boyst Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Derpity doo! Just how fast does RBG walk these days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, Boyst62 said: Just how fast does RBG walk these days? This whole thread is so retarded. No wonder you like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: i is so retarded, you like it. I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: My God, you're the most out of touch and dishonest poster on PPP. Congratulations on getting that trophy. Oh, this is going to be fun. I'll be linking a lot to Politifact. 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: You realize the "cages" for the children have been going on for a dozen years? You realize that they're not in cages and actually live quite luxuriously as they await finding their families? Water parks, movies, AC, full meals, etc. Of course, you're either inept intellectually and a liar or know nothing beyond the scope of 18 months ago in gleeful ignorance. "Kids in cages" is the quippy way to describe children being separated from their parents, taking away legal guardianship and adopting them out, but as I type that out it's much worse. The word choice comes from the original Associated Press article. Not some left wing crazy person blog. https://www.apnews.com/9794de32d39d4c6f89fbefaea3780769 This was not done in Obama's term. They were minors who didn't have parents and who came over themselves. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ The situation was begun under Donald Trump, and when the heat was on, he claimed he couldn't fix it and that it was Democratic law. This was false. He said that an executive order couldn't stop it. Then he did just that. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ I know the idea of children in cages must give you a hard on, but this one lies heavily with 45. 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: Further, Obama had given direct orders to stand down against the Russian interference. That doesn't bother you? Of course, you're a liar and dishonest or just a fool to not know this. Also false. You can argue that he didn't do enough, but hey, try to be at least factual next time: https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/dec/12/2017-lie-year-russian-election-interference-made-s/ 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: Further, being endorsed by a hate group means nothing. Hillary was endorsed by pro Palestine groups, among others. Anyone can endorse anyone, of course you're either dishonest and a liar or too ignorant to know this. 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: He defended no one in the KKK and the quotes you hear are taken out of context. Of course, you'd know this if you looked for the facts instead of claiming to be an independent but hide behind self virtue cloaked in lies and intellectually dishonest opinions that clearly mask your inability to grasp actual facts and reason. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/aug/17/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-charlottesville-counter-protest/ Well, there is him defending the white nationalists who swarmed over a college campus with torches and beating up students. "There were people in that rally. I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee. I am sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people, neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest. "Because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this. There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country." 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: But, hey, you're independent and make your own opinions up! Let me know what's on MSNBC this morning, hoss.. I'm a much bigger fan of NPR and the BBC, thank you very much. Enjoy your facts! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 3 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Well, I walked away from the Democrats and became and Independent. Then, the Republicans nominated the most corrupt person imaginable. And then he was endorsed by the KKK and neo-Nazi's. And then he won. And then he defended Nazis while courting their vote, raised the costs of health care, gave tax cuts to the super rich while adding sunset clauses to the ones for the middle class (and that is his greatest accomplishment), and decided to put children in cages all while crying about how it's the fault of the big nasty Democrats. And now, it's been revealed that he actively knew about attempts by a foreign superpower to provide intel on his opponent. And that is just what he has admitted to. (After repeatedly changing his story) So yeah, he's made a wonderful case as to why I should go back. You are nothing but a joke. It's as if you were cloned from Gleeful Gator. Not only do you not know or understand what you have posted you do it in such a transparent manner that other people can see right through you. Go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 good amusing show there WhiteWalker please please please continue.. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You are nothing but a joke. It's as if you were cloned from Gleeful Gator. Not only do you not know or understand what you have posted you do it in such a transparent manner that other people can see right through you. Go away. Please see my above answer where I step by step laid out the Pulitzer prize winning resource as evidence. Here is something else for you to read when you have time: https://medium.com/nonzerosum/umberto-eco-ur-facism-9d9cc1e9f317 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 Just now, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Please see my above answer where I step by step laid out the Pulitzer prize winning resource as evidence. Here is something else for you to read when you have time: https://medium.com/nonzerosum/umberto-eco-ur-facism-9d9cc1e9f317 You may think you proved something but you are just ignorant and ill informed. Frankly, not worth my time. Go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You may think you proved something but you are just ignorant and ill informed. Frankly, not worth my time. Go away. it's hilarious can't be serious for one second, no it cannot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You may think you proved something but you are just ignorant and ill informed. Frankly, not worth my time. Go away. I see your #WalkAway extends to a #WalkAway from facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 9 minutes ago, donbb said: I see your #WalkAway extends to a #WalkAway from facts. Jerry: The truth as YOU see it, right George? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: Jerry: The truth as YOU see it, right George? Plenty of linked evidence from the Whitewalker yet you ignore, ignore, ignore until the next Q post drops - then you run like the wind with the wisdom of Q. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, donbb said: I see your #WalkAway extends to a #WalkAway from facts. Good job, Gary. You've found another ignorant poster that you can team up with. The facts you speak of are falsehoods and not worth even disputing. He's been here before and has a history of ignorance. A perfect partner for your own ignorant self. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: "Kids in cages" is the quippy way to describe children being separated from their parents, taking away legal guardianship and adopting them out, but as I type that out it's much worse. The word choice comes from the original Associated Press article. Not some left wing crazy person blog. https://www.apnews.com/9794de32d39d4c6f89fbefaea3780769 This was not done in Obama's term. They were minors who didn't have parents and who came over themselves. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ The situation was begun under Donald Trump, and when the heat was on, he claimed he couldn't fix it and that it was Democratic law. This was false. He said that an executive order couldn't stop it. Then he did just that. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ I know the idea of children in cages must give you a hard on, but this one lies heavily with 45. I'll take this on, because it's something I care deeply about. You may not realize it, but you are making an argument on behalf of modern day slavery. Real slavery, not unlike the kind we had in America in 1850, where individuals are owned as property. The United States is a global hub of human trafficking: First, two articles, one from a left leaning site, one from a right leaning site: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ana-davila/drug-cartels-where-human-trafficking-and-human-smuggling-meet-today_b_7588408.html https://us.blastingnews.com/news/2017/02/the-trafficking-of-children-at-the-mexican-border-001504697.html Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_Mexico Various government and international organizations: https://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/library/2011/human-trafficking-sex-tourism-and-child-exploitation-southern-border https://www.unicefusa.org/mission/protect/trafficking http://www.ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Factsheet_Mexico.pdf https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/human-trafficking This administration has, as a central pillar of policy, systematically gone about the process of eliminating modern day human trafficking, not only in the United States, but globally. You aren't hearing about it in the news, but the amount of arrests related human trafficking and pedophilia under this Administration is unprecedented by magnitudes; and it's all available in the public record. The situation at our southern border is entirely bound to this. Families entering the country through our check points are not separated. The people who are separated are adults traveling with children who work to avoid our border check points. They are separated because that's how children are trafficked into this country, and it's a massive problem, not to mention the largest human rights issue we face in America today. I'll go on to make a further point for your consideration: Human trafficking is an annual multi-billion dollar industry; possibly larger since it's a black market which is nearly impossible to track. Like any other massive global industry, there are massive business operations which co-ordinate and own the lion's share of the marketplace. And like any other multi-billion dollar industry operating within the United States, these business interests have lobbyists who work to buy politicians to promote policy to protect their interests. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Good job, Gary. You've found another ignorant poster that you can team up with. The facts you speak of are falsehoods and not worth even disputing. He's been here before and has a history of ignorance. A perfect partner for your own ignorant self. Trump says jump, you say how high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, donbb said: Trump says jump, you say how high Mostly we laugh and get on with our lives. The left are the people I see dancing to his tune. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, donbb said: Trump says jump, you say how high he IS the President he may draft your sorry behind off to fight in Syria some day i sure hope it doesn't happen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: it's hilarious can't be serious for one second, no it cannot Nope. Absolutely dead serious. Of course, I read news apart from a twitter feed, so I can see the difference. Believe me, I was looking to vote Republican in 2016. I enjoy capitalism, and I like the parts of tax reform that reduced taxes for the middle class, and the parts that look to help small businesses. I am annoyed at SJW's who will bite your ear off about the correct pronoun, and safe spaces and trigger warnings. But no, one way went "Let's build an extremely costly and ineffective wall that will require the seizure of land from private citizens" and "The man who tanked the USFL, has a precedent for not paying people who built his buildings, is on trial for fraud and won't release his tax returns is the perfect choice to help the economy!" I would say that the #WalkAway movement is misguided...but then, that would require the memes to be of real people, not stock photos with quotes on them. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walkaway-campaign-stock-photos/ Yes. I fact check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 14 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Nope. Absolutely dead serious. Of course, I read news apart from a twitter feed, so I can see the difference. Believe me, I was looking to vote Republican in 2016. I enjoy capitalism, and I like the parts of tax reform that reduced taxes for the middle class, and the parts that look to help small businesses. I am annoyed at SJW's who will bite your ear off about the correct pronoun, and safe spaces and trigger warnings. But no, one way went "Let's build an extremely costly and ineffective wall that will require the seizure of land from private citizens" and "The man who tanked the USFL, has a precedent for not paying people who built his buildings, is on trial for fraud and won't release his tax returns is the perfect choice to help the economy!" I would say that the #WalkAway movement is misguided...but then, that would require the memes to be of real people, not stock photos with quotes on them. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walkaway-campaign-stock-photos/ Yes. I fact check. yes, you can see the difference that NOBODY else can... the haters can't use the lack of a wall against Trump because they don't want a wall in the first place... oh wait, they can..... keep stepping on those rakes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 OK. That is bad. Now...tell me what, precisely, this administration has done that shows on iota of effectiveness at stopping that? If you have verifiable hard statistics and data show me that then, hey, Trump has done two things I can get behind. I looked for the last half hour or so and can't find anything. What I do know is what isn't working, and what isn't likely to work. A border wall is ineffective. https://www.newsweek.com/2017/03/17/why-mexican-border-wall-wont-stop-drug-cartels-564112.html In fact, stricter border laws in other parts of the world have increased it. http://sciencenordic.com/do-stricter-border-controls-increase-human-trafficking If you can find the data, I'll mea culpa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 18 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: I would say that the #WalkAway movement is misguided...but then, that would require the memes to be of real people, not stock photos with quotes on them. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/walkaway-campaign-stock-photos/ Yes. I fact check. ... With Snopes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 13 minutes ago, row_33 said: yes, you can see the difference that NOBODY else can... the haters can't use the lack of a wall against Trump because they don't want a wall in the first place... oh wait, they can..... keep stepping on those rakes... I'm not upset at the lack of the wall. That he hasn't done it doesn't bother me other than the obvious broken promise that you lot seem to not care about. The Wall is a monumentally stupid idea. It deserves a literally monument, one in a museum, for the crystallization of stupidity that it is. For one, it is probably the least conservative thing ever. It is a massive publics work project, that overrules multiple states. It requires seizing land from citizens via Eminent Domain. Enforcing and maintaining it would require epic deployment of manpower and tax dollars. I would have sworn that a liberal had proposed it. And for all that, it is almost certain to be ineffective. Cartels use catapults to launch their drug shipments over walls. They have excavated tunnels under the ground. The wall does not effect sea travel, and it's been said that the easiest to way to smuggle a WMB into the US is in a bushel of marijuana via our seaports. It does not stop cartels from using mules to fly to Canada and come in over that border. There is no current way to effectively search every car going through our checkpoints along the southern border. Ineptitude. Graft. Pork barrel spending. It is everything that made me want to walk away from the Dems, bundled up in one package. 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... With Snopes. A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 25 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. Snopes is only a well regarded fact checker service if you don't do your due dillegence into their operation. Then again, a person who outsources their fact checking to a third party isn't a person who actually cares about the quality of information they're getting. Based on the canards you're throwing around this morning it's clear you fall into that category. Intellectual laziness passed off as virtue signaling. You're making quite a show of your ignorance, white Walker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 27 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. Well regarded by whom? Are their fact checks completely unbiased? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 Just now, GG said: Well regarded by whom? Are their fact checks completely unbiased? I wouldn't expect an honest answer. After all, he stated he "fact checks".. then cited a third party who actually did the fact checking. Lazy and dishonest, that's how he rolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-working-end-human-trafficking/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 39 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: A...well regarded fact checker service? This disturbs you? Things are beginning to make sense here. https://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/amp/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html "Well regarded". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Oh, this is going to be fun. I'll be linking a lot to Politifact. "Kids in cages" is the quippy way to describe children being separated from their parents, taking away legal guardianship and adopting them out, but as I type that out it's much worse. The word choice comes from the original Associated Press article. Not some left wing crazy person blog. https://www.apnews.com/9794de32d39d4c6f89fbefaea3780769 This was not done in Obama's term. They were minors who didn't have parents and who came over themselves. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ The situation was begun under Donald Trump, and when the heat was on, he claimed he couldn't fix it and that it was Democratic law. This was false. He said that an executive order couldn't stop it. Then he did just that. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/25/brad-parscale/tyes-immigrant-children-detained-under-obama-they-/ I know the idea of children in cages must give you a hard on, but this one lies heavily with 45. Also false. You can argue that he didn't do enough, but hey, try to be at least factual next time: https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/dec/12/2017-lie-year-russian-election-interference-made-s/ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/aug/17/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-charlottesville-counter-protest/ Well, there is him defending the white nationalists who swarmed over a college campus with torches and beating up students. "There were people in that rally. I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee. I am sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people, neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest. "Because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this. There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country." I'm a much bigger fan of NPR and the BBC, thank you very much. Enjoy your facts! See Obama's cyber chief saying he had direct orders to stand down. See the FBI among others offering help to the DNC which wasn't even hacked. Obama let nothing happen The photo of the kids in the cage is from 2013, iirc, and there are many affidavits of such treatment going back a while, including direct quotes of Obama discussing all of this. Further, Obama released undocumented families without verification allowing predatory immigration. You Source in the AP saying they're not biased is ridiculous, they're very bias. further you prove that you have the intellectual capacity of a second grader that or you feeble-minded moron to believe that Trump actually has the authority to change the law. Executive orders are not changing the law, Obama was a lazy piece of **** never actually change the law because he knew he could not do so; instead deferring to an EO that doesn't do anything. Then the butthurt left proclamations of unfairness make it laughable when Congress had how many years with Obama to change the law? Congress - the legislature - makes the laws. Trump, the head executive, is responsible bfor making sure laws are enforced. So, when Obama was too damn sorry to enforce laws and Trump actually does the job he was elected to do by this country of Americans who chose him you must realize he is doing a damn good job. And the quote, I'd protest the removal of the confederate statue in my town if it was removed. I'd be displeased because the action means nothing. It honors those who chose to defend their freedoms in a time when freedom meant something. And in this area those that fought were not slave owners. An overwhelming amount of this area was pro union but fought for the confederacy. Majority of those were anti slavery because they took hard to score jobs in the western Carolinas that they needed for their family. But, yeah, I don't even needs terrible links to continue this argument. Links and articles don't state facts. They're fake news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 6 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Well, I walked away from the Democrats and became and Independent. Then, the Republicans nominated the most corrupt person imaginable. And then he was endorsed by the KKK and neo-Nazi's. And then he won. And then he defended Nazis while courting their vote, raised the costs of health care, gave tax cuts to the super rich while adding sunset clauses to the ones for the middle class (and that is his greatest accomplishment), and decided to put children in cages all while crying about how it's the fault of the big nasty Democrats. And now, it's been revealed that he actively knew about attempts by a foreign superpower to provide intel on his opponent. And that is just what he has admitted to. (After repeatedly changing his story) So yeah, he's made a wonderful case as to why I should go back. Well, for an "independent", you sure let the DNC talking points memos do your thinking for you. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-working-end-human-trafficking/ Which is a major input in to immigration policy. The administration's immigration policy is to enforce the law as written specifically intended to encourage - if not force - Congress to do their jobs and reform the law. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Which is a major input in to immigration policy. The administration's immigration policy is to enforce the law as written specifically intended to encourage - if not force - Congress to do their jobs and reform the law. Exactly correct. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 7 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Well, I walked away from the Democrats and became and Independent. Then, the Republicans nominated the most corrupt person imaginable. I stopped reading here. Anyone who can't acknowledge the Democrats nominated the most corrupt person imaginable is pathetic. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, KD in CA said: I stopped reading here. Anyone who can't acknowledge the Democrats nominated the most corrupt person imaginable is pathetic. Surprised you got that far. I stopped reading at "WhitewalkerInPhilly." 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 35 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I stopped reading here. Anyone who can't acknowledge the Democrats nominated the most corrupt person imaginable is pathetic. BUT HILLARY is so corrupt, her biggest political enemy, with a majority in both the house and senate, can't bring 1 specific charge against her. That's pathetic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 Helps when you have the DOJ and FBI in your pocket. Not to mention the White House. But details never matter to a man with no interest in the truth as Gary continues to prove over and over again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Helps when you have the DOJ and FBI in your pocket. Not to mention the White House. But details never matter to a man with no interest in the truth as Gary continues to prove over and over again. You mean it isn't forthright and ethical for the FBI to decide that she's not guilty before they bother to begin the investigation? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 12 minutes ago, donbb said: BUT HILLARY is so corrupt, her biggest political enemy, with a majority in both the house and senate, can't bring 1 specific charge against her. That's pathetic. What will you do when the charges start to come fast and furious, Gary? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbb Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: What will you do when the charges start to come fast and furious, Gary? Bow to Lord Trump and off with my head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 In other words, more honest words, that means Gary will once again run away, change screen names and hope to return unnoticed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: In other words, more honest words, that means Gary will once again run away, change screen names and hope to return unnoticed. Isn't he in danger of running out of names? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts