Jump to content

#WalkAway


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Ah, well, he has the stench of useful idiot all about him.

 

 

He's the mind behind Firefly.

 

As I've said prior, it's a shame he turned out to be all Alliance, and nothing like his story's hero, Malcolm Reynolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's a mirage. A dream. Not reality. 

 

As we have seen play out in real time for the past 50 years. 

much is revealed when part of the agenda stated includes these words:

 

"only those who have money win". 

 

rarely do 6 words strung together reveal such a profound misunderstanding of a concept as complicated as capitalism, and the writer's perspective on the relative value of an individual's self-worth. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Not really. I don't support the work of those who are open socialists.

 

 

 

It's a real shame what Joss turned into.

 

Firefly is about a hero who exposes the evil and corruption of a massive and expansive government.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

It's a real shame what Joss turned into.

 

Firefly is about a hero who exposes the evil and corruption of a massive and expansive government.

 

And was cancelled because it was a bad show.  Fun concept though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LeviF91 said:

 

And was cancelled because it was a bad show.  Fun concept though.

 

I disagree.  The show, for my money, was one of the best in the history of televised sci-fi, and was incredibly successful in it's post-airing sales.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

I disagree.  The show, for my money, was one of the best in the history of televised sci-fi, and was incredibly successful in it's post-airing sales.

 

 

 

 

Shhh, don't pre-empt the nerd rage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nkreed said:

You know that Democratic socialism is different from socialism. But why not make the real arguement? Because it kills your point that it's not okay with our constitution.

 

I fully disagree that the Democratic socialist agenda is a loser overall. Hell we employ a ton of the ideals already but will not acknowledge that we benefit from them. (Roads, Police, Schools, etc.).  

 

This is the same arguement that had been made in the past, and we certainly aren't going to fix it in a forum.

The initial 7 tweets used to justify the movement in this thread all DIRECTLY point to the Democratic party, not liberalism. Just because the founder is saying that HE is leaving for a different reason does not translate down to the masses who are leaving the PARTY.

 

You've got to be pretty !@#$ing dumb to think roads are an example of "democratic socialism."

2 hours ago, Foxx said:

hmmm.....

 

communistfascist.jpeg

#hash #rehash

 

No ****.  You're only figuring out now that the far left and far right are replaying Weimar street-brawler politics? 

 

Voter suppression is the next step.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

You've got to be pretty !@#$ing dumb to think roads are an example of "democratic socialism."

 

No ****.  You're only figuring out now that the far left and far right are replaying Weimar street-brawler politics? 

 

Voter suppression is the next step.

the next step? wake up Tom, it has been going on for quite some time already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

the next step? wake up Tom, it has been going on for quite some time already.

 

Yeah...I've already mentioned that I'm not permitted as an independent to vote in local or state mid-terms.

 

But I don't get beaten up at the polls, which is the next antifa escalation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

Yeah...I've already mentioned that I'm not permitted as an independent to vote in local or state mid-terms.

 

But I don't get beaten up at the polls, which is the next antifa escalation...

yep, that is coming too. which i guess was your original point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Yeah...I've already mentioned that I'm not permitted as an independent to vote in local or state mid-terms.

 

But I don't get beaten up at the polls, which is the next antifa escalation...

 

I will stand with you and scare them off, I’m big enough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reasons to #walkaway 

 

Affirmative action 

 

Why would we allow this to happen in med school as opposed to merit based admission?

 

When applying to medical school two factors are looked at, an applicant's GPA and the score on the applicants Medical College Admissions Test, the MCAT. It goes without question you would want your doctor to have the highest possible score on both tests, and expect the school they got their license from to demand that as well. But the standard is not the same for everyone. It differs by appearance.  

 

For example, applicants with an MCAT of 27-29and a GPA OF 3.4-3.59 and are Asian, you have a 21% chance of getting accepted into med school. If you are white, you have a 29% chance of being accepted with the same scores. If you are Hispanic, a 60% chance. African Americans had an 81% chance. 

 

To sum it up, an African American was 4X as likely to make it into Med School as an Asian  with the same scores. 

 

Sounds fair, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

Reasons to #walkaway 

 

Affirmative action 

 

Why would we allow this to happen in med school as opposed to merit based admission?

 

When applying to medical school two factors are looked at, an applicant's GPA and the score on the applicants Medical College Admissions Test, the MCAT. It goes without question you would want your doctor to have the highest possible score on both tests, and expect the school they got their license from to demand that as well. But the standard is not the same for everyone. It differs by appearance.  

 

For example, applicants with an MCAT of 27-29and a GPA OF 3.4-3.59 and are Asian, you have a 21% chance of getting accepted into med school. If you are white, you have a 29% chance of being accepted with the same scores. If you are Hispanic, a 60% chance. African Americans had an 81% chance. 

 

To sum it up, an African American was 4X as likely to make it into Med School as an Asian  with the same scores. 

 

Sounds fair, right?

 

They get silly with admissions standards in order to promote diversity. My friend's brother (they are ethnically Chinese) was denied admission into medical school because he was "too professional" in his interview. Academically he was in the top end of applicants.

 

Makes me feel good that they went for a lesser quality applicant to become a doctor, in the name of diversity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wacka said:

Just walk a\way Renee...

 

That was in the mental jukebox while watching the Yankees game last night

 

Along with a new wave 80s song, from CFNY,  with Walk Away repeated in the chorus was remembered some 30 years later as well, unable to find it quickly,

 

it was Walk Away by The Box, not that rare but not that popular...

 

 

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

I thought about it, but I couldn't see how "Don't Want To Miss A Thing" related to the topic.

call me calloused, but Walk This Way was the first one that came to my mind.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2018 at 8:54 PM, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

Reasons to #walkaway 

 

Affirmative action 

 

Why would we allow this to happen in med school as opposed to merit based admission?

 

When applying to medical school two factors are looked at, an applicant's GPA and the score on the applicants Medical College Admissions Test, the MCAT. It goes without question you would want your doctor to have the highest possible score on both tests, and expect the school they got their license from to demand that as well. But the standard is not the same for everyone. It differs by appearance.  

 

For example, applicants with an MCAT of 27-29and a GPA OF 3.4-3.59 and are Asian, you have a 21% chance of getting accepted into med school. If you are white, you have a 29% chance of being accepted with the same scores. If you are Hispanic, a 60% chance. African Americans had an 81% chance. 

 

To sum it up, an African American was 4X as likely to make it into Med School as an Asian  with the same scores. 

 

Sounds fair, right?

 

medical school isn't totally a meritocracy

 

they need doctors to take basic jobs that nobody else would touch

 

in Canada they are taking in many people in their 40s and 50s without academic proficiency in the sciences, they have a personality profile that would fill the demand for family doctors

 

hopefully positions for surgeons and other specialists are more precious and reserved for the truly deserving

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

medical school isn't totally a meritocracy

 

they need doctors to take basic jobs that nobody else would touch

 

in Canada they are taking in many people in their 40s and 50s without academic proficiency in the sciences, they have a personality profile that would fill the demand for family doctors

 

hopefully positions for surgeons and other specialists are more precious and reserved for the truly deserving

 

 

 

Because why would you want a GP with a strong background in the sciences?  I mean, they're only going to be providing primary diagnoses which determine your entire course of care, and prescribing medication.

 

As long as they're really nice to you while they're providing sub-standard care everything should be fine.  I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

 

This, as always, is the problem with socialized medicine:

 

There are three primary qualities to health care, and at any given time only two can be exercised because it is a finite commodity which responds to the laws of supply and demand.

 

It can be high quality, it can be abundant, and it can be cheap.

 

Canada has elected to exercise abundant and cheap.

 

Enjoy seeing your witch doctors, who fortunately enough, have a pleasant bedside manner.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Because why would you want a GP with a strong background in the sciences?  I mean, they're only going to be providing primary diagnoses which determine your entire course of care, and prescribing medication.

 

As long as they're really nice to you while they're providing sub--standard care everything should be fine.  I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

 

This, as always, is the problem with socialized medicine:

 

There are three primary qualities to health care, and at any given time only two can be exercised because it is a finite commodity which responds to the laws of supply and demand.

 

It can be high quality, it can be abundant, and it can be cheap.

 

Canada has elected to exercise abundant and cheap.

 

Enjoy seeing your witch doctors, who fortunately enough, have a pleasant bedside manner.

 

 

i shake my head as well as science studies aren't a priority, but you can't demand that of people 20 years out of school.  I"ve helped filled out a few applications for accountants to give it a whirl, a lot of teachers have entered the programs

 

for family practice the requirements aren't considered that demanding any more, bedside manner and other personality factors are considered more important than grades

 

personally i have used family doctors only for basic things and getting me into top specialists the next day when required, i'm well connected through work and family to get referrals when needed, and for others more often

 

we don't have the quota thing up here, we consider people from "Asia" (read: India and Hong Kong and other places of fine education and standards) to count for diversity

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way a man can by into liberal bull **** is if he believes Bernie Sanders’ BS that the American Dream is dead. It’s not dead, but it like always is free or guaranteed. You have to work for it. And you have to produce. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

The only way a man can by into liberal bull **** is if he believes Bernie Sanders’ BS that the American Dream is dead. It’s not dead, but it like always is free or guaranteed. You have to work for it. And you have to produce. 

 

 

you can support abortion rights because you believe it will get you out of a jam when you knock up someone's wife or daughter

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

medical school isn't totally a meritocracy

 

they need doctors to take basic jobs that nobody else would touch

 

in Canada they are taking in many people in their 40s and 50s without academic proficiency in the sciences, they have a personality profile that would fill the demand for family doctors

 

hopefully positions for surgeons and other specialists are more precious and reserved for the truly deserving

 

 

I'd rather go to a vet than a doctor. Doctors are generally !@#$ing retarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...