Jump to content

Trump and Russia


Recommended Posts

Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

....elected with 78% of the vote in 2018 and bound to be reelected in 2020 in a landslide >80 % for his supreme efforts......go figure....


Hey, we keep electing Schumer and Cuomo. ?‍♂️

I blame the RNC. They put up no one "good," and have all but abandoned NYS, and seem to be getting out of California and leaving them to their ballot harvesting schemes.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Quick review of the first page of this thread.

 

 

 

On 2/16/2017 at 10:59 AM, Tiberius said:

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/chaffetz-leaks-michael-flynn-235079

 

House of reps will not investigate Trump Russia connection with all the national security issues involved,

 

but it will investigate who leaked the info that clown Flynn was talking with out enemies that interfered in our election.   Almost criminal, imo

 

 

On 2/16/2017 at 11:10 AM, Tiberius said:

 

 

So you don't trust the 17 intelligence agencies that say they did, ok, then don't believe. I guess Flynn was fired for nothing then

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

....elected with 78% of the vote in 2018 and bound to be reelected in 2020 in a landslide >80 % for his supreme efforts......go figure....

   Schiff and Pelosi "represent" very liberal districts in California.  Their base no doubts eats up all the "Get Trump" nonsense with a shovel versus a spoon.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Taro T said:

 

So, do the Senate Dems ask for a voice vote to approve Ratcliffe tonight?


It ain't gonna get any better for them under Ratcliffe, although I am enjoying Grenell's dont-give-a-flying-***** a lot!

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


It ain't gonna get any better for them under Ratcliffe, although I am enjoying Grenell's dont-give-a-flying-***** a lot!

 

 

Absolutely.  Am just marvelling at how opposed to him they were a few months back but now they have to be thinking 'well, he can't be any worse.' 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Boom Smile GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

 

No doubt this is the bomb being dropped on the way out the door, as Grenell goes back to being just an ambassador.

 

I hope he releases the transcripts as well, just so people can see if Schiff edited anything.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Google it dude. If that advise is good for me, it should be good for you, too. 

Google tells me that Flynn had all charges dropped because no one believes he lied because the FBI knew before the interview no crime was committed by Flynn. So what am I misunderstanding?

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Google tells me that Flynn had all charges dropped because no one believes he lied because the FBI knew before the interview no crime was committed by Flynn. So what am I misunderstanding?

 Alright! So you hate the truth, obviously 

 

DhG5_uQX4AErwfH.thumb.jpg.fb09609605c44e4a1a273408a3202120.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Losing battle DR........

 

With Tibsy it is a combination of willful ignorance and (even more) a fear of facing the truth and realizing that his bias is wrong.

 

 

Buckle UP! Byron York takes entire premise of Lawfare Blog’s pearl-clutching Flynn piece APART in brutal thread

 

 

‘Flynn should NEVER have been prosecuted’: Kimberley Strassel lays absolute WASTE to the FBI in devastating thread

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

 Alright! So you hate the truth, obviously 

 

DhG5_uQX4AErwfH.thumb.jpg.fb09609605c44e4a1a273408a3202120.jpg

I still am asking what the lie was? Accepting a plea is something people do all the time when they are promised certain concessions in order to not go to court. But I am asking what was his lie? I have read much about the malfeasance of the FBI and the memo stating they would force him to lie, but what was his particular lie? I only know one govt official who has any kind of possible knowledge and he said the "lie" was a trivial manner.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Makes sense. Congress did not give themselves authority to receive Grand Jury materials when it wrote the secrecy provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

 

Here is the Order, in all its glory: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/050820zr_097c.pdf

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is that hack Brian Stetler at CNN in 2017 trying his best to call the coup a right wing conspiracy:

 

https://money.cnn.com/2017/03/06/media/mark-levin-joel-pollak-breitbart-trump-obama/

 

 

My favorite part is his criticism of Right Wing media using "anonymous" sources for their claims.  Omg!!  That's what every single media outlet does.

 

Lol read this mess:

 

"Levin and Pollak's opinion pieces relied heavily on anonymously sourced reports from the BBC, The Guardian and the new Murdoch-owned conservative outlet Heat Street about requests under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act from June and October 2016.

Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler said these are "sketchy, anonymously sourced reports." CNN has not been able to confirm them. But those reports, alleging efforts by the FBI to monitor Trump associates with suspected ties to Russia, became the basis of the conspiracy theory."

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...