Jump to content

Watkins needs to step up.... Woods out....


Billsfan1972

Recommended Posts

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

That was an awful throw by Goff. He had the CB beat by a mile. 

 

You're right, and Goff actually underthrows a lot of would be deep TD passes. But Sammy has a knack for going lazy on some plays and that was one of them. 2nd lazy play in this game alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see it as lazy, though it was a definite underthrow by Goff  as he's been known to do. He just can't quite seem to get it... it's hard to overthrow SW, so put some air under it. Bad luck there but SW had to try to catch it, NOT doing so would be lazy. Just a bad bounce 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Commonsense said:

Because the throw was short Sammy is ok for looking like a stiff reaching back with one hand...get out of here. This isn't pop warner, make the play. 

He had to try to get it with one hand, he turned around and that's where the ball was... guys make one handlers in the NFL.. was he supposed to watch it fall to the ground? It was a bad bounce, you agenda people are ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

What a hilarious take.  Your bias makes you look foolish. 

 

Foolish? Keep your feet on the ground. Taking your bad takes to the grave isn't some sort of praise worthy deed. Let it go. The Saints top two corners are out, he is far from having a good game.

 

That adjustment and effort was poor I don't care who through the ball. I have nothing against Watkins he is a front running diva who can't put up numbers against top flight CB's. Don't go linking some lame clip of him smoking old man Revis.

Edited by Commonsense
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Commonsense said:

 

Foolish? Keep your feet on the ground. Taking your bad takes to the grave isn't some sort of praise worthy deed. Let it go. The Saints top two corners are out, he is far from having a good game.

 

That adjustment and effort was poor I don't care who through the ball. I have nothing against Watkins he is a front running diva who can't put up numbers against top flight CB's. Don't go linking some lame clip of him smoking old man Revis.

 

Yep. Confirmed bias.  Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watkins is not a receiver you want to throw an end zone fade to. He doesn’t have the vertical separation you need on that kind of play. He lets the DB come in and break up the play. I don’t know how anyone watches Sammy play this year and think he is elite. He’s a good receiver and a legit #1 for half the league or so. Just not worth the elite contract he will get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a face mask personal foul too......

 

Keep complaining regardless of what he does.....  And doubled most of the day.

 

A good not great game.  

1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

Watkins is not a receiver you want to throw an end zone fade to. He doesn’t have the vertical separation you need on that kind of play. He lets the DB come in and break up the play. I don’t know how anyone watches Sammy play this year and think he is elite. He’s a good receiver and a legit #1 for half the league or so. Just not worth the elite contract he will get.

Actually should have been thrown higher and away from the coverage.  Goff has been short on a # of passes to Watkins.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Yep. Confirmed bias.  Thanks. 

 

Check the history home boy and take a break from Twitter. You are pretty confrontational for a guy who provides very little material of his own. You also tend to speak in definitive terms regarding your own opinion which is very telling.

 

In short, just post the links we enjoy and stop being a bozo. Toodles.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Commonsense said:

 

Check the history home boy and take a break from Twitter. You are pretty confrontational for a guy who provides very little material of his own. You also tend to speak in definitive terms regarding your own opinion which is very telling.

 

In short, just post the links we enjoy and stop being a bozo. Toodles.

 

 

 

Get back to me when you really have common sense. 

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Gte back to me when you really have common sense. 

 

Here we go! Let's act like a 5 year old and direct comments at posters without offering an analysis or prior history that supports your own beliefs. No thanks. That's what you have been doing around here for the past few months. It comes off as arrogant, plenty of arrogant posters that can formulate takes are worth engaging, unfortunately you haven't shown that yet.

 

www.stayintheshallowendofthepool.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Commonsense said:

 

Here we go! Let's act like a 5 year old and direct comments at posters without offering an analysis or prior history that supports your own beliefs. No thanks. That's what you have been doing around here for the past few months. It comes off as arrogant, plenty of arrogant posters that can formulate takes are worth engaging, unfortunately you haven't shown that yet.

 

www.stayintheshallowendofthepool.com

 

5 year old?  Who's calling names. Your take was dumb. Goff made a horrible throw. Period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Watkins is not a receiver you want to throw an end zone fade to. He doesn’t have the vertical separation you need on that kind of play. He lets the DB come in and break up the play. I don’t know how anyone watches Sammy play this year and think he is elite. He’s a good receiver and a legit #1 for half the league or so. Just not worth the elite contract he will get.

 

 

You just said hes a number 1 for half the league- so roughly 15th, for bar napkin math? That’s about dead on the cutoff for 10m+ a year

28 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

just watching the last quarter of this game.  watkins looks lazy and half assed.

 

26copypaste defending this guy to death is hilariously bad.

 

 

Im admittedly on the fence with that interception. I’d want to see it again but I suspect that he didn’t leave a ton of opportunity on the field that play and it looked worse because they were both coasting out of bounds at the end so there was no opportunity to fight or tackle or show fire. It was a bad pass, he adjusted and tried to make a tough play and the defender was in the right spot at the right time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NoSaint said:

 

 

You just said hes a number 1 for half the league- so roughly 15th, for bar napkin math? That’s about dead on the cutoff for 10m+ a year

 

 

Im admittedly on the fence with that interception. I’d want to see it again but I suspect that he didn’t leave a ton of opportunity on the field that play and it looked worse because they were both coasting out of bounds at the end so there was no opportunity to fight or tackle or show fire. It was a bad pass, he adjusted and tried to make a tough play and the defender was in the right spot at the right time.

an elite wr should reocognize that opportunity to be there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watkins had a decent game today but he's nothing more than a 3rd WR on a very good team.

 

Same thing with a lot of the starters we have, on better teams they are nothing more than backups and role players.

 

Either way people need to move on, the Watkins trade was a good one for this team long term regardless of whether or not we keep Gaines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Watkins is not a receiver you want to throw an end zone fade to. He doesn’t have the vertical separation you need on that kind of play. He lets the DB come in and break up the play. I don’t know how anyone watches Sammy play this year and think he is elite. He’s a good receiver and a legit #1 for half the league or so. Just not worth the elite contract he will get.

 

Watkins was rock solid today as was Goff.  

 

Rams keep on winning.     

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Nice game for Watkins........4 for 82 and a TD and a couple PI's for close to the same yardage.

 

If Goff could throw a deep ball he'd have had another 70 or so and another TD on that deep shot PI he drew.

 

Bills greatly miss his impact offensively........killing Tyrod and Shady in particular.......and having to run Watkins' routes has not been flattering to Zay Jones or helped his development, IMO.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SaviorPeterman said:

Watkins had a decent game today but he's nothing more than a 3rd WR on a very good team.

 

Same thing with a lot of the starters we have, on better teams they are nothing more than backups and role players.

 

Either way people need to move on, the Watkins trade was a good one for this team long term regardless of whether or not we keep Gaines.

Go back to defending Peterman.......  A #3 that has drawn #1 and double coverage.....  Really.....

 

Today Goff missed him 2-3 times and yes may have had a drop.

 

But also a td, a great juggling catch and three over 20 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billsfan1972 said:

Go back to defending Peterman.......  A #3 that has drawn #1 and double coverage.....  Really.....

 

Today Goff missed him 2-3 times and yes may have had a drop.

 

But also a td, a great juggling catch and three over 20 yards.

 

He is the #3 WR on the Rams behind Cupp (a rookie) and Robert Woods.

 

I never said he's not a good player but at least with the Rams he's nothing more than a 3rd option. Probably why he won't resign there even if they want to keep him because he's a typical selfish player and probably believes he can put up 1500+ yards a season on another team as the #1 option.

 

Problem is some people still believe he'd make a difference here this season and that TT would magically be a different QB with him still on the roster. This is false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else notice the single high safety was on the boundary or field hash to Watkins side almost every time he was split out wide, even when he was the lone receiver to either side of the field?

 

Easier on the other receivers when the defense brackets or doubles Watkins :ph34r:

Edited by P51
“was” on
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, P51 said:

Anyone else notice the single high safety on the boundary or field hash to Watkins side almost every time he was split out wide, even when he was the lone receiver to either side of the field?

 

Easier on the other receivers when the defense brackets or doubles Watkins :ph34r:

All #3's attract double coverage......  Just ask saviorpeterman.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, P51 said:

Anyone else notice the single high safety on the boundary or field hash to Watkins side almost every time he was split out wide, even when he was the lone receiver to either side of the field?

 

Easier on the other receivers when the defense brackets or doubles Watkins :ph34r:

 

That's the kind of coverage that every team's 3rd WR gets all across the league. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Are you talking about Gaines or Matthews who have both missed multiple games this season? 

 

 

I didn't make a comparison.
Ability is dependent on availability.  
I agree that Gaines and Matthews' absences have been frustrating...just like Sammy's were in years past.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...