Jump to content

Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)


B-Man

Recommended Posts

 

 

There's nowhere to put refugees in DC.

 

 

rfk-stadium-300x147.jpg?ac4b2d RFK ?...................DC United won't mind.

 

 

Of course you know I'm joking around Tom (some of our simpler posters may not)

 

The point of the map was to show where the refugee industry is utilizing (SEE POST #15)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

rfk-stadium-300x147.jpg?ac4b2d RFK ?...................DC United won't mind.

 

 

Of course you know I'm joking around Tom (some of our simpler posters may not)

 

The point of the map was to show where the refugee industry is utilizing (SEE POST #15)

 

Then it's a weak point. In as much as there's a "refugee industry," you really think DC lobbyists and corporations aren't heavily involved? Don't follow the refugees, follow the money - the only reasons people will take either extremist view of "Let all the poor, unwashed, tortured souls in" or "Keep all the sand !@#$s away" is revenue or votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Then it's a weak point. In as much as there's a "refugee industry," you really think DC lobbyists and corporations aren't heavily involved? Don't follow the refugees, follow the money - the only reasons people will take either extremist view of "Let all the poor, unwashed, tortured souls in" or "Keep all the sand !@#$s away" is revenue or votes.

Typically if there is an issue that doesn't appear to be logical or make sense, look to see who gains the most (money,power,votes) as Tom said above as guidance to try and understand the underlying forces that affect an issue. Tom bauerle frequently makes this point as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Krauthammer’s Take: Let in Women, Children, and Refugees over 50
Charles Krauthammer says that while he doesn’t support Republican governors who proclaim Syrian refugees are unwelcome, ”they deserve some respect, a lot more than the president gave with his preening address he gave yesterday.”
“Remember, he’s the one that decided against the begging, the advice, recommendations of all of his top advisers, to do nothing at the beginning of the Syrian civil war,” Krauthammer said on Tuesday’s Special Report. “He could have established easily, a safe zone. The way that we did for over a decade in Kurdistan, in Iraq. It wouldn’t have cost boots on the ground.
” “And he decided, because he didn’t want to sully his reputation as a man who ends war and doesn’t start them, he denied them,” Krauthammer continued. ”So now he’s attacking people who are worried about the danger to the very people Obama abandoned. And forced into refugee status.”
Krauthammer floated his own proposal: Given the new circumstances, you allow the women and the children and the men over 50. As you did in the past. But you’re extra-careful, extra scrutiny for the men of fighting age, the ones who do this stuff. And for each of them, you require a positive vetting, not just the absence of a negative one.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Krauthammer’s Take: Let in Women, Children, and Refugees over 50
Charles Krauthammer says that while he doesn’t support Republican governors who proclaim Syrian refugees are unwelcome, ”they deserve some respect, a lot more than the president gave with his preening address he gave yesterday.”
“Remember, he’s the one that decided against the begging, the advice, recommendations of all of his top advisers, to do nothing at the beginning of the Syrian civil war,” Krauthammer said on Tuesday’s Special Report. “He could have established easily, a safe zone. The way that we did for over a decade in Kurdistan, in Iraq. It wouldn’t have cost boots on the ground.
” “And he decided, because he didn’t want to sully his reputation as a man who ends war and doesn’t start them, he denied them,” Krauthammer continued. ”So now he’s attacking people who are worried about the danger to the very people Obama abandoned. And forced into refugee status.”
Krauthammer floated his own proposal: Given the new circumstances, you allow the women and the children and the men over 50. As you did in the past. But you’re extra-careful, extra scrutiny for the men of fighting age, the ones who do this stuff. And for each of them, you require a positive vetting, not just the absence of a negative one.

 

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner

 

 

Did he completely miss where at least two of the suicide bombers in Paris were women?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Did he completely miss where at least two of the suicide bombers in Paris were women?

 

I doubt that sir, but the plan is still preferable to the administrations'.

 

 

 

Al-Qaida magazine cites weakness of Buffalo Niagara region. http://www.buffalonews.com/city-region/politics/al-qaida-magazine-cites-weakness-of-buffalo-niagara-region-20140320

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The best example of the horrific consequences of not vetting someone.

 

 

 

barack-obama.vadapt.320.medium.51.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens, when/if refugees are let in who ultimately commit acts of violence and/or terrorism?

 

Free college, free healthcare, free housing and free phone for each of them.

 

The left will turn them into society-draining government-dependent progressive slugs in no time, and once they're playing Candy Crush and watching cat videos, they'll have no time to blow things up.

 

America. Winning. Leftist style.

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...