GG Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Sorry, Jerry and Adam Is that one dissenting judge the same as the dentist who recommends gum with sugar? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 They can release the summaries like yesterday. Those are being withheld, and media reports indicate they were created with the intention of being able to be released post haste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 (edited) 14 hours ago, Doc Brown said: I wouldn't trust Trump to pass the collection plate at church without taking money from it. Barr, however, will follow the law to a tee. I"d trust Trump before I trusted Slick Willie and his fake-marriage gun-moll how can you liberals STILL not 100% grasp this? or at least try to comprehend it??? Edited April 5, 2019 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They can release the summaries like yesterday. Those are being withheld, and media reports indicate they were created with the intention of being able to be released post haste. No, no they can't. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-04/justice-department-defends-process-for-handling-mueller-report "Two people familiar with the matter said the summaries in Mueller’s report had markings indicating that some parts had to be reviewed and withheld, potentially including information related to grand jury proceedings." I ran across someone else that knows you: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: No, no they can't. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-04/justice-department-defends-process-for-handling-mueller-report "Two people familiar with the matter said the summaries in Mueller’s report had markings indicating that some parts had to be reviewed and withheld, potentially including information related to grand jury proceedings." I ran across someone else that knows you: Ha ha, ok, then I guess they should spend the 15 minutes or so it would take to redact that information. Ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 47 minutes ago, Tiberius said: ... and media reports indicate they were created with the intention of being able to be released post haste. @Tiberius on crack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 hour ago, row_33 said: I"d trust Trump before I trusted Slick Willie and his fake-marriage gun-moll how can you liberals STILL not 100% grasp this? or at least try to comprehend it??? It's possible to despise both presidents. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 12 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: It's possible to despise both presidents. i don't despise any Presidents, they usually lead/meld perfectly with the public's demand from their persona Carter was the only one of the my lifetime who truly was in totally over his head, but after Watergate and Nam the US gets a pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, row_33 said: i don't despise any Presidents, they usually lead/meld perfectly with the public's demand from their persona Carter was the only one of the my lifetime who truly was in totally over his head, but after Watergate and Nam the US gets a pass. Personally I despise W Bush for getting us into an un necessary costly war resulting in 6,000+ dead Americans and 1,000,000+ brown people on a bald faced out and out pre meditated LIE. Iraq and the rest of middle east is still in shambles and are and will continue to pay the freight for it for quite some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 hour ago, reddogblitz said: Personally I despise W Bush for getting us into an un necessary costly war resulting in 6,000+ dead Americans and 1,000,000+ brown people on a bald faced out and out pre meditated LIE. Iraq and the rest of middle east is still in shambles and are and will continue to pay the freight for it for quite some time. I understand 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 6, 2019 Share Posted April 6, 2019 1 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 6, 2019 Share Posted April 6, 2019 On 4/4/2019 at 10:06 PM, John from Riverside said: Just show the report They are. They have to do it in a way that is compliant with the law; further, the Democrats clamoring for its immediate release know this. They’re trying to manipulate you, weaponizing your ignorance of the law. Ask yourself why they’d do this, then ask yourself why you’d trust someone who does this to be honest with you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 https://news.yahoo.com/court-barr-must-redact-grand-214050275.html Good article on a recent DC Circuit Court ruling about the government not being allowed to turn over Grand Jury testimony to anyone outside of the narrowly-defined exceptions - even Congress. Also points out that if the Democrats in Congress don't like it, they do actually have the authority to pass legislation to change the rule. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 7, 2019 Author Share Posted April 7, 2019 Wait. What? Still NO COLLUSION! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 What will Pence be like as President when Trump leaves the White House next week in handcuffs when Mueller proves treason! oh wait, Pence will have to go too, then Hillary can be President, what a day of rejoicing that will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 32 minutes ago, row_33 said: What will Pence be like as President when Trump leaves the White House next week in handcuffs when Mueller proves treason! oh wait, Pence will have to go too, then Hillary can be President, what a day of rejoicing that will be. No, that's not the order of succession. Nancy Pelosi is next in line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, Nanker said: Wait. What? Still NO COLLUSION! There is. It's just buried under the mandatory redactions, because Barr is Trump's "hand picked" "fixer" who is "pouncing" on stuff. There's even anonymous sources citing unnamed methods that heard about it 4th hand from someone with knowledge that says so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 7, 2019 Author Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: There is. It's just buried under the mandatory redactions, because Barr is Trump's "hand picked" "fixer" who is "pouncing" on stuff. There's even anonymous sources citing unnamed methods that heard about it 4th hand from someone with knowledge that says so! Hmmm. Why can't the Dems hand pick their own fixer? Doesn't seem fair now, does it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: No, that's not the order of succession. Nancy Pelosi is next in line. He was just skipping a few steps. First President Nancy will appoint Hillary as her VP, then immediately resign, thus giving the White House to Hillary for life! Just now, Nanker said: Hmmm. Why can't the Dems hand pick their own fixer? Doesn't seem fair now, does it. There are two sets of rules, one for the evil, nasty, vile, Republicans, and one for the pure, virtuous, innocent, Democrats. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, Koko78 said: He was just skipping a few steps. First President Nancy will appoint Hillary as her VP, then immediately resign, thus giving the White House to Hillary for life! There are two sets of rules, one for the evil, nasty, vile, Republicans, and one for the pure, virtuous, innocent, Democrats. Ha! If Hillary tries skipping a few steps or even climbing a few at her inauguration then I think we'll be looking for a new president. Wouldn't it be Michael Avenatti's turn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: No, that's not the order of succession. Nancy Pelosi is next in line. 7 minutes ago, Koko78 said: He was just skipping a few steps. First President Nancy will appoint Hillary as her VP, then immediately resign, thus giving the White House to Hillary for life! Judging by the Democrat rhetoric over the last two years, what makes you think they would follow the procedures outlined in the Constitution? Trump is impeached because Shut Up!. Then something something Pence magically goes away. Hiliary becomes President Merrick Garland moves into Neil Gorsuch's office Brett Kavanaugh is led away in shackles, tarred, feathered, and put into a stockade for SJW to throw tomoatos at The last two years are declared a Do Over, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington are TNT'd off Mount Rushmore and Replaced with Barack Obama and Karl Marx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Ha! If Hillary tries skipping a few steps or even climbing a few at her inauguration then I think we'll be looking for a new president. Wouldn't it be Michael Avenatti's turn? Avenatti will be occupied in other pursuits for 25-40 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: Avenatti will be occupied in other pursuits for 25-40 years by the time Creepy Porn Lawyer gets out of prison: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Comey Barrett will still be on the Supreme Court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 14 minutes ago, Koko78 said: He was just skipping a few steps. First President Nancy will appoint Hillary as her VP, then immediately resign, thus giving the White House to Hillary for life! Or just pull off her face revealing Hillary has been underneath all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1114893927654539264 https://mobile.twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/status/1114892311954108416 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 32 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1114893927654539264 https://mobile.twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/status/1114892311954108416 ooooh Devin Nunes has been a busy boy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 Wait! I thought Alexander Haig was next up at bat....no? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 The word of the day... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Wait! I thought Alexander Haig was next up at bat....no? He is in charge... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 How are the treason charges going? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 26 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: The word of the day... If there were any doubters left about the honesty of the establishment media - they should be paying very close attention. It's sad. ********************************************* Who has the high ground again? (not the DNC) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: ooooh Devin Nunes has been a busy boy. (some of the interview this morning) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 7, 2019 Author Share Posted April 7, 2019 Best TV I’ve seen in many days! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: (some of the interview this morning) That was a barn burner! Everyone involved in this thread in any way should watch it. So, my Cliff notes and questions: "Couldn't send these over without an AG in place" So Sleepy Sessions wouldn't do anything? Or, they needed Mueller to be finished and a new AG in place? (A bit confusing to me) 5 straight up referrals (lying, leaking, misleading Congress for the sole purpose of investigating the Congressional investigation) 3 complicated ones - conspiracy (which could be up to 2 dozen people): 1 - FISA abuse and other matters 1 - manipulation of intelligence 1 - global leak referral (a dozen highly sensitive information given to only a few (2-3) reporters - he mentions later that there could be several people) They do not know if the DOJ has more referrals. The "travesty of General Flynn". Explains what criminal referral means. All that Congress does is investigate, they do not have the power to arrest or convict. (Isn't there a jail cell in the basement of Congress though?) They have to take these referrals to the Department of Justice to take this up. "It gets more complicated because you have the top officials in the Department of Justice and the FBI that are likely involved in the referrals that we are going to make." He does mention Strzok and Page later in the interview. He also mentioned whistleblowers were involved in this investigation. Many of the people on the Mueller team were part of the conspiracy. "You have the deputy on the team and another top lawyer both involved in the chain of custody of the Steele dossier." (Is the "deputy" Andrew Weissmann?) He said it is "impossible" that those two attorneys did not know that the Steele dossier was dirt coming from the Democrats. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 7, 2019 Author Share Posted April 7, 2019 Sessions soiled himself with his recusal. If he were not removed, imagine how the Dems would howl if Mueller were giving their findings to Sessions to write the report. He didn't mention Weissmann by name, but I'm pretty sure that's one of the two he was thinking of. I hope Schiff gets served and I hope Flynn gets cleared. Mueller's team went hard after the facts and in the end there were no facts to support collusion or obstruction. I.e., NO COLLUSION!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: That was a barn burner! Everyone involved in this thread in any way should watch it. So, my Cliff notes and questions: "Couldn't send these over without an AG in place" So Sleepy Sessions wouldn't do anything? Or, they needed Mueller to be finished and a new AG in place? (A bit confusing to me) 5 straight up referrals (lying, leaking, misleading Congress for the sole purpose of investigating the Congressional investigation) 3 complicated ones - conspiracy (which could be up to 2 dozen people): 1 - FISA abuse and other matters 1 - manipulation of intelligence 1 - global leak referral (a dozen highly sensitive information given to only a few (2-3) reporters - he mentions later that there could be several people) They do not know if the DOJ has more referrals. The "travesty of General Flynn". Explains what criminal referral means. All that Congress does is investigate, they do not have the power to arrest or convict. (Isn't there a jail cell in the basement of Congress though?) They have to take these referrals to the Department of Justice to take this up. "It gets more complicated because you have the top officials in the Department of Justice and the FBI that are likely involved in the referrals that we are going to make." He does mention Strzok and Page later in the interview. He also mentioned whistleblowers were involved in this investigation. Many of the people on the Mueller team were part of the conspiracy. "You have the deputy on the team and another top lawyer both involved in the chain of custody of the Steele dossier." (Is the "deputy" Andrew Weissmann?) He said it is "impossible" that those two attorneys did not know that the Steele dossier was dirt coming from the Democrats. Good summary. My take on the bolded: It's important to remember, because it's rarely if ever discussed in the media, that Sessions was under active FISA surveillance himself as a member of the Trump transition team and campaign team. They had him on one hop from the Carter Page FISA. That's really what's at the center of Session's decision to recuse himself. What Nunes is implying here is that had he given Sessions the referrals, the information within them (which are classified in some spots as he said) would have either been leaked or disarmed before the DOJ could/would take action. Sessions was a place holder. His job was to generate and protect/insulate Huber/Horowitz's investigations which were running on parallel tracks to the SCO. He set it all up - with Whitaker's help and ECW's help - and then stepped away for optics. As you said, anything Sessions generated would be deemed partisan CYA stuff. They're already trying that gambit with Barr ("He's a politically appointed AG!" ... uh, they all are) - it would be ten times worse had Sessions remained in place. Or Whitaker. Moves like this by Nunes, his decision to delay until Barr and until after Mueller submitted his report, shows (to me) just how well planned and choreographed this roll out has been by the counterintelligence group working behind the scenes. Just now, Nanker said: Sessions soiled himself with his recusal. If he were not removed, imagine how the Dems would howl if Mueller were giving their findings to Sessions to write the report. He didn't mention Weissmann by name, but I'm pretty sure that's one of the two he was thinking of. I hope Schiff gets served and I hope Flynn gets cleared. Mueller's team went hard after the facts and in the end there were no facts to support collusion or obstruction. I.e., NO COLLUSION!!! Absolutely, re Sessions and Weissman. Flynn will be exonerated, still very confident in that. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 4 hours ago, Koko78 said: There is. It's just buried under the mandatory redactions, because Barr is Trump's "hand picked" "fixer" who is "pouncing" on stuff. There's even anonymous sources citing unnamed methods that heard about it 4th hand from someone with knowledge that says so! I heard it's pretty serious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 It's this. Nadler is a stone cold liar. Always has been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's this. Nadler is a stone cold liar. Always has been. Loretta Lynch says "hold my beer" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts