Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ethan in Portland

Who is the healthy scratch for Sunday?

Recommended Posts

Murphy and Lawson are just worthless as pass rushers. At least Shaq has a small amount of run stopping ability (ala Kelsay)....we'll definitely be drafting a DE....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brian Dabollas the healthy scratch!

 

Oh wait do we like him again ? 

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PaattMaann said:

 

There is absolutely no way they only dress 4 WRs lol 

 

what inclement weather are you talking about?

 

 

Well,  maybe if someone is from an equatorial country,  cloudy  with a high of 51 degrees F  is bad weather.      

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ethan in Portland said:

With a capable rushing attack and the rush defense woes, I can’t see Corey Liuget not dressing this week. And while it would blow this board up, I can’t see Oliver not dressing either. My guess is they will dress all five DTs. 
Could Lawson go further into this regime’s dog house and not dress? Could Murphy go from making zero impact on the field to zero impact on the inactive list?

Furthermore, with the inclement weather prediction will they dress three or four tight ends?
I have a feeling, they will only dress four WRs - Brown, Beasley, Duke, and Roberts. Also with a healthy Nsekhe and Ford, they might opt to sit a linemen to get Yeldon or Sweeney active. 

It appears we should bring a strong running gameplan, complimented by a short passing game with the strategy of decent YACs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Yes I am not suggesting cutting Lee Smith. I am suggesting I might be tempted to make him inactive for this Sunday because I like the matchup of Duke against their corners and I see him as the most expendable for this game.

 

McDermott talks about earning it.   Each week we talk about penalties stalling our offensive drives.

 

Lee Smith has 7 penalties all by his lonesome this season.  4 for false start, 3 for offensive holding.

That's 1/4 of the Bills current FS penalties (16) and ~1/4 of the Bills OH penalties (13) just on his own.

 

He keeps saying "We've got to do better - I got to do better" when interviewed.  2 against Philly.

 

So I think that's a possibility.

 

But interestingly, the TE whose offensive snaps have taken a nosedive isn't Lee Smith.  It's Tyler Kroft.  He went from 44% snaps vs Miami, to 58% vs Philly, to 26% vs Wash.

Either they were working him in too quickly physically and realized they need to back down, he isn't performing as they expected, or they are really making individual TE playing time choices based upon opponent.  Knox, on the other hand, has gone from 53% to 45% to 76% the last 3 weeks.

 

Smith has had a pretty steady 30% of the snaps the last 5 games - a couple little spikes up into the 40's.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Rant? I posted a question so us arm chair coaches and gms can have an opinion before and not complain after

 

Yes you did post a question but also went on a rant.  You've gone on rants before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, PaattMaann said:

 

There is absolutely no way they only dress 4 WRs lol 

 

what inclement weather are you talking about?

You are probably correct.

I saw high 30' low 40s with sleet snow/rain mix possible. 

1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Yes you did post a question but also went on a rant.  You've gone on rants before.

Yeah maybe I did rant about Murphy. I did not like the signing from day one and feel Lawson is underutilized. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

You are probably correct.

I saw high 30' low 40s with sleet snow/rain mix possible. 

Yeah maybe I did rant about Murphy. I did not like the signing from day one and feel Lawson is underutilized. 

 

get a new weather app friend 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, billsbackto81 said:

That's a lot to ask of a street FA picked up a few days ago. I do like what he brings though, maybe he'll see some action as I expect a heavy run gameplan on both sides.

 

Leaning towards Luiget getting snaps.

 

Luiget is a vet who has played DT for two teams that have asked him to leverage different interior gap techniques.

 

If he is healthy he gets the snaps. It will not be that much of a curve for him to understand what the defensive staff feels they are giving up in the middle on run D, and what they are looking for him to bring.

 

I am concerned that he has been cast off by two teams, but Phillips seemed to blossom here after getting the boot from Gase (genius), maybe Luiget finds his game again as a Bill.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

To me, I’d just assume play an extra OL. You don’t really have to account for Smith in the pass game. He’s a good blocker but not as good as an additional OL would be in short yardage. He commits 1-2 penalties a game. I just don’t see his value? 
 

Now, I’m not terribly high on Foster either. He’s open every play. He and I have caught the same number of balls this year. His ball skills are just so poor. He does add some value as a threat though. The thought of him over the top is enough to keep the safeties back and help in the running game. I believe that matters some. I’d still take 2 shots a game down the field. I just wish that every so often it resulted in a catch or PI flag.

 

I think Smith runs routes often enough and catches enough balls that he isn't a tell in the way that an extra OL is to the defense. I would rather have him up than down but this week I want to get Duke active and while I am with you on Foster (I have never been especially high on him and he surprised me last year) I think for this week especially I might go Smith down of the two. Most weeks unless there is a specific matchup reason to think otherwise Duke would be my healthy scratch (along with Yeldon and Sweeney) of the offensive skill position guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

McDermott talks about earning it.   Each week we talk about penalties stalling our offensive drives.

 

Lee Smith has 7 penalties all by his lonesome this season.  4 for false start, 3 for offensive holding.

That's 1/4 of the Bills current FS penalties (16) and ~1/4 of the Bills OH penalties (13) just on his own.

 

He keeps saying "We've got to do better - I got to do better" when interviewed.  2 against Philly.

 

So I think that's a possibility.

 

But interestingly, the TE whose offensive snaps have taken a nosedive isn't Lee Smith.  It's Tyler Kroft.  He went from 44% snaps vs Miami, to 58% vs Philly, to 26% vs Wash.

Either they were working him in too quickly physically and realized they need to back down, he isn't performing as they expected, or they are really making individual TE playing time choices based upon opponent.  Knox, on the other hand, has gone from 53% to 45% to 76% the last 3 weeks.

 

Smith has had a pretty steady 30% of the snaps the last 5 games - a couple little spikes up into the 40's.

 

I think the Knox peak this week was game plan related. They were going to run it a lot and his run blocking has been the best of the 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dneveu said:

 

Kroft hasn't proven an ability to stay healthy and smith is still a better option than sweeney.

Kroft is not injured.  Was is was.  Perhaps we shouldn't dress Allen since he was injured last season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DJB said:

Brian Dabollas the healthy scratch!

 

Oh wait do we like him again ? 

dat dat dat, Always look at eyes

 

Image result for mr miyagi gif fight320

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The matchup of Garrett across from Dawkins or Ford worries me, I see a lot of TE's getting action to help out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Formerly Allan in MD said:

Kroft is not injured.  Was is was.  Perhaps we shouldn't dress Allen since he was injured last season.

 

... He broke his foot and injured his ankle already this year.  I like him as a player, considering half the board was talking about cutting this guy before him ever seeing the field i don't think im wrong here.

Edited by dneveu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, BuffalothruMyVeins said:

DT Taylor likely sits, I think, as long as Liuget is up to pace reasonably.

Didn't Johnson not have any snaps last week? What about Johnson inactive and Oliver takes snaps at end? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think the Knox peak this week was game plan related. They were going to run it a lot and his run blocking has been the best of the 3.

Agreed, he's a better run blocker than I thought he'd be. He has potential to be a pretty good all-around TE, if he can hold onto the ball.

7 minutes ago, Tortured Soul said:

Didn't Johnson not have any snaps last week? What about Johnson inactive and Oliver takes snaps at end? 

Johnson has been a weakness, doesn't pressure and shoved around vs Run.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Ethan in Portland said:

With a capable rushing attack and the rush defense woes, I can’t see Corey Liuget not dressing this week. And while it would blow this board up, I can’t see Oliver not dressing either. My guess is they will dress all five DTs. 
Could Lawson go further into this regime’s dog house and not dress? Could Murphy go from making zero impact on the field to zero impact on the inactive list?

Furthermore, with the inclement weather prediction will they dress three or four tight ends?
I have a feeling, they will only dress four WRs - Brown, Beasley, Duke, and Roberts. Also with a healthy Nsekhe and Ford, they might opt to sit a linemen to get Yeldon or Sweeney active. 

With the absence of Vernon, Yeldon as a receiving back could play a crucial role

9 hours ago, BuffalothruMyVeins said:

DT Taylor likely sits, I think, as long as Liuget is up to pace reasonably.

No way!! I hope to see Senorise Perry inactive. Need to have a decent rotation of DTs in this game because I see the Browns using Chubb and Hunt a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Foster - If he's lucky he'll end up with 5 receptions this year

Smith - I still remember him from his 1st stint here where he was flagged 15 yards while standing on the sideline in his street clothes.

Bojorquez - We aren't surrendering no damn football Sunday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Foster gets the start over Williams as he's better on special teams and can run block better.  I could see a very similar gameplan this week to last, running the ball and controlling the clock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...