Jump to content

The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency


Nanker

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Nanker said:

Oh so right. Thank you President Trump for saving us from waking up on Christmas morning and being required to be subjected to a Haranguing lecture from this old bat:

kisspng-microphone-cassette-deck-tape-recorder-compact-cas-video-recorder-5b3310cbc9e7d2.279228341530073291827.thumb.jpg.d9b4a00275e726d6f3965ff68c043536.jpg

Millions of dollars at her disposal and it sounds like she recorded the audio on this gem.  That voice is like an ice pick in the nads.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 7:39 AM, Nanker said:

Oh so right. Thank you President Trump for saving us from waking up on Christmas morning and being required to be subjected to a Haranguing lecture from this old bat:

 

....LMAO....and she's wearing blue.....probably a gift from Monica.............

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

A half year of wailing that a crash is coming (without evidence to support it) is now gone. 
 

https://mobile.twitter.com/CNN/status/1210213711513825281

 

2020 is going to be so hilarious. 

 

Wait until the first two weeks of January.  People are waiting to take profits out of the market to avoid 2019 taxes.  The market indices should fall in January, simply because of that profit-taking.  

 

MSM's going to have a field day screaming about the next great depression when that happens.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  That scene has been cut any time I have watched it in the last two decades which greatly predates Trump's entry into and winning the 2016 campaign.  

 

That and Marv getting hit in the face with the bricks are usually cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

This ad for Trump 2020 brought to you by the left.

 

Really...a dead rat, a swastika, and a Christian cross together?  Do you still not understand why Hillary lost?

The mental superiority angle is my favorite.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEF: 

 

Please Spay and Neuter Your Washington Post. 

 

“The Op-Ed by the Post’s editorial board is so foot-stompy that it reads as if it were composed in crayon on a wall while mommy wasn’t looking.”

 

 

More here from Jazz Shaw.

 

“The new year is approaching and that’s widely taken as an opportunity for fresh beginnings and the hope that we might do better. So here’s a Christmas wish for the Washington Post editorial board. Do better next year.”

 

 

 

 

.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I like how they say "How disinformation spreads according to Chuck Todd," because "How disinformation spreads.  By Chuck Todd." was just so blatantly obvious.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I like how they say "How disinformation spreads according to Chuck Todd," because "How disinformation spreads.  By Chuck Todd." was just so blatantly obvious.  

 

 

...poor Tim "Go Bills" Russert....RIP....HIS show has transcended to garbage........

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, bbb said:

Every time Chuck Todd is trending, it's a liberal thing.  Most of the tweets I've seen today are like this:

 

 

  

Yeah, the media definitely needs to be more hostile towards Republicans 


hillary never stops talking about how the New York Times hates her and lied constantly to take her down at every opportunity 

 

that’s how deluded they are

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got back from Bombshell — holy jeeze. No fan of Fox or Ailes, but a couple things stood out:

 

1) The entire first 40 min are all about Trump vs Kelly, and proved beyond all doubt that the liberal establishment in Hollywood (of which Roach is a key figure) still do not understand why Trump won. They still don’t get Trump attacks people, not gender or race. People. 2020 will be hilarious. 
 

2) For some reason (“some reason”) in a movie about Kelly exposing sexual harassment in corporate America (they keep hounding that it’s not just news, but all of corporate America), they end the movie without even mentioning her move to NBC. Not even in a title card at the end. 
 

As a writer, that’s what we call a perfect bookend opportunity. It provided Roach a chance to drill home the point that even after she left one cesspool, the next one was just the same. It was laid on a tee for them to smash — but didn’t. 
 

Think that’s not politically motivated / missing the point of the story entirely? Think Jay Roach’s LONG history making a mint for NBC (and himself through them) didn’t play into that decision? 
 

Virtue signaling hypocrites abound. 
 

3) A movie about women being harassed by powerful men was written, directed, and produced by all men. Minus Theron who produced. Funny that. 
 

4) Despite exposing Ailes and Shine (and O’Rielly and more), Roach made the Murdoch kids (who will inherit the empire and who are every bit as bad as their pops and deep deep DEEP establishment figures) sympathetic heroes. Again, what’s the agenda for Roach? 
 

5) They include Stephanopolous, but only his voice. George and Jay are old friends. 
 

:beer: 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

JOHN TIERNEY: Journalists Against Free Speech.

Free speech is no longer sacred among young journalists who have absorbed the campus lessons about “hate speech”—defined more and more broadly—and they’re breaking long-standing taboos as they bring “cancel culture” into professional newsrooms.

 

They’re not yet in charge, but many of their editors are reacting like beleaguered college presidents, terrified of seeming insufficiently “woke.” Most professional journalists, young and old, still pay lip service to the First Amendment, and they certainly believe that it protects their work, but they’re increasingly eager for others to be “de-platformed” or “no-platformed,” as today’s censors like to put it—effectively silenced.

 

These mostly younger progressive journalists lead campaigns to get conservative journalists fired, banned from Twitter, and “de-monetized” on YouTube. They don’t burn books, but they’ve successfully pressured Amazon to stop selling titles that they deem offensive. They encourage advertising boycotts designed to put ideological rivals out of business. They’re loath to report forthrightly on left-wing censorship and violence, even when fellow journalists get attacked.

 

They equate conservatives’ speech with violence and rationalize leftists’ actual violence as . . . speech.

 

It’s a strange new world for those who remember liberal journalists like Nat Hentoff, the Village Voice writer who stood with the ACLU in defending the free-speech rights of Nazis, Klansmen, and others whose views he deplored—or who recall the days when the Columbia Journalism Review stood as an unswerving advocate for press freedom.

 

 

Well, to be fair, journalists were mostly in favor of free speech and civil liberties in general when it was communists and the like who were being targeted. Now that it’s communists and the like who are doing the targeting, their principles are slipping. Or perhaps being revealed as nonexistent.

 
 
 
 
 
.
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

 

JOHN TIERNEY: Journalists Against Free Speech.

Free speech is no longer sacred among young journalists who have absorbed the campus lessons about “hate speech”—defined more and more broadly—and they’re breaking long-standing taboos as they bring “cancel culture” into professional newsrooms.

 

They’re not yet in charge, but many of their editors are reacting like beleaguered college presidents, terrified of seeming insufficiently “woke.” Most professional journalists, young and old, still pay lip service to the First Amendment, and they certainly believe that it protects their work, but they’re increasingly eager for others to be “de-platformed” or “no-platformed,” as today’s censors like to put it—effectively silenced.

 

These mostly younger progressive journalists lead campaigns to get conservative journalists fired, banned from Twitter, and “de-monetized” on YouTube. They don’t burn books, but they’ve successfully pressured Amazon to stop selling titles that they deem offensive. They encourage advertising boycotts designed to put ideological rivals out of business. They’re loath to report forthrightly on left-wing censorship and violence, even when fellow journalists get attacked.

 

They equate conservatives’ speech with violence and rationalize leftists’ actual violence as . . . speech.

 

It’s a strange new world for those who remember liberal journalists like Nat Hentoff, the Village Voice writer who stood with the ACLU in defending the free-speech rights of Nazis, Klansmen, and others whose views he deplored—or who recall the days when the Columbia Journalism Review stood as an unswerving advocate for press freedom.

 

 

Well, to be fair, journalists were mostly in favor of free speech and civil liberties in general when it was communists and the like who were being targeted. Now that it’s communists and the like who are doing the targeting, their principles are slipping. Or perhaps being revealed as nonexistent.

 
 
 
 
 
.


good ideas escalate to the point of poison when liberals support them 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2019 at 4:39 PM, row_33 said:


hillary never stops talking about how the New York Times hates her and lied constantly to take her down at every opportunity 

 

that’s how deluded they are

 

 

 

....could be the ONLY thing they got right THIS CENTURY.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

....could be the ONLY thing they got right THIS CENTURY.......


She doesn’t realize everyone hates her, outside her small circle of toadies 

 

but that’s not quite the point of laughter here regarding the NYT

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, row_33 said:


She doesn’t realize everyone hates her, outside her small circle of toadies 

 

but that’s not quite the point of laughter here regarding the NYT

 

 

 

...well she DOES have a couple of fans here...YOU can fill in the blanks......:D

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...well she DOES have a couple of fans here...YOU can fill in the blanks......:D

All you have to do is mention her name and @PastaJoe will come a running. He reacts quicker than the horses react to Frau Blucher. 

 

See the source image

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...