B-Man Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 The Obama Administration “grossly misrepresented” the number of crimes the criminal aliens it released from custody in FY 2014 subsequently committed by nearly tenfold, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) charges. According to FAIR, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) records the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FIOA) request on FAIR’s behalf reveal that the 30,558 criminal aliens ICE released in FY 2014 committed 13,288 additional crimes. The number of subsequent convictions contained in FIOA documents is far higher than the 1,423 additional offenses ICE reported to the House Judiciary Committee last July. The criminal aliens released in FY 2014 who went on to commit those additional crimes had convictions for offenses like homicide, kidnapping, assault, sexual assault, and drunk driving. The new crimes, according to ICE’s report to Congress, included vehicular homicide, domestic violence, sexual assault, DUI, burglary and assault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Good for some laughs but it wouldn't even be remotely funny if it weren't remotely true: Before You Put Your Camel to Bed Jiggs McDonald, NHL Hall of Fame broadcaster speaking in Ontario, says: "I am truly perplexed that so many of my friends are against another mosque being built in Toronto. I think it should be the goal of every Canadian to be tolerant regardless of their religious beliefs. Thus the mosque should be allowed, in an effort to promote tolerance." "That is why I also propose that two nightclubs be opened next door to the mosque; thereby promoting tolerance from within the mosque. We could call one of the clubs, which would be gay, "The Turban Cowboy," and the other, a topless bar, would be called "You Mecca Me Hot." "Next door should be a butcher shop that specializes in pork, and adjacent to that an open-pit barbecue pork restaurant, called “Iraq of Ribs." “Across the street there could be a lingerie store called "Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret," with sexy mannequins in the window modeling the goods", and on the other side a liquor store called "Morehammered." "All of this would encourage Muslims to demonstrate the tolerance they demand of us.” Yes we should promote tolerance, and you can do your part by passing this on. And if you are not laughing or smiling at this point... It is either past your bedtime, or its midnight at the oasis and time to put your camel to bed. Isn’t it obvious? Yes! It’s so clear! We should import more weird, backward, dull-witted, useless, and inassimilable civilizational disasters, many of which have produced nothing more technologically challenging than the pointed stick. What could be a better idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 23, 2016 Author Share Posted June 23, 2016 Obama immigration plan blocked by 4-4 tie at Supreme Court #WATE http://bit.ly/28PbSxi WASHINGTON (AP) — A tie vote by the Supreme Court is blocking President Barack Obama’s immigration plan that sought to shield millions living in the U.S. illegally from deportation. The justices’ one-sentence opinion on Thursday effectively kills the plan for the duration of Obama’s presidency. A tie vote sets no national precedent but leaves in place the ruling by the lower court. In this case, the federal appeals court in New Orleans said the Obama administration lacked the authority to shield up to 4 million immigrants from deportation and make them eligible for work permits without approval from Congress. Texas led 26 Republican-dominated states in challenging the program Obama announced in November 2014. Congressional Republicans also backed the states’ lawsuit. Oh fun Obama is going to come out and yell about the Supreme Court. It's time to get scolded again Damn it, we're always "letting him down".................. Andrew Wagner@andrewwagner 8m8 minutes ago Now comes the part where @POTUS will complain about having his power checked by co-equal branch of government. Just watch. Stephen Miller @redsteeze 7m7 minutes ago Stephen Miller Retweeted ABC News I hope he walks in the briefing room and sits on the floor So now that Dems lost on executive amnesty, will they be inviting DREAMers to another pizza selfie sit-in protest on House floor tonite? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 It doesn't matter. They'll continue to issue work permits and just say they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 I'm sure that Bill De Blasio uttered these words without any sense of irony “I share with them a sense of profound disappointment and, in fact, anger at the decision by the Supreme Court, because, with the stroke of a pen, the hopes of millions have been dashed" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Obama immigration plan blocked by 4-4 tie at Supreme Court #WATE http://bit.ly/28PbSxi WASHINGTON (AP) — A tie vote by the Supreme Court is blocking President Barack Obama’s immigration plan that sought to shield millions living in the U.S. illegally from deportation. The justices’ one-sentence opinion on Thursday effectively kills the plan for the duration of Obama’s presidency. A tie vote sets no national precedent but leaves in place the ruling by the lower court. In this case, the federal appeals court in New Orleans said the Obama administration lacked the authority to shield up to 4 million immigrants from deportation and make them eligible for work permits without approval from Congress. Texas led 26 Republican-dominated states in challenging the program Obama announced in November 2014. Congressional Republicans also backed the states’ lawsuit. Oh fun Obama is going to come out and yell about the Supreme Court. It's time to get scolded again Damn it, we're always "letting him down".................. So now that Dems lost on executive amnesty, will they be inviting DREAMers to another pizza selfie sit-in protest on House floor tonite? . I'd love to know on what legal basis 4 justices supported Obama's executive action. Will be looking for that when I have time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 24, 2016 Author Share Posted June 24, 2016 The Supreme Court’s Rebuke to Obama’s Amnesty Responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the injunction against his Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) executive amnesty and the attempted expansion of his Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, President Obama declared that the Court’s ruling “takes us further from the country that we aspire to be.” The president is exactly wrong. What we ought to aspire to be is a country of laws (with a rational immigration policy), and the Supreme Court has struck a blow toward that end. In late 2014, the Obama administration unveiled a plan to grant unilateral amnesty to more than 4 million illegal immigrants residing in the United States, in addition to the more than 2 million illegal immigrants potentially excused under DACA. The president claimed that DAPA, like DACA before it, was nothing more than an exercise in “prosecutorial discretion.” Characteristically, Obama refused to acknowledge that half of the Supreme Court and half of the nation’s state attorneys general might have valid legal arguments for opposing his executive amnesty. He opted instead to insinuate that his opponents were bigots engaging in a politics of fear, trying to “wall [them]selves off from those who may not look like us right now, or pray like we do, or have a different last name.” He went so far as to assert that the Supreme Court’s decision forces us “to decide whether we’re a people who accept the cruelty of ripping children from their parents’ arms, or whether we actually value families.” Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437061/supreme-court-obama-amnesty-they-say-no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 26, 2016 Author Share Posted June 26, 2016 San Diego -------- "Lost Capitol of the Confederacy" ? POLL: Most San Diego-ans would pay $4,000 more in taxes to Deport Illegal Aliens The American Mirror: A new poll of San Diego, California residents finds the vast majority would support a massive tax hike to deport illegal aliens. The survey, conducted by KGTV and the San Diego Union-Tribune, reveals 61% of respondents would pay an additional $4,000 per taxpayer “to deport America’s illegal immigrants.” Just 29% said they would not. The poll also found 54% believe “people who have entered the United States without proper documentation” should be deported, while 34% say they should be allowed to stay. When it comes to presidential candidates, a plurality believe Donald Trump has the “better approach” to immigration. According to the poll, 47% side with Trump’s proposals, while 37% support Hillary Clinton. Breaking the results down by race, blacks and Hispanics are supporting Trump’s proposals in bigger numbers than whites. On the same question, the poll finds 53% of blacks and 50% of Hispanics side with Trump, compared to 31% and 30% respectively for Clinton. Trump’s advantage is slightly narrower among whites, 47% to 40%. Keep reading… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 How many in San Diego are military personal who have been to third world countries and don't want to come home to one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Here's something that's rich. George Clooney's vacation paradise is being "threatened" by refugees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 1, 2016 Author Share Posted August 1, 2016 'Homeland Security' Grants Syrians 'Temporary Amnesty' in USA... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 'Homeland Security' Grants Syrians 'Temporary Amnesty' in USA... Sure. No problem-o, and I really could see Rudy Giuliani as head of the DHS signing on to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 'Homeland Security' Grants Syrians 'Temporary Amnesty' in USA... It says they can live here for 18 months without fear of being ousted. Really? Does anyone anywhere think this federal government would ask them to leave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 It says they can live here for 18 months without fear of being ousted. Really? Does anyone anywhere think this federal government would ask them to leave? Considering that this amnesty applies mostly to people who've already been here for years...no, they're explicitly not asking them to leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Here's something that's rich. George Clooney's vacation paradise is being "threatened" by refugees. I can tell that the article is part of the right wing propaganda wing because there are no women or children in any of the pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/11491-syrian-refugees-resettled-us-15-over-target-046-are-Christians (CNSNews.com) – With three weeks of the fiscal year to go, the Obama administration has exceeded its Syrian refugee admission target by 15 percent, with 11,491 resettled in the United States as of the beginning of this week. Since President Obama’s goal of 10,000 Syrian refugee admissions in FY 2016 was achieved on August 29, the number continues to pick up steadily. August ended with a new monthly record of 3,189 Syrian refugee arrivals, and a further 751 have been ushered in so far in September: 749 Sunni Muslims; two Catholic Christians. State Department Refugee Processing Center data show that of the now total 11,491 arrivals this fiscal year, the vast majority – 11,300, or 98.33 percent – are Sunnis. Just 54 of the 11,491 – 0.46 percent – are Christians. They comprise 14 Catholics, six Orthodox, four Protestants, one Greek Orthodox, plus 29 refugees identifying themselves simply as “Christian” rather than by denomination or sect. The remaining 137 are made of up of 20 Shi’a Muslims, 90 refugees described simply as Muslims, 17 Yazidis, four Jehovah’s Witnesses, five refugees identified as “other religion,” and one as having “no religion.” Millions of Syrians of all religious persuasions have fled the civil war that has ravaged their country since mid-2011. At the start of the conflict an estimated 74 percent of Syrians were Sunni and an estimated 10 percent were Christians. Since the civil war began, the U.S. has admitted a total of 13,364 Syrian refugees, of whom 13,019 (97.4 percent) are Sunnis and 102 (0.7 percent) are Christians. The remainder include Shi’a Muslims (33), other Muslims (150), Yazidis (18), Jehovah’s Witnesses (12), Zoroastrians (6), refugees self-reported as having “no religion” (8), refugees identifying themselves as “other religion” (11), atheists (3) and Baha’i (2). Under the 1951 Refugee Convention, persecution on the grounds of religion is one of five criteria for determining whether an applicant should be granted refugee status (the others relate to race, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 13, 2016 Author Share Posted September 13, 2016 Another article on the disparity. The United States Bars Christian, Not Muslim, Refugees From Syriaby Elliott Abrams The title of this blog post–The United States Bars Christian, Not Muslim, Refugees From Syria–will strike many readers as ridiculous. But the numbers tell a different story: The United States has accepted 10,801 Syrian refugees, of whom 56 are Christian. Not 56 percent; 56 total, out of 10,801. That is to say, one half of one percent. The BBC says that ten percent of all Syrians are Christian, which would mean 2.2 million Christians. It is quite obvious, and President Obama and Secretary Kerry have acknowledged it, that Middle Eastern Christians are an especially persecuted group. So how is it that one half of one percent of the Syrian refugees we’ve admitted are Christian, or 56, instead of about 1,000 out of 10,801–or far more, given that they certainly meet the legal definition? The definition: someone who “is located outside of the United States; Is of special humanitarian concern to the United States; Demonstrates that they were persecuted or fear persecution due to race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.” Somewhere between a half million and a million Syrian Christians have fled Syria, and the United States has accepted 56. Why? “This is de facto discrimination and a gross injustice,” Nina Shea, who is director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, told Fox News. Fox notes another theory: that the United States takes refugee referrals from the UN refugee camps in Jordan and there are no Christians there. more at the link: http://blogs.cfr.org/abrams/2016/09/09/the-united-states-bars-christian-not-muslim-refugees-from-syria/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 Somewhere between a half million and a million Syrian Christians have fled Syria, and the United States has accepted 56. Why? Out of how many that have applied? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 Out of how many that have applied? The other theory is more plausible. Syrian Christians never make it to the refugee camps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 The other theory is more plausible. Syrian Christians never make it to the refugee camps. Which relates directly to my question anyway. If they don't make it to refugee camps, they're not in the system and don't apply for entry as a refugee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 (edited) Isn’t it obvious? Yes! It’s so clear! We should import more weird, backward, dull-witted, useless, and inassimilable civilizational disasters, many of which have produced nothing more technologically challenging than the pointed stick. What could be a better idea? With Brexit and now Trump threatening the globalist centralized power scam the shrews are squirming and blathering on more often now. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-13/lagarde-says-globalization-s-benefits-need-to-be-shared-by-all Edited September 13, 2016 by Dante Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 16, 2016 Author Share Posted September 16, 2016 DHS accused of sitting on damning border report as immigration issue drives presidential race by Malia Zimmerman Original Article Federal lawmakers seeking to pinpoint the number of illegal immigrants who successfully sneak across the southern border ordered up a report from the Department of Homeland Security, but the agency refuses to release it and instead cites a misleading statistic that overstates the number who are nabbed, sources told Fox News. DHS denied it is holding back the report, but sources say it was completed in November and that it shows roughly half of adults who attempt to cross the border make it - approximately 250,000 in total. But that number is at odds with DHS’ official estimates. The agency claims authorities catch 80 percent of adults trying to sneak in, but critics say the figure is padded to make it appear border security is more effective than it really is. More at the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 (edited) About 1 in 3 refugees in Europe don't believe in secular laws. Let's import more of them, what can go wrong? The constitution is totally compatible with sharia, no problem. https://www.yahoo.com/news/just-under-30-percent-french-muslims-reject-secular-115105963.html Edited September 18, 2016 by drinkTHEkoolaid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 About 1 in 3 refugees in Europe don't believe in secular laws. Let's import more of them, what can go wrong? The constitution is totally compatible with sharia, no problem. https://www.yahoo.com/news/just-under-30-percent-french-muslims-reject-secular-115105963.html A bit misleading. The question is whether Sharia law is more important to them. Try asking some Americans whether the Bible is more important than the Constitution; and you'll probably get the same results. What really matters is which interpretation the refugees follow, because it isn't about the ideology, but the fanaticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 (edited) Former Nazi corroborator creep Soro's all in on bringing down the west. I love the pic of some chick unloading a kid when 70% of the refugees are men. Fake http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/20/george-soros-to-invest-500-million-in-help-for-refugees-through-his-open-society-foundations.html And king dipstick weighs in on the nation state. http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/20/obama-praises-globalism-while-acknowledging-its-faults/ And his NYC regional operative weighs in. Full court press going on. http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/nyc-mayor-refugee-terror-vanishingly-rare/ Are they stepping this shite up because they are afraid about November? And his NYC regional operative weighs in. Full court press going on. Edited September 20, 2016 by Dante Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 21, 2016 Author Share Posted September 21, 2016 (edited) Actually, the number of immigrants wrongly granted citizenship is double what was reported yesterday But don't worry................they'll "screen' the new refugees Edited September 21, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 Actually, the number of immigrants wrongly granted citizenship is double what was reported yesterday But don't worry................they'll "screen' the new refugees On the upside, if you live in Nancy Pelosi's district, you don't have to worry because none of being sent there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 If just one of those Refugees ends up committing an act of terror, the GOP will win the following elections whether it be midterm or presidential race in a landslide. That is an awfully big risk they take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted September 22, 2016 Share Posted September 22, 2016 If just one of those Refugees ends up committing an act of terror, the GOP will win the following elections whether it be midterm or presidential race in a landslide. That is an awfully big risk they take. You're right. It's not very bright of them, since I believe the vast majority of Americans would completely support bringing Syrian refugees here if the Democrats publicly embraced thorough vetting of each individual. It's disingenuous of them to call people racists for being critical of their bringing so many here so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted September 22, 2016 Share Posted September 22, 2016 You're right. It's not very bright of them, since I believe the vast majority of Americans would completely support bringing Syrian refugees here if the Democrats publicly embraced thorough vetting of each individual. It's disingenuous of them to call people racists for being critical of their bringing so many here so quickly. Its racist and fascist to bring so many here so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted September 22, 2016 Share Posted September 22, 2016 Its racist and fascist to bring so many here so quickly. Those are certainly two names they will call anyone who opposes their bringing Syrian refugees here en masse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 3, 2016 Author Share Posted October 3, 2016 Breaking: Supreme Court denies Obama rehearing on US v Texas immigration fight The White House lost on its fight over Barack Obama’s executive orders on immigration when the Supreme Court had nine members, and it won’t get a second chance with the eight remaining. On its first day back in session, the high court denied a rehearing request in US et al v Texas et al, the biggest fight between Washington and the states on enforcement of immigration statutes (via SCOTUSblog): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 19, 2016 Author Share Posted November 19, 2016 Illegal Immigrants Flood Across Border Before Trump Takes Office Human smugglers using Trump’s wall as a selling point UNEXPECTEDLY: Trump set to take sharp right turn on immigration. Obama Halts Amnesty Push in Court... Border Patrol Welcomes Wall... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 Illegal Immigrants Flood Across Border Before Trump Takes Office Human smugglers using Trump’s wall as a selling point[/size] this combined with the rumkrs he will legalize all residents and illegals... Big selling point. UNEXPECTEDLY: Trump set to take sharp right turn on immigration. Obama Halts Amnesty Push in Court... Border Patrol Welcomes Wall... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 30, 2016 Author Share Posted November 30, 2016 AN IDEA SO CRAZY IT JUST MIGHT WORK! Immigration: What If Trump Enforces The Law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 8, 2016 Author Share Posted December 8, 2016 The Surge of Migrants at the Border Never Stopped Remember the surge of often-unaccompanied children that came across America’s southern border in the summer of 2014? More than 52,000 unaccompanied children were caught trying to cross the southern U.S. border in the first five months of this year. Between 60,000 to 90,000 such children are expected to have crossed by the end of 2014, and more than 140,000 are expected next year, according to the White House. That’s more than double the 24,668 that flowed across last year and triple the 13,625 children that came in 2012. Because of the national media’s intermittent-at-best interest in our southern border, it was easy to think the problem had died down or dwindled a bit. Apparently, the numbers never really went down for long. The surge of Central American families seeking asylum at U.S. borders is not letting up, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday after touring a temporary holding facility in the Rio Grande Valley set up to manage the influx. The number of apprehensions along the southwestern border can be close to 2,000 a day — with most people turning themselves in, Kerlikowske said in a phone interview. The November influx was as high as what was seen in October: 46,195, he said. The precise monthly number is to be announced next week. Now, the 2014 figures were for children, and the recent figures were for all ages, but you get the picture. Migrants kept coming – often driven by the rumor that the United States government was providing “permisos” to those who made the journey. The Department of Homeland Security ran an op-ed in Spanish-language outlets in 2014 declaring that there are no “permisos” for unattended children. The announcement apparently had little to no effect. Hundreds of immigrant families caught illegally crossing the Mexican border between July and September told U.S. immigration agents they made the dangerous trip in part because they believed they would be permitted to stay in the United States and collect public benefits. So now the U.S. government, at considerable taxpayer expense, is constructing new facilities to process and care for these people coming across the border. It is the compassionate thing to do – but it is also not fair to expect America to underwrite the costs of caring for and educating the impoverished of Central American countries. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442874/surge-migrants-border-never-stopped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 The Surge of Migrants at the Border Never Stopped Remember the surge of often-unaccompanied children that came across America’s southern border in the summer of 2014? Because of the national media’s intermittent-at-best interest in our southern border, it was easy to think the problem had died down or dwindled a bit. Apparently, the numbers never really went down for long. Now, the 2014 figures were for children, and the recent figures were for all ages, but you get the picture. Migrants kept coming – often driven by the rumor that the United States government was providing “permisos” to those who made the journey. The Department of Homeland Security ran an op-ed in Spanish-language outlets in 2014 declaring that there are no “permisos” for unattended children. The announcement apparently had little to no effect. So now the U.S. government, at considerable taxpayer expense, is constructing new facilities to process and care for these people coming across the border. It is the compassionate thing to do – but it is also not fair to expect America to underwrite the costs of caring for and educating the impoverished of Central American countries. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442874/surge-migrants-border-never-stopped I wonder how many "unaccompanied children" die along the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Illegal Immigrants Flood Across Border Before Trump Takes Office Human smugglers using Trump’s wall as a selling point UNEXPECTEDLY: Trump set to take sharp right turn on immigration. Obama Halts Amnesty Push in Court... Border Patrol Welcomes Wall... Hysteria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Hysteria You're an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 You're an idiot. You really are a loser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts