Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

Note the edit: cued up to the right time

 

After she asks about Mifsud, her glasses disappear. These interviews are always edited, so this isn't a surprise or a shock. I'm only pointing it out because there seemed to be at least some questions/push back on this (very important topic) which weren't aired. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘Stunning’: Barr hits establishment media for ‘bovine silence’ on collapsed Russiagate narrative

Original Article

 

Attorney General William Barr hit the establishment media in an interview aired Sunday for what he called its “bovine silence” regarding the debunked narrative of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.In an interview on “Fox Sunday Futures,” Barr also asserted that the various government investigations into the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Kremlin were the “closest we have come to an organized effort to push a president out of office” since the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.Barr has long questioned the FBI’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign in July 2016. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Note the edit: cued up to the right time

 

After she asks about Mifsud, her glasses disappear. These interviews are always edited, so this isn't a surprise or a shock. I'm only pointing it out because there seemed to be at least some questions/push back on this (very important topic) which weren't aired. 

 

Good call. :beer:

 

 

It also makes me wonder if something is happening before this airs.

 

Edited by Hedge
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

REALCLEARINVESTIGATIONS: 

 

No Evidence Needed for Collusion Probe, Just a Pretext Devised by This Man. 

 

“Newly released documents reveal the FBI never had even preliminary evidence of a Trump campaign conspiracy with Russia, and instead used a rarely enforced statutory relic – the Foreign Agents Registration Act – as the legal rationale for opening investigations in 2016-2017 and surveilling Trump campaign aides. . . .

 

Former FBI Director James Comey and his deputy Andrew McCabe have publicly testified they had sufficient evidence to justify investigating the Trump campaign for coordinating with Moscow to hack Clinton campaign emails and troll social media to influence the 2016 presidential election — a scheme that, if true, would have violated espionage laws and warranted serious felony charges.

 

But the raft of new documents reveals that the actual basis for the cases was the suspicion that Trump campaign aides failed to file FARA forms with Washington bureaucrats and pay the required $305 in registration fees.”

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, I think this law should be used more, as there are a lot of people in DC now who are in volation of it.

 
 
 
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/21/2020 at 3:21 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

Here's the full interview (took me forever to find it -- still haven't seen it in full)

 

(Durham portion starts around 21:45)

 

On 6/21/2020 at 4:46 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

Note the edit: cued up to the right time

 

After she asks about Mifsud, her glasses disappear. These interviews are always edited, so this isn't a surprise or a shock. I'm only pointing it out because there seemed to be at least some questions/push back on this (very important topic) which weren't aired. 

kind of odd here...

 

they replaced the interview with an image of Trump and 2:53 of piano. as such, the second clip doesn't even attempt to play.

 

try these if you haven't seen the interview.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOJ7faIaeRI

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FztiTg5tYZI

 

 

or here @ Praying Medic's Bitchute channel.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8XVI3D9vRsMJ/

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

I'm old enough to remember Bill Clinton firing 93 out of 94 federal attorneys back in '93.  

 

History started on January 20, 2017 at about noon. Nothing negative a Democrat did before that matters.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


Here?

 

I don't think it's in there, but thanks. That was published before Maria said there were unreleased parts, so I highly doubt it would be in the parts that were transcribed, but perhaps I am mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cinga said:

 

List the illegalities Barr has committed please?

Would you accept a legitimate wrong doing if I gave you one? You'd just make excuses and never accept the truth. Isn't that right? 

 

I mean you don't accept that Trump accepted help from Russia, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hedge said:

 

I don't think it's in there, but thanks. That was published before Maria said there were unreleased parts, so I highly doubt it would be in the parts that were transcribed, but perhaps I am mistaken.


I found pieces of it on youtube, and someone posted them via her twitter.
 

 


 



 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

Would you accept a legitimate wrong doing if I gave you one? You'd just make excuses and never accept the truth. Isn't that right? 

 

I mean you don't accept that Trump accepted help from Russia, right? 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I found pieces of it on youtube, and someone posted them via her twitter.
 

 


 



 

 

:beer:

Sorry to nitpick, and I really do appreciate your effort, but I doubt these are it either. 

 

The timestamps would seem to need to be on/after 06/23, according to Maria's tweet when she announced there was more:

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Would you accept a legitimate wrong doing if I gave you one? You'd just make excuses and never accept the truth. Isn't that right? 

 

I mean you don't accept that Trump accepted help from Russia, right? 

 

Show me the evidence.

The real stuff, not Nads and Schiff for brains claiming they had evidence but never did.... the REAL evidence of collusion

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cinga said:

 

Show me the evidence.

The real stuff, not Nads and Schiff for brains claiming they had evidence but never did.... the REAL evidence of collusion

You are hilarious - evidence?  If there was evidence it would have been produced and a real impeachment held.

 

All the talking heads with paid gigs said they had evidence until under oath - then they could not produce.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said:

You are hilarious - evidence?  If there was evidence it would have been produced and a real impeachment held.

 

All the talking heads with paid gigs said they had evidence until under oath - then they could not produce.

Oh, I know... but that's Tibs fall back and I had some spare time so wanted to play for a bit... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Would you accept a legitimate wrong doing if I gave you one? You'd just make excuses and never accept the truth. Isn't that right? 

 

I mean you don't accept that Trump accepted help from Russia, right? 

What evidence are you speaking of with Trump Russia? I am serious, besides normal relations between nation's what proof do you have? We know the Steele dossier is Russian misinformation, what else do we know? I do not look at CNN to often anymore but most of their talking points were Steele dossier items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

F****ng Hilarious :lol:

 

No, it's ####ing pathetic.  These ####### are so entrenched into their bunkers that they LITERALLY make 2nd graders back & forth jibes of "nunhtna," "uh-huh," "nuhntna," "uh-huh,"  ad infinitum seem downright well reasoned & adult. And FAR more productive.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

No, it's ####ing pathetic.  These ####### are so entrenched into their bunkers that they LITERALLY make 2nd graders back & forth jibes of "nunhtna," "uh-huh," "nuhntna," "uh-huh,"  ad infinitum seem downright well reasoned & adult. And FAR more productive.


They’re our “leaders”. 
 

:beer: 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...