Gary M Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 On 11/1/2018 at 6:15 PM, DC Tom said: Alternate theory: Bloomberg, instead of pushing veganism, made the editorial decision to give PETA a platform to show the world how batshit crazy they are. And my diet is plant-based: I eat nothing that doesn't eat plants. I am a second hand vegan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: And there we go. The Stupidest Thing I'll Read All Day. That's just because you are ignorant. You can't understand intelligent thoughts. Tell us again, oh ignorant one, how Lee freed more slaves than Lincoln. You are a dumb ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: That's just because you are ignorant. You can't understand intelligent thoughts. Tell us again, oh ignorant one, how Lee freed more slaves than Lincoln. You are a dumb ass Lee had slaves and Lincoln didn't. Of course he could free more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 20 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Lee had slaves and Lincoln didn't. Of course he could free more. Lee didn't have slaves. He freed his father-in-law's. Score: Lee, 200 freed. Lincoln, zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Lee didn't have slaves. He freed his father-in-law's. Score: Lee, 200 freed. Lincoln, zero. Did you find that in your Lincoln Log? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 Quote The judge, Brian Morris of the U.S. District Court in Montana, said theState Department ignored crucial issues of climate change in order to further the president’s goal of letting the pipeline be built. In doing so, the administration ran afoul of the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires “reasoned” explanations for government decisions, particularly when they represent reversals of well-studied actions. It was a major defeat for Trump, who attacked the Obama administration for stopping the project in the face of protests and an environmental impact study. Trump signed an executive order two days into his presidency setting in motion a course reversal on the Keystone XL pipeline, as well as another major pipeline, Dakota Access. The ruling highlights a broader legal vulnerability in the Trump administration’s push to roll back Obama-era environmental protections. Since Trump took office, federal courts have found repeatedly that his agencies have short-circuited the regulatory process in areas ranging from water protections to chemical plant safety operations. Robust environmental and administrative procedure laws, many dating back to the 1970s, have given the administration’s opponents plenty of legal ammunition. Suck it https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/09/keystone-xl-pipeline-blocked-by-federal-judge-major-blow-trump-administration/?utm_term=.1c7e240dbe7f Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 WHY WON’T LIBERALS LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE ON CLIMATE? This is a theme that Steve and I have recurred to many times on this site. Today it is voiced by Freeman Dyson, one of the world’s most eminent scientists. Dyson, a theoretical physicist and professor emeritus of Mathematical Physics and Astrophysics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, is famous among other things for unifying the three versions of quantum electrodynamics. He has been a harsh critic of the slovenly science practiced by climate alarmists. Dyson wrote a foreword to a report on the benefits of carbon dioxide by Indur Goklany which is quoted at length in the Science and Environmental Policy Project’s The Week That Was. Here are some excerpts: To any unprejudiced person reading [Goklany’s] account, the facts should be obvious: that the non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial, that the possibly harmful climatic effects of carbon dioxide have been greatly exaggerated, and that the benefits clearly outweigh the possible damage. I consider myself an unprejudiced person and to me these facts are obvious. But the same facts are not obvious to the majority of scientists and politicians who consider carbon dioxide to be evil and dangerous. The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence. Those of my scientific colleagues who believe the prevailing dogma about carbon dioxide will not find Goklany’s evidence convincing. I hope that a few of them will make the effort to examine the evidence in detail and see how it contradicts the prevailing dogma, but I know that the majority will remain blind. That is to me the central mystery of climate science. It is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts? In this foreword I offer a tentative solution of the mystery. MORE AT THE LINK: . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 "Scientists behind a major study that claimed the Earth's oceans are warming faster than previously thought now say their work contained inadvertent errors..." "... that made their conclusions seem more certain than they actually are. Two weeks after the high-profile study was published in the journal Nature, its authors have submitted corrections to the publication. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, home to several of the researchers involved, also noted the problems in the scientists' work and corrected a news release on its website, which previously had asserted that the study detailed how the Earth’s oceans 'have absorbed 60 percent more heat than previously thought.'... The central conclusion of the study... is in line with other studies that have drawn similar conclusions...."WaPo reports. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 20 hours ago, B-Man said: "Scientists behind a major study that claimed the Earth's oceans are warming faster than previously thought now say their work contained inadvertent errors..." "... that made their conclusions seem more certain than they actually are. Two weeks after the high-profile study was published in the journal Nature, its authors have submitted corrections to the publication. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, home to several of the researchers involved, also noted the problems in the scientists' work and corrected a news release on its website, which previously had asserted that the study detailed how the Earth’s oceans 'have absorbed 60 percent more heat than previously thought.'... The central conclusion of the study... is in line with other studies that have drawn similar conclusions...."WaPo reports. . Don't harsh The Narrative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 (edited) https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#6e2c68c23f9f The claim that 97% of scientists support the left's theory of global warming is utter horse *****. Edited November 15, 2018 by Rob's House Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 23 hours ago, Rob's House said: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#6e2c68c23f9f The claim that 97% of scientists support the left's theory of global warming is utter horse *****. But what % of dentists agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 2 hours ago, Boyst62 said: But what % of dentists agree? 4 out of 5 - so only 80%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 20, 2018 Share Posted November 20, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2018 Share Posted November 20, 2018 46 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hint: it's not climate change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills808 Posted November 20, 2018 Share Posted November 20, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:18 AM, B-Man said: '...the non-climatic effects of carbon dioxide as a sustainer of wildlife and crop plants are enormously beneficial...' That does sound vaguely familiar... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 20, 2018 Share Posted November 20, 2018 51 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: No your life is pointless because you're a talking head on MSNBC. Geez...do I have to explain EVERYTHING to you?? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: So do us all a favor bit**. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 33 minutes ago, Wacka said: So do us all a favor bit**. Save the oxygen, Katy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Save the oxygen, Katy! I prefer to think of it as her own way of producing CO2, thereby helping to promote the greening of the Earth, which will generate more oxygen for the rest of us. It's like her words are akin to fertilizer, but for the atmosphere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 7 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's not your fault, Katy. It's us. We confused. And angry. And racist. And we have mommy issues. If it weren't for that, we wouldn't have global warming cooling climate change. And that's not me talking. That's Obama.org. And I think we all know there is no greater authority on confusion, anger, racism and mommy issues than Obama.org. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witless Bills Fan Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 26 minutes ago, Azalin said: I prefer to think of it as her own way of producing CO2, thereby helping to promote the greening of the Earth, which will generate more oxygen for the rest of us. It's like her words are akin to fertilizer, but for the atmosphere. Seems to me her brain is akin to fertilizer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 4 hours ago, 3rd Inning said: Seems to me her brain is akin to fertilizer. yeah but i'd still hit it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, /dev/null said: yeah but i'd still hit it The sad part is that we already know you'd hit it. Methinks you'd rush in to places where even Poojer fears to tread. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witless Bills Fan Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 3 hours ago, /dev/null said: yeah but i'd still hit it I would too, but only if it required minimal effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 10 minutes ago, 3rd Inning said: I would too, but only if it required minimal effort. So, you'd just lay there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witless Bills Fan Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 42 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: So, you'd just lay there? I might move my hips a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 55 minutes ago, 3rd Inning said: I might move my hips a little. TMI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 5 hours ago, /dev/null said: yeah but i'd still hit it Oh hell yeah! Me too! With a ***** baseball bat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2018 Share Posted November 21, 2018 38 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Oh hell yeah! Me too! With a ***** baseball bat. Oh, you're going to Keith Ellison her, eh? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 Quote The federal government on Friday released a long-awaited report with an unmistakable message: The impacts of climate change, from deadly wildfires to increasingly debilitating hurricanes and heat waves, are already battering the United States, and the danger of more such catastrophes is worsening. The report’s authors, who represent numerous federal agencies, say they are more certain than ever that climate change poses a severe threat to Americans' health and pocketbooks, as well as to the country’s infrastructure and natural resources. And while it avoids policy recommendations, the report’s sense of urgency and alarm stand in stark contrast to the lack of any apparent plan from President Trump to tackle the problems which, according to the government he runs, are increasingly dire. https://www.washingtonpost.com/energy-environment/2018/11/23/major-trump-administration-climate-report-says-damages-are-intensifying-across-country/?utm_term=.5793b4da3e70 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 Why would they want to dim the sun... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Why would they want to dim the sun... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Why would they want to dim the sun... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 23, 2018 Share Posted November 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... ...Why would they want to dim the sun... when they start to tell you about it, you can be sure that it has been in practice for awhile already... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 16 minutes ago, Foxx said: when they start to tell you about it, you can be sure that it has been in practice for awhile already... True story. I clicked on that because a black cylinder on the left image. Blew it up and realized it was dirt on the phone. ??♂️ Guess that means no deep State. Greggys gonna be pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: True story. I clicked on that because a black cylinder on the left image. Blew it up and realized it was dirt on the phone. ??♂️ Guess that means no deep State. Greggys gonna be pissed. ? not sure what dirt on your phone has to do with the deep state, but.. okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 Quote Stephen MillerVerified account @redsteeze 44m44 minutes ago “Guys the commies aren’t listening to our dumb Paris thing. So what now?” “Anyone here ever see Superman 4?” Quote Stephen MillerVerified account @redsteeze 42m42 minutes ago Well controlling China or India’s climate warming output is futile so I guess we’ll just take on THE ***** SUN. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurmal34 Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 So many simps. I mean, should we rake the forests? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 16 minutes ago, Thurmal34 said: So many simps. I mean, should we rake the forests? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts