ndirish1978 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 4th in targets but he's going to want #1 money. Smart money isn't on him returning to LA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 8 hours ago, Dorkington said: I'm glad he got the opportunity to go play with a real offense and QB. He had 65, 60, 28 (in only 8 games) receptions with the Bills "non real" Offense. Worst year so far was in LA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 I am already preparing myself for Sammy signing with the Pats on a deal very favorable to the Pats. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Just now, Peter said: I am already preparing myself for Sammy signing with the Pats on a deal very favorable to the Pats. Give Gillisee and Gilmore somebody else to talk to on the bench? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyC81 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, ProcessTheTrust said: He's not trash, come on...but he's not a real #1. A real #1 fights for the ball, high-points 50/50 balls. Sammy needs the ball to fall right into the bread basket. He has AMAZING hands, but he doesn't use them to their potential, if that makes sense. I think Houston should go after him, let him be a #2 to his boy Hopkins. Remember that the Texans have Will Fuller, who looked great with Watson at QB, so I don't think they'd be looking to add a starting WR. San Francisco, definitely and they have a lot of cap space. Rams right now have to think of Robert Woods as their #1 so I don't see them competing with what Sammy may get offered by SF and other teams. Edited January 9, 2018 by LittleJoeCartwright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 10 hours ago, JR in Pittsburgh said: Wonder if decoys sign their contracts with invisible ink. Maybe Robert woods will sign it on his behalf. I do not think decoys get 8 TDs like Lammy got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 11 hours ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said: Only 39 catches though, so those 8 td’s are somewhat misleading. Additionally, no one is catching 8 td’s in Dennison’s offense. Do they count less because you only caught 39 passes? I imagine 1 or 2 TD's could make a difference in a low scoring game. Have we seen a low scoring game where that could have helped? Maybe a game in January in north Florida? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 6 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: Do they count less because you only caught 39 passes? I imagine 1 or 2 TD's could make a difference in a low scoring game. Have we seen a low scoring game where that could have helped? Maybe a game in January in north Florida? I just believe that the TD numbers were somewhat coincidental. It’s not as if Watkins has proven himself to be a big red zone threat in the pros. He doesn’t have the size to be that guy. He’s a big play guy who happened to find the endzone on a high percentage of his catches this season. The reality is 39 catches isn’t enough for a supposed number one receiver. I don’t think that his presence in the red zone would have been the difference yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, DriveFor1Outta5 said: I just believe that the TD numbers were somewhat coincidental. It’s not as if Watkins has proven himself to be a big red zone threat in the pros. He doesn’t have the size to be that guy. He’s a big play guy who happened to find the endzone on a high percentage of his catches this season. The reality is 39 catches isn’t enough for a supposed number one receiver. I don’t think that his presence in the red zone would have been the difference yesterday. What about a 67 yard TD? Maybe a play like this would've helped? http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000849067/Sammy-Watkins-extends-across-goal-line-for-second-touchdown Edited January 9, 2018 by jmc12290 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 11 hours ago, Magox said: He's not terrible by any stretch of the imagination, but he's not nearly as good as what you and many other posters on this board believe him to be. No one is good enough to please you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 1 minute ago, nedboy7 said: No one is good enough to please you guys. Sure there is. How about for starters people who live up to expectations? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Arnold Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: No one is good enough to please you guys. Players who reach or exceed expectations are pleasing. Or as Sammy would say, it would "be a pleasure" to see his play match his salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurricane Marv Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 9 hours ago, billykay said: Houston already has an excellent #2 in Fuller. I don't know about excellent. He's pretty one dimensional as was seen when Hopkins was out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJDK Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 3 hours ago, Magox said: Sure there is. How about for starters people who live up to expectations? Agreed. Nobody is saying he’s terrible but his effort level is what is preventing him from making good on his physical gifts. Not a coach Mac guy. Definitely not worth what we gave up to get him and not worth the money he’ll get in free agency. Over his career he has proven to be ‘just a guy’ who has flashed here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 4 hours ago, nedboy7 said: No one is good enough to please you guys. Exactly. What do people expect, a WR who's better than 101st in receptions and 63rd in yards?? Give Tyrod some weapons like Sammy and Da'Rick and the Bills are a lock for the Super Bowl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Boo Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 People in hell want ice water. 15 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said: Baltimore and the Jets might back up the Brinks truck for him. Or the Skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Formation Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 I want to see Sammy do well, a team like San Francisco would be amazing for him. Garropolo could use an elite talent and Sammy would be the focal point in that offense. Make big bucks and play for an up and coming franchise. His numbers would be scary with Jimmy Garropolo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKellyTryouts Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 4 hours ago, Hurricane Marv said: I don't know about excellent. He's pretty one dimensional as was seen when Hopkins was out. I wouldn't say that - he dazzled with Watson and was producing TD's at a crazy rate, not just with the deep ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 Who cares what Sammy wants to do? He's not around anymore. Let it go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIZ Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 If someone makes him a true 1 or 2 and also has a QB, he's a Pro Bowl WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts