All Activity
- Past hour
-
That's me every time I see a highlight of the Norwood kick. McDermott is pretty milquetoast and not a very inspiring speaker, but it hasn't seemed to matter before. I think that element of coaching might be overrated at the professional level.
-
I’m gonna say yes. Cut the QBs, the safeties and Tre. No need to field a full team if they’re all just gonna suck. Oh yeah get rid of the coach too, we’ll just wing it from here. Anyone is better than what we have, even if his name is nobody. Great ideas! 😞
-
Best episode so far by far. Shows our ass kickn. Will be interesting to see how our team responds. Hard knocks to blame? Too worried about being funny and not enough slober knocking?
-
Rebellion has died so I don’t think the anti-Bills contrarians are as common. People these days go along with every trend. Younger generations seem to all act the same, there aren’t the many different groups/cliques we had growing up. There used to be more ways to be an individual, but influencers have ruined that. With that said, choosing to root against Buffalo is a lame form of rebellion.
-
Training Camp News - Around the League version
Sierra Foothills replied to DrDawkinstein's topic in The Stadium Wall
I'm fairly irritated that the Bills didn't end up with Dolac. I don't know if they tried signing him after the draft but they could have made it a moot point by taking him instead of Kaden Prather. I understand the team had a need at WR but they also had a need at LB. -
McDermott - "Still looking for that other safety"
Mango replied to HappyDays's topic in The Stadium Wall
Things don't apply generically to all teams. McD relies heavily on his safety tandem. Porter/Hyde injuries and aging have been a major hurdle that McBeane haven't been able to get over. If McD can take any old cerebral 7th round safety and turn them into one of the best (active)safety tandes the league, and our best safety tandem in franchise history, then he's welcome to sprinkle that magic dust again at anytime. But until then it's held this defense back and it's a vital position group for the team. -
Training Camp News - Around the League version
MrEpsYtown replied to DrDawkinstein's topic in The Stadium Wall
Yeah makes sense. It seems like Robbins has maybe turned a corner here, he’s looked pretty good -
Not to be a drama queen, I hope there isn’t something fishy going on. Seems like dudes aren’t buying in.
-
Amazing how not a single player wore #17 during the entire decade of the 1990s...
-
Right when they started showing the footage of that game, my 4 year old says "Dad, maybe they'll win this time". I wish it worked that way lol.
-
I had a brutal day at work, I'll read the cliff notes to "cheer" me up tomorrow.
-
Player From To Bob Brodhead 1960 1960 Warren Rabb 1961 1962 Mike Taliaferro 1972 1972 Gary Marangi 1974 1976 Matt Robinson 1981 1982 Willie Totten 1987 1987 Shayne Graham 2001 2001 Justin Jenkins 2007 2009 Paul Hubbard 2010 2010 Greg Salas 2015 2015 Denarius Moore 2015 2015 Justin Hunter 2016 2016 Josh Allen 2018 2025 All Players To Wear Number 17 For Buffalo Bills | Pro-Football-Reference.com
-
McDermott - "Still looking for that other safety"
MJS replied to HappyDays's topic in The Stadium Wall
Bishop played 12 snaps with a bunch of backups against starters, after missing a bunch of time with injury, was clearly shaking off some rust, and we all want to write him off before he even plays a snap in his 2nd year. Ok. -
2023, we enter the year with a huge question mark behind Tre White. We try and fill void by drafting a first round CB. He doesn't work out, we trade mid year for Rasul Douglas. Douglas gives us one solid year, but his physical skills all but evaporated one year later. 2024, we enter the year with a hole at WR and Safety and soon to be CB. We draft Coleman and Bishop. Coleman doesn't immediately fill the void. Bishop does nothing. We bring in Amari Cooper in a trade. Reviews are mixed as to what he brought to the team, but he's not going to be here a year later. 2025, we enter the year with a hole at CB, S, and WR. We draft a CB. For the time being it doesn't look like we will get significant reps from that player. We keep "addressing" critical issues with the draft and we have yet to see any of those issues get better. We can say, sure, give these guys more time, but the reality is our strategy has not allowed for these guys to have time. We needed the production almost right away. I would be willing to bet Beane will trade for another aged vet at the deadline in one of these positions. Perhaps we don't look at a rookie filling that spot or street free agent and we won't keep finding ourselves in that position. But at the end of the day you just can't miss on this many players. If that's how this ends up going it will be a massive failure.
-
Sounds like some complacency settling in and McDermott tried to diplomatically approach it!
-
Not really. Minnesota used the pick we gave them for Diggs on Jefferson. Also Diggs is getting close to a HOF resume. He had 6 straight years of 1000 yards or better. Lead the league in yards and catches one season, had over 100 catches 5 times including 4 straight years, has over 10K in yards, 70 TDs and was an All-Pro twice. Right now he is 50th in yards for a career by a receiver/TE. Not a HOFer, but a couple of good seasons could get him very close.
-
I disagree... The Leather Canary was where they briefly encountered each other. but he Was the drummer for Chameleon Church. I have the CC lp and to be honest it pretty much sucks.
-
McDermott - "Still looking for that other safety"
NickelCity replied to HappyDays's topic in The Stadium Wall
If I was a team with a middling tackle situation I'd be all over RVD. We have a shockingly good inventory of OLine talent. -
This whole DC thing presents a good example of the intellectual bankruptcy of the MAGA movement. The claim is that the Feds are moving into DC because the crime is so bad. If one wanted to evaluate this plan, they would ask, "Is DC the most dangerous city in the US?" in order to determine if the action is justified. The answer is a clear no. Not only is DC not the most dangerous city, the violent crime rate has declined to a 30 year low. If one was willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt, they could say "well, the Feds can't deploy in other cities like they can in DC. Maybe this can prove to be the a model for supporting local law enforcement and other cities will see this and ask for assistance." If that was the case, one would expect to see the Fed deployments to focus on the areas of DC with high crime rates, patrolling the streets in dangerous neighborhoods to deter crime, allowing the local police force to focus on bringing criminals to justice. The deployment would be focused on getting criminals into custody. But the deployment has mostly ignored the dangerous areas in favor of wealthy and high profile areas like Georgetown and the Federal Mall. And they are arresting people without criminal records. Those they do arrest often face trumped up charges. A guy who throws a sandwich at a cop is arrested and charged with several crimes (Say what you will about a cop being hurt by bread, you don't throw things at cop if you don't want to be arrested), but then the feds later bring in a camera crew to record themselves breaking into his home to charge him with additional crimes, something they could have done with paperwork. They wanted the theatrics. So if they aren't going into the most dangerous cities, and they aren't focusing on people with criminal records, and they aren't patrolling high crime areas, and they are using their actions for theatrics, what the hell are they doing there? You can break the MAGA understanding of this into three buckets: The Ignorant: Most people don't follow news closely. They see the Feds are coming in to combat crime and assume that is the truth The Stupid: People who follow politics closely, know the Feds are focusing more on high visibility spaces instead of the high crime areas and somehow believe this is effective The Authoritarian: People who know this isn't about stopping crime in the traditional sense, but punishing those who they view as equal to criminals simply for disagreeing or opposing their ideology. When they say they are fighting crime, they mean fighting libs. You cannot support this action as fighting crime unless you believe not being MAGA is the equivalent to a crime.
-
You put another QB behind that line & it might not look as good. The results don’t really matter in the preseason you hope to see plays and potential and we haven't seen much
-
Don’t forget the “I knew we should have drafted <insert player> or signed <insert player> or not blown cap space on “insert player””. Credit that has no value
-
Good Night / Bad Night - Pre-season Game 2
Brianmoorman4jesus replied to GunnerBill's topic in The Stadium Wall
Everyone is all over Shavers and Shanault. I just dont see it with either. Cain is better then both of them -
The Ravens outgained us 843 to 509, 45 first downs to 32, 7.59 yards per play to 4.39. Unless we force 3 turnovers it won't be a game. Those stats are what you would expect to see with a top NFL team playing a team in last place. The current line is a gift.
-
Should Buffalo cut all their backup QBs?
Brianmoorman4jesus replied to BigAl2526's topic in The Stadium Wall
No. Trubisky is good for an NFL backup. Hes fine. The other two are horrible. Go get a developmental young QB that can really run. And turn him into a passer. The 3rd QB should be one with a unique skill. At least 1 trait that is high level. Or else don’t bother. -
McDermott - "Still looking for that other safety"
MikePJ76 replied to HappyDays's topic in The Stadium Wall
Teams are always looking for tackles. All year long.