Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Dr. Who said:

It's been mentioned quite a bit in the bitter thread about Darius Slay.

 

Forgive me.

 

I don't know if anyone else in this forum is like me at this point and comes here as much (maybe more) for Bills news than discussion... but the fact that the other thread hasn't changed the title to acknowledge Slay ain't coming and we will now have an open roster spot that will not be filled by a player we've had on the team developing for years now because he was claimed by a Conference rival playoff contender is a little frustrating.

 

if I'm alone, sue me.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I think people are just piling on Beane for this. I like that he went and tried to improve an area of the roster that in previous years had failed us in the playoffs. You don’t like the result and therefore dump it all on Beane. 
 

If it came January and we get torched because a guy like Benford went down, you know people wold have been clamoring for “how did we not sign slay - look at how amazing Howie Roseman is”

 

He swung and missed, attempting to improve, which resulting in losing an end of roster depth player. There are plenty of reasons to question and rag on Beane, but this is just low handing fruit IMO. 

Edited by EmotionallyUnstable
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

I didn't think think there was a risk, you'd think the guy wouldn't mind going to a team thats pry going to the playoffs

Darius Slay isn't a guy. he's a punk.

Posted
9 hours ago, RyanC883 said:

Small ball Bean. 
 

It was reported in Pittsburgh that Slay wanted to be a starter and asked to be released.  Was Bean unaware of what was in the freaking papers here!

I would imagine that if Slay didn't want to come here because they had starters in place he would have said NO but he didn't so then there's that .

Posted
3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Yea that's a bad look for Beane. Was Ingram a critical piece? No. But did he provide some useful depth? Yep. Should you throw that away for a 34 year old? No.

Yep, this is all on Beane. MMcDermott has proven time and again that he has little concern for corners and focuses mainly on wide receivers. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, T master said:

I would imagine that if Slay didn't want to come here because they had starters in place he would have said NO but he didn't so then there's that .


um, Slay did say no.  Retirement is his only leverage. 

Posted
5 hours ago, FireChans said:

 

Why has Ingram been on the roster then?

 

I reject this premise.

Couldn’t we ask “why has so and so been on the roster” about others too?  Ingram has been here for three years and in that time, there’s definitely been times where he could have stepped up and made himself more indispensable, given the problems we’ve had there recently (Elam bust, Belford injuries, Hairston injury), and what did he do to seize his opportunity? 

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Yea that's a bad look for Beane. Was Ingram a critical piece? No. But did he provide some useful depth? Yep. Should you throw that away for a 34 year old? No.

Depends on your thoughts on whether the “window” is still open, has closed, or is still cracked. If Slay was someone you signed to “go for it”, then yes, you do what you need to do … plenty of Ingram’s come along every year (I’m not saying Slay was the missing piece, mind you)

Posted

This really pisses me off that we lose a depth guy, in his prime, that knows the system and has been here. All for some clown that didn’t want to play in Buffalo because it’s too cold and he already has a house in Philly. How could Beane not do his due diligence?

Posted (edited)

It's not a good look for Beane, but it's also not a big deal.

 

Serious question- Who's the last ex bills player that another team claimed, that actually had an impact?

 

Isiah Hodgins might be the best, maybe?

 

And I don't think anyone wants him back now

Edited by BillsFan130
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:

It's not a good look for Beane, but it's also not a big deal.

 

Serious question- Who's the last bills player that another team claimed, that actually had an impact?

 

Isiah Hodgins might be the best, maybe?

 

And I don't think anyone wants him back now

Daryl Lamonica. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

Couldn’t we ask “why has so and so been on the roster” about others too?  Ingram has been here for three years and in that time, there’s definitely been times where he could have stepped up and made himself more indispensable, given the problems we’ve had there recently (Elam bust, Belford injuries, Hairston injury), and what did he do to seize his opportunity?

Yes.

 

i often asked why Elam was on the roster because he sucked and was never active. 
 

Turns out he really sucks and is borderline out of the league.

 

The answer is that Beano thought Elam and Ingram were NOT worthless players, otherwise they would have been dumped long ago. He was clearly wrong on Elam.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Yep, this is all on Beane. MMcDermott has proven time and again that he has little concern for corners and focuses mainly on wide receivers. 

 

I mean I am sure he discussed it with McDermott but making moves on the waiver wire is 100% Brandon Beane's role and not Sean McDermott's.

22 minutes ago, AlCowlingsTaxiService said:

 

Depends on your thoughts on whether the “window” is still open, has closed, or is still cracked. If Slay was someone you signed to “go for it”, then yes, you do what you need to do … plenty of Ingram’s come along every year (I’m not saying Slay was the missing piece, mind you)

 

The only 34 year olds that ever help you "go for it" are vet QBs. No other 34 year old is a reasonable all in move.

Posted
10 hours ago, NeverOutNick said:

This actually pisses me off. Didnt realize we released Ingram to make room for Slay. Ingram has been great depth and a good spot starter and is still young. Beane’s a moron. Can’t wait until this regime is gone just a complete 💩 show

Yeah, Ingram has been so great that that last year in the playoffs, when Benford was injured, they went with Elam over Ingram.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...