Braedenstearns Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Which do you think was better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Which do you think was better? Easy choice...EM80. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Is this even a real question? Come on, man, it's E. Moulds all day long. Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Easy choice...EM80. Â Is this even a real question? Come on, man, it's E. Moulds all day long. Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Front Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Moulds by a long shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Evans made a much quicker impact, but when Moulds finally "got it" in his third year they really weren't close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Eric Moulds was beast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 What??? Â Ridiculous question. Moulds is a top 50 all time WR in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Easy choice...EM80. Is this even a real question? Come on, man, it's E. Moulds all day long. Not even close. Moulds by a long shot. Evans made a much quicker impact, but when Moulds finally "got it" in his third year they really weren't close. Â /thread? Â No wait, Cockenstein hasn't showed up to tell everyone they're wrong yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8-8 Forever? Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Moulds by a long shot. not even close. too bad moulds was on such bad teams for so long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACKMARINO Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 MOULDS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBILLS78 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Hmmmm. Tough one. Right up there with the Peerless Price/Andre Reed debate. Â I'll say Moulds by a smiiiiiiiidge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) Lee Evans, Buffalo stats: 109 games, 377 receptions, 5,934 yards, 43 TDs. Â Eric Moulds, Buffalo stats: 154 games, 675 receptions, 9,096 yards, 49 TDs. Â One of the most important stats not listed...for the last few years of his career Eric Moulds was the last player playing in the NFL that caught a TD pass from JK. Edited May 7, 2013 by dollars 2 donuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Hmmmm. Tough one. Right up there with the Peerless Price/Andre Reed debate. Â I'll say Moulds by a smiiiiiiiidge. Don't forget the heated Kelly vs. Flutie debates that we often wage here on the Wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Don't forget the heated Kelly vs. Flutie debates that we often wage here on the Wall. Â Almost as good as the Bruce Smith vs Erik Flowers debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Moulds was certainly more producitve... as bad some of the teams Moulds played on, he had far better QB play than Evans ever had. Â They are two completely different types of receivers. Moulds was likely better, but I always thought EM could have been even better. I like the guy, but, honestly, after his huge year in 2002, I think it went to his head a little...he was a bit lazy after that. I can't even explain how much he used to piss me off with his half hearted efforts, and as I recall, he seemed bent on getting a pass interfernce call on nearly every play...flame away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordio Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) The better question would be E Moulds or #83. I'd of course go Reed but Moulds lives in Reeds neighborhood. Â Evans please, maybe the most overrated Bill of alltime on this board. Decent receiver on a bunch of sh*t teams, nothing more nothing less. Edited May 7, 2013 by Gordio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon in Pasadena Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Better at what? Â ('Cause I know you can't mean at football...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cash Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 The one thing you can say in Evans' favor is that he was more consistent/better at finding the endzone than Moulds. This despite being a significantly smaller guy and having generally worse QB play during his Bills career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 I feel like the following anecdote will retain its relevance for years to come, so I plan to keep sharing: Â ME: Omfg, the Bills just cut Lee Evans. Â My co-worker who follows sports: Who the Hell is Lee Evans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickedface Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 i'd have to say moulds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 I feel like the following anecdote will retain its relevance for years to come, so I plan to keep sharing: Â ME: Omfg, the Bills just cut Lee Evans. Â My co-worker who follows sports: Who the Hell is Lee Evans? Â Funny story but wasn't he traded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) Moulds was certainly more producitve... as bad some of the teams Moulds played on, he had far better QB play than Evans ever had. Â They are two completely different types of receivers. Moulds was likely better, but I always thought EM could have been even better. I like the guy, but, honestly, after his huge year in 2002, I think it went to his head a little...he was a bit lazy after that. I can't even explain how much he used to piss me off with his half hearted efforts, and as I recall, he seemed bent on getting a pass interfernce call on nearly every play...flame away! Â He got off to a huge start in 2003, but got hurt in the Cincy OT game. He tore his groin that he came back after a few weeks and gutted it out. However, he really lost his speed. His injury killed the Bills offense that year. They were never the same after he got hurt. In the first five games of 03, he had 30 catches for 457 yards. He was on pace for 96 catches and 1462 yards that year. Â He had a good year in 04 on a team with a bad offense. After that, it was all crappy QB play. I honestly think he never quite recovered from the 03 injury. Before that, he was one of the most explosive players in the league, and he and Flutie had a great connection. His season in 1998 may have been the best season by a receiver in Bills history. He was basically uncoverable: http://www.pro-footb.../M/MoulEr00.htm . Â In any event, he was a better player than Evans. Edited May 7, 2013 by dave mcbride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Moulds was far more versatile than Evans. He can go deep. It can go across the middle. He can hurt you with the slant. He was extremely strong. Good all around receiver. Evans had one thing going for him. Speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleaMoulds80 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 wow. who was a better football player. lawrence taylor or aaron maybin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Also, a lot of people like to point to SJ's three consecutive 1,000 yard seasons (in the most pass-heavy era the league has ever known), while Moulds was 102 yards away from FIVE consecutive 1,000 yard seasons, back when it was a run-first league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Moulds no question about it  CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleaMoulds80 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) Also, a lot of people like to point to SJ's three consecutive 1,000 yard seasons (in the most pass-heavy era the league has ever known), while Moulds was 102 yards away from FIVE consecutive 1,000 yard seasons, back when it was a run-first league. Â That is such a bogus statement. We threw the ball just as many times back than, than we do now. Just because other teams chuck the ball more doesn't necessarily mean we did. Â Don't take anything away from Stevie Edited May 7, 2013 by FleaMoulds80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle flap Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Also, a lot of people like to point to SJ's three consecutive 1,000 yard seasons (in the most pass-heavy era the league has ever known), while Moulds was 102 yards away from FIVE consecutive 1,000 yard seasons, back when it was a run-first league. Â BOOM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 That is such a bogus statement. We threw the ball just as many times back than, than we do now. Just because other teams chuck the ball more doesn't necessarily mean we did.  Don't take anything away from Stevie  Moulds at his best was a far better player than Stevie, who also happens to be a good player. Moulds at his best was a dominant player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Which do you think was better? Â Do you really even have to ask ? I think it pretty much is a no brainer , one is in the Bills record books time & again the other isn't .. Â I 'll leave the answer up to you ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleaMoulds80 Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) Moulds at his best was a far better player than Stevie, who also happens to be a good player. Moulds at his best was a dominant player. Â I totally disagree but what else is new. Obviously I was a big Moulds fan but Stevie is just a better WR. He's done more with less athletic ability and less talent at the QB position than Moulds has done. Stevie has done it all by himself. Â BOOM! Â Like I said. That's a bogus argument. The Bills have chucked the ball as many times now than we have back then. Mould's best year, we threw the ball 600 times. We have NEVER thrown that many passes in the Stevie era. That's a bullsh*t argument. Â Moulds best year came in 2002, where we had 612 pass attempts. Just sayin... Edited May 7, 2013 by FleaMoulds80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awwufelloff Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Eric Moulds my favorite all time Bill. =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 I totally disagree but what else is new. Obviously I was a big Moulds fan but Stevie is just a better WR. He's done more with less athletic ability and less talent at the QB position than Moulds has done. Stevie has done it all by himself. Â Â Â Like I said. That's a bogus argument. The Bills have chucked the ball as many times now than we have back then. Mould's best year, we threw the ball 600 times. We have NEVER thrown that many passes in the Stevie era. That's a bullsh*t argument. Â Moulds best year came in 2002, where we had 612 pass attempts. Just sayin... Â Moulds best year by far was 1998. He had fewer receptions than in 2002, but he was clearly a more dominant player. I watched all the games both seasons, and his performance that year was spectacular. He also got off to an amazing start in 03 before getting hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 EM80 vs AR83 is a better comparison. Obviously I say Reed but I think it's a lot closer than most would want to admit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Moulds by a lot. Could do much more than Evans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canks Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 MOulds was good. he could have been a great O lineman though. dude had arms for days! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kentonexile Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 Time for the Keith McKellar/Pete Metz thread too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted May 7, 2013 Share Posted May 7, 2013 That is such a bogus statement. We threw the ball just as many times back than, than we do now. Just because other teams chuck the ball more doesn't necessarily mean we did.  Don't take anything away from Stevie  Well, you can go ahead and crunch the numbers if you like. But your claim above is categorically false. We did not throw the ball just as many times then as we do now--particularly when you look at passes as percentage of plays. But whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braedenstearns Posted May 7, 2013 Author Share Posted May 7, 2013 I think it was Moulds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts