keepthefaith Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 19 minutes ago, Tiberius said: "I never had anything to do with Russia" "The meeting in Trump Towers was about adoptions" "Putin strongly denies it, and I see no reason not to believe him." Is there a shred of evidence that Trump or his people took any action of any kind as a result of this meeting? Any testimony reported from those who have given it that would incriminate anyone? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 25 minutes ago, GG said: By that flimsy standard, Trump is also a Chinese and a German agent. As would be the Clintons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: As would be the Clintons. As would the CEO of just about every component company of the DOW. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swill Merchant Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 https://comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-branco-cartoon-fax-checker/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 59 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Is there a shred of evidence that Trump or his people took any action of any kind as a result of this meeting? Any testimony reported from those who have given it that would incriminate anyone? What???? Just hating the man isn't good enough? You need actual evidence? How dare you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You know who's looking less and less crazy as this develops? Ross Perot. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 hour ago, keepthefaith said: Is there a shred of evidence that Trump or his people took any action of any kind as a result of this meeting? Any testimony reported from those who have given it that would incriminate anyone? From this specific meeting? No. We know they lied about the meeting, then had to lie again and then again, tried hiding it and that we don't know why. So you probably do not think that is suspicious, correct? Or that Trump has met five times with Putin in secret, and no one knows what was discussed. You are fine with that, I know. But people that actually like our country are concerned. Just because we are in the dark about all these secret meeting, along with the tons and tons of other evidence (yes, I know you don't know about all these things that have been reported widely) makes many people think the President in compromised. 1 hour ago, RochesterRob said: You see no reason not to believe him until he says something in contrast to what you believe then he will be a liar of huge proportions according to you. Counting down the days until that happens. You don't think is a pathological liar? Or will you just run to the, "Oh, all politicians lie constantly"? 13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The poop times?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 "Many people" think the world is flat too... but they have more compelling evidence than there is of Trump being a Russian asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: "Many people" think the world is flat too... but they have more compelling evidence than there is of Trump being a Russian asset. The only thing flat right now is the Diet Coke Trump gave me. ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: From this specific meeting? No. We know they lied about the meeting, then had to lie again and then again, tried hiding it and that we don't know why. So you probably do not think that is suspicious, correct? By THIS standard, Benghazi was a crime. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: By THIS standard, Benghazi was a crime. In your addled mind, sure. But not for a serious person. 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: "Many people" think there is a deep State too... with even less compelling evidence than there is of Trump being a Russian asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 35 minutes ago, DC Tom said: By THIS standard, Benghazi was a crime. and Obamacare was treason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: You know who's looking less and less crazy as this develops? Ross Perot. I've been saying that since this started. ANYONE who poses a potential threat to the establishment will be ruined by it. We don't live in anything resembling a free society, so there's really no reason NOT to round these people up and hang them by their toes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kemp said: Found out something about your sourcing and/or Internet presence in a message from another poster. Post it publicly, along with the screen name of the poster making the accusation, coward. I looked through your reply closely. I don't see any good sources listed. You sure are showing me. Any negatives being shown are self inflicted. I'm not here to tell anyone what to think, but am willing to offer advice on how to think to those who inquire. I've given you the keys, and shown you the door. It's up to you to open it and see what's on the other side. If you choose to keep the door closed, while pontificating about what your sure is on the other side in ignorance, and demanding I tell you; then that's up to you. It's not a reputation I'd want, but if that's who you are as a man, so be it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 4 hours ago, Foxx said: i'm sure your aware but for the intended recipient, he should also understand that all of the above is made infinitely easier by the fact that 6 corporations own roughly 90% of all media. he might want to ask himself why, when a new narrative is thrust upon the scene, that that narrative is everywhere, at the same time. True or false: That's the way the entire planet is set up in virtually every single industry, not just in media. This is proof of what exactly, in regards to Trump? If these corporations are thriving under Trump, as I assume you believe, why would they want to get rid of him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 21 minutes ago, Kemp said: Found out something about your sourcing and/or Internet presence in a message from another poster. I looked through your reply closely. I don't see any good sources listed. You sure are showing me. Stop being a little B word and stalking people. ***** creepy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabrecrazed Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 41 minutes ago, Kemp said: Found out something about your sourcing and/or Internet presence in a message from another poster. I looked through your reply closely. I don't see any good sources listed. You sure are showing me. And I was thinking you couldn't get more douchey. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 45 minutes ago, Kemp said: Found out something about your sourcing and/or Internet presence in a message from another poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 3 hours ago, GG said: And that's where you are wrong. His financial "ties' to Russia start and end with condominium sales and potential real estate development deals. Nothing out of the ordinary if you take a dart and throw it at a board of countries with rich people in them. Those financial ties have been greatly exaggerated to drive a specific narrative, which you seem to have bought hook line & sinker. By that flimsy standard, Trump is also a Chinese and a German agent. Curious as to how you know that his ties to Russia start and end with with real estate. Have you seen all of the notes from Mueller, SDNY, and Virginia? If not, you, like the rest of us, don't have a clue what's in the respective investigations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Kemp said: Curious as to how you know that his ties to Russia start and end with with real estate. Have you seen all of the notes from Mueller, SDNY, and Virginia? If not, you, like the rest of us, don't have a clue what's in the respective investigations. You're such a douche 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kemp said: Curious as to how you know that his ties to Russia start and end with with real estate. Have you seen all of the notes from Mueller, SDNY, and Virginia? If not, you, like the rest of us, don't have a clue what's in the respective investigations. So, in addition to your belief that the FBI (not a even law giving body, but the enforcement arm of the Executive) should justly criminalize foreign policy positions which disagree with FBI leadership; you also believe that the FBI should conduct criminal investigations on private citizens without any prior evidence of wrongdoing. Dangerously. Stupid. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swill Merchant Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 30 minutes ago, Kemp said: Curious as to how you know that his ties to Russia start and end with with real estate. Have you seen all of the notes from Mueller, SDNY, and Virginia? If not, you, like the rest of us, don't have a clue what's in the respective investigations. Serious question. How do we know you are not a pedophile? I'm all but certain you can be linked to children. Where is the proof you didn't molest them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkreed Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Kemp said: True or false: That's the way the entire planet is set up in virtually every single industry, not just in media. This is proof of what exactly, in regards to Trump? If these corporations are thriving under Trump, as I assume you believe, why would they want to get rid of him? Wow, you start your counter argument from such a perilous perch. Since everything is consolidated, media gets a pass on mass producing "news." Think about that for a minute. I mean it. Let that sink in a little. Minus independent writers you're getting, what, a maximum of 6 stories. 6! Worst is that they are mostly the same. Speaking of consolidation/globalization (for this argument it's the same) why would a company who has business all over the globe dislike Trump? Sure US business is doing well, but what about the companies profits abroad? They should make more money abroad by taking advantage of those regions. However Trump has installed tariffs on these products and this cuts into their profits. When you look at someone like 44, you saw globalization at its finest. Open trade everywhere and the complete bastardization on the American worker. Now 45 is curtailing oversea profits by promoting his "America First" agenda. I think I'd understand why they want him out. And that's not even factoring in a shadow government angle, which would shine an entirely different light (no pun intended) on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 39 minutes ago, Kemp said: Curious as to how you know that his ties to Russia start and end with with real estate. Have you seen all of the notes from Mueller, SDNY, and Virginia? If not, you, like the rest of us, don't have a clue what's in the respective investigations. Don't change the subject. What do these things have to do with the apparent Russian bankrolling of Trump's enterprises? Where's your proof that Russians did more than be interested in his real estate deals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 I'm enjoying being a mute spectator to this beating... ? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: The then-No. 4 Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased. Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller. At the time, Ohr was the associate attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election. Ohr’s activities, chronicled in handwritten notes and congressional testimony I gleaned from sources, provide the most damning evidence to date that FBI and DOJ officials may have misled federal judges in October 2016 in their zeal to obtain the warrant targeting Trump adviser Carter Page just weeks before Election Day. They also contradict a key argument that House Democrats have made in their formal intelligence conclusions about the Russia case. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 49 minutes ago, Swill Merchant said: Serious question. How do we know you are not a pedophile? I'm all but certain you can be linked to children. Where is the proof you didn't molest them? We need to see the investigator's notes. Otherwise, we'll just have to assume that Kemp is, in fact, a child molester. Like Gary the Rapist, he must prove his innocence once the vague allegations have been made. #IBelieveThem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swill Merchant Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 5 minutes ago, Koko78 said: We need to see the investigator's notes. Otherwise, we'll just have to assume that Kemp is, in fact, a child molester. Like Gary the Rapist, he must prove his innocence once the vague allegations have been made. #IBelieveThem. I've learned through messages from other posters that he gives off the creepy vibe. A thorough, open-ended investigation is in order to prove what the rest of us already know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, Swill Merchant said: I've learned through messages from other posters that he gives off the creepy vibe. A thorough, open-ended investigation is in order to prove what the rest of us already know. I nominate @Deranged Rhino to act as Special PPP Prosecutor. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 7 minutes ago, Koko78 said: I nominate @Deranged Rhino to act as Special PPP Prosecutor. DR's got a conflict of interest, and must recuse himself. I nominate Robert Mueller instead. He's not doing anything terribly important right now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swill Merchant Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: DR's got a conflict of interest, and must recuse himself. I nominate Robert Mueller instead. He's not doing anything terribly important right now. We'll need some fair and impartial posters such as myself, Boyst, & 3rdining to provide the board with updates of his guilt while we wait for evidence to be discovered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Ya, he also predicted Clinton would get indicted. He's a fruitcake ---- Cuomo Prime Time ✔@CuomoPrimeTime "I never said there was no collusion between the campaign or between people in the campaign... I have not. I said the President of the United States," Pres. Trump’s attorney @RudyGiuliani tells @ChrisCuomo https://cnn.it/2FwzM5o 816 9:30 PM - Jan 16, 2019 797 people are talking about this Lol!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 4 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Post it publicly, along with the screen name of the poster making the accusation, coward. Any negatives being shown are self inflicted. I'm not here to tell anyone what to think, but am willing to offer advice on how to think to those who inquire. I've given you the keys, and shown you the door. It's up to you to open it and see what's on the other side. If you choose to keep the door closed, while pontificating about what your sure is on the other side in ignorance, and demanding I tell you; then that's up to you. It's not a reputation I'd want, but if that's who you are as a man, so be it. Your questions can all be answered by a red pill from galactic. 3 hours ago, Boyst62 said: You're such a douche Another mystery cleared up by a giant intellect. Galactic knows all. If you don't get it, ask Rhino. He understands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swill Merchant Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 6 minutes ago, Kemp said: You shouldn't inject your personal problems into a serious discussion. That's exactly what a guilty person would say. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Swill Merchant said: That's exactly what a guilty person would say. Great analysis, Swill Merchant. So, is Rhino galactic or a follower? Might make no sense to you, but he knows what it means. Awaiting his response. What say you, Rhino? Edited January 17, 2019 by Kemp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 I posted three names earlier for anyone interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 15 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I posted three names earlier for anyone interested. Yeah, no one cares. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts