Jump to content

If Trump loses and refuses to leave


Recommended Posts

On 11/10/2020 at 1:10 PM, Kemp said:

 

Pay attention.

 

The bet was who the President will be when the dust settles.

 


That is wasn’t the original bet here. Damn you like to change the wager a lot here. 

On 11/11/2020 at 4:42 AM, TBBills said:

This is what I been saying the right wingers in this PPP said the same thing than forgot they ever said that the day after the election.

 

@Big Gun, @coltrane34, @westside2, @Chef Jim


It’s then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Actually I did not. He was part of the group that got it wrong as I said for now the 3rd time.

 

Not sure how Republicans voted has anything to do with what Joe did.  

 

I think EVERYONE who voted for it should admit their HUGE mistake, resign, and move to the AZ desert and wear sackloth and ashes never to be seen or heard from again.  If you fug up that bad at your job you need to find a new job.

 

Just because I don't like your BFF does not mean I'm a Republican. That's just your George W Bush " if you ain't for us, You're against us" logic at play.

 

Funny, you only mentioned Biden, once again.

 

You also must remember that Trump was for the Iraq war, so who would you like to see as President, or is all you want is Biden saying he made a mistake on that vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


That is wasn’t the original bet here. Damn you like to change the wager a lot here. 


It’s then. 

 

That's the bet I have offered anyone here. Take me up on it. Oh, I know you can't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

Funny, you only mentioned Biden, once again.

 

You also must remember that Trump was for the Iraq war, so who would you like to see as President, or is all you want is Biden saying he made a mistake on that vote?

 

Biden is the only one running for prez.  I said the same about Hillary when she was running.

 

I don't think Trump was for it. Do you have any proof that he was?  But even so who cares? At the time he was a private citizen NOT a Senator with a vote like Joe and Hillary.

 

An apology might be nice but as I stated above I want him to move to the AZ desert, wear sack cloth and ashes never to be seen or heard from again.

 

But as the Stones said, you can't always get what you want.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Biden is the only one running for prez.  I said the same about Hillary when she was running.

 

I don't think Trump was for it. Do you have any proof that he was?  But even so who cares? At the time he was a private citizen NOT a Senator with a vote like Joe and Hillary.

 

An apology might be nice but as I stated above I want him to move to the AZ desert, wear sack cloth and ashes never to be seen or heard from again.

 

But as the Stones said, you can't always get what you want.

 

 

He said it on the Howard Stern show before the war became so unpopular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

 

Thanks.  The ONLY thing Trump is on record of saying is "Yeah, I guess so," Trump responded. "I wish the first time it was done correctly.". Doesn't sound like bigly support.  "Yeah I guess" is certainly a far cry from a U.S. Senator making a stupid vote.

 

 Besides, so what?  He didn't have a vote. Joe, a U.S. Senator, did and, as he often does, made the wrong decision.

 

What does what Trump as a private citizen thought have ANYTHING to do with what Joe actually did with dire consequences?

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Thanks.  The ONLY thing Trump is on record of saying is "Yeah, I guess so," Trump responded. "I wish the first time it was done correctly.". Doesn't sound like bigly support.  "Yeah I guess" is certainly a far cry from a U.S. Senator making a stupid vote.

 

 Besides, so what?  He didn't have a vote. Joe, a U.S. Senator, did and, as he often does, made the wrong decision.

 

What does what Trump as a private citizen thought have ANYTHING to do with what Joe actually did with dire consequences?

The reason it was a thing was that he was lying about not supporting it or more accurately he was lying about being against it. I mean by all means say this was a mistake by President Elect Biden but Trump doesn't get to pretend he was a voice of reason on this subject when he wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

The reason it was a thing was that he was lying about not supporting it or more accurately he was lying about being against it. I mean by all means say this was a mistake by President Elect Biden but Trump doesn't get to pretend he was a voice of reason on this subject when he wasn't.

 

I can see your point I guess.

 

I just don't see "Yeah I guess" on the Howard Stern show as any kind of ringing endorsement. if he was so for it how come this is all there is?  Usually when Trump is for something he does.things like take out a full page ad in the NY Times or run a national campaign to get someone to turn over their birth.certificate.

 

  I knew A LOT of people who supported the Iraq war before it started. They didn't say "Yeah I guess". They said things like "Saddam has nukes. We have to get him before he gets us.". " Melt the sand. " "He gassed his Own people." "Finish the job. "

 

the story you posted was from 9/30/1016.  It was a big story cuz the D's were desperate cuz they had a bad candidate.

Edited by reddogblitz
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I can see your point I guess.

 

I just don't see "Yeah I guess" on the Howard Stern show as any kind of ringing endorsement. if he was so for it how come this is all there is?  Usually when Trump is for something he does.things like take out a full page ad in the NY Times or run a national campaign to get someone to turn over their birth.certificate.

 

  I knew A LOT of people who supported the Iraq war before it started. They didn't say "Yeah I guess". They said things like "Saddam has nukes. We have to get him before he gets us.". " Melt the sand. " "He gassed his Own people." "Finish the job. "

 

the story you posted was from 9/30/1016.  It was a big story cuz the D's were desperate cuz they had a bad candidate.

The few people with a brain knew that Iraq wasn't the terrorist state, and weren't stupid enough to accept "he's a bad guy" as a legit reason for war.  I can still recall telling people how dumb they were even as they were ripping down the Saddam statues.  Bush/Cheney, 2 more complete failures, and they RE-ELECTED him(sorta). The stupidity of the American voter, and the sham that was that election scared me away from politics for years.  How old is Dan Bongino?  Was he too young to remember THAT most corrupt administration in history??  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

That was about Russian interference in the election something supported by evidence as opposed to Trumps claim of a massive amount of voter fraud in favor of Democrats with none.

Zero evidence no campaign convictions.  More evidence from the democrats creating the Russian narrative 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

That was about Russian interference in the election something supported by evidence as opposed to Trumps claim of a massive amount of voter fraud in favor of Democrats with none.

 

You're conflating interference with collusion.  There was evidence of the former but none of the latter.  But there was no evidence the interference changed a single vote.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Warcodered said:

The reason it was a thing was that he was lying about not supporting it or more accurately he was lying about being against it. I mean by all means say this was a mistake by President Elect Biden but Trump doesn't get to pretend he was a voice of reason on this subject when he wasn't.

So, you’ll go so far as to compare a guy shooting the breeze with a dopey radio show host to guy who was a multi-decade US Senator fully and completely briefed by the intelligence community?  A realty TV pitchman to a guy who given the experience and wisdom after decades in Washington who should have known the war was a mistake? 
 

This is priceless.  DJT complicit in the Iraq War, the guy who actually voted for it and bragged about it presidential.  
 

This. is. epic. 
 

:worthy:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

So, you’ll go so far as to compare a guy shooting the breeze with a dopey radio show host to guy who was a multi-decade US Senator fully and completely briefed by the intelligence community?  A realty TV pitchman to a guy who given the experience and wisdom after decades in Washington who should have known the war was a mistake? 
 

This is priceless.  DJT complicit in the Iraq War, the guy who actually voted for it and bragged about it presidential.  
 

This. is. epic. 
 

:worthy:

 

Amazing, isn't it? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, daz28 said:

The few people with a brain knew that Iraq wasn't the terrorist state, and weren't stupid enough to accept "he's a bad guy" as a legit reason for war.  I can still recall telling people how dumb they were even as they were ripping down the Saddam statues.  Bush/Cheney, 2 more complete failures, and they RE-ELECTED him(sorta). The stupidity of the American voter, and the sham that was that election scared me away from politics for years.  How old is Dan Bongino?  Was he too young to remember THAT most corrupt administration in history??  

I’ll play. 
 

Why are Barry, Michelle, Geo and Laurz best friends now? 
 

Forgive and forget? 


Shared bond of dispatching impotent dictators?  

Thruple, one extra to man the camera? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You're conflating interference with collusion.  There was evidence of the former but none of the latter.  But there was no evidence the interference changed a single vote.

No I wasn't I was responding to his posting of this tweet.

Which is about Russian interference, and even getting into the idea of whether he colluded or not this was an election where he actually asked Russia to release emails to damage his opponent. So if there was evidence of their interference they absolutely should investigate whether he worked with them.

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

So, you’ll go so far as to compare a guy shooting the breeze with a dopey radio show host to guy who was a multi-decade US Senator fully and completely briefed by the intelligence community?  A realty TV pitchman to a guy who given the experience and wisdom after decades in Washington who should have known the war was a mistake? 
 

This is priceless.  DJT complicit in the Iraq War, the guy who actually voted for it and bragged about it presidential.  
 

This. is. epic. 
 

:worthy:

So you didn't actually read what I said then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Amazing, isn't it? 

Without a hint of irony.
 

Howard Stern. 
 

Access to every piece of intelligence the country has ever gathered.

 

The same. 

1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

No I wasn't I was responding to his posting of this tweet.

Which is about Russian interference, and even getting into the idea of whether he colluded or not this was an election where he actually asked Russia to release emails to damage his opponent. So if there was evidence of their interference they absolutely should investigate whether he worked with them.

So you didn't actually read what I said then.

I did, and maybe I jumped the gun.  I’m hearing that lots of critical intelligence decisions were made by the guest hosts on Rowan and Martin’s Laugh In. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

No I wasn't I was responding to his posting of this tweet.

Which is about Russian interference, and even getting into the idea of whether he colluded or not this was an election where he actually asked Russia to release emails to damage his opponent. So if there was evidence of their interference they absolutely should investigate whether he worked with them.

 

They spent a million or so on Facebook ads.  If that was enough to overcome the $1.2 billion spent by Hilly's campaign...

 

And as for the e-mail thing, if you're secretly colluding with someone, you don't go out in public and ask them to do stuff for you.  It was more a statement on the sad state of the American press who didn't care to investigate something they should have been investigating.

 

And the truth is that Barry's admin knew about Russia's interference and didn't do a thing about it.

 

19 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Without a hint of irony.
 

Howard Stern. 
 

Access to every piece of intelligence the country has ever gathered.

 

The same.

 

I guess so.

Edited by Doc
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I’ll play. 
 

Why are Barry, Michelle, Geo and Laurz best friends now? 
 

Forgive and forget? 


Shared bond of dispatching impotent dictators?  

Thruple, one extra to man the camera? 


If you have to answer a question with what about these guys, you lost. Whataboutism has been a Trumper narrative for 4 years. Stop that ****. Stick up for what your side has done without pointing to whataboutism.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


If you have to answer a question with what about these guys, you lost. Whataboutism has been a Trumper narrative for 4 years. Stop that ****. Stick up for what your side has done without pointing to whataboutism.

I considered what you offered here and rejected it because it’s nonsensical.  However, great  misuse of one of the most overused internet expressions of the day.  Next, use straw man incorrectly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I considered what you offered here and rejected it because it’s nonsensical.  However, great  misuse of one of the most overused internet expressions of the day.  Next, use straw man incorrectly.  


When you answer a question, think, hey what I’m saying could easily be started with the phrase What about... If you answer yes, then you are using a whataboutism. And yea, it’s used a lot online now because it’s a very common defense the right has been using for the past 4 years. Again, defend your position without an argument that starts with what about... 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Biden is the only one running for prez.  I said the same about Hillary when she was running.

 

I don't think Trump was for it. Do you have any proof that he was?  But even so who cares? At the time he was a private citizen NOT a Senator with a vote like Joe and Hillary.

 

An apology might be nice but as I stated above I want him to move to the AZ desert, wear sack cloth and ashes never to be seen or heard from again.

 

But as the Stones said, you can't always get what you want.

 

 

 

Trump said it on the Howard Stern Show before the vote

 

So, you, think Biden shouldn't be President because of his vote. Who voted against it that you would accept?

 

Sanders? Are you a Bernie Bro?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


When you answer a question, think, hey what I’m saying could easily be started with the phrase What about... If you answer yes, then you are using a whataboutism. And yea, it’s used a lot online now because it’s a very common defense the right has been using for the past 4 years. Again, defend your position without an argument that starts with what about... 

 

Do you really think this tactic is used exclusively by the right?

 

12 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Trump said it on the Howard Stern Show before the vote

 

So, you, think Biden shouldn't be President because of his vote. Who voted against it that you would accept?

 

Sanders? Are you a Bernie Bro?

 

"Yeah I guess" on the Howard Stern Show. Howard Stern Show?  Really? Is that all you got?

 

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Backintheday544 said:


When you answer a question, think, hey what I’m saying could easily be started with the phrase What about... If you answer yes, then you are using a whataboutism. And yea, it’s used a lot online now because it’s a very common defense the right has been using for the past 4 years. Again, defend your position without an argument that starts with what about... 

But I wasn’t asked a question, the question was directed to @reddogblitz.  If you’re into  internet characterizations and labels, it was an attempt to hijack.   
 

Be that as it may, the subject matter of the post I attempted to hijack was about George W Bush and the relative corruption of his administration.  That poster referenced Dan Bongino, a pundit well known for suggesting Obama was the most corrupt president in history. 
 

I backfilled the  544 test and have concluded that I personally would not have started the answer to a query about George W Bush with “What about George W Bush...”. 
 

Thank you. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

But I wasn’t asked a question, the question was directed to @reddogblitz.  If you’re into  internet characterizations and labels, it was an attempt to hijack.   
 

Be that as it may, the subject matter of the post I attempted to hijack was about George W Bush and the relative corruption of his administration.  That poster referenced Dan Bongino, a pundit well known for suggesting Obama was the most corrupt president in history. 
 

I backfilled the  544 test and have concluded that I personally would not have started the answer to a query about George W Bush with “What about George W Bush...”. 
 

Thank you. 


Patent pending on that test btw.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Do you really think this tactic is used exclusively by the right?

 

 

"Yeah I guess" on the Howard Stern Show. Howard Stern Show?  Really? Is that all you got?

 

 

All I got?

 

It's a direct quote from Agent Orange.

 

All I ever read here from the other side is accusations that always turn out to be untrue.

 

But you take issue with someone saying something on the radio. You're a keen judge of reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, TBBills said:

Can you Trumpies answer me this one thing?

 

 

How come Trump is allowed to say he won, but the electoral college, popular vote, and government are not?

 

@B-Man, @westside2, @rochester rob, @Big Gun

 

I am not now and never will/have been for Trump. It's the other RochesterRob on this board

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...