Koko78 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 9 minutes ago, DC Tom said: What? What the ***** does that even mean? Resistance is futile? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 35 minutes ago, DC Tom said: What? What the ***** does that even mean? This comment belongs in the what’s better, no ignore features, or more ignore features thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 3 hours ago, DC Tom said: What? What the ***** does that even mean? “I hate your posts and now you’re on my ignore list,” is now a regular post here. Instead of just, ya know, ignoring someone. People even take pride in snapping pics of their screens to show everyone how their ignore works. It’s the PPP selfie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 4 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: “I hate your posts and now you’re on my ignore list,” is now a regular post here. Instead of just, ya know, ignoring someone. People even take pride in snapping pics of their screens to show everyone how their ignore works. It’s the PPP selfie. Why not post in a manner that does not get you ignored? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 15 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Why not post in a manner that does not get you ignored? Yeah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 5 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: “I hate your posts and now you’re on my ignore list,” is now a regular post here. Instead of just, ya know, ignoring someone. People even take pride in snapping pics of their screens to show everyone how their ignore works. It’s the PPP selfie. That doesn't quite work when there's both idiocy & volume. That's when the ignore feature is wonderful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, GG said: That doesn't quite work when there's both idiocy & volume. That's when the ignore feature is wonderful. I agree. I am pointing out the use of bragging or threatening that "I have you on ignore" and "I am going to put you on ignore." And even accompanying that with screenshots to lord the use of the feature over someone as some kind of one-upsmanship. It's a competition for who can be the meltier (!) snowflake. You want to ignore someone, ignore them, using the feature or not. We don't need a LAMP-post announcement about it. Edited April 16, 2019 by BeginnersMind 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: I agree. I am pointing out the use of bragging or threatening that "I have you on ignore" and "I am going to put you on ignore." And even accompanying that with screenshots to lord the use of the feature over someone as some kind of one-upsmanship. It's a competition for who can be the meltier (!) snowflake. You want to ignore someone, ignore them, using the feature or not. We don't need a LAMP-post announcement about it. Yeah the cult likes to block & brag! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 6 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: “I hate your posts and now you’re on my ignore list,” is now a regular post here. Instead of just, ya know, ignoring someone. People even take pride in snapping pics of their screens to show everyone how their ignore works. It’s the PPP selfie. I am actually too lazy to put you on ignore. You're useless, but just not woth the minimal effort. That's right, *****o. I'm weaponizing NOT ignoring you. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 45 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I am actually too lazy to put you on ignore. You're useless, but just not woth the minimal effort. That's right, *****o. I'm weaponizing NOT ignoring you. It's things like this that show you are ever so slightly more intelligent than the intelligence vacuum known as @/dev/null That's not saying much, but its saying something. Good morning Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 (edited) Beanz doing stellar work today. thread. https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1118147754595966977 https://twitter.com/CasualSemi/status/1118165581218369536 the Trump spying was just the latest in a long line of corrupt acts by the Obama administration. it is going to all come out (i hope anyways). Edited April 16, 2019 by Foxx 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 18 minutes ago, Foxx said: Beanz doing stellar work today. thread. https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1118147754595966977 https://twitter.com/CasualSemi/status/1118165581218369536 the Trump spying was just the latest in a long line of corrupt acts by the Obama administration. it is going to all come out (i hope anyways). I see there was a FISA warrant out on Manning, so the hop leads to Huma/Clinton/Weiner. Why were they surveilling Manning? And how did Manning know anything about the Weiner laptop Huma/Hillary emails? (this one seems to be the question in that thread) And what was the Manning lawsuit about exactly? And the US Government was surveilling Huma? Guess those Clinton emails weren't actually "lost". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Unrolled thread, same topic... Manning having a FISA warrant out against him/her while in prison. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 4 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I see there was a FISA warrant out on Manning, so the hop leads to Huma/Clinton/Weiner. Why were they surveilling Manning? And how did Manning know anything about the Weiner laptop Huma/Hillary emails? (this one seems to be the question in that thread) And what was the Manning lawsuit about exactly? And the US Government was surveilling Huma? Guess those Clinton emails weren't actually "lost". Surveilling Manning in prison. You know what that's called, when you're in prison and they watch your every move? It's called "being in prison." There's no expectation of privacy in prison - prisoners have no rights, except to attorney-client confidentiality... ...ohhhhhh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 23 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: I agree. I am pointing out the use of bragging or threatening that "I have you on ignore" and "I am going to put you on ignore." And even accompanying that with screenshots to lord the use of the feature over someone as some kind of one-upsmanship. It's a competition for who can be the meltier (!) snowflake. You want to ignore someone, ignore them, using the feature or not. We don't need a LAMP-post announcement about it. The guy that starts threads with ***** poetry time and time again is going to call out people for LAMP posts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 15 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: The guy that starts threads with ***** poetry time and time again is going to call out people for LAMP posts. And now you post a selfie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 15 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: The guy that starts threads with ***** poetry time and time again is going to call out people for LAMP posts. I’ve done that a few times, not to draw attention to me. But boy do you guys get wound up about nice things. If I go negative and say the sky is falling, will you let me join the cool kid’s club? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 8 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: I’ve done that a few times, not to draw attention to me. But boy do you guys get wound up about nice things. If I go negative and say the sky is falling, will you let me join the cool kid’s club? You don't meet the requirements. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 13 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You don't meet the requirements. I’ve done the cool kid thing and still sometimes fall prey to bad habits. But it’s a membership not worth having. Being bullying, snarky, cynical, and inhuman to others because we happen to be online is no way to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 On 4/16/2019 at 8:03 AM, BeginnersMind said: I agree. I am pointing out the use of bragging or threatening that "I have you on ignore" and "I am going to put you on ignore." And even accompanying that with screenshots to lord the use of the feature over someone as some kind of one-upsmanship. It's a competition for who can be the meltier (!) snowflake. You want to ignore someone, ignore them, using the feature or not. We don't need a LAMP-post announcement about it. I want to ignore you, but you're so worthless I can't be bothered. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 7 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: I’ve done the cool kid thing and still sometimes fall prey to bad habits. But it’s a membership not worth having. Being bullying, snarky, cynical, and inhuman to others because we happen to be online is no way to be. is this you ***** off? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Foxx said: is this you ***** off? What are you talking about? Why all the anger? Edited April 17, 2019 by BeginnersMind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Appeals court turns down Manning appeal over contempt in WikiLeaks probe A federal appeals court has turned down former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning’s bid to overturn a contempt order that led to her jailing for refusing to answer questions from a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks. Manning’s lawyers said a district court judge ignored her claims that she was subjected to illegal electronic surveillance after her conviction at a court-martial in 2013 for leaking hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and military reports to WikiLeaks. </snip> Prosecutors appear to be pressing for Manning’s testimony in order to bolster their case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who was expelled earlier this month from ndon’s Ecuador's Embassy in London, where he’d been holed up for seven years. </snip> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 43 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Appeals court turns down Manning appeal over contempt in WikiLeaks probe A federal appeals court has turned down former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning’s bid to overturn a contempt order that led to her jailing for refusing to answer questions from a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks. Manning’s lawyers said a district court judge ignored her claims that she was subjected to illegal electronic surveillance after her conviction at a court-martial in 2013 for leaking hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and military reports to WikiLeaks. </snip> Prosecutors appear to be pressing for Manning’s testimony in order to bolster their case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who was expelled earlier this month from ndon’s Ecuador's Embassy in London, where he’d been holed up for seven years. </snip> I realize it was unintended, but I can't help but laugh at a post that contains "Chelsea Manning' and two "</snip>s" 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 U.S. extradition request for Julian Assange to be heard on Thursday 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 4 hours ago, Hedge said: U.S. extradition request for Julian Assange to be heard on Thursday Timing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 Ecuador's Attorney General has informed a Julian Assange lawyer that the WikiLeaks co-founder's files, computer, mobile phones and other electronic devices will be seized during a search at the London embassy and sent to the US. Quote The searches inside the embassy quarters formerly occupied by Assange are set to be conducted by police on May 20 The files contain troves of sensitive information, include Assange's communication with his lawyers and other legal documents – which, the lawyers argue, deprive him of the right to proper defense. Having this data will potentially allow the US to "build and create new charges" to extradite Assange in violation of Ecuador's own asylum policies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 I LOVE Wikileaks! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 Ecuador hands over Julian Assange's belongings to US Quote Ecuador has begun giving the US some of Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange's possessions left behind following his stay in its London embassy. The country's foreign minister José Valencia authorised the seizure of equipment earlier this month. The material includes manuscripts, legal papers, medical records and electronic equipment. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedge said: Ecuador hands over Julian Assange's belongings to US He's still in custody in the UK, yes? Why didn't they hand over his belongings to the UK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 38 minutes ago, snafu said: He's still in custody in the UK, yes? Why didn't they hand over his belongings to the UK? Yes, he is still being held in the UK (in a maximum security facility, I believe). The US DOJ requested the items and Ecuador agreed to it. So, it would appear that there was a deal of some sort that was cut (or other leverage that was used), as there were other parties that also wanted them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 Heard his native country is bug-tussling the US for extradition rights. Thought his rape charges there were expired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 1 hour ago, snafu said: He's still in custody in the UK, yes? Why didn't they hand over his belongings to the UK? The Equadorian President visited the White House shortly before Assange was expelled. Take it for what it's worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 Chelsea Manning recovering after suicide attempt in jail, lawyers say Manning has been detained since May for refusing to testify before a grand jury about her disclosure of military and diplomatic secrets to the online anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks in 2010. "Manning has previously indicated that she will not betray her principles, even at risk of grave harm to herself," her legal team said, adding, "Her actions today evidence the strength of her convictions, as well as the profound harm she continues to suffer as a result of her 'civil' confinement." https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/12/politics/chelsea-manning-suicide-attempt-virginia-jail/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 4 hours ago, ALF said: Chelsea Manning recovering after suicide attempt in jail, lawyers say Manning has been detained since May for refusing to testify before a grand jury about her disclosure of military and diplomatic secrets to the online anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks in 2010. "Manning has previously indicated that she will not betray her principles, even at risk of grave harm to herself," her legal team said, adding, "Her actions today evidence the strength of her convictions, as well as the profound harm she continues to suffer as a result of her 'civil' confinement." https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/12/politics/chelsea-manning-suicide-attempt-virginia-jail/index.html Are we supposed to pretend that the traitor Bradley is now a hero? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 48 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Are we supposed to pretend that the traitor Bradley is now a hero? Nope. Just one ***** up human being. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, ALF said: Chelsea Manning recovering after suicide attempt in jail, lawyers say Manning has been detained since May for refusing to testify before a grand jury about her disclosure of military and diplomatic secrets to the online anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks in 2010. "Manning has previously indicated that she will not betray her principles, even at risk of grave harm to herself," her legal team said, adding, "Her actions today evidence the strength of her convictions, as well as the profound harm she continues to suffer as a result of her 'civil' confinement." https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/12/politics/chelsea-manning-suicide-attempt-virginia-jail/index.html So now attempting suicide is evidence of the strength of someone's convictions? Damn, there are some stupid effin' people in this world. Edited March 12, 2020 by IDBillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 On 3/12/2020 at 8:18 AM, ALF said: Chelsea Manning recovering after suicide attempt in jail, lawyers say Who's this Chelsea Manning? You mean the traitor Daniel Manning? The one who had his nuts cut off? No wonder he wants to kill himself. On 3/12/2020 at 2:03 PM, IDBillzFan said: So now attempting suicide is evidence of the strength of someone's convictions? Damn, there are some stupid effin' people in this world. Well Danny did have his balls clipped, so that's pretty effing stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said: Who's this Chelsea Manning? You mean the traitor Daniel Manning? The one who had his nuts cut off? No wonder he wants to kill himself. Well Danny did have his balls clipped, so that's pretty effing stupid. Is Danny Manning related to the traitor formerly known as Bradley Manning? Edited May 9, 2020 by Koko78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts