Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Author Share Posted May 1, 2019 .... What? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: .... What? Your biggest indication is if they have an obviously made-up name, like "Wolf Blitzer." 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 11 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Your biggest indication is if they have an obviously made-up name, like "Wolf Blitzer." less Wolfgangs out there than before, but the name isn't that rare... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: less Wolfgangs out there than before, but the name isn't that rare... But c'mon..."Wolfgang Blitzer?" Obvious East German spy... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 4 hours ago, B-Man said: I would be more concerned if Jerry was smarter...... Are his pants actually being held up by what’s essentially a FUPA? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Author Share Posted May 1, 2019 China ... (again) https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-cia-officer-pleads-guilty-conspiracy-commit-espionage It's this case https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/us/politics/cia-china-jerry-lee-indictment.html *took ten years to make Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: .... What? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Looks like Nellie Ohr will be the first to go down. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 8 hours ago, B-Man said: I would be more concerned if Jerry was smarter...... Chef Jim or DC Tom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 hour ago, njbuff said: Looks like Nellie Ohr will be the first to go down. She's going down like a sweet muffin. ~White Goodman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 Hmm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 (edited) Hmmmm apparently this is a problem not because the Trump campaign was spied on, but because it means Trump was right, they were spied on.F.B.I. Sent Investigator Posing as Assistant to Meet With Trump Aide in 2016 </snip>The decision to use Ms. Turk in the operation aimed at a presidential campaign official shows the level of alarm inside the F.B.I. during a frantic period when the bureau was trying to determine the scope of Russia's attempts to disrupt the 2016 election, but could also give ammunition to Mr. Trump and his allies for their spying claims. </snip> As usual, Mollie Hemingway is all over it: (thread) Edited May 2, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 The Hill wants in on this story... FBI sent undercover investigator to meet with Papadopoulos in 2016: report </snip> The previously unreported episode comes amid growing scrutiny over the FBI's actions toward President Trump's 2016 campaign. Trump has repeatedly accused the FBI of spying on his campaign, an allegation Attorney General William Barr has said he plans to look into. </snip> 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 The NYT runs the Joey-B/Ukraine article yesterday, now this today. Hmmm.. (thread) (part of the thread) A little input from George P: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hmmmm apparently this is a problem not because the Trump campaign was spied on, but because it means Trump was right, they were spied on.F.B.I. Sent Investigator Posing as Assistant to Meet With Trump Aide in 2016 </snip>The decision to use Ms. Turk in the operation aimed at a presidential campaign official shows the level of alarm inside the F.B.I. during a frantic period when the bureau was trying to determine the scope of Russia's attempts to disrupt the 2016 election, but could also give ammunition to Mr. Trump and his allies for their spying claims. </snip> they wrote a story about an undercover operative targeting a member of the campaign and had the gumption to suggest Trump and "his allies" need "ammunition to support their spying claims?". How dumb are the members of their party? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: they wrote a story about an undercover operative targeting a member of the campaign and had the gumption to suggest Trump and "his allies" need "ammunition to support their spying claims?". How dumb are the members of their party? they aren't called the Donner Party for nothing. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 If this was already posted here, I apologize. This is on the official Donald J Trump youtube page, and titled "Obama Knew"President Obama knew Russia was interfering in the 2016 election, but his administration just watched it happen. In fact, Obama’s cyber team was told to “stand down” from countering Russian meddling in order to protect the disastrous Iran deal. There is no doubt: On Russian interference in 2016, Obama dropped the ball. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 (edited) On 5/1/2019 at 12:46 PM, Deranged Rhino said: As I said, the House is not a serious committee under Nadler. No wonder Barr doesn't want to show up before this chaos. Collins was quite upset at what happened yesterday. https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1123944334745841666 https://twitter.com/Trump454545/status/1123942848477507584 Edited May 2, 2019 by Foxx 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 (edited) ladies and gentlemen... your esteemed representative. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1123717349729763330 i'm rolling here.... https://twitter.com/gamerarock/status/1123723187806703616 Edited May 2, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1123963147574968323 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1123963147574968323 Creepy story if true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 you just can't make this ***** up. https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1123769459016118274 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Creepy story if true. Better hope no one on that plane had a phone... (I've heard, long before Q mentioned it, that there is a recording of the conversation lifted from the cell phones. It's supposed to be damning: a quid pro quo offer was made, the meeting was planned by her USSS so it wasn't spontaneous as she and Bill claim) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Better hope no one on that plane had a phone... (I've heard, long before Q mentioned it, that there is a recording of the conversation lifted from the cell phones. It's supposed to be damning: a quid pro quo offer was made, the meeting was planned by her USSS so it wasn't spontaneous as she and Bill claim) Whoa if true. I didn't think they had anything on Bill at all, but of there is a recording... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Whoa if true. I didn't think they had anything on Bill at all, but of there is a recording... Exactly, the "if true" is an important grain of salt. I have heard this one so long, without confirmation, that it's one of the elements of the coup plot which I've just set aside and kind of ignored because I can't verify it. But I have to believe if there is a recording, we'll get it at some point this summer based on everything else being rolled out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 I know this story is in multiple threads here, but I thought this one was best for this conversation. Azra Turk is not FBI -- that's not speculation. If she were FBI, she would not have been inserted into a cold recruitment scenario without an official cover. That's something intelligence officers do, people who recruit spies and work as their handlers. P-Dop claims she's CIA but my sources disagree (and have issues with P-Dop). Per their speculation (and that's what it is) she's much more likely to be a foreign intelligence officer for the Turks -- who is NATO but not 5-Eye. This was a 5-Eye op, not a NATO op which brings the people I've been speaking with to the speculation that she was tapped by the Brits who used a Turkish officer to build another firewall. Something to consider. I'm sure we'll be learning more soon on this based on the conversations I've been having today. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 I was curious why Preet said (last month) that he may have let his emotions get the better of him after the election. (paraphrasing) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 sorry Donner's, you just stuck out for what seems like the nineteenth million time. will you ever learn? https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1123955389370748928 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Foxx said: ladies and gentlemen... your esteemed representative. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1123717349729763330 https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1123956417759563776 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 AG Barr gets attacked because his probe endangers powerful people Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel Original Article . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: AG Barr gets attacked because his probe endangers powerful people Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel Original Article . I recommend that @plenzmd1 read this piece 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 23 minutes ago, GG said: I recommend that @plenzmd1 read this piece Why? He's only explaining to us what other people think, not what he believes personally. Of course he doesn't claim that until he sees he's losing the argument. -) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Why? He's only explaining to us what other people think, not what he believes personally. Of course he doesn't claim that until he sees he's losing the argument. -) Awww don't chase him off. I think he has potential. He's still #OrangeManBad but he is willing to engage, and not stupidly (ala Tibs, that BigM guy, etc). And goodness knows "the other side" needs another voice down here. Doc Brown can't be all alone. Edited May 3, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Why? He's only explaining to us what other people think, not what he believes personally. Of course he doesn't claim that until he sees he's losing the argument. -) Tell where I have said i don't believe Barr did not lie about this letter. What I have said is it is not a hill I would die on, as the Dems seem like they want to do. I know you consistently have reading comprehension problems but go through every statement I have made on Barrs testimony and tell where it deviated from what I am stating here. Edited May 3, 2019 by plenzmd1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 45 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Awww don't chase him off. I think he has potential. He's still #OrangeManBad but he is willing to engage, and not stupidly (ala Tibs, that BigM guy, etc). And goodness knows "the other side" needs another voice down here. Doc Brown can't be all alone. I don't want to run him off. If he can't deal with being called out for hiding from his own opinions then he'll be leaving on his own volition. The last thing I want to do is spend a bunch of time debating someone on the issues, and then have them essentially claim that they were just trying to explain to us what someone else's position is/was. I actually think he might be coming around in some respects because he appears to be doubting some of what he's always thought was true. I agree, he has potential. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Tell where I have said i don't believe Barr did not lie about this letter. What I have said is it is not a hill I would die on, as the Dems seem like they want to do. I know you consistently have reading comprehension problems but go through every statement I have made on Barrs testimony and tell where it deviated from what I am stating here. I used to call a certain poster here "Yesbut" because of his proclivity to equivocate. Don't be a "Yesbut". Up thread I quoted you and I have not yet received an answer. My response made it clear that Barr did not lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: I used to call a certain poster here "Yesbut" because of his proclivity to equivocate. Don't be a "Yesbut". Up thread I quoted you and I have not yet received an answer. My response made it clear that Barr did not lie. and i have replied to you somewhere..please answer the question above with quotes from where i said i dont believe he lied,, ya cant. Don't know how many times I have said it, that you refuse to understand..it is not a hill I would die on. But you like to only read what you THINK someone said, so go on your merry way and please don't use any kind of thinking/reading skills that may get in the way of your pre conceived notions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 3, 2019 Author Share Posted May 3, 2019 19 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I know this story is in multiple threads here, but I thought this one was best for this conversation. Azra Turk is not FBI -- that's not speculation. If she were FBI, she would not have been inserted into a cold recruitment scenario without an official cover. That's something intelligence officers do, people who recruit spies and work as their handlers. P-Dop claims she's CIA but my sources disagree (and have issues with P-Dop). Per their speculation (and that's what it is) she's much more likely to be a foreign intelligence officer for the Turks -- who is NATO but not 5-Eye. This was a 5-Eye op, not a NATO op which brings the people I've been speaking with to the speculation that she was tapped by the Brits who used a Turkish officer to build another firewall. Something to consider. I'm sure we'll be learning more soon on this based on the conversations I've been having today. Brennan>>>Dearlove/MI6>>>>Turkey>>>>Azra 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts