Chef Jim Posted July 2, 2020 Share Posted July 2, 2020 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Yea it’s just “gonna go away” Eventually yeah. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 2, 2020 Share Posted July 2, 2020 6 minutes ago, BillStime said: Yea it’s just “gonna go away” So we're in agreement that the statement I highlighted is based on nothing? Fair enough. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 2, 2020 Share Posted July 2, 2020 4 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: So we're in agreement that the statement I highlighted is based on nothing? Fair enough. Nah - you asked if there was an official quota number announced and I was just highlighting what the stable genius QUATED and well, we are sadly well beyond that. And upon further review - he did redefine what success looks like: Trump Says 80,000-100,000 Americans Will Die, Calls That a ‘Success’ Ive never heard a President use success and 80,000-100,00 American deaths in the same sentence but sure - he deserves a second term. Rest assured, it will just go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted July 2, 2020 Share Posted July 2, 2020 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Nah - you asked if there was an official quota number announced and I was just highlighting what the stable genius QUATED and well, we are sadly well beyond that. And upon further review - he did redefine what success looks like: Trump Says 80,000-100,000 Americans Will Die, Calls That a ‘Success’ Ive never heard a President use success and 80,000-100,00 American deaths in the same sentence but sure - he deserves a second term. Rest assured, it will just go away. Oh okay. So you really didn't follow the incredibly short conversation. Got it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 2, 2020 Share Posted July 2, 2020 Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said: Oh okay. So you really didn't follow the incredibly short conversation. Got it. You asked - i answered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeKayAdams Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 On 7/2/2020 at 7:22 AM, Reality Check said: Thank you for the response. "They Live" is a classic, and I will have to watch that again this weekend. No, I have no problem being associated with the resident green new deal chica, simply because I understand the motivation behind it. I have my passions about environmental issues too, and although we may have different models on how to get there, the goals aren't too dis-similar. Where people generally focus on global warming and CO2, I am focused on the genetic and chemical pollution of absolutely everything in our world, GMO, chemical fertilizers and pesticides, especially trash and garbage. I am also deeply alarmed at the lack of respect to the microbial world that makes living soil what it is supposed to be and its relationship to the microbiomes that we cultivate in our digestive systems. We have a ways to go, and we need to talk a little more about solutions that can start small as more affordable environmental solutions so that they can be scaled up. Saving the environment doesn't require trillions, and I think that we will get there together. I agree that partisanship is a big problem, but it remains part of a logical trend. Power is devolving back to the counties away from federal dominance, and this is due largely to the collapse of global influence on America's internal and external supply chains. Local people are going to have to be more involved than ever before if they are to weather the incoming storm. I have faith that we will. The TV paints more contrast between people than actually exists in the real world. We have come this far, and we can go so much farther. Learning from the past and applying it is all we can do. It won't be pretty, but that makes the goal that much sweeter if we can attain it. Sometimes, the only things that we appreciate are the things that require the greatest sacrifice. Were you ever a Deep Space 9 fan? Sounds like you’re more of a “Jeffersonian environmentalist” while I’m more of a “Hamiltonian environmentalist.” These are terms I’ve coined just now, so I don’t think anyone else talks like this… What I mean is that I’m more likely to look at environmental problems from a top-down centralized authoritarian perspective, while you may look at solving them from a voluntary point of view at the individual or local community level first. Am I describing your point of view correctly? I’ll just continue on like I am… So I think that grassroots problem-solving is effective for many areas of civic society, especially when it comes to political parties. However, many (most?) environmental problems are time-sensitive and involve highly complex interrelationships between localities. From a historical case perspective (I’m thinking of the 1970’s and onward), I think these sets of problems just respond much better and faster to federally enforced solutions. I’d also argue that many of my environmental solutions revolve around the reallocation of financial resources and don’t necessarily lead to increases in costs for the individual. Sounds like verbal environmentalist subterfuge??? Oh dear…I’ll try to explain myself better in the global warming thread… On the subject of GMO’s: I’m cautiously supportive of them. Of course we need to be mindful of the myriad ways GMO foods could adversely affect the human body, the human digestive tract, the surrounding flora and fauna, and the general environment at large. And despite being the extremely pro-first amendment person that I am, I do demand full compulsory commercial disclosure of all GMO foods on their packaging. But looking at it also from a practical perspective, GMO foods have dramatically increased yields to feed much more of the world population while reducing pesticide use. When you think about it, the entirety of the collective human food supply (flora AND fauna) has been dramatically modified through selective breeding anyway since the beginning of the agricultural age about 10,000 years ago. All of the ancient versions of our foods look so much different than the modern ones, with this natural evolutionary process occurring even without the specific influence of people in white lab coats. Surprisingly, I had never heard of Deep Space 9 until now. I’m adding it to my growing list of PPP personal recommendations on my desk which, oddly enough, I see includes a related written memo: “alien propulsion technology: Deranged Rhino: GW hoax thread.” If you like John Carpenter movies, I also recommend “The Thing” (1982). Normally I’m not big into horror films, but this one is easily the best I’ve ever seen. And speaking of Antarctic ice…I need to check up on the global warming thread today. BUT…I haven’t forgotten my main purpose here: the good people demand a trenchant attack on neoliberalism and on the continuing decay of the American Dream under Trump’s economy. In due time, I shall happily oblige! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 1 hour ago, RealKayAdams said: Sounds like you’re more of a “Jeffersonian environmentalist” while I’m more of a “Hamiltonian environmentalist.” These are terms I’ve coined just now, so I don’t think anyone else talks like this… What I mean is that I’m more likely to look at environmental problems from a top-down centralized authoritarian perspective, while you may look at solving them from a voluntary point of view at the individual or local community level first. Am I describing your point of view correctly? I’ll just continue on like I am… So I think that grassroots problem-solving is effective for many areas of civic society, especially when it comes to political parties. However, many (most?) environmental problems are time-sensitive and involve highly complex interrelationships between localities. From a historical case perspective (I’m thinking of the 1970’s and onward), I think these sets of problems just respond much better and faster to federally enforced solutions. I’d also argue that many of my environmental solutions revolve around the reallocation of financial resources and don’t necessarily lead to increases in costs for the individual. Sounds like verbal environmentalist subterfuge??? Oh dear…I’ll try to explain myself better in the global warming thread… On the subject of GMO’s: I’m cautiously supportive of them. Of course we need to be mindful of the myriad ways GMO foods could adversely affect the human body, the human digestive tract, the surrounding flora and fauna, and the general environment at large. And despite being the extremely pro-first amendment person that I am, I do demand full compulsory commercial disclosure of all GMO foods on their packaging. But looking at it also from a practical perspective, GMO foods have dramatically increased yields to feed much more of the world population while reducing pesticide use. When you think about it, the entirety of the collective human food supply (flora AND fauna) has been dramatically modified through selective breeding anyway since the beginning of the agricultural age about 10,000 years ago. All of the ancient versions of our foods look so much different than the modern ones, with this natural evolutionary process occurring even without the specific influence of people in white lab coats. Surprisingly, I had never heard of Deep Space 9 until now. I’m adding it to my growing list of PPP personal recommendations on my desk which, oddly enough, I see includes a related written memo: “alien propulsion technology: Deranged Rhino: GW hoax thread.” If you like John Carpenter movies, I also recommend “The Thing” (1982). Normally I’m not big into horror films, but this one is easily the best I’ve ever seen. And speaking of Antarctic ice…I need to check up on the global warming thread today. BUT…I haven’t forgotten my main purpose here: the good people demand a trenchant attack on neoliberalism and on the continuing decay of the American Dream under Trump’s economy. In due time, I shall happily oblige! Good morning RealKayAdams. I like that Jeffersonian environmentalist label very much. It's incomplete though. I believe in practical grass roots moves for a lot of things because when a practical solution comes from it, it tends to have organic sense to it and it tends to be a solution that respects the budget of the user. There are plenty of useful solutions at the grassroots level that I would like to see scaled out at a centralized level. The problem is that most solutions rolled out from the top down are originating from a business model steeped in corruption and manipulation. I prefer a proof of concept that is at least somewhat related to pragmatism and a budget that can be scaled out. The problem with purely top down approaches is that I am a hostage in that situation as now the whims of voting in an election is the only way to sway the trends of spending. In that situation, all business devolves into politics. As a taxpayer, if I refuse to pay, the government will apply their monopoly of force to take my assets and put me in prison. My preference is more of a hybrid approach that does not crush people locally when many centrally commanded programs are sometimes ridiculous wastes of money and resources. When it comes to GMO, I am a bit of an extremist as I am in the "never gonna eat that crap" camp. I just can't do it. I know far too much about organic living soil science to buy into the corporate abominations being created and sold. They are creating long term problems that will not be fully realized until years down the line sadly. That is of course usually how it goes. To each their own on that subject. I saw the 1982 version of "The Thing". It was OK. I liked the original a lot more. You will enjoy DS9 I think. The first few seasons start off a little slow, but it hits one hell of a crescendo in the final season. Very interesting psychodynamics are explored in the series. It's deep. Plus, the Emissary is just bad a$$. We agree on a lot. You are against Neo-liberalism, and I am against Neo-conservatism. They are two sides of the same coin. They want capitalism financed at 0% for them, while for everyone else, they demand division and regression while their own activities are hidden. Together, their Hegelian Dialectic yields a Neo-feudalism at the local level. Have a great week, and never stop building the future you envision. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 DEMOCRATS: THIS MONSTER MUST BE STOPPED! Trump’s payroll tax cut boosts blacks ‘most,’ could add 2M-3M jobs: Analysis. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 3 hours ago, Reality Check said: I saw the 1982 version of "The Thing". It was OK. I liked the original a lot more. You will enjoy DS9 I think. The first few seasons start off a little slow, but it hits one hell of a crescendo in the final season. Very interesting psychodynamics are explored in the series. It's deep. Plus, the Emissary is just bad a$$. The baseball game episode still has one of my all-time favorite TV lines... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality Check Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 14 minutes ago, Koko78 said: The baseball game episode still has one of my all-time favorite TV lines... That is a wonderful episode... Nog and Rom were awesome characters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 No link to where this number came from (or who said it). I was hoping for information in the comments, but twitter is boosting all the bots with 10-200 followers dunking on Trump, so no information there. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted July 8, 2020 Share Posted July 8, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2020 Share Posted July 8, 2020 Economic numbers suggest a recession on its way out the door. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted July 8, 2020 Share Posted July 8, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 8, 2020 Share Posted July 8, 2020 5 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: October 1st as they are not allowed to lay-off before that due to the sweet government money they accepted. So, unless states (and countries) start welcoming tourists and work-travel back before October 1, this is, unfortunately, going to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 8, 2020 Share Posted July 8, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 9, 2020 Share Posted July 9, 2020 Jobless claims at better-than-expected 1.3 million, total getting benefits falls to 18 million Weekly jobless claims were lower than expected last week as workers slowly returned to their jobs in the wake of rising coronavirus cases. Claims for the week ended July 4 totaled 1.314 million, compared with the 1.39 million expected from economists surveyed by Dow Jones. The total marked a decrease of 99,000 from a week earlier, according to the Labor Department. </snip> Continuing claims fell sharply, dropping 698,000 from a week earlier to 18.06 million. The previous week’s total itself was revised down by 530,000. Wall Street had been expecting 18.9 million continuing claims, according to FactSet. </snip> 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted July 9, 2020 Share Posted July 9, 2020 23 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Not defending UAL but how much of the $8.6B in stock buys was still held in Feb of this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted July 9, 2020 Share Posted July 9, 2020 21 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Not defending UAL but how much of the $8.6B in stock buys was still held in Feb of this year? Not sure. In general I don't have a huge issue with buybacks because it increases the value of the company thus increasing shareholder prices for 401Ks, etc. The $5 billion bailout irks me way more. $5 billion / 36,000 jobs is $138,888 / person UAL got from the government. I am sure there are a few hundred small businesses who were unable to get PPP loans that would have used that money to keep employees on the payroll. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 10, 2020 Author Share Posted July 10, 2020 9 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: Not sure. In general I don't have a huge issue with buybacks because it increases the value of the company thus increasing shareholder prices for 401Ks, etc. The $5 billion bailout irks me way more. $5 billion / 36,000 jobs is $138,888 / person UAL got from the government. I am sure there are a few hundred small businesses who were unable to get PPP loans that would have used that money to keep employees on the payroll. That's why they need to go back to the stockholders first to get the cash. No reason that shouldn't be a condition of Federal aid. If you bought back X amount of stock in the last 24 months, Federal aid comes only after the company raises more equity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: "WH wants to knock down $600 plus-up" - What does plus-up mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, bbb said: "WH wants to knock down $600 plus-up" - What does plus-up mean? Bonus (the $600 in addition to standard unemployment benefits...) Edited July 13, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 But for the Big Five tech stocks the market it stagnant since 2017. Lots of dead money! So much winning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: But for the Big Five tech stocks the market it stagnant since 2017. Lots of dead money! So much winning! Define "The Market"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Define "The Market"? It's just a convenient and ignorant way for the left to say "the stock market crashed" and it's all Trump's fault! Ignoring the fact it is the biggest crash and turn around within a 6 month period in the history of the stock market. Not sure about y'all but my 401K is back where it was before Covid19 now and that's after an almost 20% drop 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 13, 2020 Share Posted July 13, 2020 8 minutes ago, Cinga said: It's just a convenient and ignorant way for the left to say "the stock market crashed" and it's all Trump's fault! Ignoring the fact it is the biggest crash and turn around within a 6 month period in the history of the stock market. Not sure about y'all but my 401K is back where it was before Covid19 now and that's after an almost 20% drop If you were dollar cost averaging in this whole time (which most people were in their 401k's) you're likely higher than you were pre-Covid. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 5 hours ago, Chef Jim said: If you were dollar cost averaging in this whole time (which most people were in their 401k's) you're likely higher than you were pre-Covid. I stand corrected. I don't check it often but I just did when I saw this and while it's not a lot you're right, it is higher than pre-covid now. ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 19 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Define "The Market"? Wilshire 5000. 19 hours ago, Cinga said: It's just a convenient and ignorant way for the left to say "the stock market crashed" and it's all Trump's fault! Ignoring the fact it is the biggest crash and turn around within a 6 month period in the history of the stock market. Not sure about y'all but my 401K is back where it was before Covid19 now and that's after an almost 20% drop I’m killing it (not as much today as I was two days ago) because it’s a picker’s market and I’m overweight in individual techs (AMZN and GOOG, in front of a Fidelity tech index). The same tech companies that Trump is laying off of now because they’re about the only thing driving the market. Aside from AMZN, AAPL, GOOG, FB, MSFT, NFLX, and TSLA, what’s performing well right now? Not much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 4 hours ago, SectionC3 said: I’m killing it (not as much today as I was two days ago) because it’s a picker’s market and I’m overweight in individual techs (AMZN and GOOG, in front of a Fidelity tech index). The same tech companies that Trump is laying off of now because they’re about the only thing driving the market. Aside from AMZN, AAPL, GOOG, FB, MSFT, NFLX, and TSLA, what’s performing well right now? Not much. I wish I was more knowledgeable about the market and investments. I have no idea why; however, financial matters make my eyes glaze over. I pulled all my money (My Thrift Account) out of the market when it first started to drop in Mid Feb. I have never touched it as I have always looked at the market as a long term thing. However, given the virus, the uncertainty about the election, etc., I thought I would just put it somewhere safe until I feel some stability. Probably the wrong move.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, billsfan1959 said: I wish I was more knowledgeable about the market and investments. I have no idea why; however, financial matters make my eyes glaze over. I pulled all my money (My Thrift Account) out of the market when it first started to drop in Mid Feb. I have never touched it as I have always looked at the market as a long term thing. However, given the virus, the uncertainty about the election, etc., I thought I would just put it somewhere safe until I feel some stability. Probably the wrong move.... Maybe, maybe not. You might have timed the departure well. Who knows about jumping back in. It depends on where you are in life, what your goals are, what your needs are, etc. The wealth transfer prompted by the pandemic is ridiculous, though. I’ve made absurd money in the last four months (and given some back in the last couple of days, to be sure) while other people are scrounging for bucks to pay for groceries. And others who plodded along in an S&P index or large cap index are probably up a bit, but probably not up enough to justify the risk they’ve taken over the past couple of months. In any event, it’s not right. No matter what happens in November this disconnect between the true economy, the market, the haves, and the have-nots is something we have to address. Everyone who reads this (unless you’re Terry Pegula or part of the Bills brass) is on the wrong end of what’s going on here. We’re all working for peanuts, just in varying degrees, and the last four months have just made it worse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 On 7/14/2020 at 3:11 PM, SectionC3 said: Maybe, maybe not. You might have timed the departure well. Who knows about jumping back in. It depends on where you are in life, what your goals are, what your needs are, etc. The wealth transfer prompted by the pandemic is ridiculous, though. I’ve made absurd money in the last four months (and given some back in the last couple of days, to be sure) while other people are scrounging for bucks to pay for groceries. And others who plodded along in an S&P index or large cap index are probably up a bit, but probably not up enough to justify the risk they’ve taken over the past couple of months. In any event, it’s not right. No matter what happens in November this disconnect between the true economy, the market, the haves, and the have-nots is something we have to address. Everyone who reads this (unless you’re Terry Pegula or part of the Bills brass) is on the wrong end of what’s going on here. We’re all working for peanuts, just in varying degrees, and the last four months have just made it worse. This has been going on a lot longer than the last 4 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 31 minutes ago, Unforgiven said: This has been going on a lot longer than the last 4 years. Sure. But it’s been amplified perhaps exponentially in the last six months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 On 7/13/2020 at 2:57 PM, SectionC3 said: But for the Big Five tech stocks the market it stagnant since 2017. Lots of dead money! So much winning! that's not even close to true. while we own all the ones you stated outside TSLS and FB..our portfolio of about 25 stocks has been doing just fine since 17, and through this pandemic. Just to name a few winners driving our portfolio since then ADP, Adobe, Crown Castle, Okta, Coupa , Costco, Target...all massive winners the last 4 years Having said that, no doubt the lockdowns have widened the wealth gap...unintended consequences by those who only response to an issue is "Trump wants open? Thats all i needed to know we need to stay locked down" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 On 7/14/2020 at 7:29 AM, SectionC3 said: Wilshire 5000. How has the index performed over the past 3.5 years minus FAANG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 40 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: How has the index performed over the past 3.5 years minus FAANG? Not terribly well, minus AMZN, AAPL, GOOG, and FB. https://wolfstreet.com/2020/07/11/wild-ride-to-nowhere-appl-msft-amzn-goog-and-fb-soar-to-new-high-rest-of-the-stock-market-is-a-dud-has-been-for-years/ 1 hour ago, plenzmd1 said: that's not even close to true. while we own all the ones you stated outside TSLS and FB..our portfolio of about 25 stocks has been doing just fine since 17, and through this pandemic. Just to name a few winners driving our portfolio since then ADP, Adobe, Crown Castle, Okta, Coupa , Costco, Target...all massive winners the last 4 years Having said that, no doubt the lockdowns have widened the wealth gap...unintended consequences by those who only response to an issue is "Trump wants open? Thats all i needed to know we need to stay locked down" Sure there’s hyperbole there. There’s more winners then the basket that I mentioned. But what’s driving growth right now? Big tech. Big time. Bottom line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 On 7/14/2020 at 10:29 AM, SectionC3 said: Wilshire 5000. I’m killing it (not as much today as I was two days ago) because it’s a picker’s market and I’m overweight in individual techs (AMZN and GOOG, in front of a Fidelity tech index). The same tech companies that Trump is laying off of now because they’re about the only thing driving the market. Aside from AMZN, AAPL, GOOG, FB, MSFT, NFLX, and TSLA, what’s performing well right now? Not much. ha. Nice try! good work googling US Market Index and Best Performing Stocks though. Do you know what a stock is, btw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 1 minute ago, dubs said: ha. Nice try! good work googling US Market Index and Best Performing Stocks though. Do you know what a stock is, btw? My portfolio says I do. Let’s hear your advice, big boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 16 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Not terribly well, minus AMZN, AAPL, GOOG, and FB. https://wolfstreet.com/2020/07/11/wild-ride-to-nowhere-appl-msft-amzn-goog-and-fb-soar-to-new-high-rest-of-the-stock-market-is-a-dud-has-been-for-years/ Sure there’s hyperbole there. There’s more winners then the basket that I mentioned. But what’s driving growth right now? Big tech. Big time. Bottom line. Big tech is driving it cause that where the growth is now. Certainly not rocket science, and not something that is only pandemic driven. give ya hint, ala the Graduate. Solar , EV, Autonomous Driving. 5 years from now are the big tech of today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Big tech is driving it cause that where the growth is now. Certainly not rocket science, and not something that is only pandemic driven. give ya hint, ala the Graduate. Solar , EV, Autonomous Driving. 5 years from now are the big tech of today. Sure. Of course tech isn’t purely pandemic-driven. But that is a part of it. Look at Amazon’s meteoric growth. NFLX, same deal. Google probably as well, although I don’t pay as much attention to it. And the rest of the market is in bad shape. Take out big tech and it’s flat over an extended period. That’s beyond debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts