Nanker Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Don't forget to mention her first job on Wall Street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Don't forget to mention her first job on Wall Street. Or being on the Walmart board of directors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 Washington ExaminerVerified account @dcexaminer 18h18 hours ago More Hillary Clinton: My detractors fear me http://washex.am/2rdLTKw Fact Check: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL . Poor, sad, angry, ugly-pantsuit-wearing, will-never-be-president Hillary Clinton … she just keeps steppin’ in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 Do the Dems want to find a 3rd candidate in 60 years since JFK to get legit national approval? Gore/Kerry/Hill couldn't carpetbag the political skills of William Jefferson Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 Washington ExaminerVerified account @dcexaminer 18h18 hours ago More Hillary Clinton: My detractors fear me http://washex.am/2rdLTKw Fact Check: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL . Poor, sad, angry, ugly-pantsuit-wearing, will-never-be-president Hillary Clinton … she just keeps steppin’ in it. I'll take Hillary Clinton Has No Clue Why............aw !@#$ it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I'll take Hillary Clinton Has No Clue Why............aw !@#$ it. I think she understands perfectly well why she lost in retrospect, but it would undermine her narrative to be honest about it. She's nasty, conniving, entitled, ruthless, and bitchy, but she's not that out of touch. Is she? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I think she understands perfectly well why she lost in retrospect, but it would undermine her narrative to be honest about it. She's nasty, conniving, entitled, ruthless, and bitchy, but she's not that out of touch. Is she? Goodness no, she see herself as the fairest of them all every time she looks in a mirror. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 I think she understands perfectly well why she lost in retrospect, but it would undermine her narrative to be honest about it. She's nasty, conniving, entitled, ruthless, and bitchy, but she's not that out of touch. Is she? What difference, at this point, does it make? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 What difference, at this point, does it make? big move for 2020, getting ready as we speak. could you imagine if Trump beat her again? oh, please let it happen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 Wow. www.mediaite.com/.../i-inherited-nothing-hillary-clinton-goes-off-on-the-dncs-data-o... Clinton on @DNC: "I inherited nothing from the party. It was bankrupt... its data was mediocre to poor, non existent, wrong." #CodeCon Finally blaming Obama too LOL.......Trump was right again............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4558362/Philippines-president-Duterte-hits-Chelsea-Clinton.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 big move for 2020, getting ready as we speak. could you imagine if Trump beat her again? oh, please let it happen... i think a much better outcome would be if they held an election and noone showed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 big move for 2020, getting ready as we speak.could you imagine if Trump beat her again? oh, please let it happen... "Ain't gonna be no rematch." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 "Ain't gonna be no rematch." for either side? Can't see the GOP drumming up the balls to kick him out, would be the first thing they've done in their life that wasn't a guaranteed sure thing, they only bet on NFL games 48 hours after the game has ended. You watch them just try to take away the Dem nod if she is determined to take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 for either side? Can't see the GOP drumming up the balls to kick him out, would be the first thing they've done in their life that wasn't a guaranteed sure thing, they only bet on NFL games 48 hours after the game has ended. You watch them just try to take away the Dem nod if she is determined to take it. If either of them gets the nomination in 2020 and some viable third party candidates done emerge I'm out of here. That means this country has lost its mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 If either of them gets the nomination in 2020 and some viable third party candidates done emerge I'm out of here. That means this country has lost its mind. We've seen Wallace and Perot, two different kinds of nutcakes, play very important roles in elections. At least Wallace was amusing when he jousted with the protestors, still is comedy gold. Showed Wallace clips from youtube to a young colleague with political interests and he immediately said "that guy is gonna get shot." Yep... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 If either of them gets the nomination in 2020 and some viable third party candidates done emerge I'm out of here. That means this country has lost its mind. Already way past that!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 cannot be convinced Hillary will not get the nod even after if I see her get a burial at Arlington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 (edited) for either side? Can't see the GOP drumming up the balls to kick him out, would be the first thing they've done in their life that wasn't a guaranteed sure thing, they only bet on NFL games 48 hours after the game has ended. You watch them just try to take away the Dem nod if she is determined to take it. (A) She's a loser. Dems aren't going to waste their time with her again. Especially after rigging the primary against Bernie. (B) She said the other day that she's not running again. ( C ) She's old and tired. (D) He's old, not tired BUT (E) He may not run for a second term -- seems already like his heart is less and less in it as the machine grinds him down. (F) The GOP is stupid and has no foreseeable leadership and will make the wrong decision, whatever that is. All that said, there was a Rocky 2. So what the hell do I know. Edited June 1, 2017 by snafu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 Poor Granny Maopants. Always the victim, never the bride. DNC data folks set the record straight. Harsh language at bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts