BearNorth Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 56 minutes ago, boyst said: Ever since Tre did that interview that said the Rams are a football business I've woken up fully to realize that the culture Mcdermott has built is great for the players and healthy. While I have never liked him I realize that's a good quality for rebuilding and helping a team get back to the top. However, it further opened my eyes: we need to be in the business of football. remember Rams and Broncos are both controlled by Walmart folks. 1 Quote
TheFunPolice Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Most of Beane's talking points that he went on national media tours to brag about have turned out to be flops. 1 Quote
Einstein Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago "Eff them picks" - Rams GM Beane made a comment about the Rams style a few years ago, noting that he didnt want to sacrifice the future for one year. Odd, because the Rams not only won the Super Bowl but theyre also closer to a 2nd Super Bowl than we are to our first. 3 1 1 1 Quote
BillytheKid Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 hours ago, WNYFAN1 said: I think they are easily the best team in the league. I think the Seahawks are better. Seahawks dominated them and only lost because of Darnolds 4 turnovers. They still had a chance to win and made the game winning field goal but called that time out. Then missed it. Game was in LA. Seattle had twice as many yards. More than twice as many first downs almost twice the time of possession. Quote
Lost Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Good news is if Stafford can be playing this well at age 37, there is hope that in a Beaneless era Josh can too. If Brady doesn't get him killed before then. 1 2 1 Quote
GoBills808 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, boyst said: Ever since Tre did that interview that said the Rams are a football business I've woken up fully to realize that the culture Mcdermott has built is great for the players and healthy. While I have never liked him I realize that's a good quality for rebuilding and helping a team get back to the top. However, it further opened my eyes: we need to be in the business of football. Yup Good FO for a bad team Bad FO for a good team 4 Quote
MarkyMannn Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Billz4ever said: If Stafford decides to play another 2 seasons or so after this one as he hinted this past offseason, that's also another option for them. I've said that if the Bills are stuck in no man's land for a few years between legit SB contender and mediocre, is Josh Allen content to be on a team that he knows is never going to be good enough to win a championship? I don't know if this FO would ever trade him or if Josh would ever decide he wants to be traded, but at some point Josh is going to have to make that decision. Agree with your post but may not be Josh's decision alone. Know he's got a wife too who I'm sure would push for LA where she can further her career than here in Buffalo. Edited 5 hours ago by MarkyMannn 1 Quote
BigBilly11 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Nate Scheelhaase (passing game coordinator) will be an interesting name down the road. 1 Quote
billsfan714 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I was just looking at their drafts, yes he's traded a lot of firsts. 2 1s for Goff, 2 1s for Stafford, 2 1s for Jalen Ramsey. But boy he is a fan of having a lot of picks despite the 1s hes traded. 2024 10 picks, 2023 14 picks, 2022 8 picks, 2021 9 picks. If you look at the games played by these picks, its a lot. Probably why they are in a good cap situation. A lot of guys on cheap rookie contracts. The trade he made with Atlanta, moving out of the first, got him a 2nd and a 7th last year, and the 2026 first round pick, he moved up how many spots. Currently the 26th pick in the first round of the 25 draft he turned in the 11th pick in 26 draft and he got picks in return, not giving up picks. Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Sweats said: And people actually thought that the Rams would implode after they made the high stakes wager of going all-in on their last SB and look at them now, still going after the coveted Lombardi without missing a beat. Meanwhile, we don't even know if the Bills will get into the post season this year, let alone a SB showing........with a generational QB at the helm, mind you. UGH To be fair, it more often than not does implode. There are not many examples of it working and resulting in a Lombardi trophy, but lots of examples of if not working or even becoming a long term disaster. And it looked like it was headed for an implosion in LA too, but they were able to make some moves and hit on some picks that changed that course pretty fast. Bills are one of those teams that better be trying to go all in this offseason if we don't get there this year. This team has been too close, go get the difference makers, and get it done. 1 Quote
Saint Doug Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I would fine out who on the Rams could come in here and fix our offense. Obviously, the wouldn’t come to be an OC, but a HC. I would give the DC free rein to install whatever defense they want. Preferably a very stingy one. Quote
Sojourner Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, billsfan714 said: Landon Jackson who maybe the Michael Penix of DE's. Penix actually improves the team even if he isn’t getting the job done. London is a more productive guy. Bijan more productive in the passing game also. 1 hour ago, BillytheKid said: I think the Seahawks are better. Seahawks dominated them and only lost because of Darnolds 4 turnovers. They still had a chance to win and made the game winning field goal but called that time out. Then missed it. Game was in LA. Seattle had twice as many yards. More than twice as many first downs almost twice the time of possession. Disagree but that’s down to personal preference. I can see someone making the argument for Seattle and it not being wrong. I will say, it is a divisional game and for some reason when LA went up 14-3 then 14-6 they barely ran the football from that 2nd quarter onward. In fact, all their drives from the 2nd quarter onward were all 5 plays or less… Bear in mind too their first drive was inside the opponents 10 yard line and the failed to convert a 4th & 1. Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 7 hours ago, clearwater cadet said: Think it has anything to do with players happy to take less to live and play in LA? also, no pressure to play in LA because they have no fans. Quote
TheFunPolice Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago There's definitely something to the pressure of "never having won" in sports that gets to players and probably coaches too. Get one early and then it's all gravy. You did it, and no matter what happens you'll always be a SB champion. That goes a long way toward loosening your team up in future title games. When you go somewhere that wants a title so badly and you hear it all the time and you as a player start to really feel that it can be good but also can be a detriment. Quote
JMM Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago An argument could be made that they have the best GM in the league. Philly could argue that. NO argument they have the best HC at this time. Quote
mjt328 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The goal for every GM should be a relentless pursuit of TALENT, regardless of how it's done. Draft, Free Agency, Trades, etc. Les Snead succeeded in thinking outside the box, realizing that high draft picks were significantly overvalued around the league. Rookies are hit/miss, and take time to develop. Vets cost more, but it's easier to tell what they will bring. Of course, the other piece was excellent drafting in the middle/late rounds. You can easily trade away early picks IF you are hitting strong on Day 3. He was able to get a superstar WR (Puka Nacua) in the 5th Round, while Beane is totally lost at the position 20-25 picks in. 1 Quote
Mikie2times Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 8 hours ago, ProcessTruster said: also nice when you have one of the least injured rosters in the league.. in fact they may be No. 1 . When you have your top guys, it makes a big difference. Bills had this a few years ago (no injuries of consequence) and it was big. Brandon Beanes mentor Dave Gettleman said "Hurt guys get hurt". Maybe he should have listened a bit more to his mentor vs assuming he can defy the laws of cheap NFL labor. Our roster is littered with players that have an injury history and we have no aversion to extending these players or slotting them as starters with no considerable depth options. Bernard, Benford, Bosa, Rapp, Milano, Jones, White, Taron Johnson. It's practically the entire defense and extends multiple years for many of these guys. So is our luck really that bad or is our roster building that impractical? Should we assume we got a "deal" or should we assume we actually got the going rate because other teams properly value this? Edited 1 hour ago by Mikie2times 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.