Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Hilarious response.

 

You "neglected' to point out that the rioters and burning were in response to a police shooting earlier.  Oh no

 

Well, you may have become conditioned to that response, but the majority of Americans have not. Rioting is a criminal act.

 

And as for your absurd characterizations of the reporting of Andy No and Jack Posobiec, it is laughably over the top.

 

I don't have to prove anything about it, anyone who took the time to read theirs (and others) reports is better served to post on liberal protests.

 

Your (illogical) rant exposes your own personal quite well thank you.

 

 


You know what else is a crime that many Americans haven't gotten used to? Extra-judicial murder by policemen.

And just to be clear: You can't post a single link to a reputable news source claiming that Antifa burned anything down, despite claiming that there were bunches of them. Got it. Perhaps that's because no such reports exist?


 

13 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I am curious who you consider a trustworthy source- CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, NYT "They misconstrue or inaccurately describe what actually occurred, again and again and again." All of them simply google and you will see. No one should take anyone side and run with it but you don't even dispute the facts you just tried to justify it by claiming something with no evidence.

 

12 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Seriously Logic, this is as weak as it gets.  It’s bullsh*t of the highest order, and just to

provide context, burning some &$*& to the ground because you feel like burning some &$*& doesn’t really require context.  I know this because tens of millions of people who hear the same story don’t set their neighbors house on fire, throw concrete cinderblocks at the mailman’s head or loot the Dollar General when they hear it. 

 

Sounds to me like the Ngo/Prosobiec version was spot on. 


 

 

1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Context?   What, you been sleeping the past year?  

 

Sound asleep.  Never mind. Carry on. 




If any of you can provide any link verifying the "Antifa sets fires" version of the story, I'd be happy to read it. 

To reiterate: I'm not denying that fires were set. I'm pointing out that any time angry/fed up citizens protest, riot, or destroy property, they get called "antifa" by right wingers. It's a catch-all boogeyman term that gets applied to anyone who protests police brutality or white supremacy, or who destroys property. It paints a picture of an evil cabal of violent anarchists rampaging around, destroying things for no good reason. It ignores the context of the destruction being a response to ongoing extra-judicial police murders. It ignores the context of counter-protesting White Supremacist demonstrations by the likes of the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer. It falsely claims that anybody who does protest such killings or such racist displays all belong to an easy-to-label, capital "B" Bad group of people called Antifa. It's intentionally misleading, inflammatory, and inaccurate.

And you'll have to excuse me if I roll my eyes a little bit at the pearl clutching about property destruction by people who were/are likely just fine with the seditionist capitol insurrection that claimed the lives of capitol police officers and sought to murder sitting congressmen. I know at least that @B-Man and @leh-nerd skin-erdhave posted multiple links or comments that seek to minimize the capitol riot and talk about it as if it was nothing, or claim the reports of armed insurrection were exaggerated, despite the fact that Capitol police officers were literally murdered, and that we have pictures of people with zip ties and confirmation some rioters were actively looking for Pence, Pelosi, and others. 670 pages of outrage about liberal protests -- which, admittedly, sometimes result in property destruction. But where is your hundreds-of-pages of outrage about the storming of the capitol in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election and murder congresspeople? You have no outrage about it. Predictable hypocrisy.

Property destruction by leftists or anarchists? "Bad!! Antifa! Grrrrr!"

Insurrection of our nation's capitol with intent to kill sitting congresspeople? "It's being overblown. The media lies. They were fine people having a peaceful march".

Predictable.

 

Edited by Logic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Logic said:


You know what else is a crime that many Americans haven't gotten used to? Extra-judicial murder by policemen.

And just to be clear: You can't post a single link to a reputable news source claiming that Antifa burned anything down, despite claiming that there were bunches of them. Got it. Perhaps that's because no such reports exist?


 

 


 

 




If any of you can provide any link verifying the "Antifa sets fires" version of the story, I'd be happy to read it. 

To reiterate: I'm not denying that fires were set. I'm pointing out that any time angry/fed up citizens protest, riot, or destroy property, they get called "antifa" by right wingers. It's a catch-all boogeyman term that gets applied to anyone who protests police brutality or white supremacy, or who destroys property. It paints a picture of an evil cabal of violent anarchists rampaging around, destroying things for no good reason. It ignores the context of the destruction being a response to ongoing extra-judicial police murders. It ignores the context of counter-protesting White Supremacist demonstrations by the likes of the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer. It falsely claims that anybody who does protest such killings or such racist displays all belong to an easy-to-label, capital "B" Bad group of people called Antifa. It's intentionally misleading, inflammatory, and inaccurate.

And you'll have to excuse me if I roll my eyes a little bit at the pearl clutching about property destruction by people who were/are likely just fine with the seditionist capitol insurrection that claimed the lives of capitol police officers and sought to murder sitting congressmen. I know at least that @B-Man and @leh-nerd skin-erdhave posted multiple links or comments that seek to minimize the capitol riot and talk about it as if it was nothing, or claim the reports of armed insurrection were exaggerated, despite the fact that Capitol police officers were literally murdered, and that we have pictures of people with zip ties and confirmation some rioters were actively looking for Pence, Pelosi, and others. 670 pages of outrage about liberal protests -- which, admittedly, sometimes result in property destruction. But where is your hundreds-of-pages of outrage about the storming of the capitol in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election and murder congresspeople? You have no outrage about it. Predictable hypocrisy.

Property destruction by leftists or anarchists? "Bad!! Antifa! Grrrrr!"

Insurrection of our nation's capitol with intent to kill sitting congresspeople? "It's being overblown. The media lies. They were fine people having a peaceful march".

Predictable.

 

What a total load of bunk. No Capitol police were murdered by protesters on Jan 6. That’s a fact. What property was destroyed? Anyone paying attention knows there is zero similarity between the Capitol protest and the liberal rioters that burn, loot, kill etc. Was the Capitol set on fire? Were stores looted? Murdering Congressmen ? Didn’t happen either. You’re drunk on liberal narratives to say the least. Your screen name is more misleading than a Democrat infrastructure bill. These liberal protests ring hollow when there are hundreds upon hundreds of murders in Dem cities across America per year and you never see a protest or outrage. When a couple dozen Police shootings of a non White subject occur per year, businesses are looted and burned by angry “protesters” in “ response “. This level of stupidity just cannot be supported by any American claiming to be logical. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.yahoo.com/news/one-america-news-network-stays-144956696.html

 

One America News Network Stays True to Trump

 

Months after the inauguration of President Joe Biden, One America News Network, a right-wing cable news channel available in some 35 million households, has continued to broadcast segments questioning the validity of the 2020 presidential election.

 

Whining because some people in their minds don't accept Joe, 

yet these weasels did the same thing for four years with Hillary.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we IMPEACH her now, RIGHT?!

 

Maxine Waters’ Chauvin comments while marching in Brooklyn Center sound a LOT like inciting violence (watch)

 

 

 

 

OH WAIT, I forgot that if the wrong person posts the video it can be ignored..........logical right ?

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Unforgiven said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/one-america-news-network-stays-144956696.html

 

One America News Network Stays True to Trump

 

Months after the inauguration of President Joe Biden, One America News Network, a right-wing cable news channel available in some 35 million households, has continued to broadcast segments questioning the validity of the 2020 presidential election.

 

Whining because some people in their minds don't accept Joe, 

yet these weasels did the same thing for four years with Hillary.

 

 

 

We know there is zero similarity between the two situations. Trump won fair and square in 2016, so they whined about the electoral college.  Trump was going to win easily in 2020, so they changed/ eliminated the rules so unverifiable paper ballots were allowed. Voila: Biden. Nothing to see here, lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Logic said:


You know what else is a crime that many Americans haven't gotten used to? Extra-judicial murder by policemen.

And just to be clear: You can't post a single link to a reputable news source claiming that Antifa burned anything down, despite claiming that there were bunches of them. Got it. Perhaps that's because no such reports exist?


 

 


 

 




If any of you can provide any link verifying the "Antifa sets fires" version of the story, I'd be happy to read it. 

To reiterate: I'm not denying that fires were set. I'm pointing out that any time angry/fed up citizens protest, riot, or destroy property, they get called "antifa" by right wingers. It's a catch-all boogeyman term that gets applied to anyone who protests police brutality or white supremacy, or who destroys property. It paints a picture of an evil cabal of violent anarchists rampaging around, destroying things for no good reason. It ignores the context of the destruction being a response to ongoing extra-judicial police murders. It ignores the context of counter-protesting White Supremacist demonstrations by the likes of the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer. It falsely claims that anybody who does protest such killings or such racist displays all belong to an easy-to-label, capital "B" Bad group of people called Antifa. It's intentionally misleading, inflammatory, and inaccurate.

And you'll have to excuse me if I roll my eyes a little bit at the pearl clutching about property destruction by people who were/are likely just fine with the seditionist capitol insurrection that claimed the lives of capitol police officers and sought to murder sitting congressmen. I know at least that @B-Man and @leh-nerd skin-erdhave posted multiple links or comments that seek to minimize the capitol riot and talk about it as if it was nothing, or claim the reports of armed insurrection were exaggerated, despite the fact that Capitol police officers were literally murdered, and that we have pictures of people with zip ties and confirmation some rioters were actively looking for Pence, Pelosi, and others. 670 pages of outrage about liberal protests -- which, admittedly, sometimes result in property destruction. But where is your hundreds-of-pages of outrage about the storming of the capitol in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election and murder congresspeople? You have no outrage about it. Predictable hypocrisy.

Property destruction by leftists or anarchists? "Bad!! Antifa! Grrrrr!"

Insurrection of our nation's capitol with intent to kill sitting congresspeople? "It's being overblown. The media lies. They were fine people having a peaceful march".

Predictable.

 

Nope, don’t got it. Can’t follow your thought process on waving the banner for context in support of anarchists when someone is victimized by parties unknown for something they had nothing to do with.  Can’t follow your thought process on death, destruction, serious injury by any party at any time just because you have some twisted rationalization as to cause.  I think, honestly, that’s you’re as full of ***** as the guy lugging  the toaster oven out of Walmart in support of George Floyd.  
 

As for the game you’re playing with the Capitol Protests and “links” or “support” from me, again, you’re obviously  full of crap.  Since that’s the game you’re interested in playing, I know at least that you’ve linked or at least commented multiple times about the anti-Asian bias problem in this country and how it’s all bs and a right wing conspiracy.  Your targeting of Andy Ngo is just another in a long line of that type of garbage, and you should be ashamed of yourself. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Logic said:


You know what else is a crime that many Americans haven't gotten used to? Extra-judicial murder by policemen.

And just to be clear: You can't post a single link to a reputable news source claiming that Antifa burned anything down, despite claiming that there were bunches of them. Got it. Perhaps that's because no such reports exist?


 

 


 

 




If any of you can provide any link verifying the "Antifa sets fires" version of the story, I'd be happy to read it. 

To reiterate: I'm not denying that fires were set. I'm pointing out that any time angry/fed up citizens protest, riot, or destroy property, they get called "antifa" by right wingers. It's a catch-all boogeyman term that gets applied to anyone who protests police brutality or white supremacy, or who destroys property. It paints a picture of an evil cabal of violent anarchists rampaging around, destroying things for no good reason. It ignores the context of the destruction being a response to ongoing extra-judicial police murders. It ignores the context of counter-protesting White Supremacist demonstrations by the likes of the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer. It falsely claims that anybody who does protest such killings or such racist displays all belong to an easy-to-label, capital "B" Bad group of people called Antifa. It's intentionally misleading, inflammatory, and inaccurate.

And you'll have to excuse me if I roll my eyes a little bit at the pearl clutching about property destruction by people who were/are likely just fine with the seditionist capitol insurrection that claimed the lives of capitol police officers and sought to murder sitting congressmen. I know at least that @B-Man and @leh-nerd skin-erdhave posted multiple links or comments that seek to minimize the capitol riot and talk about it as if it was nothing, or claim the reports of armed insurrection were exaggerated, despite the fact that Capitol police officers were literally murdered, and that we have pictures of people with zip ties and confirmation some rioters were actively looking for Pence, Pelosi, and others. 670 pages of outrage about liberal protests -- which, admittedly, sometimes result in property destruction. But where is your hundreds-of-pages of outrage about the storming of the capitol in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election and murder congresspeople? You have no outrage about it. Predictable hypocrisy.

Property destruction by leftists or anarchists? "Bad!! Antifa! Grrrrr!"

Insurrection of our nation's capitol with intent to kill sitting congresspeople? "It's being overblown. The media lies. They were fine people having a peaceful march".

Predictable.

 

I believe you are a real person so I will try with you. Google " antifa burns portland" and see if you can find an article that is from a "legitimate" news- I have the hill, oregon live, nypost- so not sure who is good to you. But the bigger issue you and I have is that you are clutching pearls over people delaying a vote for a few hours. Throw them all in jail, very few are against that, and then let us discuss the billions of dollars and 10 of thousands of lives ruined by your side. Your comparison is the definition of myopic vision, ignore your own widespread destruction and focus on the small idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Logic said:


You know what else is a crime that many Americans haven't gotten used to? Extra-judicial murder by policemen.

And just to be clear: You can't post a single link to a reputable news source claiming that Antifa burned anything down, despite claiming that there were bunches of them. Got it. Perhaps that's because no such reports exist?


 

 


 

 




If any of you can provide any link verifying the "Antifa sets fires" version of the story, I'd be happy to read it. 

To reiterate: I'm not denying that fires were set. I'm pointing out that any time angry/fed up citizens protest, riot, or destroy property, they get called "antifa" by right wingers. It's a catch-all boogeyman term that gets applied to anyone who protests police brutality or white supremacy, or who destroys property. It paints a picture of an evil cabal of violent anarchists rampaging around, destroying things for no good reason. It ignores the context of the destruction being a response to ongoing extra-judicial police murders. It ignores the context of counter-protesting White Supremacist demonstrations by the likes of the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer. It falsely claims that anybody who does protest such killings or such racist displays all belong to an easy-to-label, capital "B" Bad group of people called Antifa. It's intentionally misleading, inflammatory, and inaccurate.

And you'll have to excuse me if I roll my eyes a little bit at the pearl clutching about property destruction by people who were/are likely just fine with the seditionist capitol insurrection that claimed the lives of capitol police officers and sought to murder sitting congressmen. I know at least that @B-Man and @leh-nerd skin-erdhave posted multiple links or comments that seek to minimize the capitol riot and talk about it as if it was nothing, or claim the reports of armed insurrection were exaggerated, despite the fact that Capitol police officers were literally murdered, and that we have pictures of people with zip ties and confirmation some rioters were actively looking for Pence, Pelosi, and others. 670 pages of outrage about liberal protests -- which, admittedly, sometimes result in property destruction. But where is your hundreds-of-pages of outrage about the storming of the capitol in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election and murder congresspeople? You have no outrage about it. Predictable hypocrisy.

Property destruction by leftists or anarchists? "Bad!! Antifa! Grrrrr!"

Insurrection of our nation's capitol with intent to kill sitting congresspeople? "It's being overblown. The media lies. They were fine people having a peaceful march".

Predictable.

 


 hypocritical post

 

‘My side good, your side bad.’
 

“bad thing your side did, justified when my side did.” 
 

here a fundamentalist extremist problem to democracy. Blindly loyal an brainwashed, no way to see they are pawns. 

 

 

Same as the trumpets, just sycophants to different minstrels 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ~Kostabi~ said:

not that Logic needs me or anyone else to defend his thoughts. But as a casual observer it was not he but you who brought the race of Mr. Ngo into this discussion. If said individual is not credible what difference does his race have to do with it? Hopping on the racial bias train in this is lazy on your part. Cheap shot. 

Righto, best to allow him to respond as he chooses, or not. 

 

As a casual observer, you probably wouldn’t know he lied about what few thoughts I shared on the Capitol riots, and things I may or may not have linked to. I’m not sure why he chose that path, but he did. Could be he’s an emotional soul who got me confused with another poster, maybe someone named Marshall Tucker or Molly Hatchet. 
 

In the end, to avoid taking it personally,  I assumed that ole Log was interested in playing “Let’s just make up ****” game for reasons known only to him.  So, I replied in kind by making some **** up about what he said because that’s the way the “Let’s just make up ****” game is played. 

 

You have to have context, you know? 
 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Republicans "pounce"  ....... :wallbash:

I'm waiting for twitter to ban her for inciting violence.  And waiting, and waiting.  Also waiting for the Taliban's information officer to get banned for using the platform to threaten violence toward American service personnel last week.  And waiting and waiting.  

 

But its unlikely either will get "Dorseyed".  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Let's see, how would BillZtime respond if the situation was reversed ?................hmmmmmmm. 

 

I know !         Well if Tea Pain says so     TWQ0wJZ9_normal.jpg

 

 

😂

 

 

and as a bonus, notice BillZtime's prejudice again.

 

apparently he thinks that only POC "riot".................he must be missing the color of the vast majority of rioters this past few years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

What color have most of the rioters been?  And you say I'm obsessed with race.  

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

apparently he thinks that only POC "riot".................he must be missing the color of the vast majority of rioters this past few years.

 

Oh sorry.  You beat me to it. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN Warns of NBA Games Being Postponed Because of Chauvin Verdict, Includes a Huge Falsehood in Process

 

 

According to the ESPN, the NBA may be planning to postpone games once the verdict comes in for the Derek Chauvin trial. Closing arguments just concluded and the case has now been given to the jury.

 

“The looming specter of possible protests, civil unrest and team reactions in the aftermath of a verdict has the league office preparing for the prospect that a night or two of league games could be postponed this week,” ESPN said.

 

Now I get that in places like Minneapolis that one might want to postpone games to ensure the security of fans and workers. Of course, that makes a lot of sense, for everyone’s safety.

 

But there’s another thing that seems to be implied there – “team reactions.” Translation: players like LeBron James being BLM advocates potentially not liking the verdict. Indeed, the whole league has been supportive of the BLM. That’s tanked their ratings because people were tired of having politics being inserted into their sports. Where’s the realization or acknowledgment of the BLM’s connections to riots? The NBA will postpone the games but not make that connection.

 

Once upon a time we understood that we, as a society, in order to hold up our society, had to believe in justice and stand by whatever the verdict of a jury was, whether we liked it or not.

We used to understand that people shouldn’t be doxxing jurors in the trial.

We used to understand that sitting members of Congress shouldn’t be calling for a guilty verdict and trying to influence the jurors.

We used to understand that people in power or with a big platform should be calling for peace, not to be “more confrontational” and “showing them we mean business.”

We used to understand that we shouldn’t be promoting groups connected to riots and violence.

 

More at the link: 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/04/19/espn-warns-of-nba-games-being-postponed-because-of-chauvin-verdict-includes-a-huge-falsehood-in-process-n364505

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its time to give places like Portland and Minneapolis exactly what they want. they win.

 

abolish the police. completely.

 

the police departments should go on strike and stop responding to all calls. the public believes in ACAB right? they are getting no support from their leadership. the DAs are cutting anyone loose regardless. the media is demonizing them. the public is not standing up for them and has voted this in to begin with. why are they half azzing it? we will defund ooh wait murder is skyrocketing come back so we can tell you we hate you...please. enough!

 

let the activist defend the innocent. let social workers put their resumes in. let mobs take over chops and chazes with no worries of issues from police "invading" to solve the crimes that take place like in the past, and present. let them explain to the families of the innocent victims they ignore its only crime or put their lives on the line daily if they wish to help them. lets see them stand up to power when that power becomes the cities gang violence. if a business gets destroyed leave it. its only property is what i hear, so it shouldn't be missed by the community it serves. free things for everyone until there are no more things.

 

 hopefully none are put in a situation they die but if they have to defend themselves they can deal with the hindsight mob rule of what they should have done in split second situations.

 

who knows, maybe it will be a testament to the rest of the country and positive changes will be made in this utopia free from racists institutions and capitalist. maybe it will be war torn chaos. i think its time to find out. why are we arguing and fighting so hard to stop people from what they want. all we ask is that you stay there, don't bail on your ideas or community you fought so hard for if it does not turn out how you envisioned. show us all what it was you were trying to tell us whether it ends good or bad. 

 

either way, it will be a important lesson for the country.

 

 

 

Edited by Buffarukus
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/oscars-kids-cages-censorship-china/

 

 

CHRISTIAN TOTO: Seven Causes You Won’t Hear Championed During the Oscars. 

 

They matter, of course, but the progressive elites won't dare name check them

 

“They’re inconvenient to the industry. Some reflect poorly on President Joe Biden. Others make Hollywood denizens look like hypocrites of the highest order. The causes reveal the ideological limitations of an industry that purports to be modern-day truth tellers but acts like a Democratic Super PAC.”

 

We’re days away from the 93rd Oscars ceremony, and we all know what that means.

  • Progressive lectures
  • A show that, in the best-case scenario, wraps up after three grueling hours
  • A new, new ratings low

 

Kids in Cages  (there is more about each topic at the link)

 

Chinese Censorship

 

Concentration Camps

 

Big Tech Censorship

 

Blacklist 2.0

 

Businesses Crushed by Riots

It’s hard to quantify how many small business owners watched their dreams go up in literal smoke since then, and the Left’s false narrative that insurance would make amends for the damages proved more Fake News.

 

We’re seeing this process repeat itself in recent weeks prior to the Derek Chauvin trial.

 

We’re still waiting for a single celebrity to speak out on behalf of these small business owners, meaning they won’t broach the subject come Sunday. It’s worth noting this reporter directly asked eight celebrities who donated money to the Minnesota Freedom Fund about the plight of businesses destroyed by the protests.

 

They chose not to reply.

 

Businesses Crushed by COVID-19 Restrictions

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...