Albwan Posted June 5, 2020 Share Posted June 5, 2020 31 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: Do you think he can finish it in the next 7 months? That depends on how much more damage the democratic nazi party can do. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 5, 2020 Share Posted June 5, 2020 51 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They are just cutting holes in it anyway. Waste of money Got to start someplace. It's easier to watch the holes than to watch the entire border. Here is LEGAL immigration statistics for the past 6 years, by country into the US. There's no appreciable difference in the numbers from 2013 - 2018. https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2015/table3 https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2018/table3# These are the ILLEGAL immigration population statistics 1990-2017 https://www.statista.com/statistics/646261/unauthorized-immigrant-population-in-the-us/ So can you please explain to me why it is bad that this Administration wants to curb ILLEGAL immigration while still allowing LEGAL immigration? Why? What reason do you have for disagreeing with this policy? You know, the US population growth is too slow. Our country needs to boost the birth rate ASAP. Either that, or else allow people from other countries to make up the difference. Either way is fine with me, but if our country is going to allow immigration to take up the slack, then we should ALLOW them to enter LEGALLY. The policy should be to gradually increase the number of applications and open up easier paths to actual legitimate citizenship. Let them make a family, get jobs, pay taxes, live like regular citizens without having to hide from census takers, etc. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 It's a tremendous wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: It's a tremendous wall. But is it a "Bigly" wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 8 hours ago, snafu said: You know, the US population growth is too slow. Our country needs to boost the birth rate ASAP. Outlaw abortion? If we had never done that, we would now have about 50 million more people, most of which would be paying taxes and SS and oh my goodness, I just realized we might not be an almost bankrupt ponzai scheme of a social system! Not really, I already knew that as I'm sure most on here do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 17 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said: But is it a "Bigly" wall. It's getting biglier and biglier all the time from the sound of it. It's a tremendously holey, bigly wall to be sure. 11 minutes ago, Cinga said: Outlaw abortion? If we had never done that, we would now have about 50 million more people, most of which would be paying taxes and SS and oh my goodness, I just realized we might not be an almost bankrupt ponzai scheme of a social system! Not really, I already knew that as I'm sure most on here do. Yeah, 50 million people on welfare! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: It's getting biglier and biglier all the time from the sound of it. It's a tremendously holey, bigly wall to be sure. Have you gotten on your knees and ask for forgiveness yet? If no, why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 Just now, westside said: Have you gotten on your knees and ask for forgiveness yet? If no, why not? Who am I asking forgiveness from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 Just now, Gene Frenkle said: Who am I asking forgiveness from? Does it really matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 Just now, westside said: Does it really matter? I only have to answer to our lord and savior Jesus Christ, not you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: I only have to answer to our lord and savior Jesus Christ, not you. So you're against all the bowing and asking for forgiveness? Edited June 6, 2020 by westside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 18 minutes ago, Cinga said: Outlaw abortion? If we had never done that, we would now have about 50 million more people, most of which would be paying taxes and SS and oh my goodness, I just realized we might not be an almost bankrupt ponzai scheme of a social system! Not really, I already knew that as I'm sure most on here do. At a minimum, incentivize childbirth and raising children (pipe dream). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, westside said: So you're against all the bowing and asking for forgiveness? Does my prior statement not imply that I am not? 1 minute ago, snafu said: At a minimum, incentivize childbirth and raising children (pipe dream). Just say no to entitlements! Edited June 6, 2020 by Gene Frenkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 Just now, Gene Frenkle said: Does my prior statement not imply that I am not? Did I say bow to me? No, I was just curious if all libs agree with the bowing and asking for forgiveness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 11 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said: Does my prior statement not imply that I am not? Just say no to entitlements! Not sure I understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 23 minutes ago, westside said: Did I say bow to me? No, I was just curious if all libs agree with the bowing and asking for forgiveness. Are you coming on to me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 Just now, Gene Frenkle said: Are you coming on to me? Only in your dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 Just now, westside said: Only in your dreams. This is getting weird. How do you know about my dreams? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: This is getting weird. How do you know about my dreams? I know everything. I'm with antifa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, westside said: I know everything. I'm with antifa. Only Jesus knows everything. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: Only Jesus knows everything. Amen to that!! At least we agree on something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 41 minutes ago, westside said: Amen to that!! At least we agree on something. God bless you, my son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurmal34 Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 You guys talking about the one around the White House? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 7 hours ago, Thurmal34 said: You guys talking about the one around the White House? Protecting the coward in chief Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted June 6, 2020 Share Posted June 6, 2020 7 hours ago, Thurmal34 said: You guys talking about the one around the White House? 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Protecting the coward in chief Donald FINALLY got his wall. A human shield of soldiers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-rejected-by-top-court-on-california-migrant-sanctuary-law/ar-BB15vsf9 Trump loses another case. Sanctuary cities to be left alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 18, 2020 Share Posted June 18, 2020 LOL 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted June 18, 2020 Share Posted June 18, 2020 57 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL I love how he drives the trolls in his comments section insane. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 19, 2020 Share Posted June 19, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 20, 2020 Author Share Posted June 20, 2020 Biden’s still in his basement bunker, right. Just checking. He’s ghoulishly white. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted June 20, 2020 Share Posted June 20, 2020 Just now, Nanker said: Biden’s still in his basement bunker, right. Just checking. He’s ghoulishly white. That's different, so.......shut up! Lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 Poorly worded as it is well over 400 miles now... I think they mean "new" miles? 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 The Wall, prior to Trump's addition had stretches that were built out of items that were on hand such as Vietnam War era helicopter landing pads. These fences were easily penetrated but were erected in areas that naturally had a lot of influx from Mexico. They really never shut down the border but acted as a speed bump only. Other sections only had gates across roadways that could be walked around by people on foot. The approach now is not to make the wall so tall, so thick and so difficult to get over or under that no illegal aliens can possibly get into the U.S. The new wall slows people down to the extent that after our sensors and cameras pick them up they can be caught. People can argue all they want about whether or not we are replacing wall or building new wall. At this point, what difference does it make? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 This will be appealed. The military defends the border, hence ... Appeals court rules Trump administration lacked authority to shift military money to wallThe 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration illegally went around Congress in reappropriating the funds. A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that the Trump administration acted unlawfully when it transferred $2.5 billion in military construction projects to build parts of the wall at the southern border -- a blow to the administration’s efforts to fulfill President Trump’s signature 2016 campaign promise. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration illegally went around Congress in reappropriating the funds. It ruled on a suit brought by a coalition of border states including California and environmental groups. Why do I think it had more to do with this? The court also ruled that the government was not in compliance with environmental regulations, and was therefore harming those who visit the region for nature-related activities including bird-watching and would also disturb wildlife. </snip> 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: This will be appealed. The military defends the border, hence ... Appeals court rules Trump administration lacked authority to shift military money to wallThe 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration illegally went around Congress in reappropriating the funds. A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that the Trump administration acted unlawfully when it transferred $2.5 billion in military construction projects to build parts of the wall at the southern border -- a blow to the administration’s efforts to fulfill President Trump’s signature 2016 campaign promise. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration illegally went around Congress in reappropriating the funds. It ruled on a suit brought by a coalition of border states including California and environmental groups. Why do I think it had more to do with this? The court also ruled that the government was not in compliance with environmental regulations, and was therefore harming those who visit the region for nature-related activities including bird-watching and would also disturb wildlife. </snip> It is a standard ruling from the 9th Circuit: A place where they have only a passing acquaintance with the Constitution... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 36 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: This will be appealed. The military defends the border, hence ... Appeals court rules Trump administration lacked authority to shift military money to wallThe 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration illegally went around Congress in reappropriating the funds. A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that the Trump administration acted unlawfully when it transferred $2.5 billion in military construction projects to build parts of the wall at the southern border -- a blow to the administration’s efforts to fulfill President Trump’s signature 2016 campaign promise. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the administration illegally went around Congress in reappropriating the funds. It ruled on a suit brought by a coalition of border states including California and environmental groups. Why do I think it had more to do with this? The court also ruled that the government was not in compliance with environmental regulations, and was therefore harming those who visit the region for nature-related activities including bird-watching and would also disturb wildlife. </snip> Seems like mixed messages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 On 6/6/2020 at 8:52 AM, Tiberius said: Protecting the coward in chief ...go wash your hands.......FIRST time for everything............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 I love how they just saw through the stupid wall lol ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I love how they just saw through the stupid wall lol ? It was designed so that it could be seen through. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 On June 5, 2020 at 11:18 PM, Gene Frenkle said: Only Jesus knows everything. If you're going to try to fool the big man you'll either have to get much better at sarcasm or accept that your hair will never grow back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts