Deranged Rhino Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Belied by the very fact that she had a conference call with House Democrats alone. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 Important... Bill Binney is a man to listen to when he speaks on matters relating to the NSA. It appears there were communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. These communications are classified Top Secret. Just a random "low level staffer" who was randomly murdered in a bungled robbery, yet his communications with Assange are deemed Top Secret. Puzzle that one out. This could get really interesting. https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b “But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that: Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET. If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.” (SNIP Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago. In this interview, he offers a devastating rebuke of the fraudulence of the Mueller report’s analysis of “Russian hacking”. But the truly fascinating part occurs at about 6:40, where Binney discusses Clevenger’s FOIA request. Here’s what Binney says: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange. And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Important... Bill Binney is a man to listen to when he speaks on matters relating to the NSA. It appears there were communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. These communications are classified Top Secret. Just a random "low level staffer" who was randomly murdered in a bungled robbery, yet his communications with Assange are deemed Top Secret. Puzzle that one out. This could get really interesting. https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b “But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that: Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET. If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.” (SNIP Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago. In this interview, he offers a devastating rebuke of the fraudulence of the Mueller report’s analysis of “Russian hacking”. But the truly fascinating part occurs at about 6:40, where Binney discusses Clevenger’s FOIA request. Here’s what Binney says: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange. And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.” They could very likely be classified because of the means of collection, not the content. But that they exist at all is troubling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 49 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange. And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.” Helps explain the charges (or lack thereof) against Assange... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 guilty of being awesome and winning every single day as President Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Quote A Pearson spokesperson defended the textbook pointing out the book underwent “rigorous peer review to ensure academic integrity.” Yep, that would be part of the problem. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 good thing most kids give less than a rat's ass about what's in a textbook 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) It's all going to come out... If Clinton and Obama had taken the olive branch which Trump offered after the election, they wouldn't be in the position they're in now: absolutely *****ked. Correct. It was a pay-for-play operation, selling out the country to support their own ideologies (Obama) or to line their own pocketbooks (Clinton). (More/Thread) Edited April 23, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 ... I don't know what to make of this yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's all going to come out... If Clinton and Obama had taken the olive branch which Trump offered after the election, they wouldn't be in the position they're in now: absolutely *****ked. Correct. It was a pay-for-play operation, selling out the country to support their own ideologies (Obama) or to line their own pocketbooks (Clinton). The early word on her home-brewed server was so she could do an end-around Obama. That never made sense, and now we know why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... I don't know what to make of this yet. OMG the replies. Some of them made me laugh out loud. Assuming this is on the up-and-up... From the article:"Hezbollah generates about a billion dollars a year from a combination of direct financial support from Iran, international businesses and investments, donor networks, and money laundering activities," according to information provided by the State Department. Since money talks, this is just another avenue to shut down Islamic Terrorism? Do you think they'll really turn on their own for any amount? "Information"? Or something else? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 13 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: OMG the replies. Some of them made me laugh out loud. Assuming this is on the up-and-up... From the article:"Hezbollah generates about a billion dollars a year from a combination of direct financial support from Iran, international businesses and investments, donor networks, and money laundering activities," according to information provided by the State Department. Since money talks, this is just another avenue to shut down Islamic Terrorism? Do you think they'll really turn on their own for any amount? "Information"? Or something else? Everything I'm hearing from people who would know, the regime is on its last legs. They depended upon the waiver system for their oil sales - with that gone, they're pretty much sunk. When the money dries up, the goons you hire to keep your power tend to look for new revenue streams -- this could be a lucrative one for some of the lower level people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Wampum Walter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's all going to come out... If Clinton and Obama had taken the olive branch which Trump offered after the election, they wouldn't be in the position they're in now: absolutely *****ked. Correct. It was a pay-for-play operation, selling out the country to support their own ideologies (Obama) or to line their own pocketbooks (Clinton). (More/Thread) I'm not sure I realized just how huge this is. As always, the MSM is suppressing the "good stuff". Thread rolled. Hillary may regret the Russia scam. So the Blackberry servers have had her emails all along? (thread) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 Time to take your medicine, Jack. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 4 hours ago, B-Man said: Despite a gigantic staff, this guy does less than Jason Botterill. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 ******************* 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I'm not sure I realized just how huge this is. As always, the MSM is suppressing the "good stuff". Thread rolled. Hillary may regret the Russia scam. So the Blackberry servers have had her emails all along? (thread) Pretty amazing how the crackerjacks newsies at places like the NYT, WaPo and everywhere else never got wind of any of this, what with all their sources and all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 In this twitter thread, the second tweet links to the source on fec.gov (federal election commission) (thread) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 This is about 2 months old, but I don't recall it being posted here before. It's a great interview, which touches on a number of different subjects, including Hillary emails in the 2nd half of it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 (edited) 10 hours ago, Hedge said: If that’s Katherine Moennig in the room? Jack should be afraid. Very afraid. Edited April 24, 2019 by Nanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 (edited) Love that he has his soul mate POTUS Andrew Jackson’s portrait over looking him in the Oval Office. Edited April 24, 2019 by Nanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 So, OAN got a ratings boost this morning. They are also the only station who seems to be reporting the Clinton email/Judicial Watch information. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 53 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: So, OAN got a ratings boost this morning. They are also the only station who seems to be reporting the Clinton email/Judicial Watch information And in the end, the bolded is the way this will fall off the map. I've been following all of this info about Hillary and Obama and the server and the money laundering and the colluding with the media, and the bottom line is they get away with this because they can. NO ONE is going to cover this to the extent that change will take place. All we end up with is another six months of people on Twitter posting things like "Schitt's about to hit the fan!" or "It's all about to unravel!" And then nothing goes down and nothing unravels and two months later they return with "This is bad news for Obama! People are going to jail!?" And then nothing will happen. Again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 1 minute ago, LABillzFan said: And in the end, the bolded is the way this will fall off the map. I've been following all of this info about Hillary and Obama and the server and the money laundering and the colluding with the media, and the bottom line is they get away with this because they can. NO ONE is going to cover this to the extent that change will take place. All we end up with is another six months of people on Twitter posting things like "Schitt's about to hit the fan!" or "It's all about to unravel!" And then nothing goes down and nothing unravels and two months later they return with "This is bad news for Obama! People are going to jail!?" And then nothing will happen. Again. I sincerely hope you are wrong. Because if you are correct, our republic is finished. The next move is the next report, declassifications, and indictments. If the MSM can keep the indictments and subsequent trials off the air, and out of the papers, that means the average schlump may never hear about them. Or, due to the age of the internet, these people find out via social media and think to themselves "hey, the MSM is lying to me/not informing me, wtf do I need them for!?" and our MSM dies a horrible death (hey, one can dream, right!?) There is probably a plan in place to suppress what is about to happen. How tight a lid they can keep on it, and the public's response to being lied to (denied information) is the wild-card IMO. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Trump asks Twitter dude to stop people from being mean to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 6 hours ago, Nanker said: If that’s Katherine Moennig in the room? Jack should be afraid. Very afraid. If anyone is moaning in the Oval Office we must find the blue dress. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 22 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: If anyone is moaning in the Oval Office we must find the blue dress. that dress is seriously one of the most pivotal moments in our lifetime imagine if she didn't keep it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 37 minutes ago, row_33 said: that dress is seriously one of the most pivotal moments in our lifetime No it’s not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 24, 2019 Author Share Posted April 24, 2019 Good chart. 15 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: In this twitter thread, the second tweet links to the source on fec.gov (federal election commission) (thread) How this story fits into the bigger picture: 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: So, OAN got a ratings boost this morning. They are also the only station who seems to be reporting the Clinton email/Judicial Watch information. Here is the video: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts