If you're really being objective here then I think it's fine to acknowledge that Watson is an Elite QB, but 2020 was NOT his best year in the NFL as everyone seems to be arguing.  And much of that was absolutely no fault of his own.

  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Been here for 20 years.....there’s been some talk....but there hasn’t been a bills QB that has put together numbers that have been worth even discussing....even in garbage time.  Comparing discussion about watsons garbage time stats to former Bills qb stats Is a poor comparison.  Jmo

 

According to people that watch games....and not just look at stats, Watson had a great season.  Terrible OL.  Terrible run game.  Terrible coaching.  Terrible defense. All Midget WRs.  Crap TEs. It was Watson vs other teams.  Garbage time stats aside, he played great amidst the worst of circumstances 

 

Yes, he played great amidst the worst of circumstances, but if you are objectively framing his season, there's NO REASON to push 2020 as Watson's best season or anything close to it.

 

It's not just the 7 TDs he scored in blowout losses/garbage time.  It's also the 9 TDs he scored in 3 of his 4 wins against the 2 worst defenses in the league of Detroit and Jacksonville.

 

That's 16 of his 36 TDs.

 

Good year for Watson.  Bravo for doing what he could with that team... but can we please stop presenting it as some kind of magical year that's a notch on his belt towards the HOF?

32 minutes ago, NewEra said:

You think watson falls off of a cliff behind Wilson?   I don’t see it

 

Read what I wrote.  That's not what I said even though it's clearly what you're hoping I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/19/2021 at 8:08 PM, Nelius said:

Nobody's actually "exploring" this. Real top 5 looking forward are Mahomes, Rodgers, Allen, Murray, Wilson/Watson, with significant emphasis on ranking Allen above Watson. Justin Herbert lurking in honorable mention. Brady's an enigma, I'm not including him in these things. He could throw ducks for 2,000 yards next year and still win a Super Bowl apparently, I don't know how you rank that.

 

Murray?????

 

Seriously????

 

I strongly disagree.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Yes, he played great amidst the worst of circumstances, but if you are objectively framing his season, there's NO REASON to push 2020 as Watson's best season or anything close to it.

 

It's not just the 7 TDs he scored in blowout losses/garbage time.  It's also the 9 TDs he scored in 3 of his 4 wins against the 2 worst defenses in the league of Detroit and Jacksonville.

 

That's 16 of his 36 TDs.

 

Good year for Watson.  Bravo for doing what he could with that team... but can we please stop presenting it as some kind of magical year that's a notch on his belt towards the HOF?

 

Read what I wrote.  That's not what I said even though it's clearly what you're hoping I said.

I misunderstood....my bad

 

Regarding the bolded....I wasn’t “hoping” for anything.  I’m reading a message board and reacting to what I read in this situation, what I thought I read).  I don’t have anything against you and don’t really know too much about you as a poster.  We’ve had a little back in forth but nothing that would make me pass judgement 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Yes, he played great amidst the worst of circumstances, but if you are objectively framing his season, there's NO REASON to push 2020 as Watson's best season or anything close to it.

 

It's not just the 7 TDs he scored in blowout losses/garbage time.  It's also the 9 TDs he scored in 3 of his 4 wins against the 2 worst defenses in the league of Detroit and Jacksonville.

 

That's 16 of his 36 TDs.

 

Good year for Watson.  Bravo for doing what he could with that team... but can we please stop presenting it as some kind of magical year that's a notch on his belt towards the HOF?

 

Read what I wrote.  That's not what I said even though it's clearly what you're hoping I said.

I certainly didn’t act like he had a magical year.  I’m acting like he’s a great QB that played on a crappy team.  He’s not a great QB because of what he did last season. He’s a great qb because of what he’s done as a starting QB in the league since his first game.  I feel that he could be getting better, just as many qBs improve with experience.  If he continues to play like he has for the next 10 years, he’ll certainly be in the HoF.....but you brought up the HoF, not me.  
 

He’s a great QB that might be available in a trade. Probably (easily imo), the best QB ever on the trade market.  Most teams should do what they need to get him.  

Edited by NewEra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think regardless of the tiers when you have a legit franchise QB....you have a legit franchise QB

 

Then it goes down to the ability to put the team around them that a.  fit his skillset and b. there is someone else that can make a damn play on both sides of the ball.

 

If our D was as good as it had been the previous year.......we have better seeding and we are playing in the Super Bowl....I truly believe that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like then both, but it's not all about x's and o's. Obviously I'm biased, but Josh "fits" in Buffalo. I think anyone on the team would run through a wall for him and vice versa. With that being said. Houston got rid of their best WR before the season and we brought in ours. Although QB is the centerpiece, it takes a team to win.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Yes, he played great amidst the worst of circumstances, but if you are objectively framing his season, there's NO REASON to push 2020 as Watson's best season or anything close to it.

 

It's not just the 7 TDs he scored in blowout losses/garbage time.  It's also the 9 TDs he scored in 3 of his 4 wins against the 2 worst defenses in the league of Detroit and Jacksonville.

 

That's 16 of his 36 TDs.

 

Good year for Watson.  Bravo for doing what he could with that team... but can we please stop presenting it as some kind of magical year that's a notch on his belt towards the HOF?

 

Read what I wrote.  That's not what I said even though it's clearly what you're hoping I said.

Aw man he scored 9 TD’s against bad defenses in 3 games?

 

I’d cut him.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2021 at 9:06 PM, Augie said:

 

Sorry, you went from a declaration, “Allen is better”, to a supposition, “If, at the end of his career....”.  Can’t have it both ways and pretend you proved your point. 

 

If Peyton Manning played his entire career with the Jags, they might have been slightly better as a team, but he would NOT have had the same career or be seen as the sure fire HOF QB he was. 

 

What surrounds a QB matters (players, coaches and FO), and can help define a career.  I don’t blame Watson for wanting out, or at least better talent (on and off the field) surrounding him.  Russell Wilson said it himself on Dan Patrick this week.....his “legacy” rides on what surrounds him. 

 

EDIT: I am NOT saying Josh isn’t better. I’m just making a bigger point about how important surrounding talent and coaching is. You have also omitted part of my quote, which could possibly lead to being misleading. 

 

 

.

 

 

 

.

 

.

I was specifically replying to your @end if career “ assertion.  Reading comprehension is important.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Way to completely twist what I said.

I’d like you’d to sit in “transplanttexansfan’s” shoes and try to imagine what you’re arguing. 
 

Would you listen to ANY argument about how many of Josh’s TD’s came against bad teams that means they are worth less and are unimpressive? What about when they ran up the score on teams aka the other side of garbage time? No. Because it’s an inane point that goes well beyond the point of rationality. 
 

Similar to “QB X is great because he is 10/11 for 120 yards when throwing to the left hash in the third quarter,” the argument “QB X WASN’T that great because he had 9 TD’s in 3 games but he played bad teams” is inanity bordering on complete nonsense.

 

I mean. Come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FireChans said:

I’d like you’d to sit in “transplanttexansfan’s” shoes and try to imagine what you’re arguing. 
 

Would you listen to ANY argument about how many of Josh’s TD’s came against bad teams that means they are worth less and are unimpressive? What about when they ran up the score on teams aka the other side of garbage time? No. Because it’s an inane point that goes well beyond the point of rationality. 
 

Similar to “QB X is great because he is 10/11 for 120 yards when throwing to the left hash in the third quarter,” the argument “QB X WASN’T that great because he had 9 TD’s in 3 games but he played bad teams” is inanity bordering on complete nonsense.

 

I mean. Come on.

 

I am 100% certain that if next year the Bills go 4 - 12 yet Allen has the most yards & TD passes of his career all sorts of Bills fans on 2BD would be slicing and dicing the stats to show that Allen's numbers were misleading and he didn't really have a good year. 

 

The fact remains that stats in garbage time can boost a QB's numbers quite a bit.  I believe Matt Stafford has been a beneficiary of this.  To suggest that Watson has also benefited from this last season is not unreasonable.

 

Now I'm not blaming Watson for the Texans going 4 - 12.  He played well and was not the cause of their bad record  I am saying that his numbers were inflated as a result of that bad record. And IMO when it counted with the games on the line Allen was a better QB then Watson.

 

I do wonder whether on an Allen versus Watson thread on a Houston message board there would be as many Texan fans extolling the greatness of Allen as there are Bills fans praising Watson.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2021 at 11:33 AM, dave mcbride said:

What I think people are missing about Brady is that more than any QB in the league ever, he has answers. Whatever you throw at him—especially in meaningful games—he’ll figure it out and make the right decisions. Josh Allen, for instance, clearly isn’t there yet. To be sure, Brady isn’t perfect every game. He’ll occasionally even lose a playoff game. But in terms of diagnosing and exploiting what’s in front of him, no QB compares. As for physical attributes, they’re certainly good enough. He can make every throw even if his arm doesn’t compare to those of Allen, Rodgers, and Mahomes. One of the great myths of our era is that Aaron Rodgers is somehow the GOAT. He is a phenomenal QB, but too often doesn’t have the answers in big games.

 

Reading this post reminded me of a GOAT (at his position) from baseball: Mariano Rivera. Both his and Bradys success and longevity are unfathomable. Trying to compare any of their contemporary peers to them is an exercise in futility.  Naturally they both played on the teams in their sport that I hate the most.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

I am 100% certain that if next year the Bills go 4 - 12 yet Allen has the most yards & TD passes of his career all sorts of Bills fans on 2BD would be slicing and dicing the stats to show that Allen's numbers were misleading and he didn't really have a good year. 

 

The fact remains that stats in garbage time can boost a QB's numbers quite a bit.  I believe Matt Stafford has been a beneficiary of this.  To suggest that Watson has also benefited from this last season is not unreasonable.

 

Now I'm not blaming Watson for the Texans going 4 - 12.  He played well and was not the cause of their bad record  I am saying that his numbers were inflated as a result of that bad record. And IMO when it counted with the games on the line Allen was a better QB then Watson.

 

I do wonder whether on an Allen versus Watson thread on a Houston message board there would be as many Texan fans extolling the greatness of Allen as there are Bills fans praising Watson.

 

Sure. But @transplantbillsfan wouldn't be.  That's the point.

 

Objectivity cuts both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Sure. But @transplantbillsfan wouldn't be.  That's the point.

 

Objectivity cuts both ways.

 

I might be a homer, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong.

 

What you should probably do is ignore me if these are the best arguments you bring to discussion involving me.

 

By the way, did I say Watson had a bad year? In fact, didn't I say he was really good this year?

 

All I said was that his year is being blown out of proportion and provided evidence as to why. And also that in this "Allen vs Watson" discussion--ya know, the original purpose of this discussion--Allen is better than Watson and you do NOT make that player for player trade.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Sure. But @transplantbillsfan wouldn't be.  That's the point.

 

Objectivity cuts both ways.

 

On a dedicated Bills message board?  I don't expect objectivity when I visit other NFL message boards.

 

Now that doesn't mean I'm a blind partisan of the Bills and I don't view everything Bills related through rose colored glasses.  The last 25 years has hardened my football soul quite a bit and I am more then capable of being critical of the Bills.  But when it comes to talking about Allen, a guy who is likely to match or even exceed Jim Kelly as the greatest QB in Bills history, I'm going to be an advocate.  Particularly on a Bills message board.

 

 

Edited by CincyBillsFan
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

On a dedicated Bills message board?  I don't expect objectivity when I visit other NFL message boards.

 

Now that doesn't mean I'm a blind partisan of the Bills and I don't view everything Bills related through rose colored glasses.  The last 25 years has hardened my football soul quite a bit and I am more then capable of being critical of the Bills.  But when it comes to talking about Allen, a guy who is likely to match or even exceed Jim Kelly as the greatest QB in Bills history, I'm going to be an advocate.  Particularly on a Bills message board.

 

 

I don’t care if you’re not being objective as long as you know you aren’t.

 

You can be an advocate for Josh Allen without going out of your way to make silly arguments against other players. Allen can be great and Watson can be great and you can think Allen is more great. 

 

I don’t expect anyone here to say Watson > Allen (bills fan or not because I think Allen > Watson is true). 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FireChans said:

I don’t care if you’re not being objective as long as you know you aren’t.

 

You can be an advocate for Josh Allen without going out of your way to make silly arguments against other players. Allen can be great and Watson can be great and you can think Allen is more great. 

 

I don’t expect anyone here to say Watson > Allen (bills fan or not because I think Allen > Watson is true). 

 

Can you acknowledge that you're pretty clearly not objective, either?

 

Now... correct me if I'm wrong... but weren't you one of the more vocal "Allen doubters" on this message board?

 

Sorry, I may be confusing you with someone else or conflating your ridiculously-negative-clinging-to-a-past-long-gone-username with your recent opinions of Allen, but I generally get the sense you're one of those vocal ones here still with one foot in the boat.

 

NO ONE IS SAYING DESHAUN WATSON ISN'T GREAT!!!

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Can you acknowledge that you're pretty clearly not objective, either?

 

Now... correct me if I'm wrong... but weren't you one of the more vocal "Allen doubters" on this message board?

 

Sorry, I may be confusing you with someone else or conflating your ridiculously-negative-clinging-to-a-past-long-gone-username with your recent opinions of Allen, but I generally get the sense you're one of those vocal ones here still with one foot in the boat.

 

NO ONE IS SAYING DESHAUN WATSON ISN'T GREAT!!!

I mean, I thought Allen wasn’t that great in 2018. He was a work in progress. He’s great now. 

 

Do you think it’s funny in an argument about objectivity, you thought me being an Allen “doubter” in 2018 hurt my credibility? Because I’d argue the exact opposite.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Can you acknowledge that you're pretty clearly not objective, either?

 

Now... correct me if I'm wrong... but weren't you one of the more vocal "Allen doubters" on this message board?

 

Sorry, I may be confusing you with someone else or conflating your ridiculously-negative-clinging-to-a-past-long-gone-username with your recent opinions of Allen, but I generally get the sense you're one of those vocal ones here still with one foot in the boat.

 

NO ONE IS SAYING DESHAUN WATSON ISN'T GREAT!!!


He was one of the leaders of the pack!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FireChans said:

I mean, I thought Allen wasn’t that great in 2018. He was a work in progress. He’s great now. 

 

Do you think it’s funny in an argument about objectivity, you thought me being an Allen “doubter” in 2018 hurt my credibility? Because I’d argue the exact opposite.

 

Objectively... do you think it's fair to say you're underplaying your public view of Allen not just in 2018 but also in 2019?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2021 at 8:18 AM, Albany,n.y. said:

Josh is better than Watson & always will be.  Watson was 4-12 this past season.  No team with Josh Allen as the starting QB would ever go 4-12.  Even in Josh's rookie year, with no offensive line or WRs, Josh willed the team to 5 wins out of the 11 games he started.  Watson loses, Josh wins.  Wins are the most important statistic because a QB makes everyone around him better.  Josh does that, Watson doesn't.  

 

 

No, that was NOT Watson who was 4 - 12. It was the Houston Texans.

 

And if you put Allen on a crappy team, that team also might go 4 - 12, particularly if their last coach had as thoroughly dynamited the team's morale and self-belief as O'Brien did in Texas.

 

Wins are indeed the most important statistic, of course. But they are a team statistic, not a QB statistic. Blaming Watson for the Texans having the 30th best defense in the league last year is just butt-headed. You evaluate a QB by how well or poorly he plays, period.

 

I think Allen's better than Watson, but you can't tell it by wins, which are affected by stuff like whether kickers hit field goals or whether RBs fumble or whether an OLB drops an INT right in his breadbasket. You decide who the best QB is by looking at who played QB better. It ain't rocket science.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2021 at 5:35 PM, Marvlevydraftdaygenius said:

To all you fans out there that want to explore if Watson is better than Allen and if the Texans offered  Watson for Josh Allen the Bills should think about it.  Little guy Ricco on Bills Fanatics said Watson is better than Allen look at the Stats.    Here is the Major reason why Allen is better than Watson. Josh is  throwing in Buffalo, Watson is throwing in a Dome.  Has  Watson, ever in his career played in the cold?  He played at Clemson I don't recall their weather being blizzard like and in the pros he plays in a division with the Colts dome team, Tennessee warm weather team, and Jacksonville Warm weather team no where near the Weather Josh plays in.   Be thankful Buffalo you found the prototype QB to play in Buffalo's weather.

My response is that your screen name is just fantastic.

 

In fact, I am placing it in my top 10 for this site.

Edited by Bill from NYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

 

I am 100% certain that if next year the Bills go 4 - 12 yet Allen has the most yards & TD passes of his career all sorts of Bills fans on 2BD would be slicing and dicing the stats to show that Allen's numbers were misleading and he didn't really have a good year. 

 

The fact remains that stats in garbage time can boost a QB's numbers quite a bit.  I believe Matt Stafford has been a beneficiary of this.  To suggest that Watson has also benefited from this last season is not unreasonable.

 

Now I'm not blaming Watson for the Texans going 4 - 12.  He played well and was not the cause of their bad record  I am saying that his numbers were inflated as a result of that bad record. And IMO when it counted with the games on the line Allen was a better QB then Watson.

 

I do wonder whether on an Allen versus Watson thread on a Houston message board there would be as many Texan fans extolling the greatness of Allen as there are Bills fans praising Watson.

 

Flashback one year ago in the biggest game of the year, while one was playing hero ball and failing, one was bouncing off two blitz era at the same time, leading his team to a victory.  We didn’t see Watson do that this last season because his team was so bad, he rarely had the chance.

 

We’ve known Watson was a great QB since his rookie season.  He came out of the nfl womb dominating.  We KNOW he is great already.  Last seasons “stats” mean little to nothing imo.  Whether it’s garbage time stats or crunch time stats.....he’s great regardless of what his stats are.  
 

What is the argument?  Who is better?  One was a great QB on a bad team.  One was a great QB on a very good team. The year before, when both teams were on similar levels, 1 played a good half and a bad half in the same game. They’re both great qbs. Allen had a better 2020.  Watson has had a better career.
 

it’s as if, now that we have a great QB, we have to compare him to every other great qb and while doing so, trash the opposing great QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...