Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Kevbeau said:

I don’t know who deserves to be beaten more. The guy who made this, or me for watching the whole thing to see how it played out.

well, i can say with pretty good confidence that the trial ends the same way. so, you have just saved yourself a whole lot of time and Schiffty's droning.

 

;)

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

What's the point of wasting everyone's time with this garbage then?

 

No laws were broken. The President was just doing his job

 

This whole thing is mind-numbing.

 

And I would say the same EXACT THING if this was Obama being railroaded here.

 

I just don't understand this whole thing.

Ground and pound, ground and pound, ground and pound.  Keep tearing the guy down, throw constant allegations against him, when disproven or they fade from the public view, start all over again. 
 

In our little cross section of the world here on PP, we have some lovable dipsh#ts who crowed about (Among other things) Herr Mueller and his gang of sturmabteiliung acolytes taking down DJT for years, only to end up with egg on their faces, only to start it all up again.  They have no shame, they are incapable of introspection, and thus they move on to the next scandal their overlords toss out. 

 

On the other hand, there are the rest of us who suggest, as you did, that this would unacceptable if the shoe was on the other foot, despite their feelings about Obama and those before him. 

 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ground and pound, ground and pound, ground and pound.  Keep tearing the guy down, throw constant allegations against him, when disproven or they fade from the public view, start all over again. 
 

In our little cross section of the world here on PP, we have some lovable dipsh#ts who crowed about (Among other things) Herr Mueller and his gang of sturmabteiliung acolytes taking down DJT for years, only to end up with egg on their faces, only to start it all up again.  They have no shame, they are incapable of introspection, and thus they move on to the next scandal their overlords toss out. 

 

On the other hand, there are the rest of us who suggest, as you did, that this would unacceptable if the shoe was on the other foot, despite their feelings about Obama and those before him. 

 

  I don't think that is egg on their face but I am not getting within the length of a ten foot pole to find out just what it is.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't pay attention to what #9 was, but it died, 53-47

 

#10 was to allow for 24 hours, instead of 2 to file responses to motions.

It died 52-48. I'm not sure which R broke ranks.

 

They are wrapping up with 1 more tonight.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hedge said:

I didn't pay attention to what #9 was, but it died, 53-47

 

#10 was to allow for 24 hours, instead of 2 to file responses to motions.

It died 52-48. I'm not sure which R broke ranks.

 

They are wrapping up with 1 more tonight.

 

 

 

Is there a R that really dislikes Sanders &/or Warren?  Because dragging this out for weeks (months?) rather than a week or 2 really shafts them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hedge said:

I didn't pay attention to what #9 was, but it died, 53-47

 

#10 was to allow for 24 hours, instead of 2 to file responses to motions.

It died 52-48. I'm not sure which R broke ranks.

 

They are wrapping up with 1 more tonight.

 

 


Bet you could have got it with just  one guess:
 



 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#11 also dies 53-47. It was to allow Chief Justice Roberts to decide on allowing motions to subpoena documents/witnesses.

 

And the night wraps with a vote 53-47 in favor of *approving* McConnell's rules.

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Bet you could have got it with just  one guess:
 

 

 

I wasn't sure which of Romney, Collins, or Murkowski it would be, but they were the prime suspects :beer:

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there really even a defense being put forth for what Trump did? All I hear is complaining, not fair this, witch hunt that, but no facts, serious arguments or anything. Even if Biden was signing checks to his son--or whatever the brown tongues are saying--that would in no way justify Trump withholding aid Congress had appropriated. 

 

No defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...